Perplexity Trap: PLM-Based Retrievers Overrate Low Perplexity Documents
Abstract
Previous studies have found that PLM-based retrieval models exhibit a preference for LLM-generated content, assigning higher relevance scores to these documents even when their semantic quality is comparable to human-written ones. This phenomenon, known as source bias, threatens the sustainable development of the information access ecosystem. However, the underlying causes of source bias remain unexplored. In this paper, we explain the process of information retrieval with a causal graph and discover that PLM-based retrievers learn perplexity features for relevance estimation, causing source bias by ranking the documents with low perplexity higher. Theoretical analysis further reveals that the phenomenon stems from the positive correlation between the gradients of the loss functions in language modeling task and retrieval task. Based on the analysis, a causal-inspired inference-time debiasing method is proposed, called Causal Diagnosis and Correction (CDC). CDC first diagnoses the bias effect of the perplexity and then separates the bias effect from the overall estimated relevance score. Experimental results across three domains demonstrate the superior debiasing effectiveness of CDC, emphasizing the validity of our proposed explanatory framework. Source codes are available at https://github.com/WhyDwelledOnAi/Perplexity-Trap.
Community
Three key findings:
- For PLM-based retrievers, document perplexity has a causal effect on estimated relevance scores. Lower perplexity can lead to higher relevance scores.
- For PLM-based retrievers, the gradients of MLM and IR loss functions (metrics) possess linear overlap, leading to the biased effect of perplexity on estimated relevance scores.
- Better language modeling improves PLM-based retriever’s ranking performance, but also heightens its sensitivity to perplexity, thus increasing source bias severity.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper