It seems that postgres does not accept -T option. Checking the source,
I found that T is not given to getopt() while there is a code to parse
the -T option. Is there any reason for this?
---
Tatsuo Ishii


Fri, 30 Apr 1999 10:03:35 +0900
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
-T option ignored?
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> It seems that postgres does not accept -T option. Checking the source,
> I found that T is not given to getopt() while there is a code to parse
> the -T option. Is there any reason for this?

Looks like a garden-variety oversight from here.  While you're fixing
it, I suggest making the order of the getopt() list match the order of
the entries in the big switch statement; the postmaster does it that
way, and that made it a whole lot easier to see that things matched...

			regards, tom lane

Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:56:25 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored? 