prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John has a pet, then John has a dog.
2. John doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a pet, then Gerald has a dog.
2. Gerald doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Amanda has a pet, then Amanda has a dog.
2. Amanda doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia has a pet, then Julia has a dog.
2. Julia doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a pet, then Tim has a dog.
2. Tim doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Liam has a pet, then Liam has a dog.
2. Liam doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. John doesn't have a dog.
2. If John has a pet, then John has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a dog.
2. If Gerald has a pet, then Gerald has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Amanda doesn't have a dog.
2. If Amanda has a pet, then Amanda has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Julia doesn't have a dog.
2. If Julia has a pet, then Julia has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a dog.
2. If Tim has a pet, then Tim has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Liam doesn't have a dog.
2. If Liam has a pet, then Liam has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't have a pet.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. John is not happy.
2. If John lives in Europe, then John is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald is not happy.
2. If Gerald lives in Europe, then Gerald is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Amanda is not happy.
2. If Amanda lives in Europe, then Amanda is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Julia is not happy.
2. If Julia lives in Europe, then Julia is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim is not happy.
2. If Tim lives in Europe, then Tim is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Liam is not happy.
2. If Liam lives in Europe, then Liam is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John lives in Europe, then John is happy.
2. John is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald lives in Europe, then Gerald is happy.
2. Gerald is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Amanda lives in Europe, then Amanda is happy.
2. Amanda is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia lives in Europe, then Julia is happy.
2. Julia is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim lives in Europe, then Tim is happy.
2. Tim is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Liam lives in Europe, then Liam is happy.
2. Liam is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. John doesn't work in construction.
2. If John likes buildings, then John works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't work in construction.
2. If Gerald likes buildings, then Gerald works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Amanda doesn't work in construction.
2. If Amanda likes buildings, then Amanda works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Julia doesn't work in construction.
2. If Julia likes buildings, then Julia works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't work in construction.
2. If Tim likes buildings, then Tim works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Liam doesn't work in construction.
2. If Liam likes buildings, then Liam works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John likes buildings, then John works in construction.
2. John doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald likes buildings, then Gerald works in construction.
2. Gerald doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Amanda likes buildings, then Amanda works in construction.
2. Amanda doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia likes buildings, then Julia works in construction.
2. Julia doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim likes buildings, then Tim works in construction.
2. Tim doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Liam likes buildings, then Liam works in construction.
2. Liam doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like buildings.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. John doesn't study literature.
2. If John likes poetry, then John studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't study literature.
2. If Gerald likes poetry, then Gerald studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Amanda doesn't study literature.
2. If Amanda likes poetry, then Amanda studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Julia doesn't study literature.
2. If Julia likes poetry, then Julia studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't study literature.
2. If Tim likes poetry, then Tim studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Liam doesn't study literature.
2. If Liam likes poetry, then Liam studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John likes poetry, then John studies literature.
2. John doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald likes poetry, then Gerald studies literature.
2. Gerald doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Amanda likes poetry, then Amanda studies literature.
2. Amanda doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia likes poetry, then Julia studies literature.
2. Julia doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim likes poetry, then Tim studies literature.
2. Tim doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Liam likes poetry, then Liam studies literature.
2. Liam doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like poetry.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. John is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Gerald is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Amanda is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Amanda is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Julia is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Tim is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Liam is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Liam is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. John is not an old man.
2. If John is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald is not an old man.
2. If Gerald is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Amanda is not an old man.
2. If Amanda is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Julia is not an old man.
2. If Julia is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim is not an old man.
2. If Tim is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Liam is not an old man.
2. If Liam is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John has a pet, then John has a dog.
2. John doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a pet, then Gerald has a dog.
2. Gerald doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Amanda has a pet, then Amanda has a dog.
2. Amanda doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia has a pet, then Julia has a dog.
2. Julia doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a pet, then Tim has a dog.
2. Tim doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Liam has a pet, then Liam has a dog.
2. Liam doesn't have a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. John doesn't have a dog.
2. If John has a pet, then John has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a dog.
2. If Gerald has a pet, then Gerald has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Amanda doesn't have a dog.
2. If Amanda has a pet, then Amanda has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Julia doesn't have a dog.
2. If Julia has a pet, then Julia has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a dog.
2. If Tim has a pet, then Tim has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Liam doesn't have a dog.
2. If Liam has a pet, then Liam has a dog.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't have a pet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. John is not happy.
