Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,169 +1,169 @@
|
|
1 |
-
---
|
2 |
-
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
3 |
-
---
|
4 |
-
|
5 |
-
# π core-dino | Resolution-Agnostic Self-Supervised Learning on Satellite Imagery
|
6 |
-
|
7 |
-
[](https://huggingface.co/gajeshladhar/core-dino)
|
8 |
-
[](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JvSx0AERGWoc8vAZAxOSPOOG7PAh6KqZ)
|
9 |
-

|
10 |
-

|
11 |
-
|
12 |
-
---
|
13 |
-
|
14 |
-
## π Overview
|
15 |
-
|
16 |
-
`core-dino` is a resolution-agnostic **self-supervised model** designed for satellite imagery, trained on the [Core-Five dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gajeshladhar/core-five) using a DiNO-inspired setup. It handles imagery between **
|
17 |
-
|
18 |
-
<p>
|
19 |
-
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JvSx0AERGWoc8vAZAxOSPOOG7PAh6KqZ" target="_blank">
|
20 |
-
<b>Open Demo βΆοΈ</b>
|
21 |
-
</a> - Run multi-resolution inference & visualize spatial embeddings.</p>
|
22 |
-
|
23 |
-
---
|
24 |
-
|
25 |
-
## π Quickstart
|
26 |
-
|
27 |
-
```python
|
28 |
-
from ultralytics import YOLO
|
29 |
-
|
30 |
-
model = YOLO("yolo11x-obb.pt") # obb, bbox or seg any model
|
31 |
-
ckpt = "https://huggingface.co/gajeshladhar/core-dino/resolve/main/checkpoints/student.pt"
|
32 |
-
ckpt = torch.hub.load_state_dict_from_url(ckpt, map_location='cpu')
|
33 |
-
model.model.load_state_dict(
|
34 |
-
{k.replace('layers.', 'model.'): v for k, v in ckpt.items()},
|
35 |
-
strict=False)
|
36 |
-
```
|
37 |
-
|
38 |
-
---
|
39 |
-
|
40 |
-
## π§ Architecture: DiNO Γ YOLO Γ I-JEPA
|
41 |
-
|
42 |
-
We combine three ideas to build a high-performance backbone for spatial representation learning:
|
43 |
-
|
44 |
-
#### 1οΈβ£ **Multi-Resolution DINO Setup (instead of local-global)**
|
45 |
-
> In standard [DINO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14294) / [DINOv2](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07193), the student sees cropped or distorted views (local), while the teacher sees global views.
|
46 |
-
> In `core-dino`, we replace this with **clean vs degraded resolution contrast**:
|
47 |
-
- π¨βπ« **Teacher** gets clean 30β―cm satellite imagery.
|
48 |
-
- π¨βπ **Student** sees augmented versions of the same scene at varying resolutions (30β―cm β 2β―m) with photometric and spatial distortions.
|
49 |
-
|
50 |
-
This setup encourages the model to learn **scale-invariant** and **semantic-aware** features across real-world EO resolution gaps.
|
51 |
-
|
52 |
-
#### 2οΈβ£ **I-JEPA-Style Patch Dropping**
|
53 |
-
We integrate ideas from [I-JEPA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08243):
|
54 |
-
- Random **patch regions are dropped** from the student input.
|
55 |
-
- The objective is to align the **visible patch embeddings** with the teacherβs corresponding high-resolution ones.
|
56 |
-
- This enforces **local-global and partial-whole consistency** in the latent space.
|
57 |
-
|
58 |
-
#### 3οΈβ£ **YOLOv11-X as Encoder Backbone**
|
59 |
-
- We use **YOLOv11-X**, one of the most powerful and recent YOLO variants, as the spatial encoder.
|
60 |
-
- The backbone is **truncated after 23 layers**, retaining rich spatial semantics while maintaining efficiency.
|
61 |
-
- This provides strong priors from supervised detection tasks, now adapted for **self-supervised** learning.
|
62 |
-
|
63 |
-
|
64 |
-
---
|
65 |
-
|
66 |
-
## π§ͺ Training Flow: Resolution-Agnostic DiNO
|
67 |
-
|
68 |
-
The training pipeline in `core-dino` follows a student-teacher design inspired by DINO, but adapted for real-world satellite imagery:
|
69 |
-
|
70 |
-
#### π¨βπ« 1. Teacher View (Clean & High-Res)
|
71 |
-
- Receives a **clean 30β―cm image** without any augmentation.
|
72 |
-
- Used as the stable reference to guide the student.
|
73 |
-
|
74 |
-
#### π¨βπ 2. Student View (Augmented Multi-Resolution)
|
75 |
-
- Receives **randomly augmented** versions of the same image:
|
76 |
-
- Downsampled to **30β―cm to 2β―m**
|
77 |
-
- Augmented with noise, blur, color jitter, spatial dropout, etc.
|
78 |
-
- Emulates resolution variability common in EO imagery.
|
79 |
-
|
80 |
-
#### β οΈ 3. Spatial Misalignment & Solution
|
81 |
-
- Since different student resolutions produce different spatial dimensions (H Γ W),
|
82 |
-
we use **bilinear interpolation** to **resize the studentβs feature map** to match the teacher's spatial shape before computing the contrastive loss.
|
83 |
-
|
84 |
-
#### π― 4. Objective
|
85 |
-
- Align the spatial token embeddings of the student with the teacher β pixel-to-pixel and semantically β despite resolution gaps and augmentations.
|
86 |
-
- Encourages **scale-invariant**, **robust** feature learning across real-world variations.
|
87 |
-
|
88 |
-
|
89 |
-
|
90 |
-
---
|
91 |
-
|
92 |
-
## π Performance: Latent Quality & Downstream Evaluation
|
93 |
-
|
94 |
-
Despite being trained without any labels, `core-dino` demonstrates strong latent alignment and generalization capability β both in visual similarity and downstream tasks.
|
95 |
-
|
96 |
-
### π£οΈ Downstream: Road Extraction (DeepGlobe Dataset)
|
97 |
-
|
98 |
-
We evaluated `core-dino` on the [DeepGlobe Road Extraction Dataset](https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/18467#learn_the_details), using it as a frozen backbone in a simple segmentation pipeline.
|
99 |
-
|
100 |
-
- **Setup:**
|
101 |
-
- Both `core-dino` and **YOLOv11-X** backbones were **frozen**
|
102 |
-
- Only a **2-layer convolutional head** was trained
|
103 |
-
- Task: Binary road segmentation using IoU loss
|
104 |
-
|
105 |
-
- **Result:**
|
106 |
-
- `core-dino` consistently outperformed the supervised **YOLOv11-X** backbone across all epochs
|
107 |
-
- Shows superior latent representation quality, even without task-specific supervision
|
108 |
-
- Demonstrates better **generalization** and **semantic robustness** in downstream transfer tasks
|
109 |
-
|
110 |
-
<p style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; margin-top: 10px;">
|
111 |
-
<span style="font-size: 16px;">π <strong>Reproduce this comparison in Colab:</strong></span>
|
112 |
-
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JqJoboLljDc2EoqMvj40mA1Sa1vnCHry" target="_blank" style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle;">
|
113 |
-
<img src="https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg" alt="Open In Colab">
|
114 |
-
</a>
|
115 |
-
</p>
|
116 |
-
<p align="center"><br>
|
117 |
-
<img src="assets/downstream-deepglobe-roads.png" alt="Downstream Performance" style="width:85%;">
|
118 |
-
</p>
|
119 |
-
|
120 |
-
|
121 |
-
### ποΈ Downstream : Building Footprint Validation
|
122 |
-
|
123 |
-
To evaluate transferability to structural segmentation tasks, we tested `core-dino` on **building footprint extraction** using high-resolution satellite imagery.
|
124 |
-
|
125 |
-
- **Setup:**
|
126 |
-
- Compared **YOLOv11-X (original weights)** vs. **YOLOv11-X initialized with `core-dino` weights**
|
127 |
-
- Used same training pipeline for both
|
128 |
-
|
129 |
-
- **Result:**
|
130 |
-
- `core-dino` achieved **+15 mAP** improvement over standard YOLOv11-X
|
131 |
-
- Captures edge-localized and compact building structures better
|
132 |
-
- Demonstrates strong spatial precision and high-quality feature encoding
|
133 |
-
|
134 |
-
<p style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; margin-top: 10px;">
|
135 |
-
<span style="font-size: 16px;">π <strong>Reproduce this comparison in Colab:</strong></span>
|
136 |
-
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1uAqUNUDQt0_29Zhvopz0rWVSAzX-cZrk" target="_blank" style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle;">
|
137 |
-
<img src="https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg" alt="Open In Colab">
|
138 |
-
</a>
|
139 |
-
</p>
|
140 |
-
<p align="center"><br>
|
141 |
-
<img src="assets/downstream-building-footprint.png" alt="Downstream Performance" style="width:85%;">
|
142 |
-
</p>
|
143 |
-
|
144 |
-
|
145 |
-
---
|
146 |
-
|
147 |
-
## ποΈ Model Details
|
148 |
-
|
149 |
-
| Field | Value |
|
150 |
-
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|
151 |
-
| Parameters | **56.7M** |
|
152 |
-
| Backbone Architecture | **YOLOv11 X** |
|
153 |
-
| Input Size | **320 Γ 320 β 4096 Γ 4096** |
|
154 |
-
| Patch Source | [Core-Five](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gajeshladhar/core-five) |
|
155 |
-
| Resolutions | 30β―cm (clean) β 2β―m (augmented) |
|
156 |
-
| Patch Drop | I-JEPA-style masking |
|
157 |
-
| Loss | DINO contrastive loss |
|
158 |
-
| Training Time | ~48h on 1ΓA100 |
|
159 |
-
|
160 |
-
|
161 |
-
---
|
162 |
-
## π³ License
|
163 |
-
|
164 |
-
This project is released under the **[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)** license.
|
165 |
-
|
166 |
-
> β
Free to use, share, and adapt for **non-commercial research**
|
167 |
-
> β **Commercial use is not permitted** without explicit permission
|
168 |
-
> π Please provide appropriate credit when using this dataset in publications or projects.
|
169 |
-
|
|
|
1 |
+
---
|
2 |
+
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
3 |
+
---
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
# π core-dino | Resolution-Agnostic Self-Supervised Learning on Satellite Imagery
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
[](https://huggingface.co/gajeshladhar/core-dino)
|
8 |
+
[](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JvSx0AERGWoc8vAZAxOSPOOG7PAh6KqZ)
|
9 |
+

|
10 |
+

|
11 |
+
|
12 |
+
---
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
## π Overview
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
`core-dino` is a resolution-agnostic **self-supervised model** designed for satellite imagery, trained on the [Core-Five dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gajeshladhar/core-five) using a DiNO-inspired setup. It handles imagery between **20β―cm and 2β―m**, learning strong spatial features without any labels.
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
<p>
|
19 |
+
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JvSx0AERGWoc8vAZAxOSPOOG7PAh6KqZ" target="_blank">
|
20 |
+
<b>Open Demo βΆοΈ</b>
|
21 |
+
</a> - Run multi-resolution inference & visualize spatial embeddings.</p>
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
---
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
## π Quickstart
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
```python
|
28 |
+
from ultralytics import YOLO
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
+
model = YOLO("yolo11x-obb.pt") # obb, bbox or seg any model
|
31 |
+
ckpt = "https://huggingface.co/gajeshladhar/core-dino/resolve/main/checkpoints/student.pt"
|
32 |
+
ckpt = torch.hub.load_state_dict_from_url(ckpt, map_location='cpu')
|
33 |
+
model.model.load_state_dict(
|
34 |
+
{k.replace('layers.', 'model.'): v for k, v in ckpt.items()},
|
35 |
+
strict=False)
|
36 |
+
```
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
---
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
## π§ Architecture: DiNO Γ YOLO Γ I-JEPA
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
We combine three ideas to build a high-performance backbone for spatial representation learning:
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
#### 1οΈβ£ **Multi-Resolution DINO Setup (instead of local-global)**
|
45 |
+
> In standard [DINO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14294) / [DINOv2](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07193), the student sees cropped or distorted views (local), while the teacher sees global views.
