 Hydra should probably be a 3rd-4th item.  I would always make GA my last item or at least my fifth item, just to leave a space in my inventory for wards. 

Other items that may be smart to build in certain situations as a 3rd-4th item could be LW (especially if you didn't get brut), Spirit Visage/Omens (if you're dying a lot/behind).While I don't do foodprep, I am a "make to much eat it for the next 2-3 days" kind of person. It's all a matter of what kinds of food you make. I learned to cook for my family as a kid and basically everything I make is automatically served for 3-4 people.         

Regardless, if a food is wet or has sauces on it...yeah it can get kinda wiggy after a day or so of refrigeration. Salad is a decent example if you use dressing. Whenever I make salad I usually only put dressing on the amount I am eating. Since dry fridge salad stays nicer than dressed salad.MUNCIE — 85 years ago Thursday.
That was a discussion among Muncie students and residents as they took part in National Anthem Day, which trended all across social media.
March 3, 1931 is when "The Star-Spangled Banner" became the official national anthem of the United States.
Star Press reporter Rebecca Bream and Star Press photographer Jordan Kartholl spent time with adults and students at Motivate Our Minds, Ball State University and Bethel Pointe Health & Rehab.
After some interesting Star-Spangled facts were shared, the groups answered trivia questions including their favorite memorable national anthem performance, the name of the historical figure who wrote our anthem (Francis Scott Key) and what U.S. president (Herbert Hoover) was responsible for signing a congressional resolution on March 3, 1931, making "The Star Spangled Banner" our national anthem, (nationaldaycalendar.com).
And of course, there was also plenty of "Star-Spangled Banner" singing involved.
Overall, participants were quite impressive with their knowledge of our country's anthem.
Their singing wasn't too bad, either.There are only 6 articles in our cycle on the losses of Russia and Germany in the Great Patriotic War. The first four were devoted to the losses of Russia, and the last two (today's and next) - to Germany.
In the previous parts of the review ("Aesopian language of loss: the pan-European empire VS Russia" и "Losses of Russia / USSR in the war against fascism: language of numbers" it was stated that Europe of those years (in a thirst for superiority and reprisals against the barbaric Slavs in the East) united against a common enemy - Russia. That led to huge losses of both the servicemen of the Red Army and civilians of the USSR.
In the third part Civilian casualties in 1941-1945: fakes and facts documents and figures were considered about the huge and inexplicable by nothing other than the inhuman cruelty of the Nazis-punitive, casualties among the civilian population of our country in that war.
In the fourth part Typhus 1941-1944: bacteriological warfare investigated the version that the Nazis deliberately destroyed the civilians of Russia, infecting them with typhus. The fact is that already at the beginning of the war, the Wehrmacht had a vaccine against this infection. Whereas the USSR only by 1942 was able to invent such a domestic typhus vaccine and establish its mass production. In addition, to protect the army and people from bacteriological aggression during the war years, the work of the country's epidemiological service was completely restructured.
In this fifth and the next sixth parts, we will examine in detail the extent of Germany's losses. Since a lot of material has been selected to describe this issue, we will need two articles at once for its detailed presentation.
Thus, in our first article on the losses of Germany in 1941-1945. we will consider in detail various versions about the number of both captured and missing Wehrmacht soldiers.
To this day, disputes about the exact figures of the losses of the German army in the battle with Russia / USSR continue. We are talking about those figures that can be substantiated by statistical methods. Experts refer to the lack of true statistics on Germany's losses, which is motivated by various circumstances.
A relatively understandable situation with the number of prisoners of the Nazi army in the Great Patriotic War.
Based on domestic data, it is known that about 3 soldiers of the Third Reich were captured in the USSR. Moreover, 172 of them were held in the institutions of the NKVD.
In total, 2,73 million former soldiers of the German army have been in Soviet captivity.
German historians, on the other hand, believe that the Russians underestimate the number of the Third Reich military personnel placed in camps. They insist that there were not nearly 2,4 million (Russian archives) in our prisons, but about 3 (German lists including missing) fascists.
“During the war, about 3,15 million German soldiers were captured by the Soviet Union, most of them during the retreat of German troops in 1944–45. and after the German surrender.
Approximately one in three died in captivity. "
Between the domestic and Western approaches to counting, there is a difference in the calculation of the Germans who fell into our camps during the war.
As it can be easily calculated (3,1 million people minus 2,4 million people), we are talking about approximately 700 differently recorded prisoners. This is the number of Wehrmacht fighters who are missing. (At the same time, the Germans put them in the category of those who died in the camps of the USSR. And Russian historians count them among those killed during the fighting).
Experts explain this dissimilarity of figures by the following circumstance. First of all, the results of counting the dead German prisoners of war, registered in Russian and foreign archives, differ. So, according to the research of domestic specialists, 356 fascists died in captivity at the Soviets. Whereas historians in Germany increase this number of German prisoners of war at least 700 times. In other words, in Berlin it is believed that 3 German servicemen have died in Soviet captivity.
Of these two points of view, the most reliable is the position of Russian scientists, who explain this difference of 700 as follows. From the standpoint of Russian historians and documentary filmmakers, these are the very Germans who really did not return from captivity to Germany and therefore are rightly considered missing there. But in fact, they did not die at all in the Soviet camps, but were killed even before that - earlier and on the battlefields.
The overwhelming number of published works on calculating the combat demographic losses of the Wehrmacht and the SS troops as a basic source rely on the Central Bureau (department) for recording the losses of personnel of the German armed forces, which was included in the General Staff of the Supreme High Command of the German army.
Of course, Western historiography gravitates towards double standards. Everything Soviet and Russian (including counting methods, statistics and even lists) is a priori called “unreliable”. While everything German, including their statistics, is declared the ultimate truth.
Nevertheless, if you take a closer look at the German statistical that vaunted pedantry, then in fact it turns out that it was just there that she stumbled. The work of this German department of loss accounting did not impress, first of all, the German experts and researchers themselves, precisely because of its dubious credibility.
Take, for example, a respected German expert like Rüdiger Overmans. Recall that this German military historian of the Bundeswehr specializes precisely in the period of World War II. And his book "The military losses of Germany in the Second World War" (1996, 1999, 2000, 2004) is one of the most complete works on the losses of the Wehrmacht during that period. Therefore, his opinion about the quality of German statistics of those years is quite competent.
«channels of receipt of information in the Wehrmacht do not detect to the extent authenticitywhich some authors ascribe to them ”.
“No data” / no specific data ”.
«loss information became increasingly incomplete».
“The other problem - meaningful quality of statistics».
Most of all claims from German specialists are in the statistical category "missing". The fact is that since 1943, it was this group of losses that played an increasingly significant role in the statistical array of all Hitler's soldiers who died. By January 31, 1945, 50% of all German losses were already listed as “missing”.
In this category, German officials included everyone whose whereabouts were unknown.
Error correction (in relation to those cases when the missing returned to their units, or when, lagging behind their units, the servicemen continued to fight as part of other formations, or when, being wounded, they ended up in hospitals, and their units did not it was known) not practiced.
"In this way, reports about the missing in fact turned out to be more truly missing».
It turns out that the point of view of Russian historians is fully justified and, moreover, it is fair.
“Therefore, taking into account all aspects neither RCW data nor publications based on them can be considered reliable».
"The official report of the department of losses in the headquarters of the Wehrmacht, relating to 1944, documented that losseswhich were incurred during the Polish, French and Norwegian campaigns and which presented no technical difficulties in identifying, were almost twice as high as originally reported».
Most experts are of the opinion of B. Müller-Hillebrand (Burkhart Müller-Hillebrand), who calculated the casualties of