prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a famous celebrity, then Sara is influential on public opinion.
2. Sara is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a famous celebrity, then Kevin is influential on public opinion.
2. Kevin is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a famous celebrity, then James is influential on public opinion.
2. James is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a computer scientist, then John is understands math.
2. John is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a computer scientist, then Bob is understands math.
2. Bob is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a computer scientist, then Julia is understands math.
2. Julia is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a computer scientist, then Sara is understands math.
2. Sara is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a computer scientist, then Kevin is understands math.
2. Kevin is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a computer scientist, then James is understands math.
2. James is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a chef, then John is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. John is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a chef, then Bob is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Bob is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a chef, then Julia is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Julia is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a chef, then Sara is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Sara is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a chef, then Kevin is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Kevin is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a chef, then James is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. James is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a future prime minister, then John is interested in international relations.
2. John is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a future prime minister, then Bob is interested in international relations.
2. Bob is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a future prime minister, then Julia is interested in international relations.
2. Julia is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a future prime minister, then Sara is interested in international relations.
2. Sara is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a future prime minister, then Kevin is interested in international relations.
2. Kevin is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a future prime minister, then James is interested in international relations.
2. James is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a good parent, then John is strict but fair.
2. John is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a good parent, then Bob is strict but fair.
2. Bob is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a good parent, then Julia is strict but fair.
2. Julia is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a good parent, then Sara is strict but fair.
2. Sara is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a good parent, then Kevin is strict but fair.
2. Kevin is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a good parent, then James is strict but fair.
2. James is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is reads books, then John is a member of a book club.
2. John is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is reads books, then Bob is a member of a book club.
2. Bob is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is reads books, then Julia is a member of a book club.
2. Julia is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is reads books, then Sara is a member of a book club.
2. Sara is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is reads books, then Kevin is a member of a book club.
2. Kevin is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is reads books, then James is a member of a book club.
2. James is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a school principle, then John is strict.
2. John is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a school principle, then Bob is strict.
2. Bob is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a school principle, then Julia is strict.
2. Julia is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a school principle, then Sara is strict.
2. Sara is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a school principle, then Kevin is strict.
2. Kevin is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a school principle, then James is strict.
2. James is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a guitarist, then John is likes The Beatles.
2. John is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a guitarist, then Bob is likes The Beatles.
2. Bob is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a guitarist, then Julia is likes The Beatles.
2. Julia is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a guitarist, then Sara is likes The Beatles.
2. Sara is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a guitarist, then Kevin is likes The Beatles.
2. Kevin is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a guitarist, then James is likes The Beatles.
2. James is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a robber, then John is wearing a ski mask.
2. John is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a robber, then Bob is wearing a ski mask.
2. Bob is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a robber, then Julia is wearing a ski mask.
2. Julia is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a robber, then Sara is wearing a ski mask.
2. Sara is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a robber, then Kevin is wearing a ski mask.
2. Kevin is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a robber, then James is wearing a ski mask.
2. James is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is watching TV, then John is lazy.
2. John is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is watching TV, then Bob is lazy.
2. Bob is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is watching TV, then Julia is lazy.
2. Julia is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is watching TV, then Sara is lazy.
2. Sara is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is watching TV, then Kevin is lazy.
2. Kevin is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is watching TV, then James is lazy.
2. James is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is playing video games, then John is excited.
2. John is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is playing video games, then Bob is excited.
2. Bob is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is playing video games, then Julia is excited.
2. Julia is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is playing video games, then Sara is excited.
2. Sara is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is playing video games, then Kevin is excited.
2. Kevin is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is playing video games, then James is excited.
2. James is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is happy, then John is living in a tropical country.
2. John is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is happy, then Bob is living in a tropical country.
2. Bob is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is happy, then Julia is living in a tropical country.
2. Julia is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is happy, then Sara is living in a tropical country.
2. Sara is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is happy, then Kevin is living in a tropical country.
2. Kevin is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is happy, then James is living in a tropical country.
2. James is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is radicalized by the internet, then John is angry.
2. John is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is radicalized by the internet, then Bob is angry.
2. Bob is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is radicalized by the internet, then Julia is angry.
2. Julia is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is radicalized by the internet, then Sara is angry.
2. Sara is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is radicalized by the internet, then Kevin is angry.
2. Kevin is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is radicalized by the internet, then James is angry.
2. James is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a professional skateboarder, then John is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. John is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a professional skateboarder, then Bob is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Bob is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a professional skateboarder, then Julia is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Julia is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a professional skateboarder, then Sara is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Sara is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a professional skateboarder, then Kevin is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Kevin is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a professional skateboarder, then James is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. James is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is an actor, then John is a good lier.
2. John is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is an actor, then Bob is a good lier.
2. Bob is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is an actor, then Julia is a good lier.
2. Julia is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is an actor, then Sara is a good lier.
2. Sara is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is an actor, then Kevin is a good lier.
2. Kevin is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is an actor, then James is a good lier.
2. James is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is likes to visit small galleries, then John is an art enthusiast.
2. John is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is likes to visit small galleries, then Bob is an art enthusiast.
2. Bob is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is likes to visit small galleries, then Julia is an art enthusiast.
2. Julia is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is likes to visit small galleries, then Sara is an art enthusiast.
2. Sara is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is likes to visit small galleries, then Kevin is an art enthusiast.
2. Kevin is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is likes to visit small galleries, then James is an art enthusiast.
2. James is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is attractive, then John is tall.
2. John is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is attractive, then Bob is tall.
2. Bob is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is attractive, then Julia is tall.
2. Julia is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is attractive, then Sara is tall.
2. Sara is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is attractive, then Kevin is tall.
2. Kevin is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is attractive, then James is tall.
2. James is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then John is a master pianist.
2. John is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Bob is a master pianist.
2. Bob is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Julia is a master pianist.
2. Julia is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Sara is a master pianist.
2. Sara is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Kevin is a master pianist.
2. Kevin is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then James is a master pianist.
2. James is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is strong, then John is a gym instructor.
2. John is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is strong, then Bob is a gym instructor.
2. Bob is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is strong, then Julia is a gym instructor.
2. Julia is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is strong, then Sara is a gym instructor.
2. Sara is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is strong, then Kevin is a gym instructor.
2. Kevin is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is strong, then James is a gym instructor.
2. James is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a drinker, then John is a reckless driver.
2. John is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a drinker, then Bob is a reckless driver.
2. Bob is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a drinker, then Julia is a reckless driver.
2. Julia is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a drinker, then Sara is a reckless driver.
2. Sara is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a drinker, then Kevin is a reckless driver.
2. Kevin is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a drinker, then James is a reckless driver.
2. James is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a basketball player, then John is very tall.
2. John is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a basketball player, then Bob is very tall.
2. Bob is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a basketball player, then Julia is very tall.
2. Julia is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a basketball player, then Sara is very tall.
2. Sara is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a basketball player, then Kevin is very tall.
2. Kevin is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a basketball player, then James is very tall.
2. James is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a good painter, then John is talented.
2. John is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a good painter, then Bob is talented.
2. Bob is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a good painter, then Julia is talented.
2. Julia is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a good painter, then Sara is talented.
2. Sara is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a good painter, then Kevin is talented.
2. Kevin is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a good painter, then James is talented.
2. James is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a good writer, then John is a good student.
2. John is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a good writer, then Bob is a good student.
2. Bob is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a good writer, then Julia is a good student.
2. Julia is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a good writer, then Sara is a good student.
2. Sara is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a good writer, then Kevin is a good student.
2. Kevin is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a good writer, then James is a good student.
2. James is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is made of metal, then John is a robot.
2. John is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is made of metal, then Bob is a robot.
2. Bob is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is made of metal, then Julia is a robot.
2. Julia is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is made of metal, then Sara is a robot.
2. Sara is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is made of metal, then Kevin is a robot.
2. Kevin is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is made of metal, then James is a robot.
2. James is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a fast runner, then John is a child.
2. John is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a fast runner, then Bob is a child.
2. Bob is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a fast runner, then Julia is a child.
2. Julia is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a fast runner, then Sara is a child.
2. Sara is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a fast runner, then Kevin is a child.
2. Kevin is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a fast runner, then James is a child.
2. James is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is interesting, then John is a critical thinker.
2. John is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is interesting, then Bob is a critical thinker.
2. Bob is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is interesting, then Julia is a critical thinker.
2. Julia is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is interesting, then Sara is a critical thinker.
2. Sara is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is interesting, then Kevin is a critical thinker.
2. Kevin is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is interesting, then James is a critical thinker.
2. James is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a scientist, then John is a genius.
2. John is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a scientist, then Bob is a genius.
2. Bob is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a scientist, then Julia is a genius.
2. Julia is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a scientist, then Sara is a genius.
2. Sara is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a scientist, then Kevin is a genius.
2. Kevin is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a scientist, then James is a genius.
2. James is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a cinematographer, then John is a video content creator.
2. John is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a cinematographer, then Bob is a video content creator.
2. Bob is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a cinematographer, then Julia is a video content creator.
2. Julia is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a cinematographer, then Sara is a video content creator.
2. Sara is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a cinematographer, then Kevin is a video content creator.
2. Kevin is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a cinematographer, then James is a video content creator.
