Ditto.
>> 
>> >     Naming it 7.0 IMHO requires transaction log, tuple split over
>> >     blocks, foreign keys, outer  joins  and  rules  of  arbitrary
>> >     size. I don't expect ALL of them for the next release, so let
>> >     it be 6.6.
>> 
>> I like Jan's more complete list...
>> 
>>                  - Thomas
>> 
MikeA

Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:54:55 +0200
"Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
RE: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0