|
46 |
+
> In `core-dino`, we replace this with **clean vs degraded resolution contrast**:
|
47 |
+
- π¨βπ« **Teacher** gets clean 30β―cm satellite imagery.
|
48 |
+
- π¨βπ **Student** sees augmented versions of the same scene at varying resolutions (30β―cm β 2β―m) with photometric and spatial distortions.
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
This setup encourages the model to learn **scale-invariant** and **semantic-aware** features across real-world EO resolution gaps.
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
#### 2οΈβ£ **I-JEPA-Style Patch Dropping**
|
53 |
+
We integrate ideas from [I-JEPA](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08243):
|
54 |
+
- Random **patch regions are dropped** from the student input.
|
55 |
+
- The objective is to align the **visible patch embeddings** with the teacherβs corresponding high-resolution ones.
|
56 |
+
- This enforces **local-global and partial-whole consistency** in the latent space.
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
#### 3οΈβ£ **YOLOv11-X as Encoder Backbone**
|
59 |
+
- We use **YOLOv11-X**, one of the most powerful and recent YOLO variants, as the spatial encoder.
|
60 |
+
- The backbone is **truncated after 23 layers**, retaining rich spatial semantics while maintaining efficiency.
|
61 |
+
- This provides strong priors from supervised detection tasks, now adapted for **self-supervised** learning.
|
62 |
+
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
---
|
65 |
+
|
66 |
+
## π§ͺ Training Flow: Resolution-Agnostic DiNO
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
The training pipeline in `core-dino` follows a student-teacher design inspired by DINO, but adapted for real-world satellite imagery:
|
69 |
+
|
70 |
+
#### π¨βπ« 1. Teacher View (Clean & High-Res)
|
71 |
+
- Receives a **clean 30β―cm image** without any augmentation.
|
72 |
+
- Used as the stable reference to guide the student.
|
73 |
+
|
74 |
+
#### π¨βπ 2. Student View (Augmented Multi-Resolution)
|
75 |
+
- Receives **randomly augmented** versions of the same image:
|
76 |
+
- Downsampled to **30β―cm to 2β―m**
|
77 |
+
- Augmented with noise, blur, color jitter, spatial dropout, etc.
|
78 |
+
- Emulates resolution variability common in EO imagery.
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
#### β οΈ 3. Spatial Misalignment & Solution
|
81 |
+
- Since different student resolutions produce different spatial dimensions (H Γ W),
|
82 |
+
we use **bilinear interpolation** to **resize the studentβs feature map** to match the teacher's spatial shape before computing the contrastive loss.
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
#### π― 4. Objective
|
85 |
+
- Align the spatial token embeddings of the student with the teacher β pixel-to-pixel and semantically β despite resolution gaps and augmentations.
|
86 |
+
- Encourages **scale-invariant**, **robust** feature learning across real-world variations.
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
---
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
## π Performance: Latent Quality & Downstream Evaluation
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
Despite being trained without any labels, `core-dino` demonstrates strong latent alignment and generalization capability β both in visual similarity and downstream tasks.
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
### π£οΈ Downstream: Road Extraction (DeepGlobe Dataset)
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
We evaluated `core-dino` on the [DeepGlobe Road Extraction Dataset](https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/18467#learn_the_details), using it as a frozen backbone in a simple segmentation pipeline.
