 you can't go wrong with this quiet and fine establishment. If you wanted to feel like you are still in Japan, once inside you could think you are across the Pacific.
The most balanced way is to see what others are saying about them and for that we virtually always listen to the reviewers at Trip Advisor.
We went for late night bites and were all very happy. I had a couple skewers, all of which were great. My son has soft-shell shrimp and ended up ordering a second plate, and my daughter and husband both had the ramen and loved it.
Sozai always has a long line in front, and for good reason. People pack in to this small neighborhood spot for excellent food and sake. We were very impressed with the dishes we tried: a creamy eggplant dish, a deep fried head of garlic, chicken.
This is the quintessential Izakaya or Japanese Gastro-Pub. It is hidden away in the inner sunset district.
Traveling to and spending time in Japan should be on everyone’s bucket list. The night skies in Japan, especially in Kyoto, seems darker and more magical than most cities.
That atmosphere elevates the whole noodle experience.
They can be good for you, absolutely good to you and comforting as well.As far as accommodations- that depends on your budget- The cheapest REPUTA LE hotels I might suggest are Hotel Pennslyvania- directly across from MSG, or Yotel- (I just happen to be the food amd beverage manager there) You can see on Booking.com that they are amongst the cheapest options in Manhattan- if you go OUTSIDE Manhattan, it IS cheaper, bit you have to travel via train to get to most of the good spots... (.or at least the ones tourists want to see... ) I know of Three other fans that are staying at Yotel that week.

The re is also the Chelsea Hostel- which I auave heard fro a hostel is quite nice.



For other stuff- feel free to PM me, I would need more a description of what you might want to see or do if you want some suggestions-



(When In NYC- you have an opportunity  to have REAL PIZZA... NEVER PUT PINEAPPLE ON PIZZA!!!)The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider challenges to President Donald Trump’s decision to phase out a program that deferred deportation for immigrants brought to the country illegally as children.
The court granted review in three consolidated cases. SCOTUSblog, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Politico and CNN have coverage.
The Trump administration announced a winding down of the program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in September 2017. Known as DACA, the program deferred deportation and granted work permits to people who were brought to the United States illegally as minors. Immigrants in the program had to have clean criminal records and meet other educational or military service requirements.
President Barack Obama had created DACA. The Trump administration argued that DACA was unlawful because it sanctioned an ongoing violation of federal immigration law.
The issues before the court are whether the decision to end DACA is subject to judicial review and, if so, whether the decision to end the program was legal, according to SCOTUSblog. The Trump administration had sought Supreme Court review before rulings by any federal appeals courts.
Days after the administration sought cert, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco affirmed an injunction barring the phasing out of DACA. The court said in its November decision that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their claim that the decision to end DACA was arbitrary and capricious.
In May, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Richmond, Virginia, also found that rescission of the program was arbitrary and capricious. The Supreme Court recently denied a request to expedite review of that decision, according to the Washington Post.
The cases before the high court are Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, Trump v. NAACP and McAleenan v. Vidal. The SCOTUSblog case pages are here, here and here.
The cert petitions had been under consideration for months. SCOTUSblog speculated that the court wanted to hold off until after decisions on administrative law cases, such as the case challenging the decision to add a citizenship question to the census. On Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld a judge’s decision to ask the Commerce Department to provide a better explanation for its decision to add the question.<filename>supvisors/strategy.py
#!/usr/bin/python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

# ======================================================================
# Copyright 2016 <NAME>
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
# ======================================================================

from typing import Any, Mapping, Optional, Sequence, Set, Tuple

from.application import ApplicationStatus
from.process import ProcessStatus
from.ttypes import AddressStates, NameList, ConciliationStrategies, StartingStrategies, RunningFailureStrategies

# types for annotations
LoadRequestMap = Mapping[str, int]


class AbstractStrategy(object):
    """ Base class for a common constructor. """

    def __init__(self, supvisors: Any):
        """ Initialization of the attributes.

        :param supvisors: the global Supvisors instance
        """
        self.supvisors = supvisors
        self.logger = supvisors.logger


# Strategy management for Starting
class AbstractStartingStrategy(AbstractStrategy):
    """ Base class for a starting strategy. """

    # Annotation types
    LoadingValidity = Tuple[bool, int]
    LoadingValidityMap = Mapping[str, LoadingValidity]
    NodeLoadMap = Sequence[Tuple[str, int]]

    def is_loading_valid(self, node_name: str, expected_load: int, load_request_map: LoadRequestMap) -> LoadingValidity:
        """ Return True and current load if remote Supvisors instance is active
        and can support the additional load.

        :param node_name: the node name tested
        :param expected_load: the load to add to the node
        :param load_request_map: the unconsidered loads
        :return: a tuple with a boolean telling if the additional load is possible on node and the current load
        """
        self.logger.trace('AbstractStartingStrategy.is_loading_valid: node_name={} expected_load={} load_request_map={}'
                         .format(node_name, expected_load, load_request_map))
        if node_name in self.supvisors.context.nodes.keys():
            status = self.supvisors.context.nodes[node_name]
            self.logger.trace('AbstractStartingStrategy.is_loading_valid: node {} state={}'
                             .format(node_name, status.state.name))
            if status.state == AddressStates.RUNNING:
                loading = status.get_loading() + load_request_map.get(node_name, 0)
                self.logger.debug('AbstractStartingStrategy.is_loading_valid: node_name={} loading={} expected_load={}'
                                 .format(node_name, loading, expected_load))
                return loading + expected_load <= 100, loading
            self.logger.trace('AbstractStartingStrategy.is_loading_valid: node {} not RUNNING'.format(node_name))
        return False, 0

    def get_loading_and_validity(self, node_names: NameList, expected_load: int,
                                 load_request_map: LoadRequestMap) -> LoadingValidityMap:
        """ Return the report of loading capability of all nodes iaw the additional load required.

        :param node_names: the nodes considered
        :param expected_load: the additional load to consider for the program to be started
        :param load_request_map: the unconsidered loads
        :return: the list of nodes that can hold the additional load
        """
        loading_validity_map = {node_name: self.is_loading_valid(node_name, expected_load, load_request_map)
                                for node_name in node_names}
        self.logger.trace('AbstractStartingStrategy.get_loading_and_validity: loading_validity_map={}'
                         .format(loading_validity_map))
        return loading_validity_map

    def sort_valid_by_loading(self, loading_validity_map: LoadingValidityMap) -> NodeLoadMap:
        """ Sort the loading report by loading value. """
        # returns nodes with validity and loading
        sorted_nodes = sorted([(x, y[1