456
Relevant to the view "Research Concepts" (CWE-1000)
Nature Type ID Name Page
ChildOf 693 Protection Mechanism Failure 1520
CanFollow 185 Incorrect Regular Expression 463
CanPrecede 33 Path Traversal: '....' (Multiple Dot) 69
CanPrecede 34 Path Traversal: '....//' 71
CanPrecede 35 Path Traversal: '.../...//' 73
Relevant to the view "Software Development" (CWE-699)
Nature Type ID Name Page
MemberOf 19 Data Processing Errors 2309
Applicable Platforms
Language : Not Language-Specific (Prevalence = Undetermined)
Common Consequences
Scope Impact Likelihood
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
Detection Methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST),
can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code)
without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control
flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input)
with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such
as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness = High
Potential Mitigations
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy = Input Validation
Avoid making decisions based on names of resources (e.g. files) if those resources can have
alternate names.
Phase: Implementation
Strategy = Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use
a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not
strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing
input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the
full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related
fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be
syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input
is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for
malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if
the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended
validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which
inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Phase: Implementation
Strategy = Input Validation
CWE Version 4.14
CWE-182: Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value
CWE-182: Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value