> > > > > Personally, I think that Tom's code should go into standard EXPLAIN.
> > > > 
> > > > I am confused.  Which grammar do you like?
> > > 
> > > Neither =).
> > 
> > OK, would you suggest one?
> 
> I don't think there needs to be a grammar change. I think that Tom's
> qualification changes should go into non-verbose EXPLAIN and that pretty
> vs. non-pretty debug just gets handled via debug_print_pretty.

count me in :-)

And if I want it verbose I want it verbose (== gimme all you can tell).
I would not really see a logic to different levels, what goes in which 
level ? Seems I would always want to see some detail in each of the
levels.

Andreas

Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:42:43 +0100
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
Re: Rationalizing EXPLAIN VERBOSE output