prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Sara is a chef.
2. Sara is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then Kevin is a chef.
2. Kevin is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is the owner of a fancy restaurant, then James is a chef.
2. James is not a chef.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not the owner of a fancy restaurant.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is interested in international relations, then John is a future prime minister.
2. John is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is interested in international relations, then Bob is a future prime minister.
2. Bob is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is interested in international relations, then Julia is a future prime minister.
2. Julia is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is interested in international relations, then Sara is a future prime minister.
2. Sara is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is interested in international relations, then Kevin is a future prime minister.
2. Kevin is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is interested in international relations, then James is a future prime minister.
2. James is not a future prime minister.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not interested in international relations.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is strict but fair, then John is a good parent.
2. John is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is strict but fair, then Bob is a good parent.
2. Bob is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is strict but fair, then Julia is a good parent.
2. Julia is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is strict but fair, then Sara is a good parent.
2. Sara is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is strict but fair, then Kevin is a good parent.
2. Kevin is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is strict but fair, then James is a good parent.
2. James is not a good parent.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strict but fair.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a member of a book club, then John is reads books.
2. John is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a member of a book club, then Bob is reads books.
2. Bob is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a member of a book club, then Julia is reads books.
2. Julia is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a member of a book club, then Sara is reads books.
2. Sara is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a member of a book club, then Kevin is reads books.
2. Kevin is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a member of a book club, then James is reads books.
2. James is not reads books.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a member of a book club.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is strict, then John is a school principle.
2. John is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is strict, then Bob is a school principle.
2. Bob is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is strict, then Julia is a school principle.
2. Julia is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is strict, then Sara is a school principle.
2. Sara is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is strict, then Kevin is a school principle.
2. Kevin is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is strict, then James is a school principle.
2. James is not a school principle.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not strict.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is likes The Beatles, then John is a guitarist.
2. John is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is likes The Beatles, then Bob is a guitarist.
2. Bob is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is likes The Beatles, then Julia is a guitarist.
2. Julia is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is likes The Beatles, then Sara is a guitarist.
2. Sara is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is likes The Beatles, then Kevin is a guitarist.
2. Kevin is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is likes The Beatles, then James is a guitarist.
2. James is not a guitarist.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not likes The Beatles.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is wearing a ski mask, then John is a robber.
2. John is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is wearing a ski mask, then Bob is a robber.
2. Bob is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is wearing a ski mask, then Julia is a robber.
2. Julia is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is wearing a ski mask, then Sara is a robber.
2. Sara is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is wearing a ski mask, then Kevin is a robber.
2. Kevin is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is wearing a ski mask, then James is a robber.
2. James is not a robber.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not wearing a ski mask.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is lazy, then John is watching TV.
2. John is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is lazy, then Bob is watching TV.
2. Bob is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is lazy, then Julia is watching TV.
2. Julia is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is lazy, then Sara is watching TV.
2. Sara is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is lazy, then Kevin is watching TV.
2. Kevin is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is lazy, then James is watching TV.
2. James is not watching TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not lazy.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is excited, then John is playing video games.
2. John is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is excited, then Bob is playing video games.
2. Bob is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is excited, then Julia is playing video games.
2. Julia is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is excited, then Sara is playing video games.
2. Sara is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is excited, then Kevin is playing video games.
2. Kevin is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is excited, then James is playing video games.
2. James is not playing video games.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not excited.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is living in a tropical country, then John is happy.
2. John is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is living in a tropical country, then Bob is happy.
2. Bob is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is living in a tropical country, then Julia is happy.
2. Julia is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is living in a tropical country, then Sara is happy.
2. Sara is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is living in a tropical country, then Kevin is happy.
2. Kevin is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is living in a tropical country, then James is happy.
2. James is not happy.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not living in a tropical country.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is angry, then John is radicalized by the internet.
2. John is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is angry, then Bob is radicalized by the internet.
2. Bob is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is angry, then Julia is radicalized by the internet.
2. Julia is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is angry, then Sara is radicalized by the internet.
2. Sara is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is angry, then Kevin is radicalized by the internet.
2. Kevin is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is angry, then James is radicalized by the internet.
2. James is not radicalized by the internet.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not angry.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then John is a professional skateboarder.
2. John is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Bob is a professional skateboarder.
2. Bob is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Julia is a professional skateboarder.
2. Julia is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Sara is a professional skateboarder.
2. Sara is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then Kevin is a professional skateboarder.
2. Kevin is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is comfortable with riding a huge ramp, then James is a professional skateboarder.
2. James is not a professional skateboarder.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not comfortable with riding a huge ramp.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is a good lier, then John is an actor.