2. If John lives in Europe, then John is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald is not happy.
2. If Gerald lives in Europe, then Gerald is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Amanda is not happy.
2. If Amanda lives in Europe, then Amanda is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Julia is not happy.
2. If Julia lives in Europe, then Julia is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim is not happy.
2. If Tim lives in Europe, then Tim is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Liam is not happy.
2. If Liam lives in Europe, then Liam is happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John lives in Europe, then John is happy.
2. John is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald lives in Europe, then Gerald is happy.
2. Gerald is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Amanda lives in Europe, then Amanda is happy.
2. Amanda is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia lives in Europe, then Julia is happy.
2. Julia is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim lives in Europe, then Tim is happy.
2. Tim is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Liam lives in Europe, then Liam is happy.
2. Liam is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't live in Europe.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. John doesn't work in construction.
2. If John likes buildings, then John works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't work in construction.
2. If Gerald likes buildings, then Gerald works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Amanda doesn't work in construction.
2. If Amanda likes buildings, then Amanda works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Julia doesn't work in construction.
2. If Julia likes buildings, then Julia works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't work in construction.
2. If Tim likes buildings, then Tim works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Liam doesn't work in construction.
2. If Liam likes buildings, then Liam works in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John likes buildings, then John works in construction.
2. John doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald likes buildings, then Gerald works in construction.
2. Gerald doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Amanda likes buildings, then Amanda works in construction.
2. Amanda doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia likes buildings, then Julia works in construction.
2. Julia doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim likes buildings, then Tim works in construction.
2. Tim doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Liam likes buildings, then Liam works in construction.
2. Liam doesn't work in construction.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like buildings.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. John doesn't study literature.
2. If John likes poetry, then John studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't study literature.
2. If Gerald likes poetry, then Gerald studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Amanda doesn't study literature.
2. If Amanda likes poetry, then Amanda studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Julia doesn't study literature.
2. If Julia likes poetry, then Julia studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't study literature.
2. If Tim likes poetry, then Tim studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Liam doesn't study literature.
2. If Liam likes poetry, then Liam studies literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John likes poetry, then John studies literature.
2. John doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, John doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald likes poetry, then Gerald studies literature.
2. Gerald doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Amanda likes poetry, then Amanda studies literature.
2. Amanda doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia likes poetry, then Julia studies literature.
2. Julia doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim likes poetry, then Tim studies literature.
2. Tim doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Liam likes poetry, then Liam studies literature.
2. Liam doesn't study literature.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam doesn't like poetry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. John is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Gerald is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Amanda is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Amanda is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Julia is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Tim is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Liam is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
2. Liam is not an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. John is not an old man.
2. If John is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald is not an old man.
2. If Gerald is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Amanda is not an old man.
2. If Amanda is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Amanda is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Julia is not an old man.
2. If Julia is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim is not an old man.
2. If Tim is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Liam is not an old man.
2. If Liam is Dan's sibling, he is an old man.
Conclusion: Therefore, Liam is not Dan's sibling.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is tall, then John is attractive.
2. John is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is tall, then Bob is attractive.
2. Bob is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is tall, then Julia is attractive.
2. Julia is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is tall, then Sara is attractive.
2. Sara is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is tall, then Kevin is attractive.
2. Kevin is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is tall, then James is attractive.
2. James is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a master pianist, then John is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. John is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a master pianist, then Bob is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Bob is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a master pianist, then Julia is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Julia is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a master pianist, then Sara is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Sara is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a master pianist, then Kevin is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Kevin is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a master pianist, then James is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. James is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a gym instructor, then John is strong.
2. John is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a gym instructor, then Bob is strong.
2. Bob is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a gym instructor, then Julia is strong.
2. Julia is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a gym instructor, then Sara is strong.
2. Sara is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a gym instructor, then Kevin is strong.
2. Kevin is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a gym instructor, then James is strong.
2. James is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a reckless driver, then John is a drinker.
2. John is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a reckless driver, then Bob is a drinker.
2. Bob is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a reckless driver, then Julia is a drinker.
2. Julia is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a reckless driver, then Sara is a drinker.
2. Sara is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a reckless driver, then Kevin is a drinker.
2. Kevin is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a reckless driver, then James is a drinker.
2. James is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is very tall, then John is a basketball player.
2. John is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is very tall, then Bob is a basketball player.
2. Bob is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is very tall, then Julia is a basketball player.
2. Julia is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is very tall, then Sara is a basketball player.
2. Sara is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is very tall, then Kevin is a basketball player.
2. Kevin is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is very tall, then James is a basketball player.
2. James is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is talented, then John is a good painter.
2. John is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is talented, then Bob is a good painter.
2. Bob is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is talented, then Julia is a good painter.
2. Julia is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is talented, then Sara is a good painter.
2. Sara is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is talented, then Kevin is a good painter.
2. Kevin is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is talented, then James is a good painter.
2. James is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a good student, then John is a good writer.
2. John is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a good student, then Bob is a good writer.
2. Bob is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a good student, then Julia is a good writer.
2. Julia is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a good student, then Sara is a good writer.
2. Sara is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a good student, then Kevin is a good writer.
2. Kevin is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a good student, then James is a good writer.
2. James is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a robot, then John is made of metal.
2. John is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a robot, then Bob is made of metal.
2. Bob is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a robot, then Julia is made of metal.
2. Julia is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a robot, then Sara is made of metal.
2. Sara is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a robot, then Kevin is made of metal.
2. Kevin is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a robot, then James is made of metal.
2. James is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a child, then John is a fast runner.
2. John is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a child, then Bob is a fast runner.
2. Bob is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a child, then Julia is a fast runner.
2. Julia is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a child, then Sara is a fast runner.
2. Sara is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a child, then Kevin is a fast runner.
2. Kevin is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a child, then James is a fast runner.
2. James is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a critical thinker, then John is interesting.
2. John is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a critical thinker, then Bob is interesting.
2. Bob is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a critical thinker, then Julia is interesting.
2. Julia is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a critical thinker, then Sara is interesting.
2. Sara is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a critical thinker, then Kevin is interesting.
2. Kevin is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a critical thinker, then James is interesting.
2. James is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a genius, then John is a scientist.
2. John is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a genius, then Bob is a scientist.
2. Bob is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a genius, then Julia is a scientist.
2. Julia is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a genius, then Sara is a scientist.
2. Sara is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a genius, then Kevin is a scientist.
2. Kevin is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a genius, then James is a scientist.
2. James is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a video content creator, then John is a cinematographer.
2. John is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a video content creator, then Bob is a cinematographer.
2. Bob is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a video content creator, then Julia is a cinematographer.
2. Julia is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a video content creator, then Sara is a cinematographer.
2. Sara is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a video content creator, then Kevin is a cinematographer.
2. Kevin is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a video content creator, then James is a cinematographer.
2. James is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is the CEO of a company, then John is hard-working.
2. John is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is the CEO of a company, then Bob is hard-working.
2. Bob is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is the CEO of a company, then Julia is hard-working.
2. Julia is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is the CEO of a company, then Sara is hard-working.
2. Sara is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is the CEO of a company, then Kevin is hard-working.
2. Kevin is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is the CEO of a company, then James is hard-working.
2. James is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a pilot, then John is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. John is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a pilot, then Bob is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Bob is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a pilot, then Julia is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Julia is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a pilot, then Sara is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Sara is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a pilot, then Kevin is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Kevin is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a pilot, then James is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. James is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a famous celebrity, then John is influential on public opinion.
2. John is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a famous celebrity, then Bob is influential on public opinion.
2. Bob is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a famous celebrity, then Julia is influential on public opinion.
2. Julia is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a famous celebrity, then Sara is influential on public opinion.
2. Sara is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a famous celebrity, then Kevin is influential on public opinion.
2. Kevin is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a famous celebrity, then James is influential on public opinion.
2. James is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a computer scientist, then John is understands math.
2. John is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a computer scientist, then Bob is understands math.
2. Bob is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a computer scientist, then Julia is understands math.
2. Julia is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a computer scientist, then Sara is understands math.
2. Sara is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a computer scientist, then Kevin is understands math.
2. Kevin is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a computer scientist, then James is understands math.
2. James is not understands math.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a computer scientist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a chef, then John is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. John is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a chef, then Bob is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Bob is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a chef, then Julia is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Julia is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a chef, then Sara is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Sara is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a chef, then Kevin is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. Kevin is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a chef, then James is the owner of a fancy restaurant.
2. James is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a chef.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a future prime minister, then John is interested in international relations.
2. John is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a future prime minister, then Bob is interested in international relations.
2. Bob is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a future prime minister, then Julia is interested in international relations.
2. Julia is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a future prime minister, then Sara is interested in international relations.
2. Sara is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a future prime minister, then Kevin is interested in international relations.
2. Kevin is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a future prime minister, then James is interested in international relations.
2. James is not interested in international relations.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a future prime minister.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a good parent, then John is strict but fair.
2. John is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a good parent, then Bob is strict but fair.
2. Bob is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a good parent, then Julia is strict but fair.
2. Julia is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a good parent, then Sara is strict but fair.
2. Sara is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a good parent, then Kevin is strict but fair.
2. Kevin is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a good parent, then James is strict but fair.
2. James is not strict but fair.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good parent.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is reads books, then John is a member of a book club.
2. John is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is reads books, then Bob is a member of a book club.
2. Bob is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is reads books, then Julia is a member of a book club.
2. Julia is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is reads books, then Sara is a member of a book club.
2. Sara is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is reads books, then Kevin is a member of a book club.
2. Kevin is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is reads books, then James is a member of a book club.
2. James is not a member of a book club.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not reads books.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a school principle, then John is strict.
2. John is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a school principle, then Bob is strict.
2. Bob is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a school principle, then Julia is strict.
2. Julia is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a school principle, then Sara is strict.
2. Sara is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a school principle, then Kevin is strict.
2. Kevin is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a school principle, then James is strict.
2. James is not strict.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a school principle.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a guitarist, then John is likes The Beatles.
2. John is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a guitarist, then Bob is likes The Beatles.
2. Bob is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a guitarist, then Julia is likes The Beatles.
2. Julia is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a guitarist, then Sara is likes The Beatles.
2. Sara is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a guitarist, then Kevin is likes The Beatles.
2. Kevin is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a guitarist, then James is likes The Beatles.
2. James is not likes The Beatles.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a guitarist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a robber, then John is wearing a ski mask.
2. John is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a robber, then Bob is wearing a ski mask.
2. Bob is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a robber, then Julia is wearing a ski mask.
2. Julia is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a robber, then Sara is wearing a ski mask.
2. Sara is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a robber, then Kevin is wearing a ski mask.
2. Kevin is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a robber, then James is wearing a ski mask.
2. James is not wearing a ski mask.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a robber.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is watching TV, then John is lazy.
2. John is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is watching TV, then Bob is lazy.
2. Bob is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is watching TV, then Julia is lazy.
2. Julia is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is watching TV, then Sara is lazy.
2. Sara is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is watching TV, then Kevin is lazy.
2. Kevin is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is watching TV, then James is lazy.
2. James is not lazy.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not watching TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is playing video games, then John is excited.
