 credit for his role in helping integrate Hernando schools.
I was glad to see that his audience included white representatives of the School Board, County Commission and Brooksville City Council.
I was encouraged to hear the speech of Anton Southall, 12, and felt even more hopeful, interviewing him afterward, to hear him talk so knowledgeably about the historical significance of different eras' African-American leaders.
President-elect Obama will not overshadow King's reputation, Anton told me: "He enhances it, because he's following up on the legacy Dr. King left behind.''
Still, I wondered why I didn't see more children Anton's age honoring King's memory. And why I didn't see more attendees of all ages — I counted only about 150 — especially considering that the holiday fell on the eve of Obama's historic inauguration. And why more ordinary white residents hadn't taken a few hours from their day to honor King.
Finally, I wondered why the celebration wasn't held, as it was for more than 15 years, on the steps of the Hernando County Courthouse.
Nobody I talked to seemed to be as concerned about this as I was.
Wayman Boggs, president of the Hernando County Chapter of the NAACP, pointed out that Monday's celebration was preceded on Sunday by a church service at New Hope Missionary Baptist Church that drew a large, mixed-race audience.
Kennedy Park, on the edge of the mostly black neighborhood of south Brooksville, was the perfect venue for the music and food that was meant to attract young people. And Boggs said the NAACP made a point of making sure white residents were free to attend.
He's right, of course. There's no reason that staging this celebration at Kennedy Park should suggest it was an African-American rather than a countywide event. There was nothing about the location that should have prevented more white people from showing up.
But the comparative lack of diversity was only part of my concern.
Remember that King's message was about pure democracy, a reaffirmation of what this country is supposed to be all about: Everybody deserves a fair shake; no citizens should be denied opportunity; no one group of that citizenry should be arbitrarily beaten down.
It's a message that not only deserves to be heard as widely as possible, which it was when the King celebration included a parade up Main Street, but it also deserves the official approval of our local governments, which the courthouse celebration symbolized.
Why was this tradition lost? Well, as the cost of liability insurance rose, local governments were less willing to waive the expense, said former Hernando NAACP president Andy Williams, and the organization had a hard time raising the money.
"You have to remember, we're a nonprofit organization,'' he said.
The parade was first canceled for this reason in 2005, when the cost of insuring it would have been $1,200; it was held in 2006, but not in the three years since.
To me, it sounds like a problem the city, county and NAACP could solve if they all worked together.
Are there other reasons? Maybe a dimming enthusiasm for the holiday, which is unfortunate but natural.
As holidays age, and King Day was first celebrated in Hernando County 20 years ago, the observance always strays from their inspiration; look at how many people spend Memorial Day at the beach rather than the cemetery.
Maybe, as community activist Richard Howell told me last week, interest waned and attendance dropped because black residents had only one hero to celebrate and not much real proof that his vision was any closer to being realized.
As Anton reminded me, that has decisively changed with Obama's election.
You want more examples of change? Remember that city and county leaders tacitly approved of, and maybe participated in, the rash of lynchings in Hernando County in the 1920s. Remember, they wrote segregation into the zoning laws of the city of Brooksville.
Remember, the city didn't officially adopt a holiday for King until July 1988, and to make room for it on the calendar, it did away with Confederate Memorial Day.
Though belated, that was a historic choice in itself, to honor a legacy of liberation rather than slavery. Returning the King Day celebration to the courthouse steps would say, simply and profoundly, that we stand by that decision.&gt;I want to learn all of the verb tenses....

Why? And what rules do you want to choose for distinguishing a tense from a mood, etc.?

Take a look at [Le Figaro's conjugation website](https://leconjugueur.lefigaro.fr/).  Enter a verb -- say, "chanter" or "écrire" and see what forms it gives you.

I hope that you're not trying to learn the forms for their own sake, but are learning only the ones you need at your present level in order to say the things you want to say.  It's more important to practice actively and often using the forms than to memorize tables.<?php

namespace App\Http\Middleware;

use Closure;

class AuthCheck
{
    /**
     * Handle an incoming request.
     *
     * @param  \Illuminate\Http\Request  $request
     * @param  \Closure  $next
     * @return mixed
     */
    public function handle($request, Closure $next)
    {
        $reqType = explode('/',$request->route()->uri)[1];
        $role = ($request->user()->type === 'ROOT')? 'admin' : strtolower($request->user()->type);
        // dd($role);
        if($reqType === $role){
            return $next($request);
        }else{
            abort(400,"Access Denied");
        }
        
        // $main = explode("\\",$request->route()->getActionName());
        // $controller = explode("@",$main[4]);
        // $controller = $controller[0];
        // $module = $main[3];
        // // $department = strtolower($request->user()->department);
        // // $access = $request->user()->access;
        // if($request->user()->tokenCan($module.":".$controller) || $request->user()->department === "ROOT"){
        //     return $next($request);
        // }else{
        //     abort(400,"Access Denied");
        // }
    }
}
Without defending the reasoning behind this design, here's what may motivate it: 

* For those replaying the game, Maruki is a new character, so it'd make sense that he'd be tied to the new ending.
* For those new to the game, P5:R pushes his confidant track pretty hard with frequent reminders. 
* Plus, his knowledge of psychology seems very close to what's going on with cognitive psience. 
* Returning players would be highly motivated to pursue the new track. New players would experience either ending for the first time, and so either good ending is, in theory, valid. (As you say, the original ending is already very satisfying.)

I can understand being miffed at this kind of ending design. I haven't made up my mind about it myself. On the one hand, I like that there are multiple valid endings, with one of the endings requiring a bit more initiative and planning but both endings being *pretty good*. On the other hand, I sometimes found Persona's tendency to lock endings behind specific decision chains or conditions rather annoying, especially for first-time players who may not know that's coming. Also, it's totally valid to view the remaining content on the other ending track *missed* or a *mistake*. I might be disappointed too. 

With that, all I can say is that I'm sorry you got locked out of the new content, but I'm glad you enjoyed the original ending. Welcome to Persona.Sales reps get insights that they can use to improve their objection-handling tactics. Marketers get insights that they can use to optimize their messaging. Product managers get insights that they can use to adjust their roadmap priorities. Nearly every department can gain meaningful insight when you have an understanding of where and how your company wins—or loses—against your competitors.
But before anyone can improve, optimize, or adjust, you need data. That’s where win/loss interviews come in.
What product or service, if any, did you choose over ours?
What’s the one thing you would change about your experience with our business and products?
How would you rate our demo (or trial) experience?
Why did you (not) decide to buy now?
What is a win/loss interview?
A win/loss interview is a conversation between a buyer in your market and either (1) an employee at your company or (2) a third-party contractor. Regardless of whether the buyer chose your solution or one of its alternatives, the purpose of a win/loss interview is to determine why they made the purchase decision that they did.
Typically, if the interviewer is an employee at your company—perhaps it’s you, dear reader—they’re a member of either the marketing team or a dedicated sales enablement team.
You may wonder: If win/loss interviews are sales-centric conversations, shouldn’t they be conducted by sales reps? After all, by the time a buyer makes a purchase decision, they already have an established relationship with the sales rep with