2. John is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is a good lier, then Bob is an actor.
2. Bob is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is a good lier, then Julia is an actor.
2. Julia is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is a good lier, then Sara is an actor.
2. Sara is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is a good lier, then Kevin is an actor.
2. Kevin is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is a good lier, then James is an actor.
2. James is not an actor.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not a good lier.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If John is an art enthusiast, then John is likes to visit small galleries.
2. John is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, John is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Bob is an art enthusiast, then Bob is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Bob is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Bob is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Julia is an art enthusiast, then Julia is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Julia is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Julia is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Sara is an art enthusiast, then Sara is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Sara is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Sara is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Kevin is an art enthusiast, then Kevin is likes to visit small galleries.
2. Kevin is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, Kevin is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If James is an art enthusiast, then James is likes to visit small galleries.
2. James is not likes to visit small galleries.
Conclusion: Therefore, James is not an art enthusiast.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a happy wife, then Tim has a happy life.
2. Tim doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Tim has a happy wife, then Tim has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a happy wife, then Elizabeth has a happy life.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Elizabeth has a happy wife, then Elizabeth has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a happy wife, then Gerald has a happy life.
2. Gerald doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Gerald has a happy wife, then Gerald has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a happy wife, then Jonathan has a happy life.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Jonathan has a happy wife, then Jonathan has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a happy wife, then Lisa has a happy life.
2. Lisa doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Lisa has a happy wife, then Lisa has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a happy wife, then Margaret has a happy life.
2. Margaret doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Margaret has a happy wife, then Margaret has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a TV, then Tim has a flat screen TV.
2. Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Tim has a TV, then Tim has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a TV, then Elizabeth has a flat screen TV.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Elizabeth has a TV, then Elizabeth has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a TV, then Gerald has a flat screen TV.
2. Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Gerald has a TV, then Gerald has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a TV, then Jonathan has a flat screen TV.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Jonathan has a TV, then Jonathan has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a TV, then Lisa has a flat screen TV.
2. Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Lisa has a TV, then Lisa has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a TV, then Margaret has a flat screen TV.
2. Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Margaret has a TV, then Margaret has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a phone, then Tim has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Tim has a phone, then Tim has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a phone, then Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Elizabeth has a phone, then Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a phone, then Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Gerald has a phone, then Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a phone, then Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Jonathan has a phone, then Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a phone, then Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Lisa has a phone, then Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a phone, then Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Margaret has a phone, then Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a computer, then Tim has a PC computer.
2. Tim doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Tim has a computer, then Tim has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a computer, then Elizabeth has a PC computer.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Elizabeth has a computer, then Elizabeth has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a computer, then Gerald has a PC computer.
2. Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Gerald has a computer, then Gerald has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a computer, then Jonathan has a PC computer.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Jonathan has a computer, then Jonathan has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a computer, then Lisa has a PC computer.
2. Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Lisa has a computer, then Lisa has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a computer, then Margaret has a PC computer.
2. Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Margaret has a computer, then Margaret has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a closet, then Tim has a suit.
2. Tim doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a suit.
2. If Tim has a closet, then Tim has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a closet, then Elizabeth has a suit.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.
2. If Elizabeth has a closet, then Elizabeth has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a closet, then Gerald has a suit.
2. Gerald doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a suit.
2. If Gerald has a closet, then Gerald has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a closet, then Jonathan has a suit.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a suit.
2. If Jonathan has a closet, then Jonathan has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a closet, then Lisa has a suit.
2. Lisa doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a suit.
2. If Lisa has a closet, then Lisa has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a closet, then Margaret has a suit.
2. Margaret doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a suit.
2. If Margaret has a closet, then Margaret has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a Jacket, then Tim has a Leather jacket.
2. Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Tim has a Jacket, then Tim has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a Jacket, then Elizabeth has a Leather jacket.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Elizabeth has a Jacket, then Elizabeth has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a Jacket, then Gerald has a Leather jacket.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Gerald has a Jacket, then Gerald has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a Jacket, then Jonathan has a Leather jacket.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Jonathan has a Jacket, then Jonathan has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a Jacket, then Lisa has a Leather jacket.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Lisa has a Jacket, then Lisa has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a Jacket, then Margaret has a Leather jacket.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Margaret has a Jacket, then Margaret has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a pair of sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Tim has a pair of sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a pair of sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Gerald has a pair of sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a pair of sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Lisa has a pair of sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a pair of sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Margaret has a pair of sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a pair of shoes, then Tim has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Tim has a pair of shoes, then Tim has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Elizabeth has a pair of shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a pair of shoes, then Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Gerald has a pair of shoes, then Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Jonathan has a pair of shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a pair of shoes, then Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Lisa has a pair of shoes, then Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a pair of shoes, then Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Margaret has a pair of shoes, then Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a guitar, then Tim has a Fender Guitar.
2. Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Tim has a guitar, then Tim has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a guitar, then Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Elizabeth has a guitar, then Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a guitar, then Gerald has a Fender Guitar.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Gerald has a guitar, then Gerald has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a guitar, then Jonathan has a Fender Guitar.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Jonathan has a guitar, then Jonathan has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a guitar, then Lisa has a Fender Guitar.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Lisa has a guitar, then Lisa has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a guitar, then Margaret has a Fender Guitar.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Margaret has a guitar, then Margaret has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a job, then Tim has a job in technology.
2. Tim doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Tim has a job, then Tim has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a job, then Elizabeth has a job in technology.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Elizabeth has a job, then Elizabeth has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a job, then Gerald has a job in technology.
2. Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Gerald has a job, then Gerald has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a job, then Jonathan has a job in technology.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Jonathan has a job, then Jonathan has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a job, then Lisa has a job in technology.
2. Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Lisa has a job, then Lisa has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a job, then Margaret has a job in technology.
2. Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Margaret has a job, then Margaret has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a university degree, then Tim has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Tim has a university degree, then Tim has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a university degree, then Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Elizabeth has a university degree, then Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a university degree, then Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Gerald has a university degree, then Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a university degree, then Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Jonathan has a university degree, then Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a university degree, then Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Lisa has a university degree, then Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a university degree, then Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Margaret has a university degree, then Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a happy wife, then Tim has a happy life.
2. Tim doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Tim has a happy wife, then Tim has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a happy wife, then Elizabeth has a happy life.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Elizabeth has a happy wife, then Elizabeth has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a happy wife, then Gerald has a happy life.
2. Gerald doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Gerald has a happy wife, then Gerald has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a happy wife, then Jonathan has a happy life.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Jonathan has a happy wife, then Jonathan has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a happy wife, then Lisa has a happy life.
2. Lisa doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Lisa has a happy wife, then Lisa has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a happy wife, then Margaret has a happy life.
2. Margaret doesn't have a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a happy life.
2. If Margaret has a happy wife, then Margaret has a happy life.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a happy wife.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a TV, then Tim has a flat screen TV.
2. Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Tim has a TV, then Tim has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a TV, then Elizabeth has a flat screen TV.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Elizabeth has a TV, then Elizabeth has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a TV, then Gerald has a flat screen TV.
2. Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Gerald has a TV, then Gerald has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a TV, then Jonathan has a flat screen TV.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Jonathan has a TV, then Jonathan has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a TV, then Lisa has a flat screen TV.
2. Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Lisa has a TV, then Lisa has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a TV, then Margaret has a flat screen TV.
2. Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a flat screen TV.
2. If Margaret has a TV, then Margaret has a flat screen TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a phone, then Tim has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Tim has a phone, then Tim has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a phone, then Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Elizabeth has a phone, then Elizabeth has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a phone, then Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Gerald has a phone, then Gerald has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a phone, then Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Jonathan has a phone, then Jonathan has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a phone, then Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Lisa has a phone, then Lisa has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a phone, then Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Samsung Galaxy.
2. If Margaret has a phone, then Margaret has a Samsung Galaxy.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a phone.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a computer, then Tim has a PC computer.
2. Tim doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Tim has a computer, then Tim has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a computer, then Elizabeth has a PC computer.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Elizabeth has a computer, then Elizabeth has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a computer, then Gerald has a PC computer.
2. Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Gerald has a computer, then Gerald has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a computer, then Jonathan has a PC computer.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Jonathan has a computer, then Jonathan has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a computer, then Lisa has a PC computer.
2. Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Lisa has a computer, then Lisa has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a computer, then Margaret has a PC computer.
2. Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a PC computer.
2. If Margaret has a computer, then Margaret has a PC computer.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a computer.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a closet, then Tim has a suit.
2. Tim doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a suit.
2. If Tim has a closet, then Tim has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a closet, then Elizabeth has a suit.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a suit.
2. If Elizabeth has a closet, then Elizabeth has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a closet, then Gerald has a suit.
2. Gerald doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a suit.
2. If Gerald has a closet, then Gerald has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a closet, then Jonathan has a suit.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a suit.
2. If Jonathan has a closet, then Jonathan has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a closet, then Lisa has a suit.
2. Lisa doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a suit.
2. If Lisa has a closet, then Lisa has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a closet, then Margaret has a suit.
2. Margaret doesn't have a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a suit.
2. If Margaret has a closet, then Margaret has a suit.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a closet.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a Jacket, then Tim has a Leather jacket.
2. Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Tim has a Jacket, then Tim has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a Jacket, then Elizabeth has a Leather jacket.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Elizabeth has a Jacket, then Elizabeth has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a Jacket, then Gerald has a Leather jacket.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Gerald has a Jacket, then Gerald has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a Jacket, then Jonathan has a Leather jacket.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Jonathan has a Jacket, then Jonathan has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a Jacket, then Lisa has a Leather jacket.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Lisa has a Jacket, then Lisa has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a Jacket, then Margaret has a Leather jacket.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Leather jacket.
2. If Margaret has a Jacket, then Margaret has a Leather jacket.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a Jacket.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a pair of sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Tim has a pair of sunglasses, then Tim has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Elizabeth has a pair of sunglasses, then Elizabeth has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a pair of sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Gerald has a pair of sunglasses, then Gerald has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Jonathan has a pair of sunglasses, then Jonathan has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a pair of sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Lisa has a pair of sunglasses, then Lisa has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a pair of sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a pair of black sunglasses.
2. If Margaret has a pair of sunglasses, then Margaret has a pair of black sunglasses.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of sunglasses.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a pair of shoes, then Tim has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Tim has a pair of shoes, then Tim has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a pair of shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Elizabeth has a pair of shoes, then Elizabeth has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a pair of shoes, then Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Gerald has a pair of shoes, then Gerald has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a pair of shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Jonathan has a pair of shoes, then Jonathan has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a pair of shoes, then Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Lisa has a pair of shoes, then Lisa has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a pair of shoes, then Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes.
2. Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a pair of Nike shoes.
2. If Margaret has a pair of shoes, then Margaret has a pair of Nike shoes.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a pair of shoes.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a guitar, then Tim has a Fender Guitar.
2. Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Tim has a guitar, then Tim has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a guitar, then Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Elizabeth has a guitar, then Elizabeth has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a guitar, then Gerald has a Fender Guitar.
2. Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Gerald has a guitar, then Gerald has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a guitar, then Jonathan has a Fender Guitar.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Jonathan has a guitar, then Jonathan has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a guitar, then Lisa has a Fender Guitar.
2. Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Lisa has a guitar, then Lisa has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a guitar, then Margaret has a Fender Guitar.
2. Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a Fender Guitar.
2. If Margaret has a guitar, then Margaret has a Fender Guitar.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a guitar.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a job, then Tim has a job in technology.
2. Tim doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Tim has a job, then Tim has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a job, then Elizabeth has a job in technology.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Elizabeth has a job, then Elizabeth has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a job, then Gerald has a job in technology.
2. Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Gerald has a job, then Gerald has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a job, then Jonathan has a job in technology.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Jonathan has a job, then Jonathan has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a job, then Lisa has a job in technology.
2. Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Lisa has a job, then Lisa has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a job, then Margaret has a job in technology.
2. Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a job in technology.
2. If Margaret has a job, then Margaret has a job in technology.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a job.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Tim has a university degree, then Tim has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Tim doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Tim has a university degree, then Tim has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Elizabeth has a university degree, then Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Elizabeth has a university degree, then Elizabeth has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Gerald has a university degree, then Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Gerald doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Gerald has a university degree, then Gerald has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Jonathan has a university degree, then Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Jonathan doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Jonathan has a university degree, then Jonathan has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Lisa has a university degree, then Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Lisa doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Lisa has a university degree, then Lisa has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. If Margaret has a university degree, then Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain.
2. Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following facts:
1. Margaret doesn't have a university degree from a university in spain.
2. If Margaret has a university degree, then Margaret has a university degree from a university in spain.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a university degree.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., is the conclusion valid?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a car, then Tim has a house.
2. Tim doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a car, then Elizabeth has a house.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a car, then Gerald has a house.
2. Gerald doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a car, then Jonathan has a house.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Lisa has a car, then Lisa has a house.
2. Lisa doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Lisa doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Margaret has a car, then Margaret has a house.
2. Margaret doesn't have a house.
Conclusion: Therefore, Margaret doesn't have a car.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Tim has a flat screen TV, then Tim has a TV.
2. Tim doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tim doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Elizabeth has a flat screen TV, then Elizabeth has a TV.
2. Elizabeth doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Elizabeth doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Gerald has a flat screen TV, then Gerald has a TV.
2. Gerald doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Gerald doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer:


prompt:
Consider the following statements:
1. If Jonathan has a flat screen TV, then Jonathan has a TV.
2. Jonathan doesn't have a TV.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jonathan doesn't have a flat screen TV.

Question: Based on statements 1. and 2., Is the conclusion correct?

Answer: