 vacuum cleaner include its features, price, and performance. Some of the best cordless vacuum cleaners on the market today include the Eureka 7200D (which is model number C811), Bissell 9500 PowerLifter, and Hoover UH870-A.
The best inexpensive cordless vacuum cleaner is the Bissell PowerLifter. It has a low price, good features, and is easy to use.
The best cordless vacuum cleaner is the one that is the most quiet and has the best suction.
A good but inexpensive vacuum cleaner is one that uses low-pressure suction to cleanrooms and other small spaces.
A good vacuum cleaner under $100 can be a decent option for the average home. Some of the best options available under $100 include the Hoover HX6265-900, Bissell Breeze 9596-01, and the Kenmore Progressive 5188-11.
Overall, the best cordless vacuum under 150 is the Bissell PowerVac Lx. It has great features and is very easy to use. Plus, it’s a great value for the money.The Environmental Chemical Engineering section publishes high-quality research on sustainable technologies and chemical engineering tools aimed at addressing environmental problems.
Nanomaterials for environmental applications are considered by our sister journal Frontiers in Nanotechnology.
Studies on environmental monitoring, routine remediation and “end-of-pipe” technologies do not fall within the scope of this section.
All manuscripts must be submitted directly to the section Environmental Chemical Engineering, where they are peer-reviewed by the Associate and Review Editors of the specialty section.From a design concept to a crowd-funding campaign to a product backed by a major brand, the Polaroid Socialmatic represents an alternative to traditional product development methods. Is crowd-sourced innovation the shakeup that the photography industry needs?
The Consumer Electronics Show is just about over and, as far as the photo industry goes, it’s been a week of anticipated sequels and sensible updates rather than revolutionary changes. In one notable bit of news, Polaroid featured specs and a release timeline for the Polaroid Socialmatic. That’s not really a surprise, Polaroid has been promoting the camera for more than a year now. But after a series of announcements from Sony, Nikon, Canon, and Panasonic that could hardly be called innovative, the Socialmatic’s unique development is an interesting case study for comparison.
The Socialmatic is a unique concept: a networked camera with instant printing capabilities and a design inspired by the Instagram app icon. It was first introduced in May of 2012 as a design proposal by the Italian firm ADR Studios, which then sought to find a production partner when the concept received went viral. Somewhere along the line, Polaroid took notice and, after reaching an agreement with Socialmatic last February, they agreed to extend their brand name to the product.
It’s often overlooked that the Socialmatic is not a Polaroid property. Instead, it is the eponymous product of Socialmatic LLC, a completely independent company that is still associated with ADR studios. Instead of selling their design, Socialmatic partnered with a company called C&A Licensing, which currently controls the rights to produce Polaroid branded products.
As a part of their deal, Socialmatic is allowed to brand their camera with the Polaroid name and logo, and presumably C&A will share in their earnings. It seems also that there is a continuing cooperation between Socialmatic and the main line of Polaroid products since Socialmatic is being promoted at the Polaroid CES booth and on their website.
Branding contracts aren’t unique in the photo industry. Any Kodak camera you can find in stores nowadays is the result of a similar arrangement. However, the notion of signing such an agreement with a tiny company based only on a design, a strange one at that, is both unique and intriguing.
Innovative and quirky proposals for photography products seeking crowd-funding through services like Kickstarter are a dime a dozen. Recent examples include the Jigsaw Puzzle Pinhole Camera, the Lightstrap iPhone Ring Flash, the Bublcam, and the Pixelstick. Some of these campaigns are successful, and send their products on to commercial success, but all too many die a premature death or suffer from lack of exposure.
That could have been the story for the Socialmatic, but thanks to a Polaroid partnership, it’s looking nearly certain that their brainchild will see the light of day later this year. Whether or not people will buy the odd square camera remains to be seen, but the mere fact that it exists has put Polaroid in far more headlines than their native products this season. Other companies should take note.
