> > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
> > away (since it is not allways defined),
> > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
> > wich also is not defined by gcc.
> > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
> > all compilers.
> 
> 	Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
> 

I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
one underscore).

darrenk

Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:33:47 -0500
darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)
Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Darren King wrote:

> > > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
> > > away (since it is not allways defined),
> > > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
> > > wich also is not defined by gcc.
> > > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
> > > all compilers.
> > 
> > 	Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
> > 
> 
> I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
> one underscore).

	Someone want to send me a patch to fix this?  or a list of files
that need to be changed?

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Fri, 13 Feb 1998 01:09:58 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX