At 12:19 PM 29/06/2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>It's hacky (although officially hacky :) ) in regards that it parses the 
>dropStmt on each object to get the objects name.  This is necessary 
>because of an oversight in the initial design of the binary format.

If there's something missing in the format, I'd be inclined to add it. 
We've never promised to make dumps made by version X readable (or usable) 
by version X-1. We *do* the opposite, however, so you will probably still 
need to parse dump statements from old dump files. Unless we can back-patch...

So, rather than carry the hack forward, doing it right for future versions 
would be my vote.




----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                  |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371       |/  


Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:47:09 +1000
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: [PATCHES] Fixes for pg_dump and ownership/acl problems
> If there's something missing in the format, I'd be inclined to add it. 
> We've never promised to make dumps made by version X readable (or 
> usable) by version X-1. We *do* the opposite, