 in that particular charter amendment. I'm still trying to understand what the other 2 ballot questions would effect long term.<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: Add support for WAX (WAXP) addresses in encoding library
username_0: Here is the encoding library: https://github.com/ensdomains/address-encoder

Example: https://github.com/ensdomains/address-encoder/pull/47/files

Discord for dev help: https://discord.com/invite/AskZbFx

Please provide a reference link so we can check you did the encoding correctly.

We'd like to keep the encoding library as small as possible, so please be efficient in your use of space.

We will likely be reviewing PRs and paying out bounties more or less on a weekly basis. No need to ping us to check your PR, we will definitely get to it.

Thanks for your help!
<issue_comment>username_1: @username_0, @makoto
Hello, if [this issue](https://gitcoin.co/issue/ensdomains/address-encoder/164/100023862) was cancelled because WAXP is not listed on slip-0044([Previous PR](https://github.com/ensdomains/address-encoder/pull/214) was closed because of that), I can list it on slip-0044 and can add WAXP to this library. Please open the issue again if you still wish to add WAXP to this library.<issue_closed>
<issue_comment>username_0: Good to know that you could do that. Not worth it for WAXP, but I'll keep that in mind for other onesIn 6.14.1 we should switch to shipping a dynamically linked GHCi binary, on those platforms for which dynamic linking is supported (currently Linux; MacOS X and Windows support is in progress).
We might save some space in the distributions.
We cannot revert CAFs in packages that are shared by GHC and the user program.
performance of the dynamically-linked version was an issue.
In 6.14.1 we should switch to shipping a dynamically linked GHCi binary, on those platforms for which dynamic linking is supported (currently Linux; MacOS X and Windows support is in progress). ## Advantages - The GHCi binary is smaller - some packages don't need to be loaded on startup: lower memory use - GHCi startup might be quicker (or it might not) - some hacks due to having two copies of the base package are not necessary (see `rts/Globals.c`) - We might save some space in the distributions. - It takes us a step closer to not needing the RTS linker at all - It takes us a step closer to using dynamic linking by default, which is where we want to go ultimately ## Potential Issues - Do we run into any problems with GHCi and the user program sharing the same stdin/stdout/stderr handles? Do we need to virtualise these explicitly in the GHCi front end? - We cannot revert CAFs in packages that are shared by GHC and the user program. There are some old non-working hacks related to reverting CAFs when GHCi is dynamically linked (see `KeepCAFsForGHCi`) that need to be cleaned out. CAFs can only be reverted in code loaded by the RTS linker. We need to think about whether this is a necessary feature or not: we have never supported CAF reverting for interpreted code anyway. One reason to have it was so that you can recover after saying `getContents` at the GHCi prompt, but we can provide other ways to work around that. However, if we eliminated HEAP_ALLOCED (#8199), as a side effect of this implementation, this might be doable, as we no longer have to reach our fingers into the data section of dynamically linked in libraries to revert a CAF; all of the CAFs are copied to dynamic memory space first. (The current implementation doesn't work for that, however!) - There will be installation/binary-dist issues to resolve; currently we don't install any dynamically-linked binaries. ## Open questions - Whether we continue to use the same binary for GHC and GHCi is an open question: it would be possible to provide a separate statically-linked GHC binary if performance of the dynamically-linked version was an issue. - We might as well dynamically-link Haddock, and the other tools that come with GHC too.The way I see it is really different from the other comments on this thread, but here goes. I (25F) am together, and living with my SO (36M). We’ve always had a very tight bond and I never thought he’d do anything inappropriate behind my back. Since we lived together, I picked up on some weird behavior and decided to snoop. We have full access to each other’s phones (passwords, fingerprint, etc) so I technically wasn’t looking through something I didn’t have access to anyway. I saw texts from a girl he’d mentioned once in conversation a couple weeks before. It implied they had spent an evening together and that he “exceeded her expectations” and how “excited” she was to start getting to know him more. He promised her she’d see him again. When I say I saw red, I mean I LITERALLY saw nothing but red and my heart beat so hard, it’s all I was able to hear for several minutes. Anyway, I confronted him as calmly as possible. I didn’t want to scare him because I knew if I did, he’d never feel safe sharing anything with me. I want him to tell me everything, especially if it’s something he did wrong. After this strong, masculine man cried in my arms, I knew he was sorry. I also knew HE knew that what he did was unacceptable. After that day, I told him “since I’m making the decision to stay, that means I accept your apology and trust 100% you’ll never do this again. I’m not going to look through your stuff or question you because that’s not a relationship. If I didn’t trust you completely, I wouldn’t be with you anymore.” And even though I still get paranoid sometimes, I know I made the right decision to be with him and I lean on trusting my own judgement. It’s a process, but if he’s truly sorry and will not do it again, you’ll know.The third meeting of the Pacific Statistics Methods Board (PSMB) will occur from 23 to 24 May, 2019, at Statistics New Zealand's office in Auckland, New Zealand.
The Pacific Community (SPC), Statistics New Zealand, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the World Bank and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific have collaborated in the preparation of guidelines towards sample design for household income and expenditure surveys in the Pacific region. The draft guidelines will be presented to the Board who will provide direction as to the way-forward for the guidelines. The regional sampling guidelines are a derivative product from the recent Regional HIES Sampling and Planning Workshop (https://sdd.spc.int/en/news/latest-news/19-household-income-and-expenditure-surveys/212-regional-hies-sampling-and-planning-workshop).
The second meeting of PSMB endorsed the formation of the Sampling Sub-Committee (http://purl.org/spc/digilib/doc/koush). The next meeting of PSMB will review and finalise the terms of reference of the Sub-Committee, which is a necessary committee when considering the challenges of robust sample design in small island Pacific states.
The field work for the RMI HIES Experiment (http://purl.org/spc/digilib/doc/92dbv) has been completed and the third meeting of the PSMB will bring together HIES data users to make recommendation to PSMB as to the optimal methodology to the collection of consumption data through Pacific HIES. Data users will also present on the efficacy of complementary survey modules, such as: economic activity, disability, food insecurity experience and fisheries. These modules were designed for inclusion in the HIES questionnaire to produce more comprehensive data and to avoid the need for stand-alone surveys. This marks an important milestone for HIES in the Pacific region which will improve the quality of data produced for use in policy and planning to address key regional issues, such as: poverty, over-and-undernourishment, food insecurity and economic development.
Papers, presentations and meeting minutes will be posted to this (https://sdd.spc.int/en/news/latest-news/225-pacific-statistics-methods-board-psmb-may-2019-meeting) page in due course.The Salomon Speedcross 3 is not your average trail running shoe and definitely not for the faint-hearted! The first thing you notice about the Speedcross 3 is the aggressive lug pattern on the bottom of the shoe. The traction on this shoe is unbelievable, when going up steep hills the lugs provides superior traction gripping on anything you step on! On downhill sections the lugs have a reverse climb pattern on the heel to allow for you to slow down when the terrain is too steep and still descent with confidence.
The upper of the Salomon Speedcross 3 is made of a tight weaved rip stop nylon that keeps the dirt and debris out while allowing the foot to breath easily. The bed of the shoe is