 and treatment of tinea capitis: ketoconazole vs. griseofulvin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987; 6(1):46–49. 11. Ginsburg CM, Gan VN, Petruska M. [aafp.org]
Over the past 30 years, the reported incidence of tinea capitis has increased significantly, as travel and migration have been associated with changes in epidemiology and in distribution of the species of fungi that are likely to cause tinea capitis [doi.org]
Prevention
In conclusion, we postulate that DXA acid would be more effective to prevent liver damage induced by Gris. [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
(via antibiotic antifungal agent ) Application (s): antifungal drug Any antifungal agent used to prevent or treat fungal infections in humans or animals. [ebi.ac.uk]
Give with food to prevent GI distress. Store in closed containers away from light. Prevent further reinfection by cleaning disinfecting cage and cage articles. Clip nails to prevent secondary infections. [ratguide.com]
It doesn't kill fungal infections that are established in these areas, but instead prevents fungal cells from infecting new keratin that grows. It does this by preventing fungal cells from growing and multiplying. [netdoctor.co.uk]Went for a nice hike today over in North Vancouver with my friends Tim and Kate. There’s a nice trail through the woods from the Cleveland dam to the Capilano Salmon Hatchery.
We got to see people fishing along the way. Lots of fish in the streams. So many people trying there luck. It’s been raining on and off all week so the forest smelled amazing with all the trees and damp earth. Arriving at just below the hatchery there’s a big spillway where you can watch the salmon jump and try to make it up to the next section of water. I took lots of photos and managed to catch some in the air. Didn’t see any fish actually succeed at making it sadly. Think there’s a side chute that they open from time to time to allow them to make it through and up. They breed several kinds of salmon there. As many as 600,000 of some of the breeds are hatched and released each year. Good day out for sure.Akaka Bill would be 'win-win'
POSTED: Sunday, August 09, 2009
The Star-Bulletin's editorial on Aug. 9 suggested redrafting the Akaka Bill to protect it against court challenges. This bill has been redrafted many times and its current version is designed to provide flexibility to the Hawaiians, to allow the Hawaiian people to decide how they want to govern themselves and to define their own membership. Although court challenges may be filed, the bill will certainly be found to be constitutional, because it is fully consistent with U.S. and international law.
The editorial characterized Hawaii before the 1893 overthrow as a “;multiracial kingdom,”; observing that some Westerners had become naturalized. But Hawaii was hardly a happy, peaceful “;multiracial kingdom”; in the early 1890s. It was seething with fierce struggles for power.
The Bayonet Constitution, forced upon King Kalakaua in 1887 by Westerners, introduced sharp racial divisions with regard to voting. Only those “;of Hawaiian, American or European birth or descent”; could vote, which excluded Asians, even if they had been born in Hawaii or had become naturalized. Contract-laborers from Portugal and Puerto Rico could vote, but not Asians—“;a clever device for securing to the [foreigners] the control of the Kingdom,”; as stated in the 1959 “;The Hawaiian Revolution: 1893-94.”;
But the Hawaiians did not give up, and in the 1890 election the National Reform Party, led by Hawaiian leader Robert Wilcox, took control of the Legislature, and forced the Cabinet, including Lorrin Thurston, to resign. These deep divisions came into clear focus in the 1893 overthrow and 1898 annexation.
This divide continue to resonate in our islands. Although we cannot turn back the clock, we must try to achieve some measure of justice, in light of the wrongs that took place at the time of the overthrow and annexation. Congress observed in its 1993 Apology Resolution that the participation of U.S. agents in the overthrow was “;illegal”; and violated “;international law.”; This Resolution states that the Crown and Government Lands were transferred to the United States in 1898 without “;the consent of or compensation to the Native Hawaiian people,”; and calls for a reconciliation to heal these wounds. The Akaka Bill would be a major step forward in this reconciliation process and would allow the Hawaiian people to control their destinies once again.
The U.S. Constitution recognizes that indigenous peoples have a separate and distinct status within the U.S. political system, and our national government stated formally in 1970 that native groups are entitled to govern their own lands and to maintain their culture and heritage. The United Nations in 2007 passed the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which confirms the right of native people to control their lands and resources through their own governmental bodies. Native Hawaiians are “;indigenous”; under U.S. and international law, as our federal and state legislature have said repeatedly. The fact that the kingdom's monarchs sought advice from Westerners in no way undercuts the right of the Hawaiian people to reform a governmental entity and to define their membership in a manner that is appropriate for them.
The Hawaiian people were resourceful and self-sufficient before Western contact, developing aquaculture in a way that still marvels us; navigating across vast oceans; creating beautiful dances, chants, songs, and feather capes; and building formidable temples and intricate tools for fishing and hunting. Their culture was cut short by diseases and the efforts of others to control their land and government. They deserve a chance to come together once again, to build upon their dynamic heritage.
The Maori in New Zealand (Aotearoa) also suffered great losses after Westerners came, but their experiences during the past 35 years provide a road map we can examine as we move forward with passage of the Akaka Bill. The people of New Zealand established the Waitangi Tribunal in 1975 to permit the Maori to pursue their claims. This Tribunal, after lengthy hearings, made recommendations for each Maori group, which led to settlements negotiated with the government. The Maori have received lands, factories, fishing vessels and fishing rights, and are now economic players, leading to greater prosperity for all the people of New Zealand. Similarly, passage of the Akaka Bill will be a “;win-win”; solution, addressing and resolving long-festering injustices, and encouraging our host people to once again play a major role in our economy and community.
Jon M. Van Dyke, law professor and Carlsmith Ball Faculty Scholar at the William S. Richardson School of Law, UH-Manoa, authored “;Who Owns the Crown Lands of Hawaii?”; and is an occasional Office of Hawaiian Affairs consultant.Sorbonne-educated Russian cheesemaker Vladimir Borev spoke of his plans to replace sanctioned Western European cheese during an interview from his farm in Maslovka, Friday.
"We want the Lipetsk Region to become Russia's cheese province. In response to sanctions, we want to learn how to produce cheeses of a good quality and how to do it fast. And sooner or later when sanctions are lifted, Western European cheese would never enter our market again," Borev said.
After opening his farm, Borev invited well-known Corsican experts to help him perfect his craft. The cheesemaker produces his cheese using milk from his own cattle, including sheep, goats and cows, that live on his 20 hectare plot.
Commenting on his inspiration, Borev said: "The idea came when cheeses had disappeared from our shops. The grocery embargo was imposed in response to sanctions. And it was quite offensive that such a good product has been seized from us as a punishment measure. And our French and European friends don't understand that it is impossible to punish Russia."I decided to look up Mary Sue, because your definition is basically "the main character." What actual scholarly critics say about Mary Sue is that it's a sexist term dismissive of strong female characters. They also say Gary Stues are less criticized, which I rolled my eyes at. Superman is universally criticized for being boringly perfect. I'd say it depends on who's writing him though. He can range from interesting to boring. Just thought I'd mention that. 

The bare bones and orginal meaning of Mary Sue is a character devoid of flaws, which definitely fits both Rose and Sorey. I have a slightly different definition though, since flawless characters can be done well. I define them as a character who's only flaws are minor (being clumsy is the most annoying and situational non-flaw to me) and who don't go through any internal struggle or growth.  

Sorey is close, but they manage to give him enough of a person struggle that challenges his world view at the end that I wouldn't call him a Gary Stue. He has to do something he doesn't want to despite being perfect and that's interesting. Rose never had any struggle. She started perfect, had someone close to her die, then continued on being perfect as if it never happened. There's no growth or struggle for Rose.

That's not to say I hate all Marys and Garys. I enjoyed Rose when I was playing the game and was just enjoying it. It's just when I look back on the game critically, she's more perfect than the literal Christ figure and didn't have