We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.

We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
6.4.* minor releases.

When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
and start on 6.5.  We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.

Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished.  We expect the 6.4.* feature
freeze period to last about one month.

Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 30 Oct 1998 18:50:40 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
CVS trees and post-6.4 release issues
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.

	Actually, the 'splitting' and 'tagging' are one and the same, and
it will be tagged the moment I roll the release tar ball...that is
automatic *shrug*  Its been done for every past release...if you don't use
the branch, not a problem, but it is created...

> We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
> 6.4.* minor releases.
> 
> When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
> and start on 6.5.  We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
> problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.
> 
> Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
> held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished.  We expect the 6.4.* feature
> freeze period to last about one month.
> 
> Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.

	I don't think so...I heard that one after the BETA freeze, and
look at the mess *that* created.  If there is a feature freeze for
post-release bugs to be fixed, features are *frozen*, period, end of
story, do not pass go, do not collect $200, end of story...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Fri, 30 Oct 1998 23:14:35 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS trees and post-6.4 release issues
> On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > We will not be splitting the CVS tree after the 6.4 release.
> 
> 	Actually, the 'splitting' and 'tagging' are one and the same, and
> it will be tagged the moment I roll the release tar ball...that is
> automatic *shrug*  Its been done for every past release...if you don't use
> the branch, not a problem, but it is created...

Yes.

> 
> > We will continue with one source tree, applying patches needed for any
> > 6.4.* minor releases.
> > 
> > When we have finished with 6.4.* releases, we will mark the cvs tree,
> > and start on 6.5.  We mark it so we can supply patches to fix serious
> > problems that appear after 6.4.* has been closed.
> > 
> > Any risky feature patches that are posted during this period will be
> > held, and applied once 6.4.* is finished.  We expect the 6.4.* feature
> > freeze period to last about one month.
> > 
> > Certain _safe_ feature patches will be applied during this period.
> 
> 	I don't think so...I heard that one after the BETA freeze, and
> look at the mess *that* created.  If there is a feature freeze for
> post-release bugs to be fixed, features are *frozen*, period, end of
> story, do not pass go, do not collect $200, end of story...

The only feature item I think we considered adding was Jan's LIMIT.  Do
you want that?  Let us know.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 30 Oct 1998 22:44:06 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS trees and post-6.4 release issues
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The only feature item I think we considered adding was Jan's LIMIT.  Do
> you want that?  Let us know.

	If you can personally guarantee that it will in absolutely no way
cause *any* problems with the system on any platform...go for it *grin*

	The feature freeze is meant to allow us to cover over any
operating system related tweaks...adding in a new feature opens the door
for new problems to creep in...

 Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Fri, 30 Oct 1998 23:53:05 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] CVS trees and post-6.4 release issues