 auto-erotic asphyxiation. Because reasons. But they didn’t, so it wasn’t a murder. QED. Moron or lunatic? http://sorbusaucuparius.blogspot.com/2012/08/umberto-ecos-four-types-of-idiot.html Hint: no reference (above) to the Templars. But seriously, if evidence of a struggle emerges, such as injuries to the hands, fingernails etc, then the probability space will have to be reallocated. Jeffrey Dahmer and John Geoghan were murdered in prison, but neither death was confused with suicide. As it is, suicide is the most likely explanation for the facts we have.
Watch what Michael Palin does: He actually travels east instead of west, but no matter, just assume he walked west instead. It looks like the circle he's walking in is about 20 feet in circumference, so let's assume it's precisely 20 feet. If, to satisfy step 2, he were to do that walk 264 times (exactly one mile), his end point would be exactly the same degree of longitude as where he started. He could then walk north one mile to satisfy step 3.
Click on your name at the top left of OL. Go to the "do not see messages place" and type in his name. He Really is an ab-whorent psycho. something is really wrong there.

I have one more thing to say, Peter. I have been the subject of rather extreme incivility here at OL on several occasions and I do not recall you saying one word in those cases. If you continue like that - saying nothing when I am viciously attacked, but then waiting until I lose patience with some snippy dolt who can’t visualize or conceptualize or otherwise analyse rolling - then the positive way I see you is going to change.
Same here! Tony, tell us about this one...
Damn, another one.
Ok, that shows her using it as a heuristic herself. So it's kosher. Not too long ago I heard Yaron Brook criticize TAS for ascribing a different "villain" quote to Rand. Someone posted it on OL.
The first step in grasping what is really going on is to grasp that no MSM outlet will ever come out and say what is really going on. Look at their behavior over decades - they are not neutral but are soldiers in a war, Some people are only halfway through this step: they understand that the real answer will not come from MSM, but they still consume a lot of MSM and they subconsciously accept the constructs they consume. But the constructs are utterly false and their acceptance derails any chance at seeing the truth even if they happened upon it. In this case the construct is that the Saudis and Canadians are disputing about Canadian human rights criticism of the Saudis. The Saudis can’t take criticism, so they are going berserk, throwing out diplomats and immediately going to nuclear trade war. A simpleton readily accepts all the above construct because he has met such people. Cashiers at cheap stores, the popcorn guy at the movies - “people like that are everywhere, I know because I’ve met many of them.” The simpleton accepts the construct and then the entire explanation provided. There is really nothing here to investigate or understand, he concludes, just some abusive tyrants who can’t take criticism and are choosing to wreck economies and international relations, instead. The non-simpleton rejects the entire construct. The non-simpleton understands the Saud family have been in power in the most cutthroat part of the world for about one hundred years. They are among the most wealthy and powerful people on the planet. Criticism of them is constant, anyway. The chance that the construct reflects reality is precisely zero. And yet the Saudis do seem to be going hard on the Canadians, as though something very big is happening - so what can we conclude? Something very big is happening.
Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist needs his head examined.
According to Brook they lost a big donor. Rumor is they axes 15 of 50 employees a couple weeks ago.
The left ate my homework.
It must be wonderful to be sure of what is causing the things that are most distressing and inexplicable to many of us. I wish I could believe the dark forces had such superhuman powers of cooperation, efficiency and micro-managing of human affairs, and could categorize everything that happens through the lens of their machinations. But I can't, anymore than I can just believe everything is God's will.
Oooh, 'folks like yourself who see only' blah. This is gibberish to me, Adam. You have no argument, just apparent prejudice. I would ask you to flesh out your gibberish, but I don't think you can. I don't think you can connect your brief angry meta-analysis to facts. Such is bigotry and ignorance and pretension to knowledge. That you cannot seem to understand the horrors of war in Syria that have led to the 'hordes' leaving, there is no rational fruit to discussion with you. As if some unknown-to-you actor has whipped up an invasion. Pitiful prejudice and irrationality to my eyes. This is no good, Tony. You seem uninterested in challenges to the propaganda of the video. So be it. I shouldn't bother with trying to reason along with you as long as you ignore the import of my previous remarks entirely. As you seem to assume "both rates [will] remain steady" in succeeding generations, I can't get purchase on shared cognitive ground... But, maybe this is the crux: you do not know how many children a second-generation French Muslim woman will have. You haven't tried to research this question, instead falling back on'surmises.' That may indicate something important about the way you think on this issue -- in terms of Them, of collectives, of innate Muslim fecundity, a fecundity that cannot be and is not influenced by the societies in which they make their homes. What other facts need? You haven't given any facts. I am wondering if I should file you with Jerry as supporting "They are breeding like flies" and believing the ugly alarmism of ISLAM TAKING OVER EUROPE! This thread should have been lodged in the Garbage Pile, in my opinion. Ignorance, prejudice and bigotry are not what I associate with Objectivist Living.The Center for Civic Leadership (CCL) creates opportunities for students to engage in social issues with partners in the Houston community and beyond. Check out some of our programs below and upcoming events on the "Calendar" tab!
"Participating in a Houston Action Research Team (HART) allowed me to apply civic principles to academic research, something that I feel is very important in our current climate. It allowed me to gain research experience, and has inspired me to pursue elections research during my time at Rice."
"My Alternative Spring Break (ASB) was the first experience I've had at Rice that tied in the pursuit of equity with health. We learned about how housing discrimination impacts human health while doing cost analysis for Avenue CDC, a Houston nonprofit building affordable housing. ASB helped me redefine my approach towards medicine and further center equity in my extracurricular pursuits.
"I helped design and implement a diabetes-focused health education curriculum for elementary school-aged students through the Rich Family Endowment (RFE). This experience helped me confirm a very strong interest I had in health education— something that I hope to incorporate in big ways into my future career as a physician and advocate for health equity."
Houston Policy Challenge (HPC) gave me an opportunity to explore new issue areas and learn, it also taught me how to craft effective and pursuasive policy proposals. I also got to practice presenting to stakeholders and was able to build new relationships with my fellow students through the teamwork required by HPC.
"My engagement with Leadership Rice Mentor Experience (LRME) could not have been more rewarding. Through my internship site, I was able to define my personal values which have dictated several professional and personal decisions since. Through my participation, I have also solidified my upcoming career path, taking all that I have learned from my internship site to best form a social impact organization in the future."
Start your civic journey with REAL planning! REAL planning is a process of reflection and identifying your values and goals to work towards programs, fellowships, and careers. Join our Canvas page to get started!
In the sixth chapter of Acts, we are introduced to a man who will arrest our attention. He will occupy the center stage in the history of the early church and will be known as the man who preached only one sermon, only one time. In chapter 6, we discover the man’s name, which is identified along with six other men. Verse 5 identifies him as “Stephanos,” or translated, “Stephen”. The Greek word “stephanos” means “crown”.
According to verse 6, the apostles said, “We want to make sure to choose men,... of good reputation... In other words, “Choose men with a good name.” They were to find individuals who were known for their purity and integrity in the community. So, they sought these men and came up with, among them, this man, named Stephen. The passage goes on to repeat the same phrase about Stephen five different times.
As a result of this power, Stephen would become the next target of the Sanhedrin. They had been focusing on Peter and John; but now, this new man, “What’s his name? We have never heard of him. Who is he?” “Well