Josh Berkus wrote:
> I don't reccomend using them at any time, though ...

Just curious: why not?

Merlin

Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:18:26 -0400
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>
Re: Support for persistant objects in PostgreSQL?
Merlin,

> Just curious: why not?

Because it's non-atomic data, which violates normalization and makes 
maintenance and data cleaning a royal pain.  Also, you'd still need to write 
your own operators to be able to do comparisons.

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:42:04 -0700
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Support for persistant objects in PostgreSQL?