 Humanities (CPCI-SSH) (Van Leeuwen, 2006). Based on the above method, 445 publications of BJRBE are found from WoS between 2006 and 2018.

Types of BJRBE publications
As shown in Figure 1, all the papers of BJRBE are divided into six types based on the analytic results on the WoS database. Notably, the type of articles takes up a significant proportion. Moreover, nine papers belong to edition material, and eight papers are classified as proceedings paper. In addition, biographical item, news item and review, each of them only has one article as reported by the searching results.  In terms of the details of the citations of BJRBE, Table 3 is presented with the information about the total citations (TC), the total publications (TP) and the average citations per paper (AC). "No less than 50", "no less than 20", "no less than 10", "no less than 5", and "no less than 1" are different intervals of publication numbers. Besides, Hirsch (2005)   proposed H-index. It accurately reflects and evaluates academic achievement. A high H-index indicates that the corresponding publication has significant academic progress. It is found that the publications in 2008 have the maximum H-index, and the highest TC, hence those papers published in 2008 have great scientific achievements. Through observing the data of AC, the papers published in 2009 have more average citations per paper with 11.96. Based on the data collecting from the WoS database, there are only three papers have cited more than 50 times. One is a paper by Zavadskas, Kaklauskas, Peldschus, & Turskis (2007) "Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method" and it has the most citations with 75. This paper utilized the COPRAS method to evaluate multi-attribute decision support for road design alternatives. Another one is "Analysis and evaluation of possibilities for the use of warm-mix asphalt in Lithuania" (Vaitkus, Čygas, Laurinavičius, & Perveneckas, 2009)  producing warm mix asphalt, and for all the techniques. It also depicted the advantages and disadvantages. The last one is by Zavadskas, Liias, & Turskis (2008) "Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: state-of-the-art surveys". They are summarizing that in term of bridge and road construction and multi-attribute decision-making methods are significantly useful for it. Compared to the three papers, it is found that Zavadskas wrote two of them, and they are all related to the multi-attribute method. The latest article is "Evaluation of real-time intelligent sensors for structural health monitoring of bridges based on SWARA-WASPAS: a case in Iran" (Bitarafan, Zolfani, Arefi, Zavadskas, & Mahmoudzadeh, 2014). It used the method based on SWARA and WASPAS to concentrate on the research of real-time health monitoring system of Iran bridges. There are 75.38% of the publications cited more than one time, while 35.82% of them are cited even more than five times. Moreover, the TC and AC values after 2012 are less. More details about the influential papers published in BJRBE are illustrated and analysed in the next section.

Influential contributors on the aspects of papers, countries, and institutions
To comprehensively understand the status of BJRBE, the influential contributors from the most cited papers to the most productive institutions are listed and analysed. From Table 4, the frequently cited 30 papers are presented to show the articles made significant theoretical and practical contributions. Similarly, the influential countries and the country co-authorship network, the active institutions and the organization citation network, the productive author and the author co-authorship network, and the co-citation network of authors are analysed in detail to provide a general picture of the status quo the research outputs and environment of this journal. Table 4 shows the top 30 highly cited publications in BJRBE. All the 30 papers were published before 2014, and it means that the papers published in that period are relatively more influential. In the top 30 highly cited publications in BJRBE, the author Sivilevičius appears for four times. His most cited paper, "Quality attributes and complex assessment methodology of the asphalt mixing plant" (Sivilevičius, Zavadskas, & Turskis, 2008) put a kind of multi-attribute model for evaluating the efficient quality of the Asphalt Mixing Plants and proposed a case study.  Table 5 lists the top productive10 countries. From Table 5, it is evident that Lithuania makes significant contributions to the development of BJRBE. It has the highest TP, TC and H-index. As for the research outputs that are from Lithuania, there are 12 papers obtained more than 20 citations, and 23 papers have more than 15 citations, they are far more than other countries. Following with Lithuania, Poland is in the second place. Although Estonia has only published 20 papers, its AC is the maximum. It means its 20 articles have significantly impacted on the further investigations.
Moreover, among the ten countries, six of them are in Europe. Thus, more European countries published papers in BJRBE. The following is Asia. Figure 4 is presented to show the connections among the countries made significant contributions to the research of this journal.
As shown in Figure 4, the threshold value is set as 8, and 13 of the countries meet the thresholds. The set of the most extensive collection of connected to 11 countries is shown. It is a country co-authorship network of the BJRBE publications. Lithuania is the main contributor to this journal. In the thresholds, Lithuania has eight links, and its total link strength is 28. Therefore, Lithuania has the most frequent connections with other countries. Lithuania and Iran have the maximum link strength of 4, and it means the scholars from Lithuania and Iran    Table 6 lists the top 5 productive and influential institutions in BJRBE. As the three served organizations, the Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, the Riga Technical University, and the Tallinn University of Technology have the most TP, TC and H-index. Nevertheless, the University of Naples Federico II has the most AC with 9. As a result, although the University of Naples Federico II has lower TP among the five institutions, its AC is the highest. The articles owned by OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING 2 02 0/ 1 5 ( 2 ) this university are relatively less shown in BJRBE than other institutions, but each of them is influential. Moreover, a more intuitionistic organization citation network of the articles published by BJRBE is found in Figure 5. The threshold value is set as 5, and 15 of the organizations meet the thresholds. Every organization is presented as a node. An organization is presented as a significant node if it has numerous publications. Additionally, Vilnius Gediminas is the most distinguished organization. Furthermore, Figure 6 reveals that the organization co-authorship network of the BJRBE publications, the co-authorship network directly describes the collaboration among the influential authors in different organizations. In the same way, the organization citation network indicates the connections among the various organizations, and it makes a significant contribution to this area. Also, the lines and distance represent the mutual relationship between the two organizations. If two organizations have a shorter line and closer distance, it means that they have a better relationship. Figure 6 is a visualization of the organization co-authorship network of the BJRBE publications. The threshold value is set as 5, and 15 of the organizations  The author collaboration network is presented in Figure 7. The threshold value is set as 6, and 28 of all the 884 authors meet the thresholds. Čygas has 12 collaborations with other authors in this threshold, including Norkus, Aavik, Vaitkus, Žilionienė, Laurinavičius. There is the most link strength with nine between Čygas and Laurinavičius, so they have closer cooperation with each other. From Figure 8, It is known that Žilionienė, Vaitkus and Laurinavičius have much collaboration with other authors. Table 7 puts the top 11 productive authors in BJRBE. There are four authors have above 20 publications from 2006 to 2018, they are Laurinavičius, Vaitkus, Čygas and Žilionienė, as well as, it is found that they are all the editors of BJRBE. It is known that Laurinavičius is the most productive author who has 28 publications between 2006 and 2018, occupying the proportion of 6.15% in the 455 publications. And then, all the top 11 active authors have published more than eight among 13 years. Notably, the top 11 productive authors published 164 papers that account for 36.04% of  A visualization of the author co-citation network shows the co-citation relationship to the authors in the area. Figure 8 demonstrates the co-citation network of the authors cited by the BJRBE publications. Based on the analytic results given by VOSviewer, there are 5641 authors have been cited by the BJRBE publications. The threshold value is set as 17, 20 authors meet the threshold. From Figure 8, different clusters are classified into different colours, the distance and the thickness of the line present an equal relevance to the authors, and every node represents an author. For example, the line of Sivilevičius & Zavad