 it is recommended to choose the gaming chair suitable for your weight.
The above-mentioned points are a few of the important factors that you should consider before purchasing a gaming chair. Make sure you properly go through them and if you have any other queries you can comment down below.
Q. Which is the best upholstery material for a cool sitting experience?
A. The best upholstery for a cool seating experience with abundant airflow is mesh upholstery. But mesh upholstery does have some drawbacks as well since it is the least durable upholstery material and is hard to clean.
The other option you can go for is fabric upholstery. Although not as cool as mesh material it is still breathable compared to leather upholstery and also more durable than mesh.
Q. Which is the best frame for a gaming chair?
A. It is recommended to go for a metal frame for a gaming chair because they are durable and can withstand a lot of weight compared to nylon frames.
Q. What is PU leather?
A. PU leather is a type of synthetic leather which is 100% artificial leather. PU leather is short for polyurethane leather and is also considered as vegan leather. They are less durable compared to genuine leather and also less expensive.:
- domain names and Fintech names
- Adam’s career journey west and east
- Japanese numbering systems
- accounting thru to M&A Fintech
- Adam’s challenges with investment account finding/opening in the UK hence filling the gap himself
- fund raising rounds (inc the most over-funded equity crowdfunding ever) and staff growth
- trading versus investing; instruments; holding periods in re
- £1.8trn in investments in the UK of which only a tiny percentage is in ETFs rather than much higher fee actively managed investment funds
- via Freetrade folks can invest for free in structures whose fees are in the low single figure basis points
- investing in shares, ETFs vs CFDs and spread-betting
- about 40,000 people in the Freetrade community (!); most of whom have not invested directly into stocks before
- the gap for financial advice on investing in the Fintech world given the cost of IFAs offering advice
- the need for tools to measure risk levels
- how to choose which ETF to buy?
- crypto as the “gateway drug” into getting into solid investments
- individual share ownership trends over the decades
- changing expectations around governments and pensions and hence the need to take care of yourself
- £12 as the standard commission – this as a huge percentage if one is only investing small sums of money as many young people are
- Freetrade’s freemium model – zero fees for end of day deal; £1 for immediate execution
- the importance of a steady rollout of a new platform
- onboarding; transferring funds; executing deals and what happens re execution
- longer term product ideas for freetrade
- settlement and record keeping/proof of ownership
- CREST central repository
- freetrade nominees limited hold your shares, ringfenced from freetrade.io qua stockbroker
- the longer journey of building your own infrastructure but benefit of it being leading edge rather than legacy
- the issues surrounding keeping long term personal records of ownership of all sorts – assets from cars, houses, through to shares – and having records that persist longer than houses burning down, apps and technologies coming and going
- FCA requirement for a “durable medium”
- the possibility in the future of instant settlement
- computer technologies vs institutional structures/responsibilities
- cf DVLA, Land Registry
- live on Apple but not yet on Android
- Freetrade’s rollout program
- their regulatory passport in Europe
- securities one can buy now and in the future
- customer service in chat in the app
- app focus versus integrations with other Fintechs, API plans
And much much more 🙂
Share and enjoy!|
|
Section VI
Anarchist Morality
by Peter Kropotkin
Thus by an unprejudiced observation of the animal kingdom, we reach the conclusion that wherever society exists at all, this principle may be found: Treat others as you would like them to treat you under similar circumstances.
And when we study closely the evolution of the animal world, we discover that the aforesaid principle, translated by the one word Solidarity, has played an infinitely larger part in the development of the animal kingdom than all the adaptations that have resulted from a struggle between individuals to acquire personal advantages.
It is evident that in human societies a still greater degree of solidarity is to be met with. Even the societies of monkeys highest in the animal scale offer a striking example of practical solidarity, and man has taken a step further in the same direction. This and this alone has enabled him to preserve his puny race amid the obstacles cast by nature in his way, and to develop his intelligence.
A careful observation of those primitive societies still remaining at the level of the Stone Age shows to what a great extent the members of the same community practice solidarity among themselves.
This is the reason why practical solidarity never ceases; not even during the worst periods of history. Even when temporary circumstances of domination, servitude, exploitation cause the principle to be disowned, it still lives deep in the thoughts of the many, ready to bring about a strong recoil against evil institutions, a revolution. If it were otherwise society would perish. For the vast majority of animals and men this feeling re- mains, and must remain an acquired habit, a principle always present to the mind even when it is continually ignored in action.
It is the whole evolution of the animal kingdom speaking in us. And this evolution has lasted long, very long. It counts by hundreds of millions of years.
Even if we wished to get rid of it we could not. It would be easier for a man to accustom himself to walk on fours than to get rid of the moral sentiment. It is anterior in -- animal evolution to the upright posture of man.
The moral sense is a natural faculty in us like the sense of smell or of touch.
As for law and religion, which also have preached this principle, they have simply filched it to cloak their own wares, their injunctions for the benefit of the conqueror, the exploiter, the priest. Without this principle of solidarity, the justice of which is so generally recognized, how could they have laid hold on men's minds?
Each of them covered themselves with it as with a garment; like authority which made good its position by posing as the protector of the weak against the strong. By flinging overboard law, religion and authority, mankind can regain possession of the moral principle which has been taken from them. Regain that they may criticize it, and purge it from the adulterations wherewith priest, judge and ruler have poisoned it and are poisoning it yet.
Besides this principle of treating others as one wishes to be treated oneself, what is it but the very same principle as equality, the fundamental principle of anarchism? And how can any one manage to believe himself an anarchist unless he practices it?
We do not wish to be ruled. And by this very fact, do we not declare that we ourselves wish to rule nobody? We do not wish to be deceived, we wish always to be told nothing but the truth. And by this very fact, do we not de- clare that we ourselves do not wish to deceive anybody, that we promise to always tell the truth, nothing but the truth, the whole truth? We do not wish to have the fruits of our labor stolen from us. And by that very fact, do we not declare that we respect the fruits of others' labor?
By what right indeed can we demand that we should be treated in one fashion, reserving it to ourselves to treat others in a fashion entirely different? Our sense of equality revolts at such an idea.
Equality in mutual relations with the solidarity arising from it, this is the most powerful weapon of the animal world in the struggle for existence. And equality is equity.
By proclaiming ourselves anarchists, we proclaim before- hand that we disavow any way of treating others in which we should not like them to treat us; that we will no longer tolerate the inequality that has allowed some among us to use their strength, their cunning or their ability after a fashion in which it would annoy us to have such qualities used against ourselves. Equality in all things, the synonym of equity, this is anarchism in very deed. It is not only against the abstract trinity of law, religion, and authority that we declare war. By becoming anarchists we declare war against all this wave of deceit, cunning, exploitation, depravity, vice --in a word, inequality-- which they have poured into all our hearts. We declare war against their way of acting, against their way of thinking. The governed, the deceived, the exploited, the prostitute, wound above all else our sense of equality. It is in the name of equality that we are determined to have no more prostituted, exploited, deceived and governed men and women.
Perhaps it may be said --it has been said sometimes "But if you think that you must always treat others as you would be treated yourself, what right have you to use force under any circumstances whatever? What right have you to level a cannon at any barbarous or civilized invaders of your country? What right have you to dispossess the exploiter? What right to kill not only a tyrant but a mere viper?"
What right? What do you mean by that singular word, borrowed from the law? Do you wish to know if I shall feel conscious