If P is always against the testimony of Q, then the compound statement P→(P v ~Q) is a __________
A. Tautology
B. Contradiction
C. Contingency
D. None of the mentioned
Answer:A
If P is always against the testimony of Q, then the compound statement P→(P v ~Q) is a __________
A. Tautology B. Contradiction C. Contingency D. None of the mentioned
Explanation: Since either hypothesis is false or both (hypothesis as well as conclusion) are true.