 DVD price can go to charity, although in DVD has several films, and DVD selling cost is only one or two dollars. Also there is thousands public domain films, that for example Mill Creek Entertainment sell in 50 film or 100 film packs in video compressed DVDs. Instead of normal DVD video compression movie file can be in DVD ROM disc and some more effective and modern (free) video compression can be used, so more films fit in one DVD.
So charity organizations in third world could collect money in third world selling computer software and films, and it would have no negative effect to owner of that copyrighted material. Fanfilms are not allowed to make profit, public domain films are free, feature films put to youtube can be put to DVD also and paid same amount of money that is paid per youtube viewing, and computer software that is either freeware (or copyrighted but distributed for free) or abandonware that will not make profit anyway. But all this material can make money for charity organizations in third world countries.
Memory cards and USB sticks are another method of distribution, but then software / movie piracy is a problem, so cheap DVD discs in cardboard sleeves are then best solution for distribution? Actually Bluray disc manufacturing is almost as cheap as DVD discs, but BD-ROM is not used anymore in computers, not in large scale. So cheap BD-ROM stations in computers are needed? Or simply use DVD ROMs and DVD discs, they are everywhere. Perhaps DVD ROM discs can be coated with “Durabis” coating of Blurays or similar coating to prevent disc damage. There are methods like “iLok” to prevent software / digital material copying.The popular and widely used Voice over IP service Skype has once again been in the news lately with a spate of new allegations suggesting that its flimsy account recovery policy is presenting hackers and hijackers a like with ample opportunities to maliciously gain access to many Skype accounts from its large and ever expanding user base of approx 700 million users worldwide.
Skype was released back in 2003, produced by Estonian developers. The service accommodates users to communicate with friends, family and colleagues by using a microphone, webcam and instant messaging. Although seen as a vital communication tool for many people, Skype has been the subject of much criticism over the years as its security and account recovery features have suffered some setbacks.
The most recent network security rumblings are coming in response to what is being seen as lacklustre security measures put in place by Skype to protect the accounts of its users from hijackers trying to gain access to targeted accounts via a rather unsecure account recovery process. According to Skype user and security researcher @TibitXimer, his account was compromised as many as six times and he warns that anybody else’s account may suffer the same fate.
He outlines that a Skype account can be hijacked quite simply if the attacker makes contact with Skype support and provides the first and/or last name on the account, 3-5 contacts on the Skype account and one email address that has been associated with Skype. In order to cover himself in a his word versus Skype’s word on their security measures, he made sure to capture his research with screenshots while chatting to a Skype support agent, which provide evidence that the agents only requested the outlined above before verifying @TibitXimer’s account.
A similar account hijacking issue came to light five months ago when it was learned on a Russian website that any attackers could sign up for a new account with an email that was already in use, and from there could continue setting up the account to receive the victim’s password reset notification details. Although that time Skype managed to rectify the issue and have it fixed shortly after. But these sort of gaping security holes shouldn’t exist in the first place to be taken advantage of.
Like many sites use, security questions are used in account recovery scenarios where the person attempting to log into the account will be required to provide an answer to a question initially set up by the account creator such as a memorable fact or person.
Two step verification provides that extra security and peace of mind by adding an extra layer of security. This is an approach to authentication that requires the presentation of two or more of three authentication factors including a knowledge factor (something the user knows – security question) and a possession factor (something the user has – mobile phone). Some companies such as Google require users to enter a code sent to their phones via text.
Other security measures suggested for Skype come in the form of more comprehensive support that looks into these cases with more urgency, 24/7 support and an actual security policy that allows users to verify ownership of accounts.
Until then SpamTitan's main recommendations for all Skype users is to change their Skype account email addresses to a unique email that is not associated and linked to any other accounts and to stay extra vigilant.&gt;why you used?\[-.\] near the beginning

I copied this from other regex filters, but you can remove the "?". It's still working without it.

&gt;instead of simply just  \\. to denote an escaped period/dot 

~~I don't think there is a difference in using \\. or \[-.\] I tested the filter using both methods and it's working the same.~~

See the answer from /u/pebechan here: [https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/g7qv3e/leadforensics\_tracking\_domains\_blacklist/fok4ksh?utm\_source=share&amp;utm\_medium=web2x](https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/g7qv3e/leadforensics_tracking_domains_blacklist/fok4ksh?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=web2x)

&gt;I'm still learning how to RegEx like a pro, so this would be helpful to me, and possibly others.

A good site that I use is [https://regex101.com](https://regex101.com/r/G8XiTh/1)

(This is the regex from my other Post: [https://regex101.com/r/G8XiTh/1](https://regex101.com/r/G8XiTh/1))My name is Rebecca and from August 12-21 I will be joining the country's nature lovers as we use canoes, kayaks, paddle boards, and more to raise money for our worlds wildlife. One dollar is precious to wildlife and by donating you become precious too.
Will you donate to help wildlife? I hope you do. Because protecting wildlife is not just helping animals, but insects and plants, our world and our environment. So in a way you are also helping you. I'm just doing the paddling you are helping the world.
Our world is the only one blessed with so much life and shouldn't we help preserve it? Who doesn't love a the beauty of a sunset, or the thrill of a good storm? Who doesn't find beauty in the colors of fall, or the new flowers of spring. Of you don't, you might find comfort in your pet, or find joy by going to a zoo. By donating you protect it all. Our world has so much beauty, life, joy, Love. So please help keep these things in abundance by donating today.
Thank you for helping protect our wildlife. And the next time you step outside on a butiful day, you can remember that you helped keep our world like that.
This is a Smith & Wesson Model 40. It’s one of the few revolvers to use a safety. Instead of a switch or button, it uses what’s called a “grip safety.” It sits behind the grip, and must be pressed (i.e. palmed) before the gun can fire. This is the exception, not the rule. The vast majority of revolvers do not use safeties. (Smith & Wesson photo)
TLDR: Assume that revolvers don’t use safeties unless you can prove otherwise through research. Mention that specific model in the story.
Here’s an easy one. The short answer is no, revolvers do not have safeties in the same way some semi-automatic pistols do. There isn’t a switch or other device to press before the revolver can be fired. Usually.
This is as close to a hard and fast rule as you’ll find in the world of handguns. Because of their lengthy history, revolvers with safeties do exist. They’re uncommon, though. When writing, assume all revolvers do not have safeties unless you can prove otherwise through research. Then make sure you point out the specific model of revolver in the story. Otherwise, you’ll wind up looking like someone who can’t tell the difference between a revolver and a revolving door.
The rule of thumb is easy enough to remember, though: Revolvers don’t have safeties.
What Can Characters Do Instead of Switch Off a Safety? Stop, Hammer Time
If the thought of a revolver without a safety gives you a sense of uneasiness, I can tell you the feeling is unwarranted. A safety is a mechanical component of a firearm. Just because it’s called a “safety” doesn’t mean it’s the only way to prevent an accidental discharge. By design, a loaded revolver will not fire unless some specific things happen. What those are depends on the type of action the revolver uses. By the way, an “action” is the mechanism a firearm uses to fire and cycle ammunition.
I’