> > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables that you were
> > > sure no other client was updating in parallel.  Otherwise you might be
> > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple.  Or is there a solution for that?
> > >
> > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ?
> > >
> > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now, but not yet an
> > > access method that actually makes it fast...
> > 
> > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I applied it.
> >
> 
> Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ?
> I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add'
> the files on my machine.
> Am I mistaken ?
> I couldn't understand the reason now.

Applied.  No idea why the add didn't work there.  It worked here.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:58:47 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
> 
> > > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables 
> that you were
> > > > sure no other client was updating in parallel.  Otherwise 
> you might be
> > > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple.  Or is there a solution for that?
> > > >
> > > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ?
> > > >
> > > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now, 
> but not yet an
> > > > access method that actually makes it fast...
> > > 
> > > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I 
> applied it.
> > >
> > 
> > Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ?
> > I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add'
> > the files on my machine.
> > Am I mistaken ?
> > I couldn't understand the reason now.
> 
> Applied.  No idea why the add didn't work there.  It worked here.
>

Thanks a lot.

I don't know CVS well.
Could someone teach me ?

It seems that 'cvs add' on my current machine connects to
postgresql.org.
Is it right ?
Isn't 'cvs add' local ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp

Wed, 24 Nov 1999 14:00:26 +0900
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
> > > the files on my machine.
> > > Am I mistaken ?
> > > I couldn't understand the reason now.
> > 
> > Applied.  No idea why the add didn't work there.  It worked here.
> >
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> I don't know CVS well.
> Could someone teach me ?
> 
> It seems that 'cvs add' on my current machine connects to
> postgresql.org.
> Is it right ?
> Isn't 'cvs add' local ?
> 

It is local, but has to register it with the server.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:07:35 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert