prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a flat screen TV, then Lisa has a TV.
2. Lisa doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a flat screen TV, then Margaret has a TV.
2. Margaret doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a Samsung Galaxy, then Tim has a phone.
2. Tim doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy, then Elizabeth has a phone.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy, then Gerald has a phone.
2. Gerald doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy, then Jonathan has a phone.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy, then Lisa has a phone.
2. Lisa doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy, then Margaret has a phone.
2. Margaret doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a PC computer, then Tim has a computer.
2. Tim doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a PC computer, then Elizabeth has a computer.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a PC computer, then Gerald has a computer.
2. Gerald doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a PC computer, then Jonathan has a computer.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a PC computer, then Lisa has a computer.
2. Lisa doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a PC computer, then Margaret has a computer.
2. Margaret doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a suit, then Tim has a closet.
2. Tim doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a suit, then Elizabeth has a closet.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a suit, then Gerald has a closet.
2. Gerald doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a suit, then Jonathan has a closet.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a suit, then Lisa has a closet.
2. Lisa doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a suit, then Margaret has a closet.
2. Margaret doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a Leather jacket, then Tim has a Jacket.
2. Tim doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a Leather jacket, then Elizabeth has a Jacket.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a Leather jacket, then Gerald has a Jacket.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a Leather jacket, then Jonathan has a Jacket.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a Leather jacket, then Lisa has a Jacket.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a Leather jacket, then Margaret has a Jacket.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a pair of black sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a pair of Nike shoes, then Tim has a pair of shoes.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of shoes.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes, then Gerald has a pair of shoes.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of shoes.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes, then Lisa has a pair of shoes.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes, then Margaret has a pair of shoes.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a Fender Guitar, then Tim has a guitar.
2. Tim doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar, then Elizabeth has a guitar.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a Fender Guitar, then Gerald has a guitar.
2. Gerald doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a Fender Guitar, then Jonathan has a guitar.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a Fender Guitar, then Lisa has a guitar.
2. Lisa doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a Fender Guitar, then Margaret has a guitar.
2. Margaret doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a job in technology, then Tim has a job.
2. Tim doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a job in technology, then Elizabeth has a job.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a job in technology, then Gerald has a job.
2. Gerald doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a job in technology, then Jonathan has a job.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a job in technology, then Lisa has a job.
2. Lisa doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a job in technology, then Margaret has a job.
2. Margaret doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a university degree from a university in spain, then Tim has a university degree.
2. Tim doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain, then Elizabeth has a university degree.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain, then Gerald has a university degree.
2. Gerald doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain, then Jonathan has a university degree.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain, then Lisa has a university degree.
2. Lisa doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain, then Margaret has a university degree.
2. Margaret doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a car, then Tim has a house.
2. Tim doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a car, then Elizabeth has a house.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a car, then Gerald has a house.
2. Gerald doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a car, then Jonathan has a house.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a car, then Lisa has a house.
2. Lisa doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a car, then Margaret has a house.
2. Margaret doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a flat screen TV, then Tim has a TV.
2. Tim doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a flat screen TV, then Elizabeth has a TV.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a flat screen TV, then Gerald has a TV.
2. Gerald doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a flat screen TV, then Jonathan has a TV.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a flat screen TV, then Lisa has a TV.
2. Lisa doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a flat screen TV, then Margaret has a TV.
2. Margaret doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a Samsung Galaxy, then Tim has a phone.
2. Tim doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy, then Elizabeth has a phone.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy, then Gerald has a phone.
2. Gerald doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy, then Jonathan has a phone.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy, then Lisa has a phone.
2. Lisa doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy, then Margaret has a phone.
2. Margaret doesn't have a phone.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a PC computer, then Tim has a computer.
2. Tim doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a PC computer, then Elizabeth has a computer.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a PC computer, then Gerald has a computer.
2. Gerald doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a PC computer, then Jonathan has a computer.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a PC computer, then Lisa has a computer.
2. Lisa doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a PC computer, then Margaret has a computer.
2. Margaret doesn't have a computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a suit, then Tim has a closet.
2. Tim doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a suit, then Elizabeth has a closet.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a suit, then Gerald has a closet.
2. Gerald doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a suit, then Jonathan has a closet.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a suit, then Lisa has a closet.
2. Lisa doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a suit, then Margaret has a closet.
2. Margaret doesn't have a closet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a suit.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a Leather jacket, then Tim has a Jacket.
2. Tim doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a Leather jacket, then Elizabeth has a Jacket.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a Leather jacket, then Gerald has a Jacket.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a Leather jacket, then Jonathan has a Jacket.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a Leather jacket, then Lisa has a Jacket.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a Leather jacket, then Margaret has a Jacket.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a pair of black sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of sunglasses.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a pair of Nike shoes, then Tim has a pair of shoes.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of shoes.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes, then Gerald has a pair of shoes.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of shoes.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes, then Lisa has a pair of shoes.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes, then Margaret has a pair of shoes.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a Fender Guitar, then Tim has a guitar.
2. Tim doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar, then Elizabeth has a guitar.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a Fender Guitar, then Gerald has a guitar.
2. Gerald doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a Fender Guitar, then Jonathan has a guitar.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a Fender Guitar, then Lisa has a guitar.
2. Lisa doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a Fender Guitar, then Margaret has a guitar.
2. Margaret doesn't have a guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a job in technology, then Tim has a job.
2. Tim doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a job in technology, then Elizabeth has a job.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a job in technology, then Gerald has a job.
2. Gerald doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a job in technology, then Jonathan has a job.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a job in technology, then Lisa has a job.
2. Lisa doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a job in technology, then Margaret has a job.
2. Margaret doesn't have a job.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a university degree from a university in spain, then Tim has a university degree.
2. Tim doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain, then Elizabeth has a university degree.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain, then Gerald has a university degree.
2. Gerald doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain, then Jonathan has a university degree.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain, then Lisa has a university degree.
2. Lisa doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain, then Margaret has a university degree.
2. Margaret doesn't have a university degree.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer: