> >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> size
> >> would hit the same problem.
> > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
> 
> > else. Is this Ok for you ?
> 
> This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 

Thu, 5 Mar 1998 10:26:28 +0100 
Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ <Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at>
WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ wrote:
> 
> > >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> > size
> > >> would hit the same problem.
> > > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
> >
> > > else. Is this Ok for you ?
> >
> > This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> > protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> > a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't know, but imho it's not too hard to implement.

Vadim

Fri, 06 Mar 1998 09:25:46 +0700
"Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
Re: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:

> Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ wrote:
> > 
> > > >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> > > size
> > > >> would hit the same problem.
> > > > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > > > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
> > >
> > > > else. Is this Ok for you ?
> > >
> > > This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> > > protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> > > a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
>       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I don't know, but imho it's not too hard to implement.
> 
> Vadim

One thing, I don't allocate a fixed amount of memory for JDBC when
receiving tuples.

-- 
Peter T Mount  petermount@earthling.net or pmount@maidast.demon.co.uk
Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk


Sun, 8 Mar 1998 11:09:03 +0000 (GMT)
Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk>
Re: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field