 is how to not take it personal and be able to roll with the punches to were it really is no big deal to me vs shitty texting my emo feelings.

**And also my frustration comes from** feeling like I'm doing "all the right things". Dating several non college aged women, who want an arrangement, use the money for food vs a new purse - nothing wrong with either just that they have an immediate need for survival vs growing a collection. So when I feel like I've done everything "right" and it still doesn't work out I don't know how to properly react and adjust there.

So I need some help and advice friends.

BTW, I'm being raw and open here about my issue in hopes of getting some amazing input and advice, not to get trolled.Q: "The Canadian Metadata Forum 2005 is pleased to present the following sponsorship packages:" to French
****
A: Le Forum sur les métadonnées au Canada 2005 est heureux de présenter les forfaits promotionnels suivants :
Translate to French:
Demandes réglées sans la tenue d’une audience Questions relatives aux pipelines Questions relatives aux régions pionnières Questions relatives au transport, aux droits et aux tarifs Questions relatives au gaz naturel Questions relatives à l’électricité Autres questions 22 17

Answer: Il a été revu par le Groupe de planification nationale de contingence (GPNC), aux exigences duquel il répond.
IN: French:

It has co-sponsored with ECA a workshop on OSS during CODI III and with the Association africaine des utilisateurs de logiciels libres (AAUL) a meeting of African OSS user groups - the Rencontres africaines des utilisateurs de logiciels libres (RALL) - with the first edition (RALL 2004) held in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
OUT: L'Agence a coparrainé avec la CEA un atelier sur les logiciels libres au cours de la troisième réunion du Comité de l'information pour le développement (CODI III) et, avec l'Association africaine des utilisateurs de logiciels libres (AAUL), la première édition des Rencontres africaines des utilisateurs de logiciels (RALL 2004), qui s'est tenue à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso).
question: 2.8.7 Review Draft Procurement Instrument --> French.
answer: 2.8.7 Réviser l'ébauche du document d'achat
Some text: Dans des travaux antérieurs, nous avons proposé un cadre comportant quatre paliers essentiels sur lesquels la réflexion sur les liens entre droits de l'homme et mondialisation devrait s'appuyer, à savoir:

Translate to English.
Translation: In our earlier studies, we elaborated a framework that emphasized four key platforms upon which the discussion of the link between human rights and the processes of globalization should be based, viz.,
Some text: La sécurité publique est l’une des principales

Translate to English.
Translation:
Public safety and security is one of theAn air jack is a vital piece of your pit and paddock equipment helping to provide access to parts of the racing car that would otherwise be a real pain to reach. In order to operate efficiently, every air jack needs a range of accessories capable of delivering the all-important air supply and ensuring that everything operates as planned.
Our collection of air jack accessories includes everything you need to not only operate your air jack, but to transport the equipment around the pit, too. We stock a range of pressure regulators to ensure that the right amount of air is delivered along with compressed air bottles and bottle trolleys for easy movement from the car park or team truck into the pit and paddock. We also stock a range of new or replacement valves to ensure that none of the air escapes.In his global warming documentary, "Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore presents a litany of scientific data supporting the hypothesis that increasing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, driven by fossil fuel emissions, are causing a warming trend on the planet, which could have dire consequences for the human race. Steady increases in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, according the Global Warming alarmists, traps heat that would otherwise escape the planet and travel into outer space. While there does appear to be some scientific merit to the hypothesis, it can hardly be classified as "settled science," because there are still a number of unanswered questions about it.
Some global warming alarmists claim that the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide is a function of the "heat capacity" of the CO2 molecules. They argue that the carbon dioxide absorbs the heat emitted by the earth, thereby trapping it in the atmosphere and causing temperatures to rise. (Elmhurst College) On its surface, this theory seems reasonable, especially when it is accompanied by a diagram of a greenhouse, which evokes images of a warm and humid space; but is this analogy scientifically accurate, or is it just PR? Does the science & engineering support this theory as well as the advertisements, imagery, and political stunts do?
The ability of different molecules and materials to absorb heat is a very carefully studied characteristic, known as "Heat Capacity." The heat capacity of various different molecules and materials has been evaluated, through many decades of careful scientific study, both in theory and also in practice. Complicated mathematical equations have been developed and refined over the years, and a table of heat capacities of various molecules has been produced as a reference guide for scientists and engineers. The heat capacity of carbon dioxide is actually 0.84; and the heat capacity of air is 1.00. In other words, the ability of carbon dioxide to absorb heat is less than the ability of air to absorb heat. So, if the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increases, then the heat capacity of the atmosphere decreases; and the atmosphere will absorb less heat than it did before the concentration of carbon dioxide increased. This is exactly the opposite effect from what the global warming alarmists contend.
Other global warming alarmists contend that it is not the absorptive characteristic of the gas (heat capacity), but rather the conductive characteristic of the gas (thermal conductivity), which causes the alleged global warming effect. At first, this appears to be a more reasonable explanation, because the thermal conductivity of carbon dioxide (0.015) is indeed lower than the thermal conductivity of air (0.024). So, if and when the concentration of carbon dioxide increases, the thermal conductivity of the atmosphere does decrease. When the thermal conductivity decreases, the rate of heat escape from the earth's atmosphere does, indeed, slow down. This appears - at first blush - to support the global warming hypothesis.
Upon further reflection, however, there are questions about the thermal conductivity explanation, as well. The earth's atmosphere is a two way street, not a one way street, when it comes to heat exchange. Every day, heat is travelling in both directions through the atmosphere. It is travelling from the sun towards the earth; and it is travelling from the earth towards outer space, as well. A decrease in the thermal conductivity of the atmosphere will impact the exchange of heat in both directions, not just in one direction. It will have an impact on the heat trying to enter the earth from the sun, each day, as well as having an impact on the heat trying to leave the earth each day, which raises questions about the thermal conductivity explanation, as well..
Moreover, the alarmists often cite data about temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations going back as many as 400,000 years, which show a close correlation between carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere and global average temperatures. They claim that they are able to accurately deduce these fine measurements of conditions 400,000 years in the past from ice core samples taken from the South Pole. How reliable, actually, are those ice core data? 400,000 years is a very long time. High quality scientific experiments are normally conducted with round-the-clock, 24/7/365 observation and data collection; but that obviously could not be done for data going back 400,000 years. All kinds of unknown and undiscovered events may have occurred during that interim period, which could have had an unknown impact on the data.
Indeed, there is even quite a bit of "known uncertainty" surrounding that data, on top of the "unknown unknowns" mentioned above. For example, it is known that ice develops cracks over time, through which gas exchange can occur, which could skew results. Even uncracked ice is known to diffuse ('leak') gas through its pores, but the rate of diffusion has still not been accurately quantified. While that leakage from diffusion may seem relatively slow to the human eye, the impact of gas diffusion over 400,000 years could skew the results of such studies dramatically, even to the point of rendering such studies completely useless.!
The questions, uncertainties, and issues that I have raised here are only the tip of the iceberg. True & honest scientists will admit that the issues I have raised here, as well as other unmentioned questions about the global warming hypothesis, must be resolved before global warming is considered to be "settled science." On the other hand, those who dismiss my questions and doubts as undereducated or even "anti-social" are the ones you should be wary of. They are the intolerant ones, with a political agenda that doesn't care about the truth or about scientific integrity.
Nothing to do with