 are born equal and should be treated equally, it suggests that women can achieve the same levels of dignity and spirituality as men can achieve. In fact, a close reading of the remainder of the text shows that the Koran propounds multiple other teachings and commandments in the same manner, as if to reaffirm that the same rights and privileges apply to both “believing men and women” (24: 30-31; 33: 58; 48: 25; 57: 12; 71: 28). Whenever Allah speaks of piety, hypocrisy or any other human quality, good or bad, he almost invariably puts a verbal sign of equality between them (9: 67-72; 33: 73; 57: 13-18; 85: 10). Attesting to the perceived equality of men and women is also verse 24: 26, which proclaims that impure women are for impure man and vice versa, while pure men are for pure women and vice versa. In this sense, the Koran does not denigrate the value of women relative to the value of men.
In verse 3: 195, Allah invokes the principle of gender equality even more specifically, stating: “be he male or female, you are members of one another.” The Koran alludes to gender equality in some other contexts too. For example, in verse 30: 21, Allah says that “they [your wives] are your garments and ye are their garments.” Again, this metaphor could be interpreted as suggesting that men and women are equal. Furthermore, commenting on the tendency of men to lament the birth of baby girls, Allah reasons that their judgment is miserable and wrong (16: 58-59). In propounding the equality of males and females, the Koran does not stop at this level, continuing to explain that men and women are – to a certain extent – equal, not least because they were created “of like nature” and “from a single person” (4:2).
Yet, although all the aforementioned verses from the Koran could indeed be invoked to argue that the Islamic religious text advocates the equality of men and women, there are very few verses that do so in a straightforward manner. It appears from the consulted secondary sources that Muslim apologists often refer to verse 2:228 as one of the strongest indications of gender equality in the Koran (Wadud, 1999). More specifically, the verse proclaims that “women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable” (2: 228). Taken out of context, such phrases can indeed be construed as further affirming the equality of men and women in matters of divorce. Yet, if the entire verse is quoted, it appears that the rights of men and women in matters of divorce are suddenly not as equal as originally thought. Thus, the verse makes a reservation that men “have a degree of advantage” over women (2: 228). In essence, a close reading of the Koran demonstrates that this religious text makes multiple other such reservations. For example, verse 4: 19 forbids men from inheriting women against their will and treating them harshly as long as these women have not “been guilty of open lewdness.” In other words, those women who have been found guilty of lewdness deserve harsh treatment and other similarly condign punishments, according to the Koran.
If ye are in a state of ceremonial impurity, bathe your whole body. But if ye are ill, or on a journey, or one of you cometh from offices of nature, or ye have been in contact with women, and ye find no water, then take for yourself clean sand or earth, and rub therewith your faces and hands.
Verse 4: 43 exhorts men to do exactly the same after contact with women. In other words, the Koran equates contact – either sexual or casual – with women to other impurities. It makes no similar admonitions to women who had contact with men. Likewise, it should be noted in this context that the Koran diminishes the value of women in less obvious ways. For example, verse 52: 27 reads that “those who believe not in the hereinafter name the angels with female names.” In essence, although the Koran does not explicitly explain whether angels were males or females, this verse implies that the very practice of giving female names to divine beings like angels is offensive. By extension, however, this verse could be said to epitomize, if not endorse, the practice of treating women as inferior to men.
The iniquitous treatment of women in the Koran also manifests itself clearly in matters of inheritance and court testimony. Thus, verse 4: 11 advocates that the male should inherit “a portion equal to that of two females.” Verse 4: 176 offers similar calculations, insisting that males should inherit more than females. In the same vein, the Koran suggests that men are more worthy than women in that their testimonies are more reliable. More specifically, verse 2: 282 explains that a man engaged in legal proceedings should “get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women,” so that one of these women could correct the testimony of the other in case of need. Regardless of how Muslim apologists and critics of Islam interpret this verse, common sense indicates that men’s testimony has greater value than women’s testimony from the perspective of the Koran.
Importantly, even when Koranic commandments are not related to the matters of equality, they can be restrictive in nature. As far as veiling is concerned, for example, the Koran refers to the concepts of chastity and righteousness to explain that women should “guard their modesty” by concealing their beauty and lowering their gaze in the presence of people who are not their immediate relatives (24: 31). Only elderly women, the Koran maintains, have a moral right to take off their outer garments in the presence of strangers, provided that they do not make a completely “wanton display of their beauty” (24: 60). From the standpoint of most westerners, such commandments can be interpreted as restrictive and dogmatic, if not outright debilitating (Wadud, 1999). From the perspective of many Muslims, however, such commandments only serve to reinforce a tradition – the tradition that promotes female chastity. Overall, different interpretations of the practice exist. Yet, as long as women living in conservative Muslim societies disagree with such commandments, it could be said that the Koran does stifle their self-expression.
In conclusion, this essay has shown that the Koran offers an ambiguous portrayal of women. On the face of things, Koranic teachings imply that righteous women are equal to righteous men in the sight of Allah. The religious text admonishes repeatedly that males need to treat women with dignity in most cases. At the same time, however, the Koran also justifies harsh treatment of women in certain situations, such as open lewdness. Furthermore, this essay has shown that the Koran diminishes the value of women relative to the value of men. Women’s limited inheritance rights and their diminished capacity of testifying before the court demonstrate this point clearly. Their obligation to veil against their will, as prescribed in the Koran, is yet another confirmation that the Koran is in many ways misogynistic in its attitudes to women.
The Koran (A. Ali, Trans.). Medina, Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Holy Quran Printing Complex.
Wadud, A. (1999). Quran and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
Chastity And Women In Koran. [online]. Available at: <https://edubirdie.com/examples/chastity-and-women-in-koran/> [Accessed 6 Jul. 2022].
In the last one hundred years women have made tremendous progress in many parts of life. Of that there can be little doubt. The latest Today women can compete in sports, once completely dominated by males; and they excel at it. But even today women...We partner with Prime Factors®, provider of cryptographic data protection platforms, to introduce its Bank Card Security System® (BCSS) as well as its Card Security and Personalization capabilities into the our ConnectCore – Card Management offering. The combination ensures ConnectCore customers around the world that critical cryptographic payment card issuance functions are completely secure and sufficiently broad to address their needs.
Prime Factors, known for addressing the cryptographic needs of data centers for over thirty years, developed the Visa Pin Control Software that VISA deployed to over 120 VisaNet members worldwide in the 1980s. Building on that early success, the company developed BCSS specifically to support banks and financial institutions’ magnetic stripe and integrated chip (IC) smart cards. The latter are required for compliance with the PCI EMV standards, known colloquially as “chip&PIN” in many countries. BCSS is now used around the world by card issuers and card personalization service bureaux as the cryptographic key management and card personalization parameter management system for the issuance of millions of cards each year. In addition to BCSS, other product lines include EncryptRIGHT®, a general purpose data encryption, tokenization, and cryptographic key management platform, and Psypher Suite® for data encryption for EDI. The company was founded in 1981 and is based in Eugene, Oregon.
We share a member-level partnership with IBM and collaborate in sharing resources on marketing, selling, training and technical knowledge. We also have strong technology synergies and interact closely with the regional IBM Innovation Center to utilize IBM expertise in porting and deriving solution architectures.
IDEALINVENT has successfully ported ConnectCore - Front end on IBM Websphere on the System X and System P platforms. We have completed performance testing on critical business parameters; concurrent login