 however, a sheriff's deputy shot and killed a soldier during Robin Sage because he wasn't aware that Robin Sage was a training exercise, and apparently some of the gunplay was a little too realistic. Still, that was just one incident over the course of four decades.
Assuming it's true that nothing sketchy is going on with Jade Helm, the federal government doesn't seem to grasp how weird it all looks. The whole Jade Helm 15 conspiracy theory was kicked off when a map related to the operation was leaked, marking Texas, Utah, and part of California as "hostile" territory.
That might not mean anything real, but the Army didn't explain away the natural suspicion that such a map would provoke, particularly among the conspiracy-minded gunslingers living across the American West. Instead, in an official statement, the Army basically said that Jade Helm is a secret but that it would actually be a good thing, because it would bring "economic gain: an increase in the local economy, in fuel and food purchases and hotel lodging."
Unsurprisingly, those who were concerned about Jade Helm weren't reassured, filling the information vacuum with conspiracy theories. Suddenly, Jade Helm was everywhere: Bluebell ice cream trucks looked suspiciously like mobile morgues; recently closed Walmarts were being converted into government processing centers, perhaps to control the food supply; FEMA and its "death domes" were obviously involved. Alex Jones helpfully suggested that "Helm" stands for "Homeland Eradication of Local Militants."
Now, as Jade Helm kicks off, a group civilian group called Counter Jade Helm is gearing up to act as a voluntary watchdog group and presumably signal to America's bunker-dwellers if it's ever time to break out the gas masks. Counter Jade Helm claims to have about 200 volunteers across seven states, although as Texas Team Leader Eric Johnston, a former sheriff's deputy, ominously told ABC News, "I would like to think that if the situation were to turn afoul, many more of our people would stand up and come to assist."
The group is run out of Phoenix, Arizona, by a 44-year-old former Marine named Pete Lanteri, who has spent the past decade running civilian border patrols to catch undocumented immigrants trying to sneak into the US, and is now using those skills—and his network of civilian volunteers—to monitor the military.
"We're going to be watching what they do in the public," he told the Houston Chronicle. "Obviously, on a military base they can do whatever they want. But if they're going to train on public land we have a right as American citizens to watch what they're doing."
On the official Counter Jade Helm website, there's a helpful map of known operations. Another section provides a method for creating and sharing "SALUTE reports." SALUTE is jargon from actual military reconnaissance, used when scouting the enemy. It stands for "size," "activity," "location," "unit," "time," and "equipment." In other words, they're borrowing tactics from the military to monitor the military.
The SALUTE reports section is sitting empty at the moment.
And as far as Jade Helm operations go, there's not much to report. ABC News reporters heard a few gunshots from a military base in Bastrop, Texas, but that's to be expected from a military drill.
Still, two uninvited Texans named Derrick Broze and Mark Jankins decided to scout the base on Wednesday afternoon. But the two volunteers—who may or may not be CJH members—told the the Austin American-Statesman that nothing looked unusual in Bastrop.
Broze pointed out, however, that "there's a perfectly legitimate reason for people to fear their government will see them as the enemy."
I agree with you, but with someone as sensitive as this, framing it that bluntly just won’t do it. And I care about my relationships with these folks because contrary to your assumption at the end of your post, this band actually actually got quite successful before they picked me up. So making enemies out of them would be really rough on my career as a musician haha. 

If this was a one-off debate with people that I don’t necessarily have to be friends with, then yeah I’d essentially just read your response word for word. Bluntness can be great when preserving a relationship isn’t important…then turns them into a frog.
By touching the forehead of a target and then, according to a mental image the user forms, the target changes into a tree frog. This is mainly used for interrogating several prisoners of war. Seeing their comrades changed into a frog before their eyes, the prisoners of war will cave in, becoming what could be described as a "frog chorus", sonorously chanting information. This terrifying technique will, without a doubt, make an "information leak" open up.
The word for frog, "蛙", is pronounced "kaeru". The term "to turn into", written as "変える", is also pronounced "kaeru", which leads to this technique's interesting pronunciation, "Kaeru Kaeru no Jutsu".
Retrieved from "https://naruto.fandom.com/wiki/Turning_into_a_Frog_Technique?oldid=1307474"Published on April 11, 2012 April 22, 2012 by cara.b.b.
a few months ago, i picked up the perfect leather clutch. it lives in my mama-purse (i.e. cracker, diaper, toy carrier), but when i don’t need to lug around everything-beckett-could-possibly-need-at-a-moment’s-notice, i just pull it out and run, and it’s a perfectly chic little clutch. to kick it up a notch, i added a tassel that i made using this tutorial (a quickie $5-10 project).
yesterday, i came across this number, and was quickly reminded of my pouch. similar, no? personally, i like mine better, and it was about $50 cheaper. i think that’s a win.
<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: Custom Message not working for EmailAddress Validator ASP.NET Core
username_0: Hi,

I have the below rule in ASPNet Core and its work fine except for the EmailAddress WithMessage, it shows please ("Please enter a valid email address") and not Email Address is not in the correct format. 
public RegisterValidator()
        {
            RuleFor(x => x.Email)
               .NotEmpty().WithMessage("{PropertyName} must be provided before submitting")
               .Length(10,50).WithMessage("you have exceeded the sprcified length {MaxLength}")
               .EmailAddress().WithMessage("{PropertyName} is not in the correct format");
}
Thanks
<issue_comment>username_1: Can't think of any reason why that would happen. A call to WithMessage always overrides the built-in messages. Could you put together a small sample project that reproduces the issue?
<issue_comment>username_0: Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. I have attached a new project to reproduce the issue.

[FluentValidateTest.zip](https://github.com/username_1/FluentValidation/files/961424/FluentValidateTest.zip)
<issue_comment>username_1: It looks like the attribute names have changed. FV is generating the message in the HTML as email="message", while it should be data-val-email="message". I'll get that changed for the next release.
<issue_comment>username_1: A quick fix would probably be to stick some jquery in the page that copies the value of the email attribute to a data-val-email
<issue_comment>username_0: Thanks,

I noticed that, when i checked in chrome debugger. I will try the jquery workaround.
<issue_comment>username_2: @username_1 I'm experiencing the same issue, I am using a.net core service, I have version 7.0.0.0 of FluentValidation installed and here is my configuration:
```
public class CheckCreditRequestValidator : AbstractValidator<CheckCreditRequest>
{
	public CheckCreditRequestValidator()
	{
		RuleFor(x => x.Answer)
			.NotEmpty()
			.MinimumLength(2)
			.MaximumLength(30)
			.WithMessage("\"Answer\" is required and must be between 2 and 30 characters.");
	}
}

//In another class
using FluentValidationResult = FluentValidation.Results.ValidationResult;

FluentValidationResult res = new ModelValidators.CheckCreditRequestValidator().Validate(request.data);

if (!res.IsValid)
{
	throw new Exception($"The following errors have occurred: {string.Join(", ", res.Errors)}");
}
```
The results of the `res.Errors` looks like this:
![capture](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15707802/26278193/07344b06-3d52-11e7-814c-74eb38fc1342.PNG)

It's not using