
if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
are some 12491 that should be 1249l

would this cause our alignment problem?
somehow I doubt it..

in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
silly eh?

we'll see

Fri,  6 Mar 1998 16:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>
errors in pg_attribute.h

I fixed this (the 1/l thing) and did a recompile but it didn't help
our alpha problems any..

Can anyone describe the way the page stuff works?

On Fri, 6 March 1998, at 16:43:21, Brett McCormick wrote:

> if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
> are some 12491 that should be 1249l
> 
> would this cause our alignment problem?
> somehow I doubt it..
> 
> in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
> attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
> silly eh?
> 
> we'll see

Fri,  6 Mar 1998 17:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>
Re: [HACKERS] errors in pg_attribute.h
> 
> 
> if you look at the schema for pg_attribute, down at the very end there
> are some 12491 that should be 1249l
> 
> would this cause our alignment problem?
> somehow I doubt it..
> 
> in any case, i found this by trying to put a 4 byte field after
> attrelid and before attname to see if that cleared up the problem.
> silly eh?

That is surely a bug.  Patch applied to source tree.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Fri, 6 Mar 1998 23:48:36 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] errors in pg_attribute.h