"Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of patients with neck p" by Javier González-Iglesias, Cesar Fernández-De-Las-Peñas et al.
Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial
Fish eye DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. Fish eye OBJECTIVES: To investigate if patients with mechanical neck pain receiving thoracic spine thrust manipulation would experience superior outcomes compared to a group not receiving thrust manipulation. Fish eye BACKGROUND: Evidence has begun to emerge in support of thoracic thrust manipulation as an intervention in the management of mechanical neck pain. However, to make a strong recommendation for a clinical technique it is necessary to have multiple studies with convergent findings. Fish eye METHODS AND MEASURES: Forty-five patients (21 females) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a control group, which received electro/thermal therapy for 5 treatment sessions, and the experimental group, which received the same electro/thermal therapy program in addition to a thoracic spine thrust manipulation once a week for 3 consecutive weeks. Mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to examine the effects of treatment on pain (100-mm visual analogue scale), disability (100-point disability scale), and cervical range of motion, with group as the between-subjects variable and time as the within-subjects variable. The primary analysis was the group-by-time interaction for pain. Fish eye RESULTS: The group-by-time interaction effects for the ANOVA models were statistically significant for pain, mobility, and disability (P<.05), indicating greater improvements in the manipulation group for all the outcome measures. Patients receiving thoracic manipulation experienced greater improvements in pain at the fifth (final) treatment session and at the 2-week and 4-week follow-up periods (P<.001), with pain improvement scores in the manipulation group of 16.8 mm and 26.5 mm greater than those in the comparison group at the 2- and 4-week follow-up periods, respectively. The experimental group also experienced significantly greater improvements in disability with a between-group difference of 8.8 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.5, 10.1; P<.001) at the fifth visit and 8.0 points (95% CI: 5.8, 10.2; P<.001) at the 2-week follow-up. Fish eye CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that thoracic spine thrust manipulation results in superior clinical benefits that persist beyond the 1-month follow-up period for patients with acute neck pain. Future studies should continue to investigate the effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation, as compared to other physical therapy interventions, in a population with mechanical neck pain. Fish eye LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b.
González-Iglesias, Javier; Fernández-De-Las-Peñas, Cesar; Cleland, Joshua A.; and Gutiérrez-Vega, Maria Del Rosario, "Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial" (2009). Regis University Faculty Publications. 965.