Does your department offer a counselling psychology program?
Our department does not offer a counseling psychology program. A Master's of Education degree program that includes a counselling practicum is available through the University of Regina's Faculty of Education. For a listing of similar programs offered in Canadian universities, please visit the website of the Canadian Counselling and Psychotherapy Association.
How much is the cost of tuition and fees for your graduate programs?
Is funding available for graduate students?
Funding is available through scholarships, teaching assistantships, and research assistantships/stipends provided by individual supervisors. Most of our students are successful in securing funding from external sources, such as the funding tri-council. Students who are guaranteed funding will be notified of the details of this funding in their offer of admission.TOP TEN: This week's most popular articles
Round-up includes stories on the new Sound Force loudspeakers from D.A.S. Audio and AKG's DMS800 wireless system.
Stories on the new Sound Force loudspeakers from D.A.S. Audio and AKG's DMS800 wireless system are included in this week's Top Ten round-up.
A review of the SSL Live L300 console and a Studio Profile on Dublin's Windmill Lane Recording have also made our list of the most-read articles from the past few days.
1. Alchemea plans Studio Sale following closure
A raft of audio equipment and furniture from the recently-closed London college is going up for grabs.
2. Studio Profile: Windmill Lane Recording
Following the demolition of the original site, Matt Fellows finds that the Dublin facility remains alive and well.
It may be a compact alternative to the L500, but has downsizing taken away any of the original’s appeal? Andy Coules investigates.
4. D.A.S. launches Sound Force loudspeakers
Series of club systems designed for dance venues where ‘exceptional sound, imposing power and impressive looks’ are key.
5. QSC rolls out Rent It Now program
Initiative allows customers to find participating dealer rental locations that rent QSC products, including mixers and loudspeakers.
6. AKG announces DMS800 availability
Digital wireless microphone system is ideal for theatre, conference, live production and tour sound applications.
7. New Allen & Heath Qu-Pac on Andy The Kid tour
Former Static-X bassist chooses company's latest digital mixer for its user-friendliness and onboard effects.
8. Robbie Williams conquers Abu Dhabi with Sennheiser
SKM5200 MkII mics with 5235-J capsules and SR2050 in-ear transmitters were used for the singer's inaugural concert in the region.
9. Adlib showcases brand partner offering in Glasgow
Rental firm held two open days at the O2 Academy, where L-Acoustics, Soundcraft, DPA and Solid State Logic were all involved.
10. Huge funding boost for 'Save Our Sounds' campaign
British Library receives £9.5m from Heritage Lottery Fund to help save the UK’s threatened archive of over 6.5 million recordings.
Picture: Windmill Lane Recording studio manager Niall McMonagleFirst of all, let me say how refreshing it is, after listening to some of the folks on the LNC, to be put in the position of, for a change, having to differ with people who frame their arguments in terms of how we should not water down our message or support the lesser evil!
However. In the comment Michael quotes from me below, I cautioned against two dangers: (1) watering down our ideas or trying to appear non-radical, and (2) making running for office and seeking votes our primary mission.
I haven't changed my views about those things. But supporting Joel Engardio would do neither. In this case, we *can* walk and chew bubble gum at the same time, i.e. support him while still making it clear where we feel that he falls short (and hopefully get him to improve somewhat). And it doesn't mean we need to focus most of our efforts on running for office.
What other efforts to meaningfully affect local politics would supporting him take time away from? Right now we don't have any local Libertarian candidates. Have you guys looked at Joel's website? I did, and there's a lot more there than in his flier. I'm not saying the content is great by libertarian standards, but he seems to lean decidedly in the pro-freedom direction on both the civil liberties *and* economic liberty sides of the chart.
government agencies or ending foreign involvements (for national candidates).
line on every issue.
(3) My choices do not necessarily restrict the choices of others.
but.....maybe that has something to do with our declining participation.
the number of Lib candidates who I voted for and who got elected.
I read Joel's website before going to the meeting. My "vote" remains firm against the trend we are experiencing of serving merely as an auxiliary for non-Libertarian candidates. However, at this point, I would simply not participate actively in the LPSF, rather than stand in the way of well-meaning members attempting new things.
The question you pose as to what we would be doing with our time instead of supporting non-Libertarians depends on what we mean by "supporting" a candidate. If we mean just telling the candidate "we support you"' then, I would say "nothing". If we mean actually campaigning for the candidate, I would say attending a City Hall meeting and speaking out in favor of a Libertarian position would serve the LPSF better.
As an aside, I heard hopes that Ron Paul would support Johnson. I will be surprised if he did. If he does, I might modify my strong opposition to LPSF's trend.
Beautiful! I had no problem supporting Adachi's pension reform, although I did not support Adachi. A letter grade on issues any candidate espouses is a great idea.
We are few. Our vision stands on the shoulders of great women and men.
It is not for us to bend to the illusions of the mob.
It is to jolt them awake with a clear vision of a free, peaceful, civil community.
I love your suggestion of grading candidates on libertarian criteria.
I don't know of one person who has ever been a member of the LPSF who only supports candidates who are 100% libertarian. Your characterization is a gross distortion. Even an ideologue like myself passionately supports a particular candidate who opposes open borders and worships the Constitution*. That candidate is Ron Paul.
*To understand why supporting the U.S. Constitution does not rank as a defining issue for my type of libertarian, see /No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority/ by Lysander Spooner. It's a seminal libertarian work. Even if you disagree with its thesis, as a knowledgeable libertarian it behooves you to have read it. It's short and it's available free online in pdf format.
I'm not clear how supporting a statist like Joel Engardio would not give the message to anyone who cared (does anyone care?) that we support the usual Republocratic empty promises to make the City Govt more efficient and caring.
I think "statist", like "libertarian", is a matter of degrees. I'm willing to support those who seem to be going further in the right direction than the other available choices, even if it's not as far as we'd like them to go, except in cases where it seems like backing this amount of incremental positive change will negatively impact our ability to achieve more positive change in the future.
But I agree with you that we want people to know what we really want. It wouldn't be a bad idea though to talk on our website (or in brochures) about what we propoose for San Francisco -- sort of our own local platform. We could have one section where we talk about how we would ideally like the city to be governed (or not governed), and another section where we talk about incrementalist ideas for moving in that direction (i.e. the proposed cap on city officials' salaries at $99,999/year discussed at our meeting Saturday).
Hi Starchild and All! Thanks to everyone who weighed in on this issue. Starchild and I were the only ones who felt this candidate was worth recommending/supporting. I felt this candidate was far from perfect but much closer to our ideal than those others at The Board of Supervisors, plus he had an open mind and was receptive to Libertarian ideas. Regardless, the majority has spoken--the LPSF will not recommend or support Joel in his bid for Supervisor.
I also like Les' grading idea. Perhaps one grade on personal issues and another one on economic issues to help clarify our priorities. I think we can revisit this issue again in another meeting.
Me too on the grading idea. Preferably even issue by issue for each candidate (at least on issues where we can get a good idea of their positions).
I agree with Starchild.
Issue by issue would be significantly more informative.<issue_start><issue_comment>Title: Add config for http/https port like stats port
username_0: Subj

We deploy haproxy-ingress on different namespaces, but on same node, that create some issues.
Currently we try resolve it by replace tmplt file.

Thanks.
<issue_comment>username_1: Do you mean change ports 80/443 using a configmap option? All the other port numbers have already a configmap option af