2. John is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is playing video games, then Bob is excited.
2. Bob is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is playing video games, then Julia is excited.
2. Julia is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is playing video games, then Sara is excited.
2. Sara is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is playing video games, then Kevin is excited.
2. Kevin is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is playing video games, then James is excited.
2. James is not excited.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not playing video games.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is happy, then John is living in a tropical country.
2. John is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is happy, then Bob is living in a tropical country.
2. Bob is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is happy, then Julia is living in a tropical country.
2. Julia is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is happy, then Sara is living in a tropical country.
2. Sara is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is happy, then Kevin is living in a tropical country.
2. Kevin is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is happy, then James is living in a tropical country.
2. James is not living in a tropical country.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not happy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is radicalized by the internet, then John is angry.
2. John is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is radicalized by the internet, then Bob is angry.
2. Bob is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is radicalized by the internet, then Julia is angry.
2. Julia is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is radicalized by the internet, then Sara is angry.
2. Sara is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is radicalized by the internet, then Kevin is angry.
2. Kevin is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is radicalized by the internet, then James is angry.
2. James is not angry.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not radicalized by the internet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is a professional skateboarder, then John is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. John is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is a professional skateboarder, then Bob is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Bob is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is a professional skateboarder, then Julia is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Julia is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is a professional skateboarder, then Sara is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Sara is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is a professional skateboarder, then Kevin is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. Kevin is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is a professional skateboarder, then James is comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
2. James is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a professional skateboarder.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is an actor, then John is a good lier.
2. John is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is an actor, then Bob is a good lier.
2. Bob is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is an actor, then Julia is a good lier.
2. Julia is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is an actor, then Sara is a good lier.
2. Sara is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is an actor, then Kevin is a good lier.
2. Kevin is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is an actor, then James is a good lier.
2. James is not a good lier.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not an actor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If John is likes to visit small galleries, then John is an art enthusiast.
2. John is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Bob is likes to visit small galleries, then Bob is an art enthusiast.
2. Bob is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Julia is likes to visit small galleries, then Julia is an art enthusiast.
2. Julia is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Sara is likes to visit small galleries, then Sara is an art enthusiast.
2. Sara is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Kevin is likes to visit small galleries, then Kevin is an art enthusiast.
2. Kevin is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If James is likes to visit small galleries, then James is an art enthusiast.
2. James is not an art enthusiast.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not likes to visit small galleries.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is tall, then John is attractive.
2. John is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is tall, then Bob is attractive.
2. Bob is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is tall, then Julia is attractive.
2. Julia is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is tall, then Sara is attractive.
2. Sara is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is tall, then Kevin is attractive.
2. Kevin is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is tall, then James is attractive.
2. James is not attractive.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a master pianist, then John is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. John is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a master pianist, then Bob is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Bob is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a master pianist, then Julia is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Julia is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a master pianist, then Sara is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Sara is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a master pianist, then Kevin is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. Kevin is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a master pianist, then James is able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
2. James is not able to play all Mozart piano pieces.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a master pianist.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a gym instructor, then John is strong.
2. John is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a gym instructor, then Bob is strong.
2. Bob is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a gym instructor, then Julia is strong.
2. Julia is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a gym instructor, then Sara is strong.
2. Sara is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a gym instructor, then Kevin is strong.
2. Kevin is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a gym instructor, then James is strong.
2. James is not strong.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a gym instructor.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a reckless driver, then John is a drinker.
2. John is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a reckless driver, then Bob is a drinker.
2. Bob is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a reckless driver, then Julia is a drinker.
2. Julia is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a reckless driver, then Sara is a drinker.
2. Sara is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a reckless driver, then Kevin is a drinker.
2. Kevin is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a reckless driver, then James is a drinker.
2. James is not a drinker.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a reckless driver.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is very tall, then John is a basketball player.
