 them all the best in their new positions and hope they will keep in touch! We are delighted to welcome five new members of staff on board:
Richard Erwin-Jones—Arts Manager
Following a career change away from Project Management in a US Bank, Richard gained over 10 years’ experience of Arts Management in the East Midlands. This has included roles in: Resource Development for Arts Council England; Communications for Nottingham Arts Theatre, Nottinghamshire County Council and Curve Theatre; leading the Creative Regeneration Programme for Groundwork East Midlands and more recently Project Manager at Cultivate; the East Midland’s Audience and Organisational development agency.
Elizabeth Bergeron—Arts Engagement Worker, leading on Past Inspired and Community Events
Elizabeth is originally from the other Boston, but spent some time studying in the UK and basically never left. With a background in museums, she is especially looking forward to working with local heritage professionals for the Past Inspired strand.
Kate Thomas—Arts Engagement Worker, leading on Pop Up and DIY
Kate studied contemporary dance at The University of Lincoln. After graduating, she successfully secured an Internship with contemporary dance company Made by Katie Green. Kate is the newest member of the Transported team and started in January 2014.
Lauren Williams—Arts Engagement Worker, leading on Creative Consultation and On Your Doorstep
Lauren is a local girl having lived in Lincolnshire all her life. Last year she graduated from Bishop Grosseteste University with a degree in Drama in the Community and has previously studied dance for a few years with a passion for musical theatre.
Penny Milnes—Administrator
Penny started working for Transported in January. Although she doesn’t have a background in the Arts, she does have lots of experience working for local businesses and the community in Boston and South Holland. She is very excited to be working with such a professional and dedicated team!
For contact details for all of the Transported team, visit or call 01406 701006.&gt;Scientists make their money by pumping out studies like this.

How does this suggest they altered the data? Do you have evidence of some widespread problem of scientists performing bad science, or altering results, to make money? Aside from instances in which there is a third party encouraging them to do so for ulterior motives?

Where did you get the idea that scientists pump out bad studies for money? Did you make it up, or did someone tell you that?

&gt;The study used two people practicing batting? You would need hundreds to make it legit. If I need to explain why, I’m not interested in talking to you

There is no study about two people batting. It was a hypothetical example of two training methods, not a reference to some actual experiment that was conducted.

Take this as an opportunity for self-reflection. You made an argument that was entirely based on you not actually reading the post.Introduction to the Loitering Munition.
A loitering munition (LM), as a new type of the precision-guided munitions, a weapon class between cruise missiles and unmanned combat aerial vehicles UCAVs. This Type of Kamikaze Drones have similitries of both. In the cruise period, the LM conducts flight and mission target search in the form of a UAV, but in the launch section and the final guidance attack period, the LM switch mode as a missile. At launch, the original folded wings are unfolded, and the aircraft is transformed from projectile to drone form, and then the configuration of the loitering munitions does not change again after the conversion of the machine finished Therefore, it is a challenge for a LM to adapt to the control requirements of different mission phases under the same aerodynamic shape. This typical working process for a loitering munition includes pneumatic launch, loitering and gathering intelligence, locking on target, aborting mission, or precise attack.
Traditional precision guided munitions include various types of guided missile, guided bomb, guided projectile, and cruise missile etc. The design of the propulsion system and guidance control system makes important positions in the system design, but they are kept independent as usual. The main goal of propulsion design is to achieve effective range and reach the final flight speed to meet the requirements of the attack mission. For example, the antitank missile uses a rocket engine as the propulsion to fly at high speed, and its main speed schemes include the following three types: boost, glide flight, boost, acceleration cruising, glide flight, and acceleration boost, constant velocity, boostcruising flight. A propulsion map and speed of typical high-speed kinetic energy antitank missile, and in general, while designing the guidance algorithms, it will be assumed that the flight speed is constant, especially at the terminal guidance phase, or the flight speed is time varying passively affected by gravity, propulsion, and aerodynamic forces.
At the same time, the research of speed is mainly focused on the cruise flight process or is considered as a terminal constraint at some special flight mission, for example, a rendezvous mission to a tanker. Because the pneumatic layout and aerodynamic characteristics of LMs are closer to UAV than to missiles it is unreasonable to assume that the speed is constant or ignore the dynamic adjustable characteristics of speed just like a traditional precision-guided munition in designing the guidance and control algorithms in the terminal guidance phase. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out research on the speed scheme at the terminal attack stage for a LM. This is concerned with the problem of designing speed-trajectory characteristics of the LM within the attack phase. First of all, the speed requirement of guidance and control design in the LM’s precision attacking process is concerned. Then, a speed scheme is proposed to improve the accuracy of a LM strike. In the following sections, the boundary condition for the establishment of the scheme is Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
When users launch the loitering munition, wings provide lift in the air and the propeller provides thrust for the loitering munition to cruise over the target area.
Analysis of Loitering Munition Launch Environment.
real-time precise weapons for small-scale ground troops, which improves the security of the soldiers and effectively reduces the number of casualties. Some loitering munition is more complex, which used the folding inflatable wing to fly. However, when users launch the loitering munitions, the battlefield environment is very complex, such as mountains, forests, canyons, towns, rivers. Complex terrain in the battlefield environment makes it more difficult for the climbing of loitering munitions. Wind direction and speed will also make loitering munitions’ launch more and more difficult. If in the process of climbing, the loitering munition has crashed onto obstacles such as trees, mountains, buildings, the users will lose one shot.
Based on technology of computer simulation, virtual battlefield environment can be established. In different virtual battles, users can be trained to adapt to complex battlefield environment. In the training process, operators need to analyze the current battlefield terrain, wind direction, wind speed and the characteristics of the target to make reasonable decisions.
while the operator is preparing to launch the loitering munition, the battlefield environment is supposed to be carefully analyzed. If the launch is not allowed, the operator should change the launch angle and position. After launch, operations need to analyze the characteristics of the target area in real time, determine a reasonable search strategy. When the characteristics of target have been analyzed, the operator needs to plan a reasonable attack ballistic to complete the mission.
The below graph shows a possible battlefield environment, when suffered sudden attack from enemies at the ridge, the loitering munition is launched to attack the target. But in this situation, the launch angle must be carefully adjusted fly over the highland before the target. L is the distance between the highland and launch position. H1 and H2, represents the two positions’ height, which are most likely to hit obstacles in this trajectory.
Flight Program and Trajectory Optimization.
munition is established, ignoring the rotation of the earth. It is supposed that the launch speed of the loitering munition is 30 m/s. The distance L between the launch position and highland in figure 4 is 40m.
optimal = 32.8.
safe H = 26.3480m.
The optimal ballistic, height and Mach along with the change of time are, the slope angle of velocity changing with time.
In order to introduce the speed scheme clearly, only the longitudinal motion of a LM has been discussed. The force analysis of a LM is, and the homing guidance geometry of missile-target engagement of the flight process. L is the lift force (aerodynamic force along z direction), D is the drag force (aerodynamic force along x direction), T is the thrust of engine, m is the mass of LM, g is the gravitational acceleration, and θ is the pitch angle Eulerangle along y axis of LM. R is the instantaneous separation between LM and target, V is the speed of the loitering munition in x direction in body-coordinate, VΓ is the speed of the loitering munition in z direction in body-coordinate, η is the angle made by the line of sight with respect to the fixed reference, and q is the pitch rate angular rate along y axis. Assume that VΓ is small and θ is close to η, and the thrust T is assumed to act through the LM centroid and along the x axis. Then, from the engagement geometry and the force analysis of the aircraft.
a speed scheme for loitering munitions has been given for precision strike mission. The pitch angle boundary of the solution during attack was given, and the