 and discussion thread.
While President Hillary Clinton (and I'm not joking, this woman if she were blonde would have been a dead ringer for HRC 20 years ago, even has the same voice) is practicing her speech at the beginning of the movie she references that all the world has come together and no more national boundaries exist, and humanity is all working together, and blah blah blah.
literally 5 minutes into the movie from here, Jeff Goldblum is having to negotiate entering a landed alien spaceship with this really mean looking congolese war lord who's guys are the stereotypical african militia, I mean we got child soldiers, starving guys with AKs, beat up 1985 Toyota pickup trucks. the whole thing, WTF man?! We aren't they in prosperity flying around in their hovercopters?
The alien foot soldiers are all over the map, like in the movie the one they killed was taken down easily with 9mm pistols, but some of them just take dozens of shots from alien blaster rifles.
Just like in the movie, the military authorities constantly underestimate the enemy they're dealing with. like in the 1996 film they send F/A-18s against a ship described as 15 miles wide, and in this they send the space fighters in a desperate plan against a ship covering a 5th of the planet and then are shocked it has point defense systems.
Patricia Whitmore, the 6 year old first daughter in the original film is now a white house staffer who apparently flies fighter jets on the weekend? I mean it's alluded she was in training and dropped out, but in this film she's flying the space fighter with superb proficency and executing complicated manuvers. Like she must have gotten to advance level of training which makes it all the more weird she's basically filing papers at the White House when the film begins. While we're on Patricia, she's hot.
A glaring lack of victory dance cigars, why no victory dance cigars?
I loved the original, but think I might munch my $8 popcorn in another movie.
This movie premiered weeks ago where I am but I didnt even bother to watch it since the first movie was mind numbingly awful (the space aliens just happen to have an Apple compatible computer system that controls everything and it doesnt have an anti-virus? Puh-lease). Plus a German directed it- with the exception of Wolfgang Petersen, all the other German directors around right now are terrible.
Actually, the whole computer virus thing was explained in a deleted scene. All of modern computer tech is based on science extracted from the downed ship they had at Area 51. That was why they were able to infect the aliens, we were using the same technology. As far as having anti-virus, with a hive mind, what would be the point??
yeah but the undeleted scenes the crazy gay mad scientist (who comes back to life in this film if you haven't seen the trailer) is kvetching that they haven't even been able to turn on any of the technology in the ship until the invaders arrive.
he makes it seem like all they know about the aliens is the biological from probing the aliens from the crash.
Toivomme voivamme esittää Eurooppa-neuvoston kesäkuun kokouksessa Göteborgissa osia integraatiostrategiasta.

Which language is this?

Language: Finnish


Kun luo yleiskatsauksen koko toimintaan, joutuu toteamaan, että toiminnan paremman koordinoinnin ja tehokkuuden lisäämisen tarve on voimakas.

Which language is this?

Language: Finnish


Meitä ajavat eteenpäin kaasukysymys, Venäjä, Ukraina ja toimituksiin liittyvät ongelmat sekä lisäksi öljyn hinnat, ilmastonmuutos ja monet muut seikat.

Which language is this?

Language: Finnish


Sovin erityisesti alkuperäisen esittelijän Figueiredon kanssa, että esittäisin tämän suullisen tarkistuksen, jonka on tarkoitus korvata hänen asiakirjojensa tarkistus 9.

Which language is this?

Language:
Finnishexport * from './applyTriggerPropsToChildren';
export * from './getTriggerChild';
export * from './isFluentTrigger';
export * from './types';
Daily
This is a special edition post, because the girl behind the camera is my very good and talented friend Lea Bernot. Besides her ability to hold a DSLR she is also a fashion enthusiast, so we had some fun with my closet and made three different outfits.
With the street styles increasingly advanced at producing runway replicas and the result is a very good chance of bumping into someone wearing the same outfit. For some that does not bother them at all, but for other the only way to be sure of an original is to go vintage. The difficulty is, where is the good vintage? My answer to that question is my mothers closet, as many of you already know. The vintage bits make your outfit special and unique. Of course you can also be the master of special fashion by buying crazy priced clothes, but if your budget is zero – a predicament familiar to most of us – then there is much to be said for rummaging through one’s own wardrobe.
True, this might sound boring or very obvious, but embark on the task properly. It means that your mind has to be very open and try taking everything out, trying it on, mixing it up in different combinations – and you can discover buried treasures. Believe me I know, having excavated the contents of my fully packed closet last weekend, whereupon I found four different pieces which I can revamp and suddenly they will look entirely right again. I can’t wait to redesign some of my stuff that were bought 5 summers ago, which makes them admirably thrifty, but glorious to behold.
Photos by Lea Bernot
First look:
Second look:
Third look:Song of Deborah as Polemic 7 A. Roll Call of tribes that participated in the campaign (vv. 14-15a). B. Roll Call of tribes that did not participate (vv. 15b-17). Aâ€™. Praise for tribes that have shown special valour in their participation (v. 18). This chiastic arrangement that places the non-participating tribes at the structural centre of the stanza seems designed to draw attention to the non-participants, thus suggesting again that a significant rhetorical purpose of the song may be to present a polemic against non- participation (18). Otherwise, for a song written primarily to celebrate a victory, one would expect the focus to be only on those who contributed to that victory and not on those who did not. Fourth, this surprising attention on non-participation continues in v. 23, where the city of Meroz is cursed for its refusal to help in YHWHâ€™s cause. Interestingly, this is followed by a pronouncement of blessing on Jael in v. 24. Here, the fact that Meroz is twice cursed (rra) while Jael is twice referred to as blessed (Ëšrb) seems to suggest that the two are intentionally juxtaposed for contrast (19). Moreover, since the pronouncement of blessing on Jael is immediately followed in vv. 25- 27 by an account of how she managed to kill Sisera, while the pronouncement of curses on Meroz is explicitly said to be due to its refusal to help, it is highly likely that the curse and the corresponding blessing are intended to represent respectively the consequence of non- participation and the reward for participation. If so, not only does this continue the theme of participation versus non-participation introduced in vv. 14-18, the very juxtaposition of the curse and blessing also seems designed to further reinforce the polemic already introduced against non-participation. Finally, even the placement and description of the actual battle in vv. 19-22 seem oriented towards a further development of the theme â€œparticipation versus non-participationâ€. For not only is vv. 19-22 sandwiched between two sections (vv. 14-18 and vv. 23-27) that highlight participation versus non-participation, the very structure of (18) A similar point is also made by R.H. Oâ€™CONNELL, The Rhetoric of the Book of Judges (VTS 63; Leiden 1996) 117, who notes that by placing the tribes at the geographic periphery at the structural centre in vv. 15b-17, their absence from the rally is shown to be the focal concern of the strophe, which serves a rhetoric of rebuke. (19) This is especially so in light of the fact that rra and Ëšrb are also used in Gen 12,3; 27,29; Num 22,6.12; 24,9; Jer 20,14; Mal 2,2 as a pair that provides significant binary opposition. In fact, areas in which Israel is said to be blessed (Ëšwrb) in Deut 28,3-8 if she obeys YHWH are repeated almost exactly in Deut 28,16-19 as the very same areas that will be cursed (rwra) if she disobeys.A former mining cottage in Adamstown is given a modern makeover