I am wanting to fiddle with the latest Win32 stuff, using the Mingw
tools.
Is it included in the current (2-17-04) snapshot?
 
I did a download of the tarball and expanded it.
I changed directory to the /postgresql-snapshot directory and performed
a ./configure
 
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating GNUmakefile
config.status: creating src/Makefile.global
config.status: creating src/include/pg_config.h
config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/tas/dummy.s to
src/backend/port/tas.s
config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.c to
src/backend/port/dynloader.c
config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/sysv_sema.c to
src/backend/port/pg_sema.c
config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/sysv_shmem.c to
src/backend/port/pg_shmem.c
config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.h to
src/include/dynloader.h
config.status: linking ./src/include/port/win32.h to
src/include/pg_config_os.h
config.status: linking ./src/makefiles/Makefile.win32 to
src/Makefile.port

Make fails:
 
$ make
src/Makefile.global:275: src/Makefile.port: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `src/Makefile.port'.  Stop.

What is necessary in order to fool around with the Win32 stuff?
From the above symbolic link formation, it seems like it should have
found the file.

Message



I am wanting to 
fiddle with the latest Win32 stuff, using the Mingw tools.
Is it included in 
the current (2-17-04) snapshot?
 
I did a download of 
the tarball and expanded it.
I changed directory 
to the /postgresql-snapshot directory and performed a 
./configure
 
configure: creating 
./config.statusconfig.status: creating GNUmakefileconfig.status: 
creating src/Makefile.globalconfig.status: creating 
src/include/pg_config.hconfig.status: linking ./src/backend/port/tas/dummy.s 
to src/backend/port/tas.sconfig.status: linking 
./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.c to 
src/backend/port/dynloader.cconfig.status: linking 
./src/backend/port/sysv_sema.c to src/backend/port/pg_sema.cconfig.status: 
linking ./src/backend/port/sysv_shmem.c to 
src/backend/port/pg_shmem.cconfig.status: linking 
./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.h to 
src/include/dynloader.hconfig.status: linking ./src/include/port/win32.h to 
src/include/pg_config_os.hconfig.status: linking 
./src/makefiles/Makefile.win32 to src/Makefile.port
Make 
fails:
 
$ 
makesrc/Makefile.global:275: src/Makefile.port: No such file or 
directorymake: *** No rule to make target `src/Makefile.port'.  
Stop.
What is necessary in 
order to fool around with the Win32 stuff?
From the above 
symbolic link formation, it seems like it should have found the 
file.
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:48:21 -0800
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Win32 development question

Strange.  That should have worked.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dann Corbit wrote:
> I am wanting to fiddle with the latest Win32 stuff, using the Mingw
> tools.
> Is it included in the current (2-17-04) snapshot?
>  
> I did a download of the tarball and expanded it.
> I changed directory to the /postgresql-snapshot directory and performed
> a ./configure
>  
> configure: creating ./config.status
> config.status: creating GNUmakefile
> config.status: creating src/Makefile.global
> config.status: creating src/include/pg_config.h
> config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/tas/dummy.s to
> src/backend/port/tas.s
> config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.c to
> src/backend/port/dynloader.c
> config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/sysv_sema.c to
> src/backend/port/pg_sema.c
> config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/sysv_shmem.c to
> src/backend/port/pg_shmem.c
> config.status: linking ./src/backend/port/dynloader/win32.h to
> src/include/dynloader.h
> config.status: linking ./src/include/port/win32.h to
> src/include/pg_config_os.h
> config.status: linking ./src/makefiles/Makefile.win32 to
> src/Makefile.port
> 
> Make fails:
>  
> $ make
> src/Makefile.global:275: src/Makefile.port: No such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target `src/Makefile.port'.  Stop.
> 
> What is necessary in order to fool around with the Win32 stuff?
> From the above symbolic link formation, it seems like it should have
> found the file.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:50:50 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question