 teach you our knowledge, if you are willing to learn. We can show you how to heal, but you must do the work yourselves. We can guide you along your process, but it is your walk and your responsibility to evolve in the right direction. We hope you hear our call in your Soul.”
Chapter 50
Conclusion
 developed, developed, abandoned succeeded prophec annihilation,.”
Author’s Note is worth sharing and passing on. Our ultimate purpose and raison d’être is to help consciousness to rise to higher levels of spiritual understanding. So, although I’ve been working on an autobiography_12<<Quick Answer: Can you open an elevator door with your hands?
Can you hold the elevator door?
Can elevators crush you?
Does holding the elevator button work?
Why do strangers often avoid eye contact on a crowded elevator?
How long should elevator doors stay open?
Can you jump in a free falling elevator?
However, holding and forcing the door to remain open, can be unsafe/dangerous to people and can cause damage to the elevators. Please do not hold, force open or obstruct the elevator doors.
That’s because most of the door-close buttons in U.S. elevators don’t actually work. In fact, they’re programmed that way. … Only firefighters are able to close elevator doors manually through the use of a key. It’s important to note that there are exceptions to this rule, though.
Being trapped in an elevator can be a terrifying situation to find yourself in. Being injured in an elevator can be even more so. … Power outages are the most common cause of elevator entrapment and since there is no way to plan for power outages it’s hard to prevent them.
If the elevator is crowded, people stare at the ceiling, at the ground, or at the floor selection buttons – doing everything they can to avoid interacting. University of Chicago Professor Dario Maestripieri believes this behavior is an instinctive response to a perceived dangerous social situation.
IT IS IMPORTANT: How much does it cost to fix a bent garage door?
You're not going to get anywhere as long as you are stuck wondering who goes first. You'll just keep running around this cycle.

You need more emotional connection and quality time together in order to desire sex.   He needs more of a sexual connection in order to desire the quality time and emotional investment.  You just keep going round and round. 

Both views are equally valid, and neither one of you is wrong for the way you see things, but you're stuck because right now you both are insisting "Me first.  Give me what I want, so that I will desire to give you what you want.   Fill my tank so that I want to fill yours."   Both of you are asking for a one-sided solution that favors yourself, and that's not a good answer either direction.

If you want to break this cycle, you're going to have to choose to do it together.   Each of you is going to have to choose to see the other's needs as equally valid to your own, and out of your desire for their happiness, choose to willingly give them what they need, and extend some trust and expectation that they will do the same for you.

&gt;It doesn't feel good... I truly don't want to

There's a problem here. You're going to have to figure out the root of this and address it before you are able to do your part of the above.  If sex is unpleasant for you, no amount of great quality time together or emotional connection is going to make you want it.

 Or something different. But figuring out what that is and addressing it is a critical part of solving this.

&gt;if you don't satisfy your husband, he has a right to leave and he should leave.

Perfectly true, although I would counter that it works both ways and it's not just about sex. If he's not giving you the type of relationship you want, you have every right to leave and should leave.

There are two right answers to a relationship that isn't meeting your needs. Fix it, or end it.

The two of you need to decide together if you want to form a true marriage together instead of staying just roommates and friends -  If you're willing to each do the work to fully invest yourselves in the relationship and in your SO - to truly care about their happiness within the relationship just as much as your own, and work together to build something better for you both than what you have now.The NHL has been harping on and on about penalty calls being the lowest in 30 years this season. And yet, the Canucks are on track to get 290, just 6 short of last year. Good thing it doesn’t matter how many powerplays the Canucks get because right now they can’t even score on 1.
Over these past 20 games, the Canucks have managed to score just 5 goals on 48 opportunities, working on an anemic 10% success rate. Compared to their league leading 24.3% conversion rate last year, this is a serious step down. Granted, they were holding top spot in the league for a good portion of this season and have now slipped to 3rd at 20.5%, but lately the downgrade has been very evident. The change between last season and this one is that other teams have finally figured out how to shut down the Canucks PP.
After watching Vancouver’s cup run, it seems the other teams in the NHL finally got the memo: if you give the Sedins space, they will emulsify you. Now, in a lesson from Boston’s playbook, teams have stopped chasing the Sedins around the ice like chickens with their heads cut off and are applying just enough pressure to keep the Sedins from creating space while simultaneously preventing them from getting comfortable. But solely blaming the Sedins isn’t fair because the second PP unit isn’t scoring either. Thus, if the entire teams’ powerplay is incapable of scoring goals due to systematic issues, the responsibility lies squarely on the shoulders of Alain Vigneault.
There are several solutions for Alain to Vancouver’s faltering PP. Kassian can be tried with the Sedins, giving Kesler, booth and burrows the opportunity to form the second PP unit. This would give the Sedins a big body in front of the net and add a bit more grit to their line. Having Kassian on the top PP unit changes the system entirely; the Sedins would be forced to get shots on net and feed the point rather than cycle through the corners in an attempt to draw out defenders (which as previously mentioned, no longer works).
If Kassian and the Sedins doesn’t work out, plan B is to split the twins up outright, thus making both PP units far more dangerous. It is also far more difficult for the opposition to decide who to play their top defensive pairing against if both PP units posses equal offensive potential. Even keeping the Amex line (Booth, Higgins, Kesler) together would not be detrimental as It would make the shift after the PP easier to arrange lines.
No matter what it takes for Vigneault to get the Canucks’ PP out of its funk, it is important to see the silver lining. The Canucks have historically been very reliant on their PP both to get them into a game and to win it. With powerplays on the decline in the NHL and notoriously less calls soon to come in the playoffs, this is a chance for the Canucks to get used to playing 5-on-5 hockey without their powerplay crutch before the post-season starts.I'll admit Little Inferno went a little over my head at first and I'm still not entirely sure if it's supposed cleverness is quite as deep as people analyzing it pretend. But it's certainly interesting and unique.

This video made me wonder what the devs are up to now. I loved World of Goo, maybe the first "indie game" I ever played knowing the term "indie game". Apparently, they're working on a kind of "office worker programming game" called [Human Resource Machine](http://tomorrowcorporation.com/humanresourcemachine) which I suppose continues the subtle anti-capitalist tones that already popped up in World of Goo.More workable and pragmatic models for project finance are helping improve the pace of projects in Africa and remove some of the bottlenecks that existed previously, says Standard Bank.
Significant risks, however, still remain. The regional picture varies in terms of progress by country and further uncertainty is caused outside of South Africa because of the tendency to use dollar funding for power projects whose revenue is in local currency.
According to David Humphrey, Global Head of Power and Infrastructure at Standard Bank, those that take the plunge by investing in energy projects in Africa need to go in with their eyes wide open: “For example, unless there is a ‘user pays’ for the currency volatility risk (as in Kenya), the increasing local currency funding requirement caused by depreciation against the dollar becomes a real risk, as it is often followed by liquidity and convertibility constraints in the affected country. In other words, dollar funding is not a ‘silver bullet’, and comes with significant risk.
CE of US engineering giant General Electric, Jeff Immelt, continues to see Africa as GE’s most promising growth region. His company has built a US$6 billion business in Africa over the last decade, virtually from scratch. GE Africa now operates in 35 countries on the continent and the company recently pledged to invest US$2 billion in new investments in Africa by 2018, with the electric power sector seen as a top