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
- **Setup:**
|
101 |
+
- Both `core-dino` and **YOLOv11-X** backbones were **frozen**
|
102 |
+
- Only a **2-layer convolutional head** was trained
|
103 |
+
- Task: Binary road segmentation using IoU loss
|
104 |
+
|
105 |
+
- **Result:**
|
106 |
+
- `core-dino` consistently outperformed the supervised **YOLOv11-X** backbone across all epochs
|
107 |
+
- Shows superior latent representation quality, even without task-specific supervision
|
108 |
+
- Demonstrates better **generalization** and **semantic robustness** in downstream transfer tasks
|
109 |
+
|
110 |
+
<p style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; margin-top: 10px;">
|
111 |
+
<span style="font-size: 16px;">π <strong>Reproduce this comparison in Colab:</strong></span>
|
112 |
+
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1JqJoboLljDc2EoqMvj40mA1Sa1vnCHry" target="_blank" style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle;">
|
113 |
+
<img src="https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg" alt="Open In Colab">
|
114 |
+
</a>
|
115 |
+
</p>
|
116 |
+
<p align="center"><br>
|
117 |
+
<img src="assets/downstream-deepglobe-roads.png" alt="Downstream Performance" style="width:85%;">
|
118 |
+
</p>
|
119 |
+
|
120 |
+
|
121 |
+
### ποΈ Downstream : Building Footprint Validation
|
122 |
+
|
123 |
+
To evaluate transferability to structural segmentation tasks, we tested `core-dino` on **building footprint extraction** using high-resolution satellite imagery.
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
- **Setup:**
|
126 |
+
- Compared **YOLOv11-X (original weights)** vs. **YOLOv11-X initialized with `core-dino` weights**
|
127 |
+
- Used same training pipeline for both
|
128 |
+
|
129 |
+
- **Result:**
|
130 |
+
- `core-dino` achieved **+15 mAP** improvement over standard YOLOv11-X
|
131 |
+
- Captures edge-localized and compact building structures better
|
132 |
+
- Demonstrates strong spatial precision and high-quality feature encoding
|
133 |
+
|
134 |
+
<p style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; margin-top: 10px;">
|
135 |
+
<span style="font-size: 16px;">π <strong>Reproduce this comparison in Colab:</strong></span>
|
136 |
+
<a href="https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1uAqUNUDQt0_29Zhvopz0rWVSAzX-cZrk" target="_blank" style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle;">
|
137 |
+
<img src="https://colab.research.google.com/assets/colab-badge.svg" alt="Open In Colab">
|
138 |
+
</a>
|
139 |
+
</p>
|
140 |
+
<p align="center"><br>
|
141 |
+
<img src="assets/downstream-building-footprint.png" alt="Downstream Performance" style="width:85%;">
|
142 |
+
</p>
|
143 |
+
|
144 |
+
|
145 |
+
---
|
146 |
+
|
147 |
+
## ποΈ Model Details
|
148 |
+
|
149 |
+
| Field | Value |
|
150 |
+
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|
151 |
+
| Parameters | **56.7M** |
|
152 |
+
| Backbone Architecture | **YOLOv11 X** |
|
153 |
+
| Input Size | **320 Γ 320 β 4096 Γ 4096** |
|
154 |
+
| Patch Source | [Core-Five](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gajeshladhar/core-five) |
|
155 |
+
| Resolutions | 30β―cm (clean) β 2β―m (augmented) |
|
156 |
+
| Patch Drop | I-JEPA-style masking |
|
157 |
+
| Loss | DINO contrastive loss |
|
158 |
+
| Training Time | ~48h on 1ΓA100 |
|
159 |
+
|
160 |
+
|
161 |
+
---
|
162 |
+
## π³ License
|
163 |
+
|
164 |
+
This project is released under the **[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)** license.
|
165 |
+
|
166 |
+
> β
Free to use, share, and adapt for **non-commercial research**
|
167 |
+
> β **Commercial use is not permitted** without explicit permission
|
168 |
+
> π Please provide appropriate credit when using this dataset in publications or projects.
|
169 |
+
|