Hi all,
is not usefull have a mailing list in where people can
partecipate in a sort of "code revision" about the 
actual code ?


Regards
Gaetano Mendola


Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:06:05 +0200
"Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Code revision

Do you mean "code review"?

andrew

Mendola Gaetano wrote:

>Hi all,
>is not usefull have a mailing list in where people can
>partecipate in a sort of "code revision" about the 
>actual code ?
>  
>



Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:18:33 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Code revision
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> 
> >Hi all,
> >is not usefull have a mailing list in where people can
> >partecipate in a sort of "code revision" about the 
> >actual code ?
> >  
> Do you mean "code review"?

Yep, I'm a drunk dyslectic :-)

Gaetano



Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:36:07 +0200
"Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: Code review
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:06:05PM +0200, Mendola Gaetano wrote:
> is not usefull have a mailing list in where people can
> partecipate in a sort of "code revision" about the 
> actual code ?

I think pgsql-patches is used for that purpose by some people.
If you're implementing a major change, its usually best to
send a proposal for the change to pgsql-hackers for discussion.
Once a consensus is reached, implement the change and send the
patch to pgsql-patches, where people will usually comment on
the patch if they feel it needs changes.

-Neil


Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:25:44 -0400
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Code revision