The Constitution's Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unlawful searches and seizures. Without a documented search warrant based on probable cause, no search of a person's residence or personal possessions can be done. This means that before a search may be carried out, a neutral court must accept the factual basis for it. This paragraph best supports the assertion that police officers cannot examine a person's house or personal files unless they have
A. legal permission
B.direct proof of a crime
C. Read the individual's constitutional rights to him or her.
D. a reasonable suspicion that a crime has taken place.
Answer:A
The Constitution's Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unlawful searches and seizures. Without a documented search warrant based on probable cause, no search of a person's residence or personal possessions can be done. This means that before a search may be carried out, a neutral court must accept the factual basis for it. This paragraph best supports the assertion that police officers cannot examine a person's house or personal files unless they have
A. legal permission B.direct proof of a crime C. Read the individual's constitutional rights to him or her. D. a reasonable suspicion that a crime has taken place.
Explanation: Choice an is supported by the second and third sentences. A judge's consent (i.e., legal authorisation) is required before a search can be done, according to the statement. Choices b and d are incorrect because a court must permit the search in order for it to be legal. It is not enough for the police to have direct proof or a reasonable belief. The passage does not discuss options c and e.