Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Francesco Capuano
commited on
Commit
·
1a48c91
1
Parent(s):
006f8db
add: app demo
Browse files- app.py +239 -0
- copy.md +109 -0
- requirements.txt +8 -0
app.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
import matplotlib
|
| 2 |
+
matplotlib.use('Agg')
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
import gradio as gr
|
| 5 |
+
import gymnasium as gym
|
| 6 |
+
from stable_baselines3 import SAC
|
| 7 |
+
from stable_baselines3.common.vec_env import VecFrameStack, DummyVecEnv
|
| 8 |
+
import os
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
import gym_laser # Registers env name for gym.make()
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
# Pre-trained model configurations (TODO: add models by hosting them on huggingface)
|
| 15 |
+
PRETRAINED_MODELS = {
|
| 16 |
+
"Random Policy": None,
|
| 17 |
+
"Upload Custom Model": "upload",
|
| 18 |
+
"SAC-UDR(1.5,2.5)": "sac-udr-narrow",
|
| 19 |
+
"SAC-UDR(1.0,9.0)": "sac-udr-wide-extra",
|
| 20 |
+
}
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
MAX_STEPS = 100_000 # large number for continuous simulation
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
def get_model_path(model_id):
|
| 25 |
+
"""Get the path to a pre-trained model."""
|
| 26 |
+
return f"pretrained-policies/{model_id}.zip"
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
def load_pretrained_model(model_id):
|
| 30 |
+
"""Load a pre-trained model."""
|
| 31 |
+
model = hf_hub_download(
|
| 32 |
+
repo_id=f"fracapuano/{model_id}", filename=f"{model_id}.zip"
|
| 33 |
+
)
|
| 34 |
+
return SAC.load(model)
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
def make_env_fn():
|
| 38 |
+
"""Helper function to create a single environment instance."""
|
| 39 |
+
return gym.make("LaserEnv", render_mode="rgb_array")
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
def initialize_environment():
|
| 43 |
+
"""Initializes the environment on app load."""
|
| 44 |
+
try:
|
| 45 |
+
env = DummyVecEnv([make_env_fn])
|
| 46 |
+
env = VecFrameStack(env, n_stack=5)
|
| 47 |
+
obs = env.reset()
|
| 48 |
+
state = {
|
| 49 |
+
"env": env,
|
| 50 |
+
"obs": obs,
|
| 51 |
+
"model": None,
|
| 52 |
+
"step_num": 0,
|
| 53 |
+
"current_b_integral": 2.0, # Store current B-integral in state
|
| 54 |
+
"model_filename": "Random Policy" # Default model name
|
| 55 |
+
}
|
| 56 |
+
return state
|
| 57 |
+
except Exception as e:
|
| 58 |
+
return None, f"Error: {e}"
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
def load_selected_model(state, model_selection, uploaded_file):
|
| 62 |
+
"""Loads a model based on selection (pre-trained or uploaded)."""
|
| 63 |
+
if state is None:
|
| 64 |
+
return state, gr.update()
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
try:
|
| 67 |
+
if model_selection == "Random Policy":
|
| 68 |
+
state["model"] = None
|
| 69 |
+
state["model_filename"] = "Random Policy"
|
| 70 |
+
state["obs"] = state["env"].reset()
|
| 71 |
+
state["step_num"] = 0
|
| 72 |
+
return state, gr.update()
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
elif model_selection == "Upload Custom Model":
|
| 75 |
+
if uploaded_file is None:
|
| 76 |
+
return state, "Please upload a model file.", gr.update()
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
model_filename = uploaded_file.name.split('/')[-1]
|
| 79 |
+
state["model"] = SAC.load(uploaded_file.name)
|
| 80 |
+
state["model_filename"] = model_filename
|
| 81 |
+
state["obs"] = state["env"].reset()
|
| 82 |
+
state["step_num"] = 0
|
| 83 |
+
return state, gr.update()
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
else:
|
| 86 |
+
model_id = PRETRAINED_MODELS[model_selection]
|
| 87 |
+
model = load_pretrained_model(model_id)
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
state["model"] = model
|
| 90 |
+
state["model_filename"] = model_selection
|
| 91 |
+
state["obs"] = state["env"].reset()
|
| 92 |
+
state["step_num"] = 0
|
| 93 |
+
return state, gr.update()
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
except Exception as e:
|
| 96 |
+
return state, f"Error loading model: {e}", gr.update()
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
def update_b_integral(state, b_integral):
|
| 99 |
+
"""Updates the B-integral value in the state without restarting simulation."""
|
| 100 |
+
if state is not None:
|
| 101 |
+
state["current_b_integral"] = b_integral
|
| 102 |
+
return state
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
def run_continuous_simulation(state):
|
| 106 |
+
"""Runs the simulation continuously, using the current B-integral from state."""
|
| 107 |
+
if not state or "env" not in state:
|
| 108 |
+
yield state, None, "Environment not ready."
|
| 109 |
+
return
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
env = state["env"]
|
| 112 |
+
obs = state["obs"]
|
| 113 |
+
step_num = state.get("step_num", 0)
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
# Run for a large number of steps to simulate "always-on"
|
| 116 |
+
for i in range(MAX_STEPS):
|
| 117 |
+
model = state.get("model")
|
| 118 |
+
model_filename = state.get("model_filename", "Random Policy")
|
| 119 |
+
current_b = state.get("current_b_integral", 2.0)
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
# Apply the current B-integral value from state
|
| 122 |
+
env.envs[0].unwrapped.laser.B = float(current_b)
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
if model:
|
| 125 |
+
action, _ = model.predict(obs, deterministic=True)
|
| 126 |
+
else:
|
| 127 |
+
action = env.action_space.sample().reshape(1, -1)
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
obs, _, done, _ = env.step(action)
|
| 130 |
+
frame = env.render()
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
if done[0]:
|
| 133 |
+
obs = env.reset()
|
| 134 |
+
step_num = 0
|
| 135 |
+
else:
|
| 136 |
+
step_num += 1
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
state["obs"] = obs
|
| 139 |
+
state["step_num"] = step_num
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
yield state, frame
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
with gr.Blocks(css="body {zoom: 90%}") as demo:
|
| 145 |
+
gr.Markdown("# Shaping Laser Pulses with Reinforcement Learning")
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
with gr.Tab("Demo"):
|
| 148 |
+
sim_state = gr.State()
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 151 |
+
b_slider = gr.Slider(
|
| 152 |
+
minimum=0,
|
| 153 |
+
maximum=10,
|
| 154 |
+
step=0.5,
|
| 155 |
+
value=2.0,
|
| 156 |
+
label="B-integral",
|
| 157 |
+
info="Adjust nonlinearity live during simulation.",
|
| 158 |
+
)
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 161 |
+
image_display = gr.Image(label="Environment Render", interactive=False, height=360)
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 164 |
+
with gr.Column():
|
| 165 |
+
model_selector = gr.Dropdown(
|
| 166 |
+
choices=list(PRETRAINED_MODELS.keys()),
|
| 167 |
+
value="Random Policy",
|
| 168 |
+
label="Model Selection",
|
| 169 |
+
info="Choose a pre-trained model or upload your own"
|
| 170 |
+
)
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
with gr.Row():
|
| 173 |
+
with gr.Column(scale=1):
|
| 174 |
+
model_uploader = gr.UploadButton(
|
| 175 |
+
"Upload Model (.zip)",
|
| 176 |
+
file_types=['.zip'],
|
| 177 |
+
elem_id="model-upload",
|
| 178 |
+
visible=False # Initially hidden
|
| 179 |
+
)
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
# Show/hide upload button based on selection
|
| 182 |
+
def update_upload_visibility(selection):
|
| 183 |
+
return gr.update(visible=(selection == "Upload Custom Model"))
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
model_selector.change(
|
| 186 |
+
fn=update_upload_visibility,
|
| 187 |
+
inputs=[model_selector],
|
| 188 |
+
outputs=[model_uploader]
|
| 189 |
+
)
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
# On page load, initialize and start the continuous simulation
|
| 192 |
+
init_event = demo.load(
|
| 193 |
+
fn=initialize_environment,
|
| 194 |
+
inputs=None,
|
| 195 |
+
outputs=[sim_state]
|
| 196 |
+
)
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
continuous_event = init_event.then(
|
| 199 |
+
fn=run_continuous_simulation,
|
| 200 |
+
inputs=[sim_state],
|
| 201 |
+
outputs=[sim_state, image_display]
|
| 202 |
+
)
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
# When model selection changes, load the selected model
|
| 205 |
+
model_change_event = model_selector.change(
|
| 206 |
+
fn=load_selected_model,
|
| 207 |
+
inputs=[sim_state, model_selector, model_uploader],
|
| 208 |
+
outputs=[sim_state, model_uploader],
|
| 209 |
+
cancels=[continuous_event]
|
| 210 |
+
).then(
|
| 211 |
+
fn=run_continuous_simulation,
|
| 212 |
+
inputs=[sim_state],
|
| 213 |
+
outputs=[sim_state, image_display]
|
| 214 |
+
)
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
# When a custom model is uploaded, load it
|
| 217 |
+
model_upload_event = model_uploader.upload(
|
| 218 |
+
fn=load_selected_model,
|
| 219 |
+
inputs=[sim_state, model_selector, model_uploader],
|
| 220 |
+
outputs=[sim_state, model_uploader],
|
| 221 |
+
cancels=[continuous_event]
|
| 222 |
+
).then(
|
| 223 |
+
fn=run_continuous_simulation,
|
| 224 |
+
inputs=[sim_state],
|
| 225 |
+
outputs=[sim_state, image_display]
|
| 226 |
+
)
|
| 227 |
+
|
| 228 |
+
# When B-integral slider changes, just update the value in state (no restart needed)
|
| 229 |
+
b_slider.change(
|
| 230 |
+
fn=update_b_integral,
|
| 231 |
+
inputs=[sim_state, b_slider],
|
| 232 |
+
outputs=[sim_state]
|
| 233 |
+
)
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
with gr.Tab("About"):
|
| 236 |
+
with open("copy.md", "r") as f:
|
| 237 |
+
gr.Markdown(f.read())
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
demo.launch()
|
copy.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Table of Contents
|
| 2 |
+
- [TL;DR](#tl-dr)
|
| 3 |
+
- [Shaping Laser Pulses](#shaping-laser-pulses)
|
| 4 |
+
- [Automated approaches](#automated-approaches)
|
| 5 |
+
- [BO's limitations](#bos-limitations)
|
| 6 |
+
- [RL to the rescue](#rl-to-the-rescue)
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
## TL; DR:
|
| 10 |
+
We train a Reinforcement Learning agent to **optimally shape laser pulses** from readily-available diagnostics images, across a range of dynamics parameters for intensity maximization.
|
| 11 |
+
Our method **(1) completely bypasses imprecise reconstructions** of ultra-fast laser pulses, **(2) can learn to be robust to varying dynamics** and **(3) prevents erratic behavior** at test-time by training in coarse simulation only.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 14 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/Figure1_and_CPA.png" alt="Phase changes animation">
|
| 15 |
+
<p> (A) Schematic representation of the RL pipeline for pulse shaping in HPL systems. (B) Illustration of the process of linear and non-linear phase accumulation taking place along the pump-chain of laser systems.</p>
|
| 16 |
+
</div>
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
By opportunely controlling the phase imposed at the stretcher, one can benefit from both energy and duration gains, for maximal peak intensity.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
---
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
## Shaping Laser Pulses
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
Ultra-fast light-matter interactions, such as laser-plasma physics and nonlinear optics, require precise shaping of the temporal pulse profile.
|
| 25 |
+
Optimizing such profiles is one of the most critical tasks to establish control over these interactions.
|
| 26 |
+
Typically, the highest intensities conveyed by laser pulses can usually be achieved by compressing a pulse to its transform-limited (TL) pulse shape, while some interactions may require arbitrary temporal shapes different from the TL profile (mainly to protect the system from potential damage).
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 30 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/phase.gif" alt="Phase changes animation">
|
| 31 |
+
<p>Changes in the spectral phase applied on the input spectrum (left) have a direct impact on the temporal profile (right).</p>
|
| 32 |
+
</div>
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
In this work, we shape laser pulses by varying the GDD, TOD and FOD coefficients, effectively tuning the spectral phase applied to minimize temporal pulse duration.
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
<!-- add link to space demo -->
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Automated approaches
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
The most common automated laser pulse shape optimization approaches mainly employ black-box algorithms, such as Bayesian Optimization (BO) and Evolutionary Strategies (ES). These algorithms are typically used in a closed feedback loop between the pulse shaper and various measurement devices.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
For pulse duration minimization, numerical methods including BO and ES require precise temporal shape reconstruction, to measure the loss against a target temporal profile, or obtain derived metrics such as duration at full-width half-max, or peak intensity value.
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
Recently, approaches based on BO have gained popularity because of their broad applicability and sample efficiency over ES, often requiring a fraction of the function evaluations to obtain comparable performance.
|
| 45 |
+
Indeed, in automated pulse shaping, each function evaluation requires one (or more) real-world laser bursts. Therefore, methods that directly optimize real-world operational hardware are evaluated based on their efficiency in terms of number of the required interactions.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
### BO's limitations
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
While effective, BO suffers from limitations related to (1) the need to perform precise pulse reconstruction (2) machine-safety and (3) transferability. To a large extent, these limitations are only more significant for other methods such as ES.
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
#### 1. Imprecise pulse reconstruction
|
| 52 |
+
BO requires accurate measurements of the current pulse shape to guide optimization. However, real-world pulse reconstruction techniques can be **noisy or imprecise**, leading to poor state estimation, and increasingly high risk of applying suboptimal controls.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 55 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/reconstructing_frog.png" alt="Phase changes animation" width="70%">
|
| 56 |
+
<p>Temporal profiles with temporal-domain reconstructed phase (top) versus diagnostic measures of the burst status (bottom), in the form of FROG traces. Image source: Zahavy et al., 2018.</p>
|
| 57 |
+
</div>
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
#### 2. Dependancy on the dynamics
|
| 60 |
+
BO typically optimizes for specific system parameters and **doesn't generalize well when laser dynamics change**. Each new experimental setup or parameter regime may require re-optimizing the process from scratch!
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
This follows from standard BO optimizing a typically-scalar loss function under stationarity assumptions, which can prove rather problematic in the context of pulse-shaping. This follows from the fact day-to-day changes in the experimental setup can quite reasonably result in non-stationarity: **the same control, when applied in different experimental conditions, can yield significantly different results**.
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 65 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/B_integral.png" alt="Phase changes animation" width="70%">
|
| 66 |
+
<p>Impact of experimental conditions only, in this case a non-linearity parameter known as "B-integral", on the end-result of applying the same control.</p>
|
| 67 |
+
</div>
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
#### 3. Erratic exploration
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
BO can endanger the system by applying **abrupt controls at initialization**. Controls are applied as temperature gradients applied on a gated-optical fiber, and as such successive controls cannot typically vary significantly because the one-step difference in temperature difference cannot vary arbitrarily.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
<div align="center" style="display: flex; justify-content: center; gap: 20px;">
|
| 74 |
+
<div>
|
| 75 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/pulses_anim.gif" alt="BO temporal profile">
|
| 76 |
+
</div>
|
| 77 |
+
<div>
|
| 78 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/control_anim.gif" alt="BO exploration">
|
| 79 |
+
</div>
|
| 80 |
+
</div>
|
| 81 |
+
<p>BO, (left) temporal profile obtained probing points from the parameters space and (right) BO, evolution of the probed points as the parameters space is explored.</p>
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
## RL to the rescue
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
In this work, we address all these limitations by **(1) learning policies directly from readily-available images**, capable of **(2) working across varying dynamics**, and **(3) trained in coarse simulation to prevent erratic-behavior** at test time.
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
First, (1) we train our RL agent directly from readily available diagnostic measurements in the form of 64x64 images. This means we can **entirely bypass the reconstruction noise** arising from numerical methods for temporal pulse-shape reconstruction, learning straight from single-channel images.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 90 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/Figure1.png" width="50%">
|
| 91 |
+
<p>Control is applied directly from images, thus learning to adjust to unmodeled changes in the environment. </p>
|
| 92 |
+
</div>
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
Further, (2) by training on diverse scenarios, RL can develop both **safe and general control strategies** adaptive to a range of different dynamics. In turn, this allows to run and lively update control policies across experimental conditions.
|
| 95 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 96 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/udr_vs_doraemon_average.png" width="50%">
|
| 97 |
+
<p>We can retain high level of performance (>70%) even for larger---above 5, fictional---levels of non-linearity in the systems. This shows we can retain performance by applying a proper randomization technique.</p>
|
| 98 |
+
</div>
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
Lastly, (3) by learning in a corse simulation, we can **drastically limit the number of interactions at test time**, preventing erratic behavior which would endanger system's safety.
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 103 |
+
<img src="https://huggingface.co/datasets/fracapuano/rlaser-assets/resolve/main/assets/machinesafety.png" width="50%">
|
| 104 |
+
<p> Controls applied (BO vs RL). As it samples from an iteratively-refined surrogate model of the objective function, BO explores much more erratically than RL.</p>
|
| 105 |
+
</div>
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
In conclusion, we demonstrate that deep reinforcement learning can master laser pulse shaping by learning **robust policies from raw diagnostics**, paving the way towards **autonomous control of complex physical systems**.
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
If you're interested in learning more, check out [our latest paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2503.00499), our [simulator's code](https://github.com/fracapuano/gym-laser), and try out the [live demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/fracapuano/RLaser).
|
requirements.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
--extra-index-url https://test.pypi.org/simple/
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
gradio==5.38.0
|
| 4 |
+
gym_laser==0.1.0
|
| 5 |
+
gymnasium==1.0.0
|
| 6 |
+
huggingface_hub==0.33.4
|
| 7 |
+
matplotlib==3.10.3
|
| 8 |
+
stable_baselines3==2.5.0
|