Kol HaAm
The Kol HaAm adopted the blood plot of The Doctors' Trial in 1953 and described in its headline the banned Jewish doctors as "a gang of murderous doctors in the service of American-British espionage". On this background, the government sought to ban the existence of MKI and, among other things, discussed the possibility of closing Kol Ha'am. In January 1953, the Minister of the Interior, Israel Pharmacist ordered the closing of the newspaper for ten days. according to a law from the British Mandate era that permits the issuing of a closure order to a newspaper that publishes things that may harm the public peace. The newspaper submitted a petition to the Beg 3 against the closure, but the High Court refused to issue a conditional order in the matter. In March 1953 the Minister of the Interior again ordered the closing of the newspaper for ten days, this time because of an editorial article under the title "Aba Ibn will go to fight alone", in which the newspaper appeared against the alleged statement of  Ambassador Israel Abba Even, according to news that appeared in Haaretz, that Israel will place hundreds of thousands of soldiers alongside the United States in the event of a war with the Soviet Union. Among other things, the newspaper wrote: "We will increase our fight against the anti-national policy of the Ben-Gurion government which is permeated with the blood of the Israeli youth." This time the High Court issued a conditional order against the action of the Minister of the Interior and suspended the closure of the newspaper until the Kol Ha'am petition against the closure is investigated. The ruling on the petition, which became known as the High Court of the People's Voice, was published on October 16 1953. The ruling written by the Judge Agrant with the consent of the judges Moshe Landoi and Yuel Sussman, stated that freedom of expression is a fundamental right that is an inseparable part of democracy. The authority of the Minister of the Interior to close a newspaper on the grounds of public peace is limited to cases in which there is near certainty of a risk to public peace from the newspaper's publications. Referring to the case of Kol Ha'am, as well as the newspaper Al-Ittihad which published similar things and even issued a closure order against it, it was ruled that the published words are far from indicating a near certainty of a danger to public peace and therefore canceled the order the closing This ruling was a milestone in Israeli jurisprudence and law, in establishing freedom of expression as a fundamental right and as an example of the court's authority to cancel an action carried out by the executive authority in violation of a fundamental right if certain conditions are met, such as the test of near certainty.