> 
> On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today?
> > 
> > If not, I'll ftp it.
> 
> 	I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly?  The mailing lists
> have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got
> lost...

Wonder what the limit is?  Let me find out by trial and error... :-)

-- 
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

Sun, 1 Feb 1998 17:12:33 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today?
> > > 
> > > If not, I'll ftp it.
> > 
> > 	I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly?  The mailing lists
> > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got
> > lost...
> 
> Wonder what the limit is?  Let me find out by trial and error... :-)

	I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
increased hackers, but just switched it around:

    # maxlength            [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
    # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
    # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
    # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
maxlength           =   4000000

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Sun, 1 Feb 1998 18:26:01 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
> 	I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
> increased hackers, but just switched it around:
> 
>     # maxlength            [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
>     # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
>     # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
>     # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
> maxlength           =   4000000

Gee, that is taking all the fun out of finding the limit myself.  :-)

-- 
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

Sun, 1 Feb 1998 17:37:53 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 	I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
> > increased hackers, but just switched it around:
> > 
> >     # maxlength            [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
> >     # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
> >     # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
> >     # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
> > maxlength           =   4000000
> 
> Gee, that is taking all the fun out of finding the limit myself.  :-)

	I could add a random number generator to the code from 1->4000000
that changes each time an email is sent, just so that it became a game of
(excuse Vadim) Russian Roulette? :)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Sun, 1 Feb 1998 19:29:59 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?