grouped, x="Datetime", y="Price", hover_name="Price",
                  facet_col='Number', color="Shop", facet_col_wrap=6,
                  width=1900, height=850)
    return fig
@app.callback(
    Output("Detail_Graph", "figure"),
    [Input("Detail_Input", "value")])
def update_figure(input):
    df = pd.read_csv("/home/pi/backup/lego/log.csv")
    df["Datetime"] = df["Datetime"].str.replace("T", " ").str.replace("Z", "")
    df["Datetime"] = pd.to_datetime(df["Datetime"], format="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
    df["Datetime"] = df["Datetime"].dt.floor("H")
    grouped = df.groupby(["Datetime", "Number", "Shop"]).min().reset_index().sort_values(by=["Number", "Datetime"])
    fig = px.line(grouped[grouped["Number"] == input], x="Datetime", y="Price", color="Shop", hover_name="Price",
                  width=1900, height=850)
    fig.update_layout(transition_duration=500, hovermode="x unified")
    return fig

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run_server(debug=True,port=8050,host="0.0.0.0")

Since I have been nursing my son, I have really started to like having a larger bust area. So, I have started to look into breast enlargement surgery. I really don't know if it is for me just because I am terrified of being put under. But I am really starting to warm up to the idea. I mean after all, it really is a simple surgery and it also has the highest satisfaction rate of any cosmetic surgery. I am sure that my husband would really like it as well. He says that he wouldn't but I know when he is fibbing. What man wouldn't want that? It only takes an overnight stay and one week home from work too. Oh and they also do it where the stitches are in the natural creases so that you don't see any scaring or anything like that which I like too. The company that I found is Mya Cosmetic and they have some of the best surgeons with some of the most experience. I know when I am looking for a surgeon that is definately something that I look for is lots of experience.
So, if you are looking for a reputable surgeon to do cosmetic surgery, you really aught to check them out.Just curious if anyone has tried this without test and what they thought of it. Thinking of trying this, if you have what dose did you do and was it worth it without the test? Ive done some research and seen people say its not worth it without the test and have seen others say it is. Opinions?
I’d say to try it if you had Mast Prop and Tren Ace. Experimenting something thats normally not recommended can usually lead to some unwanted/unexpected sides. Although there are ancillaries for most sides, playing with shorter esters might make you feel more at ease knowing if these sides come up they can disperse much quicker after stopping the gear when using shorter esters vs longer ones. Just my 2 cents but post results/review if you decide to go for it. Good luck!
so two different steroids, neither of which aromatise? and one which acts against estrogen?
Your libido will be pretty shot with just tren/mast and no test. Add a test base in there and you will find that it will be a lot nicer.
 Even some dbol or something would work if you don’t want to add test, although I’m not sure why you wouldn’t.
Not everybody does things by the book. There are no set in stone protocols when it comes to AAS. I know someone that has ran Masteron only cycles and I’m going to give it a try myself in a couple months. I also prefer running EQ as a base rather than Test. I don’t know why you are so against anything far from what you believe in. I understand its not the norm and it could lead to some unwanted sides so I recommended using shorter esters and ancillaries to combat any sides. At the end of the day we’re all experimenting on our body, what makes his proposition any different.  Conformity never led to any new information. Obviously he stated he has looked into the topic and has seen its risks and benefits.
 That’s not something I “believe” in, that how’s these hormones work.
If you knew what you’re talking about, you’d know that.
I have read some of your posts and can say you are well knowledgeable in the field. With this said I’ll give you whatever suitable time you need to come back with a better response than the subjective “you’ll feel like shit without aromatization” statement.
But the fact that you’re throwing all this flame for that one reason as to why he should run an aromatizing steroid… I don’t know. 
Ok, let’s try and spell this out for you. Take a huge dose of an AI and see how you feel.  That’s a fact.
This is the same as what will happen to this guy if he runs a cycle without any aromatisable compounds.
Why would I need to come up with something better, when this is the reason he’ll feel like shit? What more do you need, other than it’ll make him feel like shit?
Do you understand that the purposes of forums like this are to teach people the correct way to use compounds such as this, not just say “durr give it a try bro” and encourage practices we know are unwise?
Do you understand why you should not be giving advice now?

Now if you wouldn’t mind, please GTFO. I have never seen a post or a thread by you that was any good.
I think “feel like shit” is rather self-explanatory when describing the effects of tanking your estrogen. I would also be worried about a possible estrogen rebound during pct.
But in the end, what form of scientific knowledge could possibly be derived from this “experiment” other than, “damn, sore joints and celibacy ain’t as shitty as i thought”?

I understand what you’re saying completely bro. If it was some noob saying want to try this for my first cycle I would’ve quickly argued against it and suggested as to do some more research and checkout some stickies. This guy said he looked into it thoroughly and still felt the need to question whether he should’ve tried the cycle. When even known AAS contributors like Bill Roberts have agreed with the use of a Tren & Masteron only cycle, I didn’t see any harm in suggesting the cycle with the right precautions such as shorter esters and the right ancillaries. If it wasn’t for all the flame I was getting I would’ve aided with ideal tapering dosages as well.
<gh_stars>0
﻿using GladNet.Common;
using GladNet.Engine.Common;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using UnityEngine.Events;

namespace Booma.Client.Network.Common
{
	/// <summary>
	/// Serialization hack for UnityEvent.
	/// Has args <see cref="INetPeer"/> and <see cref="NetStatus"/>
	/// </summary>
	[Serializable]
	public class NetworkStatusUnityEvent : UnityEvent<INetPeer, NetStatus>
	{

	}
}Historical Clock by Eberhard & Co. auctioned. The historic pocket watches Magini Sistema model of Eberhard & Co.
The historic pocket watches Magini Sistema model of Eberhard & Co. has been at an auction of the Italian auction house auctioned off Casa D’Aste Meeting Art for € 56,000.
The split-seconds chronograph Sistema Magini was made by Eberhard & Co. in the early 1940s and was used by the pilots of his time in World War II as a timepiece. Example, flew back the clock in the pocket of a pilot about 1942 from Rome to Tokyo. Now, the timepiece was bought by an anonymous bidder.
Although simple model of the ten automatic watches and ten split-seconds chronograph have been ordered, this project was never realized. Thus, it is at the Eberhard & Co. Sistema Magini a real historical kind. The Clock comes in a metal case with a crown made of chrome and a yellow-colored dial with dark blue central pointers.
Admittedly, the case looks pretty worn out, but that’s the excitement of this Pocket no harm.
In addition to the central time display, the clock can also identify the date and month. Apart from the minute scale the Clock has a 24-hour scale on the outer edge. Means that the pointer does not turn two, but only once a day. Should the pilot to quickly legibility are guaranteed.
The automatic movement with manual winding is received correctly.
This reflects the know-how of the Swiss watch industry. Eberhard & Co. should benefit from the