 Access
Right now we are gearing up for Early Access in just a few months, and if we're gonna succeed we need some support! Please vote for us on IndieDB to help raise awareness that our game exists! Even if we don't win, but make it into the top 50 nominees, that will help us so much with visibility. So please take a moment to vote for us if you think Abatron is deserves a little love. :)
29 F3d 628 United States v. M Gibb
29 F.3d 628
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Jon M. GIBB, Appellant.
No. 94-1530.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Filed: July 11, 1994.
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
While Jon M. Gibb was serving a three-year term of supervised release, the district court found that he had violated a release condition. The court revoked supervised release and imposed an eighteen-month prison term to be followed by two additional years of supervised release. Gibb appeals the supervised release portion of this revocation sentence.
On appeal, Gibb urges us to reconsider our decision in United States v. Schrader, 973 F.2d 623, 625 (8th Cir. 1992), that a district court upon revoking supervised release may impose both a period of imprisonment and an additional term of supervised release. Other panels of this court have repeatedly followed Schrader, and we have declined to consider the issue en banc. See United States v. Love, 19 F.3d 415, 416-17 (8th Cir. 1994).
Under Schrader, the district court correctly concluded that it was authorized to impose an additional term of supervised release. However, as the government concedes, the district court erred in imposing a prison term and a new term of supervised release which, together, exceed the length of Gibb's original three-year term of supervised release. See United States v. Stewart, 7 F.3d 1350, 1352 (8th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we vacate Gibb's revocation sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing consistent with Stewart and with 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e). Accord United States v. Bewley, No. 94-1045 (8th Cir. Jun. 20. 1994).Freddy's is looking for enthusiastic, friendly back-ofhouse team members for daytime shifts. Responsibilities include guest service, cleaning tasks, dishes, food/custard preparation, teamwork, etc.

Upcoming
Yom Kippur
Surely, this Instruction which I enjoin upon you this day is not too baffling for you, nor is it beyond reach. - Deuteronomy 30:11
Introduction to Judaism - Bet Shalom, Minnetonka, MN
Rabbi Aaron D. Panken, z"l, Memorial Shiur: A Yom Kippur Afternoon of Learning, Prayer, and Inspiration
Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion is proud to partner with Westchester Reform Temple (WRT) and the Union for Reform Judaism to share a Yom Kippur afternoon of learning, prayer, and inspiration. Rabbi Jonathan Blake and URJ President Rabbi Rick Jacobs have organized an incredible program highlighting four distinguished scholars who
Introduction to Judaism - Temple Shalom, Chevy Chase, MD
Virtual
Famous Author Series hosted by Robin Kall: "Reading with Robin"
The virtual series kicks off on September 30th. Robin will moderate a conversation with the following authors about their newly released books:
- Fault Lines by Karl Pillemer, PhD. A ten-year groundbreaking study about family estrangement & reconciliation. Karl is the Hazel Reed Professor of Human Development at Cornell University.
- AData Search Access to data searches enabled by the SBRA (Please note that you can search database only in Serbian)
- Search by parties
- Search by the property a provisional remedy has been imposed upon
- Search by the number of the court decision imposing a provisional remedy
- Search by the number under which the application form for registration of a provisional remedy has been filed in the Register
- Temporary filed submissions search
- Search of data on filed registration applications and appeals
- List of returned mailIBERVILLE PARISH, La. (WAFB) - A Mississippi man was killed Monday morning after his truck ran off the roadway and underneath the Atchafalaya Basin Bridge on I-10.
Shortly before 7:30 a.m. on October 21, state troopers began investigating a single-vehicle crash on I-10 westbound at the Whiskey Bay exit in Iberville Parish. John Cloninger, 50, of Pearl, MS died in the crash.
Louisiana State Police said the crash happened as Cloninger was driving a 2001 Peterbilt tractor-trailer westbound on I-10. For reasons still under investigation, Cloninger ran off the roadway to the right and struck a concrete bridge rail.
After hitting the railing, the truck fell to the ground underneath the Atchafalaya Basin Bridge.
Cloninger, who was unrestrained during the crash, was pronounced deceased on the scene.
Troopers do not yet know if Cloninger was intoxicated, but a toxicology sample was obtained from him for analysis.
Jul 11 2008 by Gordon Bannerman, Perthshire Advertiser Friday
THREE times PA Sunshine Challenge champion David Smith has crashed out of the 2008 tournament.
And reigning champion Willy Hutton from Blair Atholl had a close shave before a 20th hole win over Craigie Hill’s Alan Urquhart.
Auchterarder five-handicap man Smith has dominated the Bill Goff backed event in recent years, narrowly losing out to Hutton last time round after a hat-trick of trips to the Algarve finals.
Smith enjoyed home advantage against regular entrant Craig Mitchell, flying the flag for Craigie Hill.
The four handicapper had to give Smith a shot and looked down and out with three to play.
But Mitchell (48), who specialises in making vehicles wheelchair friendly, got back on track. He held his nerve to win all three remaining holes and take the tie down the 19th.
And with the rain finally easing off he was home and dry with a par to cause a major upset in the formbook.
He said: “When I saw I had drawn Dave at Auchterarder I thought it was my first and last tie in the tournament. He has a great track record.
“I began with a birdie and was playing really well. But was still just one up after five. We were both playing well but Dave was three up with three to play.
“Things looked bleak for me but I wasn’t throwing in the towel.
“We were soaked to the skin by that stage but it actually dried up for the extra hole. I managed a par and that was good enough to see me through. It was quite a contest.”
Now Craig faces six-handicapper Gregor Roach, from Perth, who is playing out of Glen Isla.
*See next week’s PA for full resultsIt took less than two months for Elon Musk to turn Twitter into exactly what he had accused the social media site of being all along: a town square, with a dictator for a mayor, where policy is enacted and enforced based on caprice and political ‒ or, in this case, personal ‒ grudges.
As of this writing, Musk wasin charge ‒ but a poll he conducted asking whether he should resign as Twitter chief returned a solid majority saying yes. No matter what he decides, Twitter would remain his property, and the company’s imperative would be the same: revive Twitter as a forum and as a business by laying ground rules that apply to all, enforcing them fairly, and informing the community when and how that happens. That is, the opposite of what Musk has done.
If there’s anything to learn from the Musk era at Twitter, it’s that the free-speech absolutism Musk claimed to espouse is untenable as a guiding principle. Those running social media sites will inevitably find something they don’t want on their property. Maybe it poses a threat to someone’s physical well-being; maybe advertisers don’t want their brands next to it; maybe it gets the goat of the guy in charge. There are fair and credible ways to deal with this reality. Then there is what Musk did.
The billionaire capped off weeks of erratic rule-making and rule-revoking by suspending the accounts of several US journalists last week. He said they had posted “basically assassination co-ordinates” for him and his family. It seems he was upset that an account had been tweeting public data about his private jet, so he conjured up a policy to justify banning it and used that same policy to justify banning reporters who criticised the move. Eventually, he allowed many to return.
Next Musk exiled those who repeatedly encouraged users to join competitor services; “free promotion” suddenly, was against the rules, too.
Twitter is a private company and a public square. Any owner has the legal prerogative to govern by whim. But owners also bear an ethical