
they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
(ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...

let me know if there are any problems ...


Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:21:10 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
libpq++ and libpqxx removed 
Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
home page?  Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
>
>
>
> they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
>
> let me know if there are any problems ...
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>


Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:58:24 +0800
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed 

There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on
the current one until the new portal is in place ...

Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side?

On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
> home page?  Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
> >
> >
> >
> > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
> >
> > let me know if there are any problems ...
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>


Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:59:24 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed 
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on
> the current one until the new portal is in place ...
>
> Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side?

Sure.  Make me a button that matches the rest.  That's what the holdup
has been for any changes.  That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
trying to tell you that for months.


>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
> > home page?  Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> > > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> > > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> > > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> > > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
> > >
> > > let me know if there are any problems ...
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net
         56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
      http://www.camping-usa.com      http://www.cloudninegifts.com
   http://www.meanstreamradio.com       http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================




Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:24:47 -0400 (EDT)
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed 
Where can we see the new portal?  Maybe it should be designed in such a way
as to not use image links at all.  From all my experience in doing
websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea.

Chris

> > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should
> have such on
> > the current one until the new portal is in place ...
> >
> > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the
> left side?
>
> Sure.  Make me a button that matches the rest.  That's what the holdup
> has been for any changes.  That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
> The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
> trying to tell you that for months.


Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:28:03 +0800
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed 
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Where can we see the new portal?  Maybe it should be designed in such a way
> as to not use image links at all.  From all my experience in doing
> websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea.

I don't believe we are using image links on the new portal ...
>
> Chris
>
> > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should
> > have such on
> > > the current one until the new portal is in place ...
> > >
> > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the
> > left side?
> >
> > Sure.  Make me a button that matches the rest.  That's what the holdup
> > has been for any changes.  That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
> > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
> > trying to tell you that for months.
>
>


Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:36:14 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed 