I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.
Does anynone know what's happening here?

Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9GBurU27235
	for <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:57:11 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14299=sra.co.jp=t+2Dishii@postgresql.org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9G4GcP30712
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:16:39 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:12 +0900
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
delayed mail?
Tatsuo Ishii writes:
 > I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.
 > Does anynone know what's happening here?

I've seen massive delays too:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
	id EAA08864; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:41 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
	id f9G3Oh219345; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:44 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9G3Ljq66512
	for <lkindness@csl.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:23:36 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14283=csl.co.uk=lkindness@postgresql.org)
Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FNaKP72316
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
	by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9FGg8X57598
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9FGg6g02963
	for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110151642.f9FGg6g02963@candle.pha.pa.us>

and this one's days:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
	id KAA11316; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from postgresql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
	id f9G9Y3220747; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with SMTP id f9G0GHP83130;
	Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgsql-announce-owner+M120@postgresql.org)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9D4our63609;
	Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:56 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9D4oqo09577;
	Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110130450.f9D4oqo09577@candle.pha.pa.us>

Hardly any (yours omong the excepted, headers below) messages are
coming through in a timely fashion:

Received:  from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)
	id PAA14131; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:46 +0100 (BST)
Received:  from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)
	id f9GEHl222496; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:47 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
	by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9GEEEs48462
	for <lkindness@csl.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:16:31 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14305=csl.co.uk=lkindness@postgresql.org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9GCDVP15349
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.13.152])
	by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id VAA16107
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii@portsv3-24.sra.co.jp [133.137.84.24])
	by sranhm.sra.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id VAA10335
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:26 +0900
Message-Id: <20011016211312V.t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Lee.

Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:25:33 +0100 (BST)
Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>
delayed mail?

known problems, should be fixed and catching up now ...

On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.
> Does anynone know what's happening here?
>
> Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])
> 	by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9GBurU27235
> 	for <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:57:11 -0500 (CDT)
> 	(envelope-from pgsql-hackers-owner+M14299=sra.co.jp=t+2Dishii@postgresql.org)
> Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
> 	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f9G4GcP30712
> 	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:16:39 -0400 (EDT)
> 	(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>


Tue, 16 Oct 2001 17:10:58 -0400 (EDT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: delayed mail?