A couple of seasons back I would have said I would want to coach at WPL level or manage a HGA side but to be honest I can achieve all I want to at Llangollen.
I am still only 35 but have been managing sides for the past 10 years or so.
I feel content and realise what a privileged position I am in to be able to manage my town's football team.
The history of the club is fascinating and the people involved now are superb.
Short-term I want to help the club into tier-three and I would love to repay the support of the community with some silverware, but perhaps more importantly I want to increase the link between youth and senior sides and develop our facilities to benefit the whole town.
Nothing has made me prouder within football than being able to give the upcoming talent from the town their debuts.
The football landscape is changing and there is more emphasis on the community aspects of football.
We have had that for years here at Llangollen so we need to build on that. Maybe one day we will see the club back in the HGA.Ah, the Australia Diary Company. I have no idea what this place has to do with Australia. It’s a rather famous traditional Chinese eatery in Jordan, Kowloon. They’re known for their egg and milk puddings, macaroni and scrambled eggs. Honestly, it’s like food from the 70s / 80s.
Still, it’s in all the guidebooks so you gotta go. Expect a queue but don’t worry – it moves pretty quickly (and so will you).<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: Search catalog shows incorrect range when the user pages beyond the results
username_0: Steps to reproduce:

1. Set up a fresh Metacat install w/ MetacatUI
2. Insert one metadata record (e.g., EML 2.1.1)
3. Browse to `/data/page/2`
4. See 

<img width="197" alt="Screen Shot 2019-06-13 at 4 00 06 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/563/59474882-162c0b80-8df5-11e9-97e2-196bc6356c4a.png">

Expected behavior: "Datasets 26 to 50 of 1" or something else?

Normally, a user can't get here because the buttons for the next page are disabled but a bookmark could lead a person here or a person could guess the URL from the pattern we use.

I also notice that the text says "Datasets 1 to 1 of 1" (incorrect plural [filed here](https://github.com/NCEAS/metacatui/issues/970)) but could also be "Dataset 1 to 25 or 1". I think the pattern "Dataset(s) {1 + nResultsPerPage * (pageNum - 1) } to {1 + nResultsPerPage * (pageNum - 1) + nResultsPerPage} of {totalResults}" covers all use cases.
<issue_comment>username_1: Thanks Bryce. Should be a simple fixThis is FURLA’s second shop designed by the prestigious architectural studio David Chipperfield, an elegant concept unveiled at Milan Fashion Week last September.
The 149 sqm flagship store is divided into a series of minimalist yet distinctive rooms linked by sumptuous arches.
The recurring presence of the Furla arch symbol inside pays homage to over 90 years of history, heritage and Italian identity.
Furla was established in Bologna in 1927, a city renowned worldwide for the presence of the famous Bologna Portico arches. The interior has intriguing tactile textures: the walls are covered with raw earth obtained by mixing different natural clays. This plaster contrasts with the smooth, continuous surface of the floor covered with the traditional Italian Pastellone finish.
Arched modular structures support anodised aluminium shelves, defining a minimalist but striking framework that offers a contemporary interpretation of Carlo Scarpa’s interiors.
The shop reflects Furla’s Italian lifestyle and features its collections of bags, small leather goods, shoes, sunglasses and scarves.
Workflows are the fundamental building blocks of business processes in any organization today. These workflows have attributes and outputs that make up various Operational, Management and Supporting processes, which in turn produce a specific outcome in the form of business value. Risk Assessment and Direct Assessment are examples of such processes; they define the individual tasks integrity engineers should carry out. According to ISO 55000, achieving excellence in Asset Management requires clearly defined objectives, transparent and consistent decision making, as well as a long-term strategic view. Specifically, it recommends well-defined policies and procedures (processes) to bring about performance and cost improvements, improved risk management, business growth and enhanced stakeholder confidence through compliance and improved reputation. In reality, such processes are interpreted differently all over the world, and the workflows that make up these processes are often defined by individual engineers and experts. An excellent example of this is Risk Assessment, where significant local variations in data sources, threat sources and other data elements, require the business to tailor its activities and models used. Successful risk management is about enabling transparent decision-making through clearly defined process-steps, but in practice it requires maintaining a degree of flexibility to tailor the process to the specific organizational needs. In this paper, we introduce common building blocks that have been identified to make up a Risk Assessment process and further examine how these blocks can be connected to fulfill the needs of multiple stakeholders, including data administrators, integrity engineers and regulators. Moving from a broader Business Process view to a more focused Integrity Management view, this paper will demonstrate how to formalize Risk Assessment processes by describing the activities, steps and deliverables of each using Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) as the standard modeling technique and extending it with an integrity-specific notation we have called Integrity Modelling Language or IML. It is shown that flexible modelling of integrity processes based on existing standards and best practices is possible within a structured approach; one which guides users and provides a transparent and auditable process inside the organization and beyond, based on commonalities defined by best practice guidelines, such as ISO 55000.
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) is a time dependent mechanism. Three conditions are required at the same location for the formation of SCC namely, susceptible material, susceptible environment and sufficient stress. Pipe age, operating stress level and coating type are significant parameters in determining the susceptibility to near-neutral pH SCC; whereas, additional parameters such as operating temperature and distance from compressor station are considered for high pH SCC. Environmental conditions such as soil type, topography and drainage have also shown correlation to SCC susceptibility. Several integrity assessment methods can be used to identify SCC on pipeline including hydrostatic testing, in-line inspection (ILI), and direct assessment (DA). Because the occurrence of SCC is a complex phenomenon and it depends on many parameters, it is important to develop a risk assessment model that can systematically incorporate all relevant evidences of SCC in a sensible way. This paper presents a robust risk assessment model for SCC, which uses evidence from failure histories, observation from assessments (i.e., digs, pressure tests, and ILIs), and mechanistic understanding of SCC (i.e. susceptible coating, pipe material, stress level, soil properties, etc.). This risk model is transparent and updateable, which allows incorporation of new scientific learnings and findings of SCC.
#ifndef ENCODER_MATERIALPARAMETER_H_
#define ENCODER_MATERIALPARAMETER_H_

#include "Object.h"

namespace gplayencoder
{

class MaterialParameter : public Object
{
public:

    /**
     * Constructor.
     */
    MaterialParameter(void);

    /**
     * Destructor.
     */
    virtual ~MaterialParameter(void);

    virtual unsigned int getTypeId(void) const;
    virtual const char* getElementName(void) const;
    virtual void writeBinary(FILE* file);
    virtual void writeText(FILE* file);

private:
    std::vector<float> _value;
    unsigned int _type;
};

}

#endif
Battery "D" was organized along with the 11th. Infantry, having its rendezvous at Coldwater, mustering into the service of the United States on September 17, 1861. Its officers were: Captain Alonzo F. Bidwell, of Coldwater. First Lieutenant Josiah W. Church, Coldwater. First Lieutenant James M. Beedle, Union City and Second Lieutenant William Greene, of Wayne, Indiana.
The Battery left their rendezvous at Coldwater on December the 9th., taking its route to the field in Kentucky. There are no records of its movements prior to June 26, 1863, when they are reported to be under the command of Captain Church, Captain Bidwell having resigned on August 2, 1862. They were engaged in the action at Hoover's Gap, Tn, on June 26, 1863, then in the battle of Chickamauga on the 19th. and the 20th., September following. At Hoover's Gap, they inflicted severe damage upon the southern forces. Their loss in this action was one man wounded. At Chickamauga they were heavily engaged, and overwhelmed by numbers, having to abandon five of their pieces, bring off only a 12 pounder Howitzer. Their loss was nine wounded