 this game on StubHub... d'oh!
I really want Cliff Lee to be a Yankee next year. Via free agency. Is that going to happen? Or do they going to need to trade for him in-season and give up prospects?
I am totally fine with this
[5] all reports make it seem he is going to test out the fa market and thus would not be inclined to sign an extension.
cashman's mo has been to not pay twice - so i doubt we say a trade for him.
this is where having burnett and his big ass contract might be problematic.
[4] damn, bad move :{
has the makings of a really interesting game. of course, sterling may have something to say about this.
[7] I'll sign up for that. But I'm coming around on paying twice.
[2] I'm sure he can do better, but it's the Post, so he doesn't have to :)
I'm worried about signing Cliff Lee to a long-term contract, actually. He'll be 32 at the end of this season. Three years, okay; more than that, no thanks.
[10] Sure we can debate the terms and shorter will be better. But this is his 3rd consecuative year as best left handed pitcher in baseball. I like the chances of him keeping that up.
[7] I don't think Burnett's contract will be a hinderance. If anything, with the contract situation of Pettitte and Vazquez, it's possibile that the Yanks could go after Lee and let ML flotsam and jetsam round out the rotation.
Who would you be willing (and who would the M's want) to get Lee THIS season?
Joba?
Romine?
Gardner?
[12]
The Yanks of the late aughts have tried to NOT have flotsam and jetsam as their 4/5 pitchers. They've seen enough of Ponson and the like.
One would expect the 2011 version of the Sox to be better (healthier) and that the Rays will be as strong (if not stronger, given their minor league depth). If that's the case, the Yanks can't afford to go into 2011 with CC, Hughes, Lee and 2 question marks.
[13] Lee has been traded twice recently, and neither of those deals contained MLB contributors. Maybe the Ms will try to extract more than the indians and phils were able to get.
In the end, the m's will want more value than the draft picks they're going to get but probably the centerpiece would be one great prospect and a couple of decent prospects.
[13] Not Romine, definitely. And the problem with trading Gardner is that we'd be short an outfielder.
a 2011 rotation of cc, lee, hughes, aj and joba seems unthinkable now, right?
[16]
They definitely have a need for power, so I'd have no problem dealing Miranda (as an example).
[16] Absolutely not Gardner. And yes, that's a complete reversal from my pre-season feelings. He's that important to this team.
[13] I suspect the Yankees will have to part with either Romine or Montero to start. They may take Joba, but given that he'll be arbitration eligible soon, I'd doubt it.
[14] So instead of Ponson, they have Mitre & Gaudin. Yanks and other teams always have these types of guys on hand if not for ML depth, for MiL depth. Of course it should be mentioned that there are other guys on the farm that can step in for a start or three.
Jack Z of the M's would probably want someone nearly ready to help (and that means Montero or Romine), and at least two very high ceiling kids: probably from the pitching side of the ledger. I'm not sure if Noesi fills that bill, but I'd bet someone like Manny Banuelos does.
My own feeling is that the Yanks should pass on a trade. As for free agency, he's worth signing ONLY if the M's don't offer him arbitration. Next year's draft class is overflowing with talent (supposedly), and the Yanks really don't need to give up a 1st round pick again.
Of course if Vazquez is a Type A free agent and the Yanks get a couple of picks from losing him to free agency... consider my previous 2 sentences moot.
A CC-Lee-Hughes-AJ-Joba rotation would be very nice indeed.
Part of me wonders if Lee is worth it, though. His insane level of control this year (still just 4 walks IIRC) is almost certainly a fluke, and it wasn't too long ago (2007) that he was completely lost. If you look at 2008-2010 as his peak (and it may not be!), I wonder if whoever gets Lee is going to be overpaying for that peak and not getting quite as much performance.
This is not someone like Moose, who had almost a decade of rockstar pitching behind him when he became a free agent. Caveat Lee-mptor.
[21] That's a great read on the M's trade demands, I think.
As for Lee's 19/1 K/BB ration in 2010, yeah, that seems like a fluke. As for Lee shutting everyone down, inclding the World Champion Yanks, in the 2009 postseason, I didn't get the sense that was a fluke.
Diane, you could always buy these:
[23]
Heh... that's one section over from where my seats were! LOL
The Japanese soccer team has a player named "Daisuke Matsui".
Disconcerting.
[25] does he have shoulder savings or bad knees?
Probably. What are shoulder savings?
[26] a few off-seasons ago there was this wonderful article about daisuke in which he complained about the red sox training program and said he used up his shoulder savings from japan.
[28]
So now his ERA is higher than his Shoulder IRA?
Oh, right, I remember that!
No, Diane, not the IRA. that's soldier, not shoulder.What type of information does Hexagon receive at its website?
The information we receive depends upon what you do when visiting this site. In general, we receive two types of information: The personal information you provide voluntarily, and aggregated information about visitors as a whole.
Personal Information
We may request personal information when you register for a login account for the website or when purchasing items/tickets from the online store. This personal information may include your name, e-mail address, phone number, street address, etc.
Aggregated Information
We receive certain types of information about general activity at the website. This does not include personal identifying information, but does include how many times the hexagon.org website is visited, what pages are requested most, what domain names (e.g. "aol.com") visitors are coming from and the date and time of each visit. Hexagon, either directly or through various third parties, gathers and compiles this information into an aggregate form for statistical analysis and reporting. These reports track website activity overall rather than on an individual level. Any third party retained by Hexagon to gather, compile, analyze or report such aggregated information shall be obligated to prevent disclosure of any visitor's personal information to anyone other than Hexagon.
How does Hexagon use this information?
The personal information you voluntarily provide is used to fulfill your request (e.g. for information, for sales fulfillment, etc.). Hexagon does not sell, trade, or rent your personal information to anyone. Hexagon does not disclose personal information to third parties, except: 1) When the purpose and manner of the disclosure has been disclosed to you prior to your providing the information, or 2) When disclosure is required by law or by a court or other governmental entity. [In addition, Hexagon may include your personal information in mailing lists for publicizing future Hexagon events and related charitable events, which may require disclosing your personal information to other charitable organizations responsible for publicity for such events.]
Because aggregated information does not include personal information, aggregated information will not identify you. We use aggregated information to help determine things like which areas of the website our visitors, including you, like and don't like based on traffic to those areas, peak traffic hours, etc. This helps us continue to build a better website for you and the rest of our visitors. We may disclose aggregated data to third parties (such as advertisers) or include it in public records.
If we decide to update our privacy policy, we will update this page so that you are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances we disclose it. Hexagon reserves the right to update this privacy policy at any time.
Consent
By using the Hexagon website, you consent to the collection and use of information as described above.Regretfully we have to announce that, due to deteriorating and ongoing health issues affecting key band members, exacerbated by the current crisis, it is no longer possible for the band to continue LIVE work at the intensity and regularity they have been for the past 45 years.
Following medical advice we have instructed our agents and promotors that we have no option but to cancel all shows for the foreseeable future.
Until such times as these pervading problems can be addressed and resolved we cannot now consider taking the risk of exposing vulnerable BLOCKHEAD immune systems to the rigours and stresses of ‘the road’.
