A state statute requires machinery in food processing plants to include automatic shut-off switches that are accessible to each employee working on the machine. Fruit Companys (FCs) equipment does not have the switches. Greg, an FC employee, suffers an injury that an accessible shut-off switch would have prevented. Gregs best ground for recovery is that FC committed
A.	a dram shop act.
B.	a violation of the danger invites rescue doctrine.
C.	negligence per se.
D.	res ipsa loquitur.
Answer:C
A state statute requires machinery in food processing plants to include automatic shut-off switches that are accessible to each employee working on the machine. Fruit Companys (FCs) equipment does not have the switches. Greg, an FC employee, suffers an injury that an accessible shut-off switch would have prevented. Gregs best ground for recovery is that FC committed
A.	a dram shop act. B.	a violation of the danger invites rescue doctrine. C.	negligence per se. D.	res ipsa loquitur.