
> In fact, I had proposed a simpler UNDO capability that revisited tuples
> and set their XID to a fixed aborted XID to clean up aborted
> subtransactions, but most now like the multiple XID solution.

I think for the implicit subtransactions that we will want 
(with error codes comming) using a different xid for every command 
inside a transaction is not so sexy, no ?

Andreas


Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:38:23 +0200
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff