 audience and drive traffic to my sites. Once these leads enter my sales funnel, the conversion process grinds them further in daily promotions to qualify buyers for incrementally higher end products.
Here are some publications that may be helpful in getting a grasp on the market potential within this and related niches: American Scientist, Discover, Popular Science, Popular Mechanics, Science News, Scientific American, Physics Today, Physics World, Technology Review, Air & Space, Astronomy Magazine, Planetary Report, Sky and Telescope, Skeptic, The Scientist.
I've bought products with less useful information than this... so much simpler an approach to what i used to do for traffic and sales...
If you insight about physics think about problem in your field.
People always use search engine to find their solution. If their can't find any solution easily and if you can solve their problem they will buy from you.
and try to deep search until you find niche market in your field.
Always research in Forum about your field.
I guess I look at your challenge to monetize a "difficult" niche in a different light. Where others see physics as something to stay away from because it is hard to monetize...
I take that as an opportunity to step in where other marketers won't go.
I don't have the answers for you as to how to do that, but I would certainly start investigating and doing research online to see if I could figure out this puzzle. Once you do that, your competition will be a lot less than in other popular niches.
I would begin by trying to identify where physics lovers hang out online. Are there certain sites or forums or groups (Facebook, Yahoo, etc) where they congregate? If you can find them as a group somewhere, you can figure out what they want be asking them.
Perhaps it is not "physics" that you should focus on monetizing, but your knowledge of physics that would be easier to monetize. For example, sell plans or courses for hobbyists, survivalists, environmentalists, etc. using your credibility as a physicist.
You could probably create study guides and sell them online. I know a Network Engineer who does this. Physics is an interesting field, but any college physics professor will tell you... it's hard to find a job in Physics after college.
Will it be possible to monetize with a list and syndication-without the offline component? I am assuming this will limit me to just marketing books and some low priced equipment(to a maximum of 500USD). I am wondering if I should get into this.
On a related but different note, thanks for all the time you spend on this forum.
You actually can make a very comfortable income just by selling books and low-priced products from Amazon. This can be done with a list and syndication without the offline component. However, closing sales on high end equipment (4-6 figure price range) is difficult without multiple communication channels such as telephone, webinar, personal visits, etc. This type of demographic does not respond well to product "review sites".
Building lists through article syndication is the most powerful marketing method I have ever known, and it's my method of choice for breaking into any niche no matter how stiff the competition may be. Most of the fields within physics (and science in general) are intensely competitive, but it can also be extremely lucrative.
Schools will pay a lot of money for good leads sometimes. High CPC.
Things that come to mind in related interests such as telescopes (affiliate? some sell for many thousands), altenative energy plans and gadgets, parabolic lenses, solar stoves, book of experiments, surveillance drones. robotics kits, neodymium magnets, etc...
Seems endless to me...
specialized problems that people are facing.
The main key here is DEMAND. Don't start off with a topic.
Start with the people. The customers. The demand.
problems and then provide a solution. Money.
and sales only happen when people want to buy something.
Are you wanting to sell physics products or sell to people whose common interest of physics has brought them together?
Thanks again myob. You are one of the few people whose responses are almost always appropriate. A lot of what you tell is more in lines of developing fundamentals rather than discussing just tactics. Your posts along with a few others have shifted my focus to fundamentals.
There is also a huge market in debunking pseudoscientific conspiracy theorists.
...For those that missed it, myob also promotes conspiracy theories.
Not quite correct. Actually I provoke conspiracy theorists and their believers of the absurd. It is rare that the known laws of physics conspire along with such theories. As explained in this article, people often believe in conspiracies because they are the most "logical" explanation. And scientific models don't necessarily translate well for those with this mindset. "The problem for skepticism is that transcendentalism is intuitive; empiricism is not".
Imho physics isn't a "niche", it's a category.
0 - 10 years - fun science products for kids. Fun science things that parents can do with their kids - space rockets made from empty drink bottles, that sort of thing.
11 - 18 years - more serious science home kits. Tutorials for those who want to cram for exams or falling behind in class. Perhaps science camps/classes for holiday/vacation time.
University students - good offers on course books.
General population - accessible books on popular science. "What was the Big Bang?", "What is a Higgs Boson and Does Anyone Care?"
Career Physicists? Keep up to date with the latest research, seminars.
What products are available in those niches is anyone's guess.
On Friday I’m heading to Texas for SXSW Interactive. I first heard about this conference two years ago. Last year I kicked myself repeatedly for missing it. This year I’m going. I’m very excited that Nick and Rachelle are able to attend as well. All signs point to a great time and excellent conference.
I’ve started putting together an iCal calendar of SXSWi events (subscribe) since I wasn’t able to find one anywhere else. (To my great shock and disgust.) If there is another one out there or if there’s something wrong with mine, please let me know.
<gh_stars>0
---
title: /Q – možnosti (operace nízké úrovně)
ms.date: 01/08/2020
f1_keywords:
- /q
helpviewer_keywords:
- Q compiler option [C++]
- -Q compiler option [C++]
- /Q compiler option [C++]
ms.openlocfilehash: 722a63a43e5e08fe80b26f908c7ae92df2fdb29c
ms.sourcegitcommit: 0f4ee9056d65043fa5a715f0ad1031c0ed30e2b6
ms.translationtype: MT
ms.contentlocale: cs-CZ
ms.lasthandoff: 02/05/2020
ms.locfileid: "77034516"
---
# <a name="q-options-low-level-operations"></a>/Q – možnosti (operace nízké úrovně)

K provedení následujících operací kompilátoru nižší úrovně můžete použít možnosti kompilátoru **/q** :

- [/Qfast_transcendentals (vynutit rychlou transcendentní objekty)](qfast-transcendentals-force-fast-transcendentals.md): generuje rychlé transcendentní objekty.

- [/QIfist (Potlačit _ftol)](qifist-suppress-ftol.md): potlačí `_ftol`, je-li vyžadován převod z typu s plovoucí desetinnou čárkou na typ Integer (pouze x86).

- [/Qimprecise_fwaits (odebrat příkazů fwaits uvnitř bloků try)](qimprecise-fwaits-remove-fwaits-inside-try-blocks.md): Odebere `fwait` příkazy uvnitř `try` bloků.

- [/QIntel-JCC-erratum](qintel-jcc-erratum.md): snižuje dopad na výkon, který způsobila aktualizace kontrola (JCC) vyžádal povolení mikrokódu.

- [/Qpar (auto-paralelizace)](qpar-auto-parallelizer.md): povolí automatické paralelismue smyček, které jsou označeny direktivou [#pragma Loop ()](../../preprocessor/loop.md).

- [/Qpar-Report (úroveň vytváření sestav auto paralelizace)](qpar-report-auto-parallelizer-reporting-level.md): povoluje úrovně generování sestav pro automatické paralelismuy.

-