In 2005, Facebook launched a social media site that allows its users to designate certain other users as “friends.” Facetrak, a gaming site that allows its users to play with designated “friends,” claims that Facebook’s use of the word constitutes false advertising and trademark infringement. Under the principles discussed in “A Sample Court Case,” Apple, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., Facebook’s use most likely
A.creates an impression of seamless integration with Facetrak’s “friends.”
B.implies something false about the quality of Facebook’s “friends.”
C.makes no statement about the quality of Facetrak’s “friends.”
D.misleads gamers about the quality of Facebook’s “friends.”
Answer:C
In 2005, Facebook launched a social media site that allows its users to designate certain other users as “friends.” Facetrak, a gaming site that allows its users to play with designated “friends,” claims that Facebook’s use of the word constitutes false advertising and trademark infringement. Under the principles discussed in “A Sample Court Case,” Apple, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., Facebook’s use most likely
A.creates an impression of seamless integration with Facetrak’s “friends.” B.implies something false about the quality of Facebook’s “friends.” C.makes no statement about the quality of Facetrak’s “friends.” D.misleads gamers about the quality of Facebook’s “friends.”