 clearly harks back to artistic traditions of Op art and kinetic art; on the other, the artist also makes reference to the Arts and Crafts tradition of garden mobiles and new age kitsch. Reyle lets “high art” collide with its pop-cultural adaptations to reveal their hidden relations. He then combines the two into an aesthetically ambivalent work.
The aluminum sculptures represent the basic geometrical forms of circle, square, and rhombus, respectively. The surface of each one is articulated in linear, concentrically arranged segments that trace an evenly progressing ninety-degree angle around a central axis so that the surface of the object fans out into the room. By combining this formal reductionism with large scale––Windspiel (Diamond) is about eighteen by thirteen feet, Windspiel (Square) is about five-and-a-half feet square, and Windspiel (Circle) has a diameter of roughly nine-and-a-half feet––Reyle has found a stylistic means of transforming the sacred poignancy of the space into something complex, ambivalent, and beautiful. The way the sculptures slowly rotate serves to emphasize this: Electric motors hidden in the wooden ceiling ensure they turn at a slow pace, while light from discreetly placed spots reflects off the aluminum, flashing across the entire room. Reyle has further varied this effect by treating the surfaces of the sculptures in different ways; he also took into account the effect of natural light. Daylight entered the room in such a way as to emphasize the surface and materiality of the objects; when the light began to fade, the shadows the objects cast on the walls became far more visible, seeming to double their presence. What is more, the shadows turned in the opposite direction to the objects, lending the ensemble an element of elegant drama.
Also on show alongside this main installation with its themes of the sacred and the aesthetic was a new painting from the series “Zen Paintings” and two untitled assemblages from the series “Scrap Metal Paintings,” both 2017–. All of these too seem to have been made with an eye for their dramatic impact: Two of them were highly aesthetic arrangements of industrial waste; in the manner of the Nouveaux Réalistes, Reyle has taken the metal splinters produced in drilling and lathe work and strewn them across a canvas. The other picture, a sweep of paint made in rough black acrylic paste, appeared to have been executed with a kind of meditative evenness, less gestural than earlier, comparable paintings by the artist. Ridges of paint protruding from the canvas were then decorated with metallic foil, in a process similar to gilding. Taken as a whole, the works in this show consistently develop Reyle’s project of the (aesthetic) transfiguration of the everyday.


export const PaginatedMethods = [
    'getAccountCDRs', 'getCustomerCDRs', 'listAccounts', 'getTariffsList'
];
I chatted to a few people about this, and from what I can tell, most people who want criticism have never entertained the notion that they could ask for it. So I think that "it's the height of rudeness" an exaggeration when significant portions of the community expect it and want it and haven't considered another option for asking for it.

I believe this is an issue of miscommunication, not rudeness. Especially on fanfiction.net. If a writer don't want critique on a platform that, by default, encourages its people to "review", then in my opinion they should let the reader know that they don't want readers to take that button literally.// @flow
import * as React from "react";

import ChoiceGroup from "../../ChoiceGroup";
import Checkbox from "../../Checkbox";
import Collapse from "../index";
import Stack from "../../Stack";
import Slider from "../../Slider";
import Stepper from "../../Stepper";
import Text from "../../Text";

export default {
  Example: (): React.Node => {
    const [planeChecked, setPlaneChecked] = React.useState(true);
    const [trainChecked, setTrainChecked] = React.useState(true);
    const [busChecked, setBusChecked] = React.useState(true);
    const [adults, setAdults] = React.useState(1);
    const [children, setChildren] = React.useState(0);

    const handleChange = event => {
      switch (event.target.value) {
        case "Plane":
          setPlaneChecked(!planeChecked);
          break;
        case "Train":
          setTrainChecked(!trainChecked);
          break;
        default:
          setBusChecked(!busChecked);
          break;
      }
    };
    return (
      <Stack spacing="none">
        <Collapse label="Transport">
          <ChoiceGroup onChange={handleChange}>
            <Checkbox value="Plane" checked={planeChecked} label="Plane" />
            <Checkbox value="Train" checked={trainChecked} label="Train" />
            <Checkbox value="Bus" checked={busChecked} label="Bus" />
          </ChoiceGroup>
        </Collapse>
        <Collapse label="Duration">
          <Slider label="Travel time" defaultValue={[0, 5]} maxValue={24} minValue={0} />
        </Collapse>
        <Collapse label="Passengers">
          <Stack>
            <Stack align="center">
              <Stack spacing="none">
                <Text>Adult</Text>
                <Text type="secondary">12+</Text>
              </Stack>
              <Stepper
                minValue={1}
                defaultValue={adults}
                onChange={newAdults => setAdults(newAdults)}
              />
            </Stack>
            <Stack align="center">
              <Stack spacing="none">
                <Text>Child</Text>
                <Text type="secondary">0-11</Text>
              </Stack>
              <Stepper
                minValue={0}
                defaultValue={children}
                onChange={newChildren => setChildren(newChildren)}
              />
            </Stack>
          </Stack>
        </Collapse>
      </Stack>
    );
  },
  info: {
    title: "Multiple collapses",
    description:
      "You can have multiple collapses at once, each of which can open and close separately.",
  },
};
How long can a colony remain queenless b/f laying worker develops?
So we are about 100% sure our 4 week old colony (from package) is queenless...no new eggs, no tiny larva, all capped brood. We also found 3 supersedure cells which we promptly removed BEFORE we realized we were queenless (oops! we are newbies). We have ordered a queen and she should be here by Tuesday at the latest. However, our concern is with only capped brood and a few more days waiting (and the fact we screwed up the "emergency queens" they were obviously rearing) are we gong to end up with a laying worker? I am assuming they have been queenless for 8-10 days based on what we are seeing....will nearly 2 weeks all told of being queenless create a laying worker?
I’m in the same situation (queen-less hive) but I think I may have been without a queen for maybe three weeks. All the brood has hatched and no new eggs; there is still a lot of bees in the hive. On the other hand I’m not too sure the hive has a laying worker, or I would see some eggs or larva.
The official research word is that most all hives have laying workers all the time. Hives with mated/laying queens and active brood nests generally mask the problems that laying workers can create - those problems can and do develop in colonies without mated/laying queens and active brood nests.
Thanks Clemens....I did read that (that all colonies have them) but am just paranoid that they will reject the queen getting shipped to us on Monday if there is no larva for them to take care of and a worker starts laying like mad. Being new we don't have the resources yet to put a brood frame in to keep the ladies busy to suppress a potential laying worker and I had a hard enough time locating this queen...really don't want to have to find another one if they reject her!
Good luck to you and your hive Jay T!
I am a newbee too and caught a swarm on the 10th and checked a couple of times and finally on the 20th yesterday i went through the entire hive. They never produced and egg and every time I checked they seemed more agitated than the time before. I called and talked to Carlton Simpson at Simpsons Bee Supply in Danville, OH. He and I were under the same assumption that there was no queen so I bought one from him. He said put it on the top bar and if they go to it and start faning and are not agressive then the hive is more then likely queenless. That's what I did, that's how they reacted, and the hive in 3 minutes almost went quiet. It was like a hush came over the crowd. I will uncork