|
|
--- |
|
|
license: cc-by-2.0 |
|
|
pretty_name: Partial orders on lattice paths from (0,0) to (10,9) |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# Dataset Card for Partial Orders on Lattice Paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((10,9)\\) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consider northeast lattice paths that travel along the edges |
|
|
of a grid from \\((0, 0)\\) to \\((a, b)\\), only taking steps north and |
|
|
east and never passing through the diagonal \\(y = \frac{b}{a}x\\), where |
|
|
\\(a\\) and \\(b\\) are relatively prime. \[1\] defines two |
|
|
order relations on such paths called the *matching ordering* |
|
|
\\((\leq_M)\\) and the *Lagrange ordering* \\((\leq_L)\\), motivated by questions in |
|
|
number theory. The matching ordering assigns a |
|
|
number to each lattice path based on the number of perfect |
|
|
matchings of an associated snake graph, while the Lagrange |
|
|
ordering assigns a number to each lattice path equal to the |
|
|
Lagrange number of a certain continued fraction. These |
|
|
numbers each define a partial order. Mathematicians are interested in |
|
|
better understanding the relationship between these orders \[2\]. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Background on Posets |
|
|
|
|
|
A partially ordered set (*poset*) is a set \\(P\\) of objects |
|
|
equipped with a binary relation, typically denoted \\(\leq\\), that |
|
|
is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. This means that |
|
|
for all elements \\(a,b,c \in P\\): (1) \\(a \leq a\\), (2) if \\(a \leq b\\) and |
|
|
\\(b \leq a\\), then \\(b = a\\), and (3) if \\(a \leq b\\) and \\(b \leq c\\), then \\(a \leq c\\). |
|
|
Unlike total orders which are more familiar (e.g., \\(\mathbb{Z}\\)), in a |
|
|
partial order some pairs of elements may be incomparable. |
|
|
An example of a partially ordered set is the set of all subsets |
|
|
of \\(\{1, 2, 3, 4\}\\), ordered by inclusion. This is a partial order |
|
|
and not a total order because \\(\{1, 2\}\\) is not comparable to |
|
|
\\(\{2, 3\}\\) or to \\(\{2, 3, 4\}\\), for example. In a poset, \\(y\\) *covers* \\(x\\) |
|
|
if \\(y\\) is greater than \\(x\\) with respect to the ordering, and for |
|
|
any \\(z\\) such that \\(x \leq z \leq y\\), either \\(z = x\\) or \\(z = y\\). In this |
|
|
example, \\(\{1, 2, 4\}\\) covers \\(\{1, 2\}\\), \\(\{2, 4\}\\), and \\(\{1, 4\}\\), but not |
|
|
\\(\{1\}\\), \\(\{2\}\\), or \\(\{4\}\\). |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Details |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset contains pairs of lattice paths encoded by a sequence of \\(1\\)’s (for steps |
|
|
east) and \\(0\\)’s (for steps north). Each pair of lattice paths |
|
|
is a covering pair in exactly one of the two partial orders, the Lagrange order or the matching order |
|
|
(pairs that are covers in both are few and were removed). |
|
|
The task is to predict which partial order a covering pair belongs to. |
|
|
|
|
|
**Statistics** |
|
|
| | Lagrange order | Matching order | Total instances | |
|
|
|----------|----------|---------------|------| |
|
|
| Train | 7,558 | 3,875 | 11,433 | |
|
|
| Test | 1,895 | 968 | 2,863 | |
|
|
|
|
|
**Math question:** Characterize the relationship between the matching |
|
|
and Lagrange orders. |
|
|
|
|
|
**ML task:** Given a pair of lattice paths \\((w, w′)\\), train a |
|
|
model that can predict whether \\(w′\\) covers \\(w\\) |
|
|
in either the matching or Lagrange order. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Small model performance |
|
|
|
|
|
We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing largest class | |
|
|
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------| |
|
|
| Paths from \\((0,0)\\) to \\((10,9)\\) | \\(66.2\%\\) | \\(90.6\% \pm 0.8\%\\) | \\(65.3\% \pm 0.0\%\\)| \\(66.2\%\\) | |
|
|
|
|
|
The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Further information |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Curated by:** Helen Jenne |
|
|
- **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
|
|
- **Language(s) (NLP):** NA |
|
|
- **License:** CC-by-2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets). |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/lattice_path_posets) |
|
|
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
|
|
**BibTeX:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@article{chau2025machine, |
|
|
title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics}, |
|
|
author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry}, |
|
|
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366}, |
|
|
year={2025} |
|
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**APA:** |
|
|
|
|
|
Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Card Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Kvinge, [email protected] |
|
|
|
|
|
## References |
|
|
|
|
|
\[1\] Schiffler, Ralf. "Perfect matching problems in cluster algebras and number theory." Open Problems in Algebraic Combinatorics 110 (2024): 361.\ |
|
|
\[2\] Apruzzese, P. J., and Kevin Cong. "On two orderings of lattice paths." arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16963 (2023). |