 to confusion in devtools or other places. 

See https://github.com/mdn/learning-area/issues/122 for original report.
<issue_comment>username_0: See original report for updates.<issue_closed>:  (416) 386-1067
Direct Phone: 
161 Bay Street Suite 3600Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1
Canada
With total assets of $24.0 billion, Element Financial Corporation is one of North America's leading fleet management and equipment finance companies. A shareholder vote has been scheduled for September 20, 2016 to consider approval of an arrangement to separat...more
Other People with the name BelloLisa Bello
The Ethical Community Charter SchoolDiana Bello
National Computer Leasing CorporationCarmine BelloElizabeth Bello
JSA Health TelepsychiatryYusuf Bello
David Phillips Furniture LimitedEditor's note: This is a He Said, She Said on the issue. To read this author's husband's take, go HERE.
Who would have thought that five years into our marriage we would still be having this debate? Gender roles. Egalitarianism. Complementarianism.
If you've come here first, please read my husband's take on the issue before continuing on.
The fact that we were both raised in Christian households, yet differ on this and other Biblical issues isn't surprising. We could have been brought up in the same household (which would be, admittedly, concerning) and have two completely different interpretations of Ephesians 5.
I would argue with his definition of egalitarianism. Obviously there are differences — biological, hormonal, stereotypical — between men and women. I don't dispute that. For me, the danger is in going one step further to assume how those differences do or should affect real-life situations — from choice of profession, to division of labor in the home, to the ever-present work v. children debate.
I believe it's inaccurate, or at least short-sighted, to say that women are more naturally drawn toward caring professions like nursing or teaching, while men are attracted to active or powerful careers like engineering or technology. When you accept this as fact, you ignore the societal structures that encouraged that type of funneling to happen. You also ignore that — with those societal pressures dwindling — more women are entering the workforce in "atypical" ways, rising to the ranks of CEO at tech firms, becoming race car drivers, making strides in math and science.
Men fall victim to the same societal pressures. Who could forget the "hilarious" concept of Ben Stiller as a "male nurse" — also known as … a nurse — in Meet the Parents?
Of course, some women are called to teach. Some men are called to build skyscrapers. But to insinuate that a person is better suited to one of those fields simply because of his or her gender is incorrect. And you certainly didn't pull it from the Bible.
The Bible actually talks little about gender roles. It speaks to the roles of husbands and wives, but not necessarily men and women in general. When it refers to men carrying out the task of preaching and teaching, I do believe it is descriptive of the societal norm and not prescriptive for the future. After all, the first person ever to spread the Gospel — the good news of Jesus' resurrection — was Mary Magdalene.
"Submit to one another out of reverence to God."
In marriage, we are called to submit to one another. I submit to the fact that his career requires certain things of me as a preacher's wife — like moving to St. Louis. Twice. He submits to the fact that mine is a real calling and makes sacrifices to help me achieve my goals — like moving to D.C. I submit to him by washing and folding laundry. He submits to me by doing … pretty much everything else, if I'm honest (I got a good one).
The part that follows — the part that says "wives, submit to your husband" — actually doesn't say that. It really reads, "wives, to your husbands," referring to the previous line. So literally: "Submit to one another … wives, to your husbands." By logic, also: men, to your wives.
It's not my goal here to explain away the convicting words of scripture. The same passage also says the husband is the head of the of the wife. To which my husband poetically says," You're gonna have to explain away that one, too."
But really, I accept it. I may not completely understand it. And I may not gracefully practice it. And he might be the head, but the passage later says he's supposed to give his life up for me. I think I got the long end.
I believe what Dr. Mimi Haddad, president of Center for Biblical Equality, says about the egalitarian view: "Females and males are created in God’s image to share dominion. Both are responsible for sin. Both are equally redeemed by Calvary and equally gifted by the Holy Spirit for responsible stewardship."
My husband — though he calls himself complementarian — would agree.
But the issue of complementarianism v. egalitarianism really comes down to how you live it. After all, they're just words.
Georgia citizens should absolutely have the ability the sue state and local governments for violating the United States Constitution, the Georgia Constitution or state law. I don’t believe this constitutional amendment is the proper way to provide that option.
Previous legislatures passed waiver of sovereign immunity bills on two different occasions. Those bills were vetoed by two different governors, indicating they saw the potential for problems. This year, the legislature took a different approach with a constitutional amendment, an end run around the governor because an amendment can’t be vetoed.
A constitutional amendment is also more difficult to repeal or modify than a legislative bill, consequently, if the proposed amendment passes, the courts could well become clogged with lawsuits that aren’t necessarily frivolous, but motivated by reasons other than putting an end to governmental abuse.
Although the amendment prohibits lawsuits filed against state and local governments from naming individuals, it does not stipulate that a declaratory judgment against a government entity cannot be used as evidence in a subsequent lawsuit against an individual. It might seem obvious that the amendment’s prohibition against naming individuals would not allow a verdict against the state or local government be used in a subsequent suit against an individual, but there are no assurances.
Georgia has many good judges, but it also has a lot of poor ones. I’ve been in courtrooms where the judge did not seem to have a clue about important aspects of the case in front of him. In one instance, during a trial involving a municipal government, the judge did not understand the priority that a city charter has over a code of ordinances. On numerous occasions, he asked for assistance from attorneys on both sides in open court.
Without additional safeguards written into the amendment to prevent abuse and unintended consequences, a “no” vote is appropriate.
Thanks for analysis. You covered relavent points and I totally agree.JUNE WHITFIELD and Bernard Cribbins are to be reunited on screen in what is believed to be David Tennant’s last Doctor Who episode.
The veteran actress – best known for playing Edina’s mother in Absolutely Fabulous, and as June alongside Terry Scott in the ’80s sitcom Terry and June – is in Cardiff filming scenes for the Christmas episode.
She and Cribbins are long-time friends and appeared together on screen in the ill-fated Carry on Columbus in 1992.
Other new faces filming in the capital are Hi-de-Hi! actor Barry Howard and Karl Collins, who plays Danny Glaze in The Bill.
They joined David Tennant and Catherine Tate, who plays the Doctor’s assistant Donna Noble.
Cribbins, who plays Donna’s grandfather Wilfred, was seen sporting antler ears and jumping for joy while climbing on board a mini-bus outside his house.
The Christmas special will be the final of Russell T Davies’ four 2009 specials of the sci-fi series, and will signal the end of his tenure as head writer. The first of them, Planet of the Dead, aired on Saturday on BBC1 and grabbed a peak audience of 8.7 million viewers, and a 39% slice of the audience.Emily Pierce, our head barista trainer here at 1912 Coffee will personally show you what it's like to be in the coffee industry, showcasing the techniques of a qualified barista and what they do day in and day out using a portafilter/espresso machine, grinding, pulling shots and steaming milk. Emily will start the class by talking about the history of coffee, where coffee came from, coffee terminology, etc. Once she has finished teaching and showcasing the espresso machine, she will then hand off the portafilter to students -- where they'll get some hands-on experience.
Classes will be on back-to-back Saturdays or Sundays. Two 3-hour classes, 6 total hours. 5 students per back-to-back classes.This is a new Miranda 35mm camera which I’ve added to my growing Miranda camera collection – the Miranda Sensorex II. When I say new I of course mean new to me – the camera is about 40 years old!
I picked this up from my usual source of vintage cameras ebay, and paid about £15 including postage for the body without a lens. For the pictures above I used the lens from my Sensorex.
The supplied view