Should the conviction be reversed?
A. No, because the intentional delivery of adulterated or mislabeled drugs gives rise to strict criminal liability.
B. No, because the jury could have found that the president’s conduct was sufficiently reckless to constitute murder.
C. Yes, because distribution of the defective lot was only a regulatory offense.
D. Yes, because the cancer, not the president’s conduct, was the proximate cause of death of the patient.
Answer:B
Should the conviction be reversed?
A. No, because the intentional delivery of adulterated or mislabeled drugs gives rise to strict criminal liability. B. No, because the jury could have found that the president’s conduct was sufficiently reckless to constitute murder. C. Yes, because distribution of the defective lot was only a regulatory offense. D. Yes, because the cancer, not the president’s conduct, was the proximate cause of death of the patient.