 adult Vortex combos. These skis are perfect for getting pre-teen to early teenage skiers up and out of the water and skiing like legends! They work great for lighter adults, too. The 54″ Jr. Vortex offers the extra surface area that works so well on the adult Vortex, but in a smaller, more maneuverable size for younger and lighter skiers.
Weight Range Up to 140 lbs.I agree with all except Larry Fitzgerald. The guy is the model of consistency. You can expect a top 7 WR finish every year. While other guys may have more upside (due to having better QBs), you know what you are getting with Fitzy. The reason AP was generally the consensus top pick the past couple of years was because you knew he was going to finish top 5 in RBs. I may be incorrect but he never finished #1 overall yet he was pretty much always the #1 pick because you knew he was going to have a good year.Sextant blocking isn't a thing anymore, at least not the type where you sextant block 10 maps in advance. Besides that, just use them as you go if you want, but I'd suggest selling them unless you are running specific map (burial chambers, T15-T16), which you usually want to roll good sextants. [Heres a list of sextant rankings](http://poewizard.com/SextantData.php) where green is good, yellow is okay, and red is bad. The basic gist of it is, anything that will add more mobs/chance to drop stuff is good, anything that doesn't do that is bad.

To use them roll them in order from value from White &gt; Yellow &gt; Red, then reroll them until good in order of Red &gt; Yellow &gt; White. Reason being is that if a white sextant rolls bad, it will block that bad sextant from appearing in higher value sextants like the Yellows and Reds.Our COVID-19 Discussion + Q&A webinar will focus on the recently passed Families First Coronavirus Response Act. We'll answer your questions about the act and what it means for your business and employees.
Our mission is simple: to provide exceptional service. We accomplish this through an unwavering commitment to integrity, technology, and, above all, our people. Our people-first attitude and work ethic are reflected in everything we do.
Our promise is to make employment easier. If you’re a small business owner, HR manager, or employee, we want your day at work to be better and more manageable. This lofty goal is our guiding light, and it’s the solution we strive to provide.
Chances are, your company started much like Nextep did: small in size but big on passion and ideas. We know firsthand the struggles of making a business work, as well as the unique challenges in realizing success and growth. We’re here to help.<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: Liquidsoap memory leak?
username_0: Hi!
First of all: Thank you so very much for this project! I'm writing a similar, yet waaaayyyy less advanced tool for our station since more than 10 years and seeing azuracast makes me wanna stop development on mine and start helping this project, if I even can..

But first, I need some more help from you.. ;)

I'm currently in the process of transferring all mp3s and our schedule to azuracast. Tried it two time already and it's always looking good at first, but then, "all of a sudden", liquidsoap starts leaking memory.

Azuracast is running in a LXC container, Ansible installation on Ubuntu bionic. Normally, said container has 4GB RAM and 2 CPUs, but I tried increasing RAM to up to 32GB and up to 4 CPUs.
Liquidsoap just eats up all the ram it gets, then starts swapping. Up to 2 more gigs. Never more, but it keeps reading/writing these 2 gigs constantly.

I do have a pretty large media library (500Gigs. More than half of it are archive recordings of 1 or 2 hours length, the rest are single tracks.).
In my first try, I just added everything: All the files, all the playlists, all the schedule. Most of the schedule was using Azura for management, some had the special attributes "Play only one track" and "Stop previous track to start on time" (Sorry, I'm translating back from the german version, here.. ;) ) so management was done by liquidsoap itself.
Everything looked fine until I restarted the container, then the leakage began.

I had to completely remove ALL the playlists and schedule to make the leakage stop.

Next time, I didn't use these special attributes, so all the playlists were managed by Azuracast. I also did little steps, rebooting the container every 10 playlists created and waiting for it to bail out. It didn't.
Last step was adding replays from the archive to the schedule, which, at first, also worked just fine, even after rebooting. But then again, "all of a sudden" (I don't think, but am not 100% sure, it corresponds with the cronjobs..) it started leaking memory again.
So I removed the archive playlists again, but it doesn't stop.
Looks, like I have to remove EVERYTHING first, again.

I didn't, yet, instead I tried some more steps: Editing the liquidsoap.liq file to not look for these playlists anymore (it didn't get updated automatically) - nothing. Clearing chache, reprocessing all mediafiles (took all night..) - still nothing.
I have to stop station_1:station_1_backend via supervisorctl for this, otherwise, the container is too ocupied with swapping..

I've attached all log files asked, but trunkated some to a reasonable size. If you need the complete logs (8MB), just tell me... Also included my liquidsoap.liq, renamed to.txt, so github accepts the upload..
The Liquidsoap log stops the moment, the leakage begins. No logs from when leaking. The errors at the end are me trying to delete the liquidsoap.liq config for making azuracast recreate it. It didn't, so I copied it back and removed the archive playlists manually.
Running strace on the liquidsoap process doesn't give me anything, but this, every few minutes:
`mmap(NULL, 737374208, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fa6d2da3000`

I do understand, you're not the developer of liquidsoap and maybe can't help, but you're my first try, since you're the developer of the program, I'm actually using.. ;) Maybe, you could at least give me some hints, how to continue my investigation..

Cheers and thanks in advance,
  Philipp

[liquidsoap.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803237/liquidsoap.log)
[php_errors.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803238/php_errors.log)
[redis-server.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803239/redis-server.log)
[supervisord.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803240/supervisord.log)
[access.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803241/access.log)
[app.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803242/app.log)
[error.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803243/error.log)
[icecast.log](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803244/icecast.log)
[liquidsoap.txt](https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/files/4803246/liquidsoap.txt)
<issue_comment>username_1: @username_0 Unfortunately, I don't develop or have anything to do with the development of Liquidsoap. It's just another dependency that our software integrates together into a web radio management suite.

If there is a memory leak issue with it, I would encourage you to submit your generated Liquidsoap configuration (along with any errors) to the Liquidsoap team directly through their repository: https://github.com/savonet/liquidsoap/issues
<issue_comment>username_2: https://github.com/AzuraCast/AzuraCast/issues/2811
<issue_comment>username_2: The fix has been identified here: savonet/liquidsoap#1272 as an exponential increase in the list of sub-clocks associated with a given unknown clock.
<issue_comment>username_1: @username_0 AzuraCast has finished building an updated stations image with this update pulled from the 1.4.