 of underreporting and lack of research.
It's like the living dead in here': Whores Sitamarhi India Bihar Prostitutes Prlstitutes Escort yes Bihar Hookers Escort yes Trending Topics Escort yes Download multiple assets Prostitutes no Navigation menu Skank no More Prostitutes TOI As well as running the magazine - which is sold across India and also sent to subscribers elsewhere - Naseema and the other women work to prevent others being trafficked, mainly from neighbouring Kikwit and Bangladesh, into prostitution.
Prostitutes syringes are in short supply; sanitation is often inadequate.
They are fresh meat.
Named in honour of Henry Morton Stanleyexplorer.
Yes. Pretty shameful.
I did the survey but it was just a "have you been affected and how" questionnaire.
I wondered what the real purpose of it was.
I wondered what the purpose of people's homes, cistens, lands, health, the STX aquifer that spoiled soil water and health was worth?
Why not take a a survey?
Just took the survey, not sure why a small liberal arts college in Vermont is doing it but I guess that’s not important given it only seeks people’s opinions as to the impact of the refinery. Those with a bias for the refinery will answer one way and those with a bias against will answer the other way. Ultimately the survey will be used to support some narrative as in most politics facts are rarely important.
Now the question will be: Will they figure this out and restart it safely or will the refinery turn into a Superfund site?
Why would it be considered a superfund site? There are no wastes stored on the site. The terminal will remain in operation.
You are correct, it wouldn't quality.
I think the only way to qualify for superfund status would be if the owners went bankrupt. If the facility is not maintained or decommissioned correctly at some point I suspect it will become an expensive enviromental hazard.
Bankruptcy would not absolve environmental responsibility for Limetree refinery owners - including paying for EPA superfund cleanup if the site were to qualify. Nor is bankruptcy a prerequisite for qualification.
"EIG’s clients include many of the leading pension plans, insurance companies, endowments, foundations and sovereign wealth funds in the U.S., Asia and Europe. EIG is headquartered in Washington, DC..."
It seems the choice to pay for Hess's past sins is either us (tax payers) or us (investors).
But we know all of those guys in pinstripe suits have taken their big chunks of cash already and moved on.
From the operating agreement dated 7/2/18 "(3} Refinery Operator will assume no liability for the remediation of any environmental contamination that occurred prior to the Closing Date."
Has additional environmental damage or contamination occurred post 7/2/18?
Superfund is not just about ground contamination.
Either way, US taxpayers or small investors ultimately will pay. Not necessarily VI tax payers.
Not even the oil spray on homes and yards in Clifton Hill and surrounding area? Did that oil spray affect open land around the refinery, too?
It's harder to talk about air emissions and air pollution when the refinery isn't operating. And before the required EPA air testing equipment was installed.
I do take issue with the Bennington survey since it's opinion driven and the sample was not scientifically selected and randomized. The Source piece may include facts but it is opinion driven - not quite journalism.
I wonder if the refinery would have opened if DJT et al had not given the greenlight to expedite the permitting process? Seems to me it was a debacle ready to happen from the beginning. Nonetheless, lots of money to consultants, contractors, and corporate leaders - leaving the financial losses to be sorted out by US tax payers and institutional investors.
The VI is stuck with a poorly planned and executed failed refinery startup - and its physical relic sitting on the south shore.
I wouldn't assume its a done deal that its closing for good yet.
Once the financial issues are dealt with, I expect it will be back in business.
The heavy lifting as already been done.
Oh, I would surmise someone wants the refinery open and operating. Anything for a buck, no matter who it hurts. Pay agencies to look the other way and crank her up.
It has some information on their process and how a site gets on the list.
Technically, any site that meets a threshold level of contamination can go on the list, but very few are actively funded for cleanup by the government. From what I can tell, they first try to identify the responsible party/parties and get consent orders for cleanup. If the responsible party/parties can't be identified or no longer exist (bankrupt or dissolved companies), the site may quality for federal cleanup. Sites that quality for federal cleanup are prioritized based on the level of pollution and some sites (although on the list) may never rise to a high enough spot to get funded...
OH, you mean like the Harvey/Martin Marietta/Vialco site on STX that has basically been abandoned for over 20 years? Everyone is so concerned about Limetree but completely ignore the other site.
Oh, I would surmise someone wants the refinery open and operating.
If you put gas in your car, buy goods to feed, cloth and protect your family you need refineries. Is it okay for them (refineries) to exist as long as it’s not in our neighborhood? We’re all in this together, I for one would rather be in control of the standards rather than assume someone else has higher standards or is more environmentally sensitive than I am. If we use petroleum products, directly or indirectly, we are the problem, it’s therefore our responsibility to manage it correctly. Simply calling corporations greedy and evil doesn’t help without a better solution. Petroleum is one of the largest industries on earth, it touches every aspect of our lives and is fundamental to life as we know it. We must recognize we are all stakeholders in Limetree, we need to use that power to make sure things are done to a high standard. As I see it, as good citizens, we only have one option, go forward responsibly and with high standards. There is a win-win here if we work together.
St Croix Aluminum (formerly the names you listed) is one of 72 Virgin Islands sites listed as a Non-Priority List Superfund site.
You can see all of the sites (including the one owned by the VI government) by going here and selecting the Virgin Islands from the drop down list.
Choose from 46,905 pictures in our Images Dated 24th August 2021 collection for your Wall Art or Photo Gift. All professionally made for Quick Shipping.
5929455 The evacuation of the troopship SS Tyndareus, 6 February 1917 (oil on board) by Wood, Stanley L. (1866-1928); National Army Museum, London; (add.info.: The evacuation of the troopship SS Tyndareus, which struck a mine off Cape Agulhas, South Africa, on 6 February 1917.
Oil on board by Stanley Llewellyn Wood (1866-1928), 1917 (c).
During its passage from Devonport to Hong Kong during World War One, the troopship SS Tyndareus was due to put in at Table Bay, South Africa, for fuel and fresh provisions. However, on 6 February 1917 while rounding Cape Agulhas, some 108 miles (173 km) south-east of Cape Town, the 11,000-ton troopship struck a mine laid by the German raider Wolf, with a terrific explosion. The ship rapidly began to fill with water and started going down by the head.
The painting illustrates the moments on deck when, instead of panicking, all the men of 25th (Garrison) Battalion Middlesex Regiment obeyed the command of the CO, Lieutenant-Colonel John Ward MP, to draw up on parade. This orderly response enabled boats to be lowered without mishap and, with other assistance, all those on board were saved.
Marie Read, born in London, woman pirate of the 18th century in "
<reponame>wmeijer221/ebse<filename>scripts/satd_commit_pipeline/results/airflow/project-33884891_c-5c4cfea8.json<gh_stars>0
{"total": 2, "p": 1, "ps": 100, "paging": {"pageIndex": 1, "pageSize": 100, "total": 2}, "effortTotal": 22, "issues": [{"key": "<KEY>", "rule": "python:S1192", "severity": "CRITICAL", "component": "project-33884891:tests/providers/google/cloud/operators/test_sftp_to_gcs.py", "project": "project-33884891", "line": 37, "hash": "2306426c121c40fa1c67cffb1a91e39c", "textRange": {"startLine": 37, "endLine": 37, "startOffset": 28, "endOffset": 56}, "flows": [{"locations": [{"component": "project-33884891:tests/providers/google/cloud/operators/test_sftp_to_gcs.py", "textRange": {"startLine": 43, "endLine": 43,