ivik taken from what is believed to be his Facebook page and shown on NRK and TV2. The victim said he recognized the man from the news reports as the gunman.
He was a youth and adult member of the conservative Fremskrittspartiet (FrP) or Progress Party, VG newspaper reports, remaining involved until 2007. The party's most prominent manifesto pledge is to minimize immigration.
His membership was confirmed by a senior party member, Jonas Kallmyr, who is quoted by VG as saying that encountering Breivik was "like meeting Hitler before World War II."
The leader of the Progress Party, Siv Jensen, told Norwegian broadcaster TV2 News she was "horrified" to learn that the suspect was a former member of her party.
"But this is first and foremost an attack against the entire nation. It has affected all of us," she said, saying that her party members stood in solidarity with the youth movement of the Labour Party.
A post in Breivik's name on an online forum, Document.no, from December 2009, talks about non-Muslim teenagers being "in an especially precarious situation with regards to being harassed by Islamic youth."
"I know of many hundred occasions where non-Muslims have been robbed, beaten up and harassed by Islamic gangs," the post reads. "I had a best friend between the ages of 12-17 who was a Pakistani, so I was one of the many protected, cool 'potatoes' that had protection. But this also made me see the hypocrisy up close and personal and made me nauseous."
Such anti-Islamic sentiment is nothing new in Norway or other European nations, where there has been resistance against increasing numbers of Muslims and their practices.
About 3% of Norway's population in 2010 -- 144,000 people -- were Muslim, but that was expected to more than double to 6.5% over the next 20 years, according to a report released earlier this year by The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. That is one of the largest percentage increases in Muslim populations across all of Europe, thanks in part to fertility rates significantly higher than those of non-Muslims.
Another post in Breivik's name in October 2009 advises "Hans", described as the founder of Document.no, to "develop an alternative to the violent extreme Norwegian Marxist organisations Blitz, SOS Rasisme and Rod Ungdom" -- all left-wing movements in Norway.
"The conservatives dare not openly express their viewpoints in public because they know that the extreme Marxists will trump them. We cannot accept the fact that the Labour Party is subsidising these violent "Stoltenberg jugend", who are systematically terrorising the politically conservative," the post reads.
He is making a reference to the youth movement of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who heads the Labour Party.
A Twitter account attributed to Breivik by Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten has only one message, dated July 17. "One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who has only interests," it says, adapting a quote from 19th-century British philosopher John Stuart Mill.
Police have not ruled out the possibility that other people may have helped the suspect.
"The official questioning is starting now," Roger Andresen, a police official, told reporters during a news conference Saturday.
The suspect was cooperating with police, making it clear he wanted to explain himself, Andresen said.
Norway's police website said the suspect is currently charged with breaking paragraph 147a of the penal code -- a terrorism offense, with a maximum sentence of 21 years.
The statement said he was charged in both the Utoya attack and the bombing of government buildings in Oslo, and that the charges might change. "The suspect has never been arrested by the police before," it said.
Two addresses connected to the suspect are being searched, police said. One of them is believed to be an apartment in Oslo and the other a farm in Hedmark.
NRK reports that Breivik is registered as having run a company that produced "vegetables, melons, roots and tubers" -- an industry which allows access to large amounts of fertilizer, the broadcaster notes, which can be used for explosives.
An employee at a Norwegian agricultural cooperative told CNN that the man identified in media reports as the suspect in Friday's attacks bought six tons of fertilizer from her company in May.
Oddmy Estenstad, of Felleskjopet Agr, said she did not think the order was strange at the time because the suspect has a farm, but after the Oslo attack she called police because she knew the material can be used to make bombs.
More details on the man are sure to emerge in the coming hours and days. But what many Norwegians find hard to comprehend is that the chief suspect in the massacre appears to be one of their own.
Stoltenberg stressed that whoever was behind the attacks must be dealt with properly.
"It is very important that those who are responsible -- one or several persons -- are sentenced according to Norwegian law, in the Norwegian system of justice," he said.
"Norway is a small country but it is a proud country. We are all very close, especially in times like this."
CNN's Laura Smith-Spark and Cynthia Wamwayi contributed to this report.Il régnait apparemment une certaine confusion quant à savoir qui, au juste, les Américains appuyaient.

Translate to English.
There was apparently some confusion as to who exactly the Americans were supporting, a point that is still debated to this day.Think of it as the “demon sheep” ad of the Super Bowl (though with much better production values).
During last night’s NFL championship– an event that has become an annual testimony to the incompetence of Madison Avenue ad firms — German automaker Audi aired a commercial intended to showcase that their A3 model is both stylish and green. Boy, did it backfire.
Rather than talking about the closing seconds of the ad, where the A3 breaks out of gridlock to show off its moves, the public focused more on the first 90 percent of the ad — which showed a world dominated by “green police” monitoring the public’s every environmental trespass. It took some pretty tin-eared writing to pitch a green car with the right’ s narrative of environmental statism. It doesn’t work as advertising — but it was a delightful change of pace for those of us who are sick of the MSM hawking global warming ad nauseam.
Here’s Your Bipartisan: “75% Are Angry at Government’s Current Policies” Was “Snowmageddon” Another Win for the Gipper?
Published on Monday, found the evaluations weren’t hard enough, a challenge that’ll be rectified with harder questions in the 20-19 test and also a comprehensive re design out of 20 20. The selective schools evaluation was too simple and too imprecise.
When Questions were too simple, it had been difficult to just monitor the students, whose evaluation results make two thirds of their dent out of 300 which could determine whether and at which they are certain to find yourself a spot.
Additionally, Having concerns which were overly easy made training far better, the analysis found. “highscores can possibly be accomplished by properly answering pretty difficult questions with good consistency — that could result from prep and exercise.
When There clearly were extra-hard questionsthey tended can be seen in maths and overall abilities as opposed to reading, meaning students strong in those areas might stick right out of the bunch.
The report also discovered that the margin of error has been too significant.
“The Selection tests must get a higher level of mistake dimension so as to boost confidence they are able to quantify ability with increased accuracy,” the report said.
Re Action Into the Department of Education’s report to the selective schools evaluation, which found it was biased towards adolescents, students strong in maths and the ones whose parents had been welleducated, had been mixed.
Andrea Connell, leader of Sydney Girls’ High School, agreed with the findings that are suggested, including trying to secure more disadvantaged, female and handicapped students in to the school process.
She welcomed a strategy to create the evaluation less observable towards students strong in maths.
“In case We’re talking about taking a look at the weighting of their overall ability and maths segments and giving a marginally deeper focus on English and writing and reading, I feel that is clearly a fantastic issue to spot,” she explained.
However, Christina Ho out of UTS, whose study had relied on particular schools,” said the report identified that the biggest problem whilst the very low variety of disadvantaged students while in this system, however, indicated just obscure tactics to address it.
Government couldn’t provide more tangible suggestions for how to tackle the gap,” she explained.
Doctor Ho also criticised a strategy to make the test stricter by making sure all Students are more prepared, following the report found training helped Students understand what to anticipate and manage their period.[ORGASM] Low Pressure Ejaculation? (M)

Hi all, first post on here.  
I've had this problem for perhaps four months now and I thought it would go away after a while.  
Before, whenever I would orgasm, it would come out with considerable pressure/speed. But recently, all that ever happens is that it oozes out instead of shooting out. I masturbate semi-regularly, and have even tried holding off on it a while to see if it helps, but nothing.  
I should add that I'm a healthy,