In more recent cases, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of law enforcement as opposed to individuals suspected of breaking the law. For example, in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Court found
A. Police can stop a motorist whom they believed violated traffic laws even if their ulterior motive is to investigate the possibility of drug dealing.
B. Jail officials can strip search petty offenders even when there is no suspicion of carrying a weapon or contraband.
C. Police no longer have to provide Miranda warnings in all custodial situations if certain exceptions are met.
D. None of the above.
Answer:B
In more recent cases, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of law enforcement as opposed to individuals suspected of breaking the law. For example, in Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, the Court found
A. Police can stop a motorist whom they believed violated traffic laws even if their ulterior motive is to investigate the possibility of drug dealing. B. Jail officials can strip search petty offenders even when there is no suspicion of carrying a weapon or contraband. C. Police no longer have to provide Miranda warnings in all custodial situations if certain exceptions are met. D. None of the above.