2. John is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is very tall, then Bob is a basketball player.
2. Bob is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is very tall, then Julia is a basketball player.
2. Julia is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is very tall, then Sara is a basketball player.
2. Sara is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is very tall, then Kevin is a basketball player.
2. Kevin is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is very tall, then James is a basketball player.
2. James is not a basketball player.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not very tall.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is talented, then John is a good painter.
2. John is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is talented, then Bob is a good painter.
2. Bob is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is talented, then Julia is a good painter.
2. Julia is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is talented, then Sara is a good painter.
2. Sara is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is talented, then Kevin is a good painter.
2. Kevin is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is talented, then James is a good painter.
2. James is not a good painter.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not talented.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a good student, then John is a good writer.
2. John is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a good student, then Bob is a good writer.
2. Bob is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a good student, then Julia is a good writer.
2. Julia is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a good student, then Sara is a good writer.
2. Sara is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a good student, then Kevin is a good writer.
2. Kevin is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a good student, then James is a good writer.
2. James is not a good writer.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good student.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a robot, then John is made of metal.
2. John is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a robot, then Bob is made of metal.
2. Bob is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a robot, then Julia is made of metal.
2. Julia is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a robot, then Sara is made of metal.
2. Sara is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a robot, then Kevin is made of metal.
2. Kevin is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a robot, then James is made of metal.
2. James is not made of metal.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a robot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a child, then John is a fast runner.
2. John is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a child, then Bob is a fast runner.
2. Bob is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a child, then Julia is a fast runner.
2. Julia is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a child, then Sara is a fast runner.
2. Sara is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a child, then Kevin is a fast runner.
2. Kevin is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a child, then James is a fast runner.
2. James is not a fast runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a child.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a critical thinker, then John is interesting.
2. John is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a critical thinker, then Bob is interesting.
2. Bob is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a critical thinker, then Julia is interesting.
2. Julia is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a critical thinker, then Sara is interesting.
2. Sara is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a critical thinker, then Kevin is interesting.
2. Kevin is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a critical thinker, then James is interesting.
2. James is not interesting.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a critical thinker.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a genius, then John is a scientist.
2. John is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a genius, then Bob is a scientist.
2. Bob is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a genius, then Julia is a scientist.
2. Julia is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a genius, then Sara is a scientist.
2. Sara is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a genius, then Kevin is a scientist.
2. Kevin is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a genius, then James is a scientist.
2. James is not a scientist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a genius.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a video content creator, then John is a cinematographer.
2. John is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a video content creator, then Bob is a cinematographer.
2. Bob is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a video content creator, then Julia is a cinematographer.
2. Julia is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a video content creator, then Sara is a cinematographer.
2. Sara is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a video content creator, then Kevin is a cinematographer.
2. Kevin is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a video content creator, then James is a cinematographer.
2. James is not a cinematographer.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a video content creator.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is the CEO of a company, then John is hard-working.
2. John is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is the CEO of a company, then Bob is hard-working.
2. Bob is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is the CEO of a company, then Julia is hard-working.
2. Julia is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is the CEO of a company, then Sara is hard-working.
2. Sara is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is the CEO of a company, then Kevin is hard-working.
2. Kevin is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is the CEO of a company, then James is hard-working.
2. James is not hard-working.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not the CEO of a company.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a pilot, then John is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. John is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a pilot, then Bob is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Bob is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a pilot, then Julia is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Julia is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a pilot, then Sara is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Sara is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a pilot, then Kevin is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. Kevin is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a pilot, then James is a pilot for Air Canada.
2. James is not a pilot for Air Canada.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a pilot.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a famous celebrity, then John is influential on public opinion.
2. John is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a famous celebrity, then Bob is influential on public opinion.
2. Bob is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a famous celebrity, then Julia is influential on public opinion.
2. Julia is not influential on public opinion.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a famous celebrity.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer: