On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 22:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Bruce suggested that this should get some code review, since a bug in
> > pg_dump would be bad news. Any comments would be welcome.
> 
> The issue was that the author wants it in 7.2.1.

I'm confused: which author? Where does this information come from?

>  I question whether a
> purely performance pg_dump patch belongs in a minor release.  I will let
> others decide.

I agree.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC


18 Feb 2002 22:34:17 -0500
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Re: pg_dump: use ALTER TABLE for PKs
> > The issue was that the author wants it in 7.2.1.
>
> I'm confused: which author? Where does this information come from?

I certainly didn't propose that it appear in 7.2.1 - I was thinking 7.3.

> >  I question whether a
> > purely performance pg_dump patch belongs in a minor release.  I will let
> > others decide.

It sure shouldn't...

Chris


Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:49:08 +0800
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: pg_dump: use ALTER TABLE for PKs