By buying out small photography startups, or simply extending branding offers in the same way that Polaroid did, major camera manufacturers can access innovative designs and ideas for relatively small investments of effort and capital. What if, for example, Canon had featured the official Canon meMini wearable camera next to their run-of-the-mill compact updates? Or if GoPro had introduced the GoPro Branded Pocket Drone? Both are existing products — albeit without any affiliations to Canon or GoPro — currently gathering funds from Kickstarter campaigns, similar to the position that the Socialmatic occupied not so long ago.
Sure, neither of the products are in these respective companies’ wheelhouses, but isn’t that a main driver of innovation? Canon’s imaging division will never survive the next decade by simply pumping out a sequence of mildly interesting compact cameras. Products that defy convention can reinvigorate entire brands, or at the very least attract significant press attention.
Consider this: when photographer Kelly Angood launched a Kickstarter campaign to produce a cardboard pinhole camera based on a classic Hasselblad 500 model, Hasselblad threatened to sue her for copyright infringement if she brought the project to completion, and Angood responded by changing her design to a more neutral-looking Twin Lens Reflex camera called the Videre. But what if Hasselblad had offered to strike a branding agreement instead?
By offering their name and logistical assistance, Hasselblad could have associated their brand with a unique product that, thanks to its successful crowd-funding attempt, had already shown the potential for commercial success. It could have been a huge hit, or at the very least would have shown that Hasselblad isn’t afraid to shake things up.
Sure, the Videre doesn’t exactly fit in with Hasselblad’s existing product line, but I’d wager it would have been a far better PR move than the much-maligned Hasselblad Lunar and Stellar.
I won’t get ahead of myself, It would be unwise for camera manufacturers, or any tech firm for that matter, to view Kickstarter and similar services as shopping malls for unique design proposals. Some would likely resist approaches by large brands; there is a reason that they chose to pursue crowd-funding and not major corporate support after all.
But when the biggest names in the business are struggling to adapt to a marketplace that shifts quicker than sand dunes in a hurricane, propositioning designers with big ideas but small means is a fruitful and efficient way to breathe new life into a stale product line.
The active growth of pathologically altered malignant cells inside the uterus can start every woman in a certain period of time. Therefore, the question of how to live with uterine cancer, is important not only for patients with the disease, but for all sensible women. A high percentage of morbidity on the diagnosis is 30-35 units per 100 cases of female cancer in General.
The main reasons for the formation of the disease are hormonal malfunctions inside the woman’s body, occurring more often on the background of age-related changes. After all, according to medical statistics cancer susceptibility processes in the uterus begins 35 years, and peak range of diagnosis is 45-55 years. The weakening of immunity and violation of metabolic processes in the body are also common instigators of malignancy in the uterus.
For cancer of the uterus life expectancy depends on the characteristics of the disease and the degree of neglect. Medical the language of disease has several options: cancer of the endometrium, malignant neoplasm of the body or cervix, swelling of the mucosa of the fallopian shell and others.
One of them is a standalone type of cancer the process is less common because these are diagnoses that do not have certain preconditions and provocations. That is, the disease of the Autonomous origin occurs by itself and often has a genetic predisposition.
Hormonal type of a malignant tumor is a natural phenomenon for cancer, because 80% of diagnoses have causes abnormal production of hormones.
Carcinoma of the uterus and adenocarcinoma.
Squamous cell tumor.
Glandular epidermoid and others.
According to doctors, if time to go to the doctor, uterine cancer can be cured effectively and permanently. But the high performance of promise in the first two stages of the disease.
Almost everyone there are four main phases of the formation of cancer, clarifying the fact that the most dangerous and incurable is considered the last stage. It is hard to confirm or deny the figure clearly, because there are cases when uterine cancer 1 degree have been fatal, but the malignant tumor of stage 3 was to be effective treatment. To judge the assumptions that it: miracles of healing or incorrectly billed diagnosis is only after a detailed examination of the elements of the disease at each stage of development.
The first stage of the formation of cancer in the uterus involves initial tissue damage of the fallopian epithelium. This form of the disease may not have obvious symptoms and diagnosed randomly when passing preventive examination. The effectiveness of cure reaches 90% of success, because at this stage of tumor development by experienced