 certainly do thats what makes us human, it's just isn't shown and reflected most of the time. We keep those things deep down but there is an anger threshold where people can't take it anymore and go on a rampage.She still didn't pay attention to Barry at all before, she basically used him as a shoulder to cry on. The very fact that she had something with a guy like Barry, who has given up on having any kind of personality, friends, hobbies or even opinions for god knows how many years was possible ONLY because she literally paid no attention to him or who he was.  

 

I like how complex their characters are but I think this episode really made the point that excuses only go so far and at some point you need to take a hard look at yourself and realize you're narcissistic and selfish (or a psycho killer, erm). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2011. Pp. x, 426. Maps, notes, biblio, index. $37.50. ISBN: |||PHONE_NUMBER|||.
Marshall and his Generals takes a hard look at more than three dozen of the U.S. Army’s senior-most field commanders during the Second World War.
Prof. Taaffe (Stephen F. Austin University), has written extensively in American military history. In Marshall and his Generals, he focuses on the importance of George C. Marshall in the selection and assignment of senior U.S. Army commanders during World War II. He discusses the criteria used by the chief-of-staff to identify likely commanders, gives short profiles on their military background, useful given that most of the men who commanded armies and corps were even then not particularly well-known, and then goes on to evaluate their performance in the field. None of the officers come away without some critical comment, in several cases contrary to popular opinion, such as Dwight Eisenhower, who made a number of mistakes in North Africa. But Taaffe stresses that Marshall strongly favored men who were able to learn from their mistakes, such as Eisenhower. A short “Biographical Afterward” follows the officer covered into the post-war period. The principal flaw of the work is that Taaffe leaves out several important commanders, notably Walter Short, and includes no airmen.
Despite this reservation, Marshall and his Generals, a volume in the UPK series “Modern War Studies”, is a very valuable addition to the literature on the U.S. Army in World War II.
Advertisements
added: 1 Mar 2013 // by: Music-News.com Newsdesk
Justin Bieber has had his YouTube crown snatched away by Rihanna, who now has more views than any other artist in the world on her official channel (RihannaVEVO).
The Bajan superstar has accumulated over 3.47 billion views while Bieber has fallen behind by around 4 million views on his main channel (JustinBieberVEVO), according to Starcount's social media leaderboard.
Justin Bieber was the first person to reach 3 billion views back in October 2012, with Rihanna following hot on his heels. Impressively, the 'Umbrella' singer closed a gap of 150 million views since Starcount reported Bieber's milestone.
Rihanna's recent video 'Stay' may be accountable for her popularity surge, as it has amassed almost 40 million views in the last two weeks. It is now a two-horse race at the top of YouTube, with Lady Gaga dropping behind Eminem in fourth place with 2.2 billion views.
Rihanna can now claim to be the most popular person on both Facebook and YouTube although she still has some way to go before she can catch up to Bieber on Twitter. The 'Baby' singer reached the 35 million follower mark earlier this week while Rihanna is currently followed by 28.5 million Twitter users. With a new video soon to be released with fellow Canadian and Rihanna's ex-boyfriend Drake, it might not be long before Bieber claims back his YouTube throne.
Top Ten Artists on Youtube
Artist (Channel) Number of YouTube views
Rihanna (RihannaVEVO) 3,473,009,875
Justin Bieber (JustinBieberVEVO) 3,468,086,137
Eminem (EminemVEVO) 2,271,010,123
Lady Gaga (LadyGagaVEVO) 2,212,935,653
PSY (officialpsy) 1,971,319,786
Shakira (shakiraVEVO) 1,894,218,310
Beyonce (beyonceVEVO) 1,754,696,052
Chris Brown (ChrisBrownVEVO) 1,500,251,228
The Black Eyed Peas (BlackEyedPeasVEVO) 1,485,409,286
Jennifer Lopez (JenniferLopezVEVO) 1,477,864,165
Get our free BREAKING NEWS email for Music News and Film News. Subscribe to our YouTube channel, Twitter and NEW Intagram page.
> For more Music-News stories click here
Bookmark this news story:
AdvertisementWith the introduction of GDPR, the requirement to provide "delete me" functionality becomes important.
In this regard I was wondering if there is a possibility to automatically remove inactive users from Dynatrace?
Is there a simple way to at least show the last logon date/time of a user and we can take it from there...?
Hi @Tarjei U.
You can only manually delete users in Dynatrace. We do not have an automatic delete feature.
I echo Brian Ls question, is there a way of getting last login atleast?
Hello, we do not have this information in the product.
Why do you need the last login date/time?
So we could delete any older than XX days - typical AUDIT requirements.
Not a GDPR expert (is anyone?) but in what way would that apply to internal employees which are the only people I expect would be logging in to Dynatrace?
There's the line that employees as data subjects have "the right to be forgotten under certain circumstances" which is quite vague.
Though even in this case first as it's really just a name and probably a company email address and second as there is always the option to delete an account if requested so I'm not sure I would agree that it would be necessary for GDPR compliance but agree it would be nice to have just as a matter of good housekeeping. Again a disclaimer I'm not at all involved in the decisions around this but am just interested.
b) If there is a possibility of autodeleting a user.
So their though process is as follows. Employee Alice quits the company. Her user account in the company will follow the normal processed, and be removed from the AD in due time. However the user in Dynatrace will not. And according to them this is not in line with GDPR.
Don't know about SaaS, but you can delete users and groups (also create them) using REST API in Dynatrace Managed. I'm pretty sure Dynatrace has similar API for SaaS, but it's probably not public.
Typically enterprise customers do have an IAM tool, which handles such cases and creates/deletes users in applications. When someone quits a company, the IAM tool is in charge of deactivating and deleting accounts.
I've never seen a tool which would "autodelete" users if they cannot be found anymore in AD/LDAP.
@Tarjei U. Our current SAML implementation is EAP and not feature-complete. There are know limitations like a user needs to be created in Dynatrace.
We are aware of this and working on a brand new SAML implementation which resolves the two issues you mentioned.
Will this apply to AppMon, and possibly DCRUM in the future as well?
Can you give me an update on the implementation of this feature? We have a customer who is asking the same question and it's very critical for the implementation plan.
This question becomes very critical, and it is important to enable some sort of functionality for all tools in order to comply with GDPR regulations when it comes to removal of user accounts. A local copy of a user containing mail adresse is as far as I can understand personal data. Especially when mail adress i directly linked with the name and a user ident, which they are, more often than not. As Tarjei mentions the user also has the right to removal of their personal data.
We do have service providers as customers, which makes it necessary to be able to automatically remove users from the various Dynatrace tools. I think Tarjei is asking for "last login" in order to be able to identify which users are inactive, and thus should be removed. This grouping of users I imagine could be a possible methodology for group deleting users that aren't active.
Obviously this would in some scenarios bring up another important functionality regarding re-enablement of users deleted, that needs handling... Again, without being in breach of GDPR regulations.
I would generally avoid treating user reviews as implicitly credible.  Anyone is qualified to leave a "review" even though not many people are well spoken or rational enough to leave a useful review.  

Some of what you're reading isn't necessarily wrong, but in many cases, it's not exactly important.  Yes, monsters have more HP in master rank.  No, hunts don't take