Fruits & Vegetables, Inc., and Great Grocery Stores dispute the interpretation of an ambiguous phrase in their contract. In a suit between the parties to con­strue the contract, a court may accept evidence of
A. consistent additional terms only.
B. consistent additional terms and contradictory terms only.
C. contradictory terms only.
D. anything extrinsic to the contract.
Answer:A
Fruits & Vegetables, Inc., and Great Grocery Stores dispute the interpretation of an ambiguous phrase in their contract. In a suit between the parties to con­strue the contract, a court may accept evidence of
A. consistent additional terms only. B. consistent additional terms and contradictory terms only. C. contradictory terms only. D. anything extrinsic to the contract.