First, with Jan's fix, initdb works fine now.

Here are the open issues.  IMHO, none of these are show-stoppers.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Self-join optimizer performance problem
Get interfaces fixed for new protocol
Profiling improvements?
Problem with tables >2Gb, add elog()?
Do we want to add timestamps to elog messages?
ScanKeyData missing initializations
Alpha/64-bit issues, mkoidname() problem
large objects memory exhaustion
Commit sgml document sources(Thomas)
Commit html documents(Thomas)
Commit postscript documents(Thomas)


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Wed, 25 Feb 1998 10:22:45 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Open 6.3 issues
> 
> First, with Jan's fix, initdb works fine now.
> 
> Here are the open issues.  IMHO, none of these are show-stoppers.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Self-join optimizer performance problem
> Get interfaces fixed for new protocol
> Profiling improvements?
> Problem with tables >2Gb, add elog()?
> Do we want to add timestamps to elog messages?
> ScanKeyData missing initializations

    More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
    Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
    things are delayed for 6.4.


Jan

-- 

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #


Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:43:45 +0100 (MET)
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
> > ScanKeyData missing initializations
> 
>     More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
>     Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
>     things are delayed for 6.4.

There was one place in selfuncs.c where scan key was initialized
directly by assignment values to structure' fields 
(without ScanKeyEntryInitialize) and so new 6.3 fields were
not initialized at all. One should check all code...

Vadim

Wed, 25 Feb 1998 23:32:13 +0700
"Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues
> 
> Jan Wieck wrote:
> > 
> > > ScanKeyData missing initializations
> > 
> >     More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
> >     Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
> >     things are delayed for 6.4.
> 
> There was one place in selfuncs.c where scan key was initialized
> directly by assignment values to structure' fields 
> (without ScanKeyEntryInitialize) and so new 6.3 fields were
> not initialized at all. One should check all code...

    Haven't found any more places where sk_attno is assigned a
    value and where no previous ScanKeyEntryInitialize() is
    done. Think it's already fixed then.


Jan

-- 

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #


Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:22:48 +0100 (MET)
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues
> Here are the open issues.  IMHO, none of these are show-stoppers.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Self-join optimizer performance problem
> Get interfaces fixed for new protocol
> Profiling improvements?
> Problem with tables >2Gb, add elog()?
> Do we want to add timestamps to elog messages?
> ScanKeyData missing initializations
> Alpha/64-bit issues, mkoidname() problem
> large objects memory exhaustion
> Commit sgml document sources(Thomas)
> Commit html documents(Thomas)
> Commit postscript documents(Thomas)

I would like the new docs to be considered "show stoppers", but expect that
they will be committed before March. That is 3 days away and I have completed
the tutorial and user's guide packages. Just need to redraw one of the other
figures (1 hour?) and then massage the programmer's guide and administrator's
guide (1-2 hours each), and then commit.

Hmm, I think that I will go ahead and put some of the products into the cvs
tree soon so folks can work out any installation problems. OK?

                                                             - Tom


Wed, 25 Feb 1998 17:25:06 +0000
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
> >
> > Jan Wieck wrote:
> > >
> > > > ScanKeyData missing initializations
> > >
> > >     More details on missing initializations of ScanKeyData pleas.
> > >     Might have some time now since the other permission and setuid
> > >     things are delayed for 6.4.
> >
> > There was one place in selfuncs.c where scan key was initialized
> > directly by assignment values to structure' fields
> > (without ScanKeyEntryInitialize) and so new 6.3 fields were
> > not initialized at all. One should check all code...
> 
>     Haven't found any more places where sk_attno is assigned a
>     value and where no previous ScanKeyEntryInitialize() is
>     done. Think it's already fixed then.

Ok, but the problem was in un-initialized sk_func->fn_oid (sorry)...

Vadim

Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:00:41 +0700
"Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues