Sadly, many people are asking whether "service animal" laws are now being abused by those who want to scam the system. There have been news stories, articles, opinion pieces as well as other editorials where people rant and complain about people they feel to be abusing the system. You hear some complain that they to sit near your dog at a restaurant which they don't believe is a "real" service dog, or others complain that their neighbors possess a pet in the "no pet" building because they claimed the animal is [https://wordpress.org/support/topic/comment-box-appears-on-pages-but-not-on-homepage/#post-13001545 how to ask doctor for emotional support animal]. A number of the commentary posseses an indignant tone, and a few people are downright angry. So how exactly does this affect people who legitimately own and use a service animal to raised their lives? In lots of ways. For one, it could it more challenging to navigate bureaucracy around the globe when your claim of your disability as well as your service or emotional support animal's status is questioned. In case a landlord or company owner has heard negative stories claiming that some individuals are abusing the machine, it can cause them to look suspiciously whatsoever claimants. Some landlord and business people have begun asking for proof of status, although asking for written or another evidence might not be legal, although many those who own legitimate service animals and emotional support animals never have taken advantage of registering them, and thus have no such documentation to create. It is the suspicious attitude and illegal demands of some landlords and business people that make registrations services like the Service Animal Registry of California so fundamental to legitimate owners. Although registration is optional, it can help shortcut the housing rental and business access issues once the owner can create a simple document which will often satisfy the owner or landlord. Also, when using public spaces, it is usually easier to hand over a document with a simple sentence stating, "This can be a service animal" and letting the other party see the information, as opposed to having a long-winded protracted conversation (or worse yet, argument) in public areas, with onlookers listening in and gathering round the discussion. So, perform some people scam the machine, or game what the law states? Sadly, the answer then is "probably yes." In your life, there is always room for abuse and individuals can make an effort to take advantage of many systems that we as a society applied to protect the rights of those that need such protection. For example, many drivers falsely display disabled parking placards to take advantage of free and convenient parking. Not to mention the number of people that lie on the tax returns, claim improper tax deductions, abuse store return policies, or do other bad acts. However that percentage of abuse, which around service animal laws is hopefully small, could well be a very small price to pay when compared to the higher goal of promoting access and equality for those. In the end, you can not control any system to make it 100% abuse proof. So tolerating the not enough people who scam service animal laws may be the price we gladly pay to make sure that the disabled in the great condition of California have equal access under law.