2. James is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is hard-working, then John is the CEO of a company.
2. John is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is hard-working, then Bob is the CEO of a company.
2. Bob is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is hard-working, then Julia is the CEO of a company.
2. Julia is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is hard-working, then Sara is the CEO of a company.
2. Sara is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is hard-working, then Kevin is the CEO of a company.
2. Kevin is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is hard-working, then James is the CEO of a company.
2. James is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a pilot for Air Canada, then John is a pilot.
2. John is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a pilot for Air Canada, then Bob is a pilot.
2. Bob is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a pilot for Air Canada, then Julia is a pilot.
2. Julia is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a pilot for Air Canada, then Sara is a pilot.
2. Sara is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a pilot for Air Canada, then Kevin is a pilot.
2. Kevin is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a pilot for Air Canada, then James is a pilot.
2. James is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is influential on public opinion, then John is a famous celebrity.
2. John is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is influential on public opinion, then Bob is a famous celebrity.
2. Bob is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is influential on public opinion, then Julia is a famous celebrity.
2. Julia is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is influential on public opinion, then Sara is a famous celebrity.
2. Sara is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is influential on public opinion, then Kevin is a famous celebrity.
2. Kevin is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is influential on public opinion, then James is a famous celebrity.
2. James is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is understands math, then John is a computer scientist.
2. John is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is understands math, then Bob is a computer scientist.
2. Bob is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is understands math, then Julia is a computer scientist.
2. Julia is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is understands math, then Sara is a computer scientist.
2. Sara is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is understands math, then Kevin is a computer scientist.
2. Kevin is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is understands math, then James is a computer scientist.
2. James is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then John is a chef.
2. John is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Bob is a chef.
2. Bob is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Julia is a chef.
2. Julia is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Sara is a chef.
2. Sara is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Kevin is a chef.
2. Kevin is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then James is a chef.
2. James is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is interested in international relations, then John is a future prime minister.
2. John is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is interested in international relations, then Bob is a future prime minister.
2. Bob is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is interested in international relations, then Julia is a future prime minister.
2. Julia is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is interested in international relations, then Sara is a future prime minister.
2. Sara is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is interested in international relations, then Kevin is a future prime minister.
2. Kevin is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is interested in international relations, then James is a future prime minister.
2. James is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is strict but fair, then John is a good parent.
2. John is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is strict but fair, then Bob is a good parent.
2. Bob is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is strict but fair, then Julia is a good parent.
2. Julia is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is strict but fair, then Sara is a good parent.
2. Sara is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is strict but fair, then Kevin is a good parent.
2. Kevin is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is strict but fair, then James is a good parent.
2. James is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a member of a book club, then John is reads books.
2. John is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a member of a book club, then Bob is reads books.
2. Bob is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a member of a book club, then Julia is reads books.
2. Julia is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a member of a book club, then Sara is reads books.
2. Sara is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a member of a book club, then Kevin is reads books.
2. Kevin is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a member of a book club, then James is reads books.
2. James is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is strict, then John is a school principle.
2. John is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is strict, then Bob is a school principle.
2. Bob is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is strict, then Julia is a school principle.
2. Julia is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is strict, then Sara is a school principle.
2. Sara is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is strict, then Kevin is a school principle.
2. Kevin is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is strict, then James is a school principle.
2. James is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is likes The Beatles, then John is a guitarist.
2. John is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is likes The Beatles, then Bob is a guitarist.
2. Bob is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is likes The Beatles, then Julia is a guitarist.
2. Julia is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is likes The Beatles, then Sara is a guitarist.
2. Sara is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is likes The Beatles, then Kevin is a guitarist.
2. Kevin is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is likes The Beatles, then James is a guitarist.
2. James is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is wearing a ski mask, then John is a robber.
2. John is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is wearing a ski mask, then Bob is a robber.
2. Bob is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is wearing a ski mask, then Julia is a robber.
2. Julia is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is wearing a ski mask, then Sara is a robber.
2. Sara is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is wearing a ski mask, then Kevin is a robber.
2. Kevin is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is wearing a ski mask, then James is a robber.
2. James is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is lazy, then John is watching TV.
2. John is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is lazy, then Bob is watching TV.
2. Bob is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is lazy, then Julia is watching TV.
2. Julia is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is lazy, then Sara is watching TV.
2. Sara is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is lazy, then Kevin is watching TV.
2. Kevin is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is lazy, then James is watching TV.
2. James is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is excited, then John is playing video games.
2. John is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is excited, then Bob is playing video games.
2. Bob is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is excited, then Julia is playing video games.
2. Julia is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is excited, then Sara is playing video games.
2. Sara is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is excited, then Kevin is playing video games.
2. Kevin is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is excited, then James is playing video games.
2. James is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is living in a tropical country, then John is happy.
2. John is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is living in a tropical country, then Bob is happy.
2. Bob is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is living in a tropical country, then Julia is happy.
2. Julia is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is living in a tropical country, then Sara is happy.
2. Sara is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is living in a tropical country, then Kevin is happy.
2. Kevin is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is living in a tropical country, then James is happy.
2. James is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is angry, then John is radicalized by the internet.
2. John is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is angry, then Bob is radicalized by the internet.
2. Bob is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is angry, then Julia is radicalized by the internet.
2. Julia is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is angry, then Sara is radicalized by the internet.
2. Sara is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is angry, then Kevin is radicalized by the internet.
2. Kevin is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is angry, then James is radicalized by the internet.
2. James is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then John is a professional skateboarder.
2. John is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Bob is a professional skateboarder.
2. Bob is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Julia is a professional skateboarder.
2. Julia is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Sara is a professional skateboarder.
2. Sara is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Kevin is a professional skateboarder.
2. Kevin is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then James is a professional skateboarder.
2. James is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a good lier, then John is an actor.
2. John is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a good lier, then Bob is an actor.
2. Bob is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a good lier, then Julia is an actor.
2. Julia is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a good lier, then Sara is an actor.
2. Sara is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a good lier, then Kevin is an actor.
2. Kevin is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a good lier, then James is an actor.
2. James is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is an art enthusiast, then John is likes to visit small galleries.
2. John is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is an art enthusiast, then Bob is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Bob is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is an art enthusiast, then Julia is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Julia is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is an art enthusiast, then Sara is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Sara is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is an art enthusiast, then Kevin is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Kevin is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is an art enthusiast, then James is likes to visit small galleries.
2. James is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is attractive, then John is tall.
2. John is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is attractive, then Bob is tall.
2. Bob is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is attractive, then Julia is tall.
2. Julia is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is attractive, then Sara is tall.
2. Sara is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is attractive, then Kevin is tall.
2. Kevin is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is attractive, then James is tall.
2. James is not tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not attractive.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then John is a master pianist.
2. John is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Bob is a master pianist.
2. Bob is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Julia is a master pianist.
2. Julia is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Sara is a master pianist.
2. Sara is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then Kevin is a master pianist.
2. Kevin is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is able to play all Mozart piano pieces, then James is a master pianist.
2. James is not a master pianist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is strong, then John is a gym instructor.
2. John is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is strong, then Bob is a gym instructor.
2. Bob is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is strong, then Julia is a gym instructor.
2. Julia is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is strong, then Sara is a gym instructor.
2. Sara is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is strong, then Kevin is a gym instructor.
2. Kevin is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is strong, then James is a gym instructor.
2. James is not a gym instructor.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strong.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a drinker, then John is a reckless driver.
2. John is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a drinker, then Bob is a reckless driver.
2. Bob is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a drinker, then Julia is a reckless driver.
2. Julia is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a drinker, then Sara is a reckless driver.
2. Sara is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a drinker, then Kevin is a reckless driver.
2. Kevin is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a drinker, then James is a reckless driver.
2. James is not a reckless driver.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a drinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a basketball player, then John is very tall.
2. John is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a basketball player, then Bob is very tall.
2. Bob is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a basketball player, then Julia is very tall.
2. Julia is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a basketball player, then Sara is very tall.
2. Sara is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a basketball player, then Kevin is very tall.
2. Kevin is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a basketball player, then James is very tall.
2. James is not very tall.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a basketball player.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a good painter, then John is talented.
2. John is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a good painter, then Bob is talented.
2. Bob is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a good painter, then Julia is talented.
2. Julia is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a good painter, then Sara is talented.
2. Sara is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a good painter, then Kevin is talented.
2. Kevin is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a good painter, then James is talented.
2. James is not talented.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good painter.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a good writer, then John is a good student.
2. John is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a good writer, then Bob is a good student.
2. Bob is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a good writer, then Julia is a good student.
2. Julia is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a good writer, then Sara is a good student.
2. Sara is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a good writer, then Kevin is a good student.
2. Kevin is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a good writer, then James is a good student.
2. James is not a good student.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good writer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is made of metal, then John is a robot.
2. John is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is made of metal, then Bob is a robot.
2. Bob is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is made of metal, then Julia is a robot.
2. Julia is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is made of metal, then Sara is a robot.
2. Sara is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is made of metal, then Kevin is a robot.
2. Kevin is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is made of metal, then James is a robot.
2. James is not a robot.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not made of metal.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a fast runner, then John is a child.
2. John is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a fast runner, then Bob is a child.
2. Bob is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a fast runner, then Julia is a child.
2. Julia is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a fast runner, then Sara is a child.
2. Sara is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a fast runner, then Kevin is a child.
2. Kevin is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a fast runner, then James is a child.
2. James is not a child.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a fast runner.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is interesting, then John is a critical thinker.
2. John is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is interesting, then Bob is a critical thinker.
2. Bob is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is interesting, then Julia is a critical thinker.
2. Julia is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is interesting, then Sara is a critical thinker.
2. Sara is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is interesting, then Kevin is a critical thinker.
2. Kevin is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is interesting, then James is a critical thinker.
2. James is not a critical thinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not interesting.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a scientist, then John is a genius.
2. John is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a scientist, then Bob is a genius.
2. Bob is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a scientist, then Julia is a genius.
2. Julia is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a scientist, then Sara is a genius.
2. Sara is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a scientist, then Kevin is a genius.
2. Kevin is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a scientist, then James is a genius.
2. James is not a genius.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a cinematographer, then John is a video content creator.
2. John is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a cinematographer, then Bob is a video content creator.
2. Bob is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a cinematographer, then Julia is a video content creator.
2. Julia is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a cinematographer, then Sara is a video content creator.
2. Sara is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a cinematographer, then Kevin is a video content creator.
2. Kevin is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a cinematographer, then James is a video content creator.
2. James is not a video content creator.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a cinematographer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is hard-working, then John is the CEO of a company.
2. John is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is hard-working, then Bob is the CEO of a company.
2. Bob is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is hard-working, then Julia is the CEO of a company.
2. Julia is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is hard-working, then Sara is the CEO of a company.
2. Sara is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is hard-working, then Kevin is the CEO of a company.
2. Kevin is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is hard-working, then James is the CEO of a company.
2. James is not the CEO of a company.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not hard-working.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a pilot for Air Canada, then John is a pilot.
2. John is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a pilot for Air Canada, then Bob is a pilot.
2. Bob is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a pilot for Air Canada, then Julia is a pilot.
2. Julia is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a pilot for Air Canada, then Sara is a pilot.
2. Sara is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a pilot for Air Canada, then Kevin is a pilot.
2. Kevin is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a pilot for Air Canada, then James is a pilot.
2. James is not a pilot.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a pilot for Air Canada.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is influential on public opinion, then John is a famous celebrity.
2. John is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is influential on public opinion, then Bob is a famous celebrity.
2. Bob is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is influential on public opinion, then Julia is a famous celebrity.
2. Julia is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is influential on public opinion, then Sara is a famous celebrity.
2. Sara is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is influential on public opinion, then Kevin is a famous celebrity.
2. Kevin is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is influential on public opinion, then James is a famous celebrity.
2. James is not a famous celebrity.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not influential on public opinion.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is understands math, then John is a computer scientist.
2. John is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is understands math, then Bob is a computer scientist.
2. Bob is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is understands math, then Julia is a computer scientist.
2. Julia is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is understands math, then Sara is a computer scientist.
2. Sara is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is understands math, then Kevin is a computer scientist.
2. Kevin is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is understands math, then James is a computer scientist.
2. James is not a computer scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not understands math.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then John is a chef.
2. John is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Bob is a chef.
2. Bob is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Julia is a chef.
2. Julia is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer: