 that the big question in her mind was whether she would be able to play a full game without experiencing concussion symptoms.
As it turned out, Hailey was able to play with her school team at a tournament in Detroit, and then joined Team Manitoba for a tournament in Quebec in December. Everything went well.
"I'm happy it turned out that way because it meant that I was okay," she says.
Next year, Hailey is planning to attend the University of Ottawa on a hockey scholarship.
********
When the Pan Am Concussion Program started, it was common for staff to see patients who were referred with symptoms lasting for six to 12 months or greater.
"We were routinely referred patients with chronic and persistent symptoms," says Ellis.
That has largely stopped as primary-care physicians have become able to more quickly recognize symptoms of concussion and refer patients to the Pan Am Concussion Program sooner. The early diagnosis and treatment translates into better outcomes, says Ellis.
"I believe more patients are being referred to our clinic in the earlier stages of injury, and thus we are able to address some of the causes of their symptoms (exercise intolerance, vestibular and cervical spine dysfunction) earlier and prevent patients from developing persistent symptoms that are associated with a deterioration in mood, school, and social functioning," he says.
The result is the program is seeing a significant decrease in the number of patients who go on to have these chronic symptoms and conditions, including mood disorders.
But difficult cases still come up. A concussion will never be as ho-hum as an ankle sprain. There can be other physical issues that complicate recovery. As Ellis says, there is still much work that needs to be done on concussions in terms of improving techniques for diagnosis and treatment, not to mention better understanding the long-term effects of traumatic brain injuries. And if the last few years are any indication, a lot of that work will be carried out at the Pan Am Concussion Program.
Bill Redekop is a Winnipeg writer.By Jeffrey P. Snider
The fundamentals for crude oil continue to be atrocious. Production remains relatively stable if slightly reduced, which is about the only factor in favor of oil prices since the February 11 low. On the other side of the ledger, you don't hear as much about how it's all oil supply anymore other than the occasional reference to a "glut" that is now recognized for both parts of the imbalance.
The inventory extreme has only become that much more so. It is difficult to state just how much that is the case. For example, in the past 26 weeks, half a year, domestic oil inventory has been drawn down in only four of them. Cumulatively since the week of September 25, 2015, coincident to the more significant turn toward economic weakness more generally, US oil stocks are reported up by a dizzying 78.6 million barrels. In the latest weekly reading for the week of March 18, that rise was more than 9 million barrels.
The only inventory "glut" even close to that was the one that preceded it at the outset of 2015. In other words, two separate, record inventory builds that just happen to have been heralded by two similar sized and timed oil price crashes.
The predictability of domestic production actually precludes the prospect of a supply imbalance driving either the price of oil or the inventorying of it.
This second wave of oil imbalance has flowed into gasoline stocks, too, further registering "something" generally amiss on the economic side of demand. Gasoline inventories have also risen in alarming fashion to record highs.
That leaves none of the fundamentals about oil justifying even the slightest hint of a rebound, save one. That one would be, as always, the "dollar" and in this case the lack of its immediate pressure that has allowed risk junkies to finally chase again. Given the momentum afforded, you can't really blame them.
The WTI futures curve only suggests the same factor, as the front end has flattened considerably since mid-February in the unwinding of liquidation. The back end, however, has only rebounded very slightly; it is the outer years that are more attuned to physical factors while the very front months blow easily about in the "dollar" winds back and forth.
The front part of the curve is as flat (low contango) as it has been in nearly a year, but instead of anchored around $70 or so as was thought then, the entire curve, despite the big move since February, remains below $50! The May 2016 contract (the current front month) is up almost $9 since the lows, but the December 2017 contract has gained less than $4.75.
There would be some positivity to all of this, had global liquidity and general "dollar" indications suggested that global funding was rebounding with risk assets; it is not (subscription required). Every symptom, from credit markets to the eurodollar curve to swap spreads (and basis spreads), still and only proclaims that nothing has changed except the proclivity to sell. The "dollar shortage" is still specified in far too many places, suggesting that now is not an inflection so much as another pause in between the last "run" and the next one likely already set up.
It goes to show how powerful even such a "pause" in "dollar" conditions can be, as despite some of the worst fundamental conditions imaginable, oil prices have managed a sizable retracement back into the $40s - at least at the front end. The back end isn't so enthralled, and why would it be? It has been subject to the "dollar's" gravity for almost two years now, as demonstrated by the two huge inventory builds.Snobby, pretentious, elitist, misleading, wrong, inaccurate… I’m sure there’s more words to describe it. This is based on the title though, as I haven’t actually read the article. So I’m not sure if this is the fault of the Somm or the publication. 

There’s tons of great value wine under $30 and even under $15. Especially in Spanish wine, South some Ian wine, and certain regions of France. Other places too, but those are the first that come to mind. Also, most people aren’t looking for some ethereal, life-changing experience with every bottle of wine. Sometimes people just want to drink something and casually enjoy it. Finally, price doesn’t always equal quality. I mean, sure, if something cost a bit more, there’s a good chance it’ll be better or at least an expectation, but Napa is the perfect example of expensive, overpriced wine, where you can go and get something of similar style and quality for a lower price from France or Spain.So I have been looking at the Social Autopsy FAQ makes me want to face-palm as it sounds like a FAQ from a place like Doxbin.
From the FAQ: “What is a digital footprint? Users submit a screenshot of a person’s hate-fueled social media post, which is then used to create a profile that includes their full name, place of employment, city of residence and schools."

From the FAQ: “How do you discover users real names? Screenshots are submitted anonymously by online friends of that user. Their “friends” of course, know their full names and details."
From the FAQ: “How do I know if I have been added to this database? Check back when we’ve fully launched to search by name or employer."
From the FAQ: “How do you prevent people from using this information to harm others? We do not allow any commenting on our database, and we have disabled the ability to search our database by keywords (e.g homophobia, racism, etc). In other words, you would have to know the individual by first and last name in order to discover them."
Publicly outing on poor or even fake evidence would cause someone alot of harm for something they never did, So what are you saying is that the dox will stay up for at least a year no matter how trueful it is?
But this would make you the judge and jury of what is hate speech meaning that your personal ideals will get in the way to the choices you make, Welcome to 1984 enjoy your stay.
Pretty much this is going to end badly for everyone behind the website.Professor Beverley-Ann Biggs is an infectious disease physician and public health researcher in the Department of Medicine and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service (VIDS). She is recognised internationally for her work on maternal and child health, refugee health, nutrition, and infectious diseases. She is a Chief Investigator on collaborative projects in Vietnam and Bangladesh that are investigating the mechanisms involved in childhood stunting and impaired development, and developing strategies for prevention. She consults for the World Health Organization, including as a member of the Nutrition Guideline Advisory Group. She directs the Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Refugee Health Program, providing support to general practitioners and other health providers, and a specialist outreach program in rural areas for improved health and wellbeing of refugees and asylum seekers.
Beverley-Ann has published extensively in the areas of international and immigrant health and has contributed to World Health Organization Nutrition and Australasian Refugee Health guideline development. The group has had a continuous presence in Vietnam since 1996. She is a member of the Victorian Refugee Health Network, which brings together health providers, non-governmental organisations, and Departments of Health and Immigration to advise on policy and programs. She founded the Refugee Health Program at RMH to provide clinical services support, education, and translational research. She has over 120 publications and has received over $18 million in research and program funding.
What determines stunting and impaired development in Vietnamese children?
This