Beckett Dillon PRO

Just a unique tag to give the symbol (Similar to a hashtag) while defining the logic and flow with the LLM that will use it. You can name it anything. There is no metaphysical weirdness trying to be projected in this framework

Thanks for at least engaging with my proposal! I appreciate the critical feedback, as it helps refine and invalidate ideas. However, I believe there may be some misunderstanding, as my proposal actually aligns with several of your key points.

I explicitly emphasize that this framework:

• Leverages existing model capabilities - not inventing new ones

-Works because of prior training - not claiming any magical properties

• Uses established patterns in language models - keeping it simple

• The term "glyph" isn't meant to replace symbolic logic notation, but rather to describe a specific use case: using symbols as semantic anchors to organize and access existing patterns in model training, like ! does currently. The proposal focuses on practical application - how to structure these symbols to tap into and organize pre-existing capabilities efficiently.

I agree completely that "AI is much simpler than it's made out to be" - that's actually central to my argument. I'm suggesting a way to leverage that simplicity through structured organization, not complicate it.