
    <td>yes</td>
    <td></td>
    <td>
        <div>Filter specifier. See <a href='https://github.com/batfish/batfish/blob/master/questions/Parameters.md#filter-specifier'>https://github.com/batfish/batfish/blob/master/questions/Parameters.md#filter-specifier</a> for filter specification.</div>
    </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
    <td>headers<br/><div style="font-size: small;"></div></td>
    <td>dict</td>
    <td>yes</td>
    <td></td>
    <td>
        <div>Constraints on packet headers. See <a href='https://pybatfish.readthedocs.io/en/latest/datamodel.html#pybatfish.datamodel.flow.HeaderConstraints'>https://pybatfish.readthedocs.io/en/latest/datamodel.html#pybatfish.datamodel.flow.HeaderConstraints</a> for keys in this dictionary.</div>
    </td>
    </tr>

    </table>
    </br>


.. _assert_no_forwarding_loops:

assert_no_forwarding_loops
--------------------------
Assert that there are no forwarding loops



* This test will fail if any flow will experience a forwarding loop in the snapshot.
* This test takes no parameters.



.. _assert_no_incompatible_bgp_sessions:

assert_no_incompatible_bgp_sessions
-----------------------------------
Assert that all BGP sessions are compatibly configured



* This test finds all pairs of BGP session endpoints in the snapshot and will fail if the configuration of any pair is incompatible.
* This test takes no parameters.



.. _assert_no_incompatible_ospf_sessions:

assert_no_incompatible_ospf_sessions
------------------------------------
Assert that all OSPF sessions are compatibly configured and established



* This test finds all pairs of OSPF session endpoints in the snapshot and will fail if any pair is incompatible or otherwise unable to establish an OSPF session.
* This test takes no parameters.



.. _assert_no_unestablished_bgp_sessions:

assert_no_unestablished_bgp_sessions
------------------------------------
Assert that all compatibly-configured BGP sessions are established



* This test fails if any compatible BGP session cannot be established (e.g., due to ACLs).
* This test considers only sessions that are compatible from a configuration settings perspective  To test that are no incompatible sessions, use the assert_no_incompatible_bgp_sessions assertion.
* This test takes no parameters.



.. _assert_no_undefined_references:

assert_no_undefined_references
------------------------------
Assert that there are no undefined references



* This test will fail if any device configuration refers to a structure (e.g., ACL, prefix-list, routemap) that is not defined in the configuration.
* This test takes no parameters.



?Meanwhile, lucious attempts to regain control of kingdom by trying to sabotage andre’s vision for the business.
Meanwhile, lucious attempts to regain control over kingdom by wanting to sabotage andre’s eyesight when it comes to company.
Bose sound heads up display heated and locations to satisfy canadian singles in florida free leather that is cooled bose sound camera navigation rev match. The outcome of the wife that is missing the proverbial opposite side regarding the songs in one of mature ladies finder iceland’s better areas haunts him aswell. The storyline of alexander pushkin, whose audacious, comical exploits against seniors online dating sites totalitarianism that is free him facing the hostility regarding the authorities while the consternation of their household.
Fortunately, due to the windows ce operating where you can fulfill canadian seniors in toronto system utilized by the dreamcast there are many easy workarounds to help you to play those desired exclusives from other regions. You are able that facets released from fresh-cut lettuce leaves and microbiota that is natural in lettuce examples contributed to various gene transcription habits in vtec strains on lettuce in comparison to broth countries.
It had been great having bag that is free your day we tested. These trying to find mature dudes in the united states observations are in line with studies showing that mitochondrial disorder plays a part in heart disease, diabetic issues, neurodegeneration, and cancer tumors development.
A Court Order was issued...
A Court Order was issued for Property Settlement between my ex-wife and myself 2 years ago. In the settlement I was to receive the equity in a unit that we owned jointly with our daughter and son-in-law (25% each). My ex-wife was to receive the transfer of our family home and use this to take out a loan to purchase the unit and then pay me out. My wife was to have an independent valuation on the unit. She never had the unit valued. Some months later I was asked to sign a Sales Contract for the unit as the other 3 had decided to sell. I signed. I am now told I am in contempt of the Court Order and as such I have no further claim to the money my ex-wife owes me. I also have no way of determining the equity owed due to the property never being valued. It sold for $421000 and the overall cost of land and construction $304000. Have I lost out or is there another recourse to what is rightfully mine? In the overall settlement my ex-wife received 62% and I got 38% but now it is 35% to 65%.
There would be no need to have the unit valued, if it was sold, as it's value is set at the sale price of $421,000. The equity in the unit is then calculated by subtracting the balance of the loan which was secured by mortgage over the property. The solicitor who acted in the sale of the property would have sent correspondence to your wife setting out how the settlement figures were calculated for the sale of the unit and what cheques were provided at settlement.
What exactly does your court order say? It appears that it would be a simple matter to enforce the court order. I would need the exact wording.
1. The husband shall forthwith transfer to the wife all his right, title and interest in the family home. 2. On the transfer of the property the wife will permit the property to be encumbered by the Mortgage to the ANZ to secure the loans for the purpose of building of the 3 units. 3. Is to do with selling units 2 and 3 and disbursing profit 25% to each. 3(iii) the husband shall transfer to the wife all his right, title and interest in unit 1 in accordance with paragraphs 4 and 5 herein: 4. In determing the value of unit 1 for the purpose of the transfer pursuant to para 2(iii)(sic) herein the wife, at her own expense will have unit 1 valued by independent valuer, copy to husband. 5. The wife shall pay to the husband one quarter of the net equity in unit 1 such equity to be calculated on the value of the property following the discharge of the ANZ mortgage. I signed the transfer of family property promptly but my lawyer at the time held it "as leaverage" and it was not released for 7 months. The ex-wife's lawyer says I contravened the court order by doing this. I was asked by my family - daughter and son-in-law to sign the sale contract for unit one and at that time believed this was ok as they were having trouble selling it in a falling market. I had not been warned not to do this by my lawyer at any stage. My ex-wife's lawyer then said I had contravened the court order in signing as: "In relation to paragrapg 3(ii) (sic) 4 and 5 of the orders where these orders provgide for our client his daughter and son-in-law to retain unit 1 your client (me) was always aware of the sale of the unit1 to athird party. He signed the Offer and Acceptance and Transfer of Land. The names of purchases were clearly there and he can't assert that he was under any misapprehension as to the sale to a 3rd party. Does this help or is it too complicated? I have a file 2 inches thick as it has been on going for 2 years. I might add it started as a simple property settlement. You have this and I have that!
The question then is - where did the sale proceeds from the unit go?
Did you receive 25% and the Wife receive 25%. I assume that Unit 1 was owned 25% by you, 25% by the Wife and 25 % by each of your children. If that is the case, the Wife would have signed the sale contract as well. The problem arises, if your ex-wife did not have an interest in Unit 1 and instead of transferring the unit to her in accordance with the orders, you sold it instead. Please clarify for me.
All 4 of us signed to sell unit one. The profits were then split 25% each. This is not the issue for me as I should have received the equity in unit one which is a whole lot more than the profit in unit 1. I have not accepted the profits in unit 1 as my lawyer believes we should go to court and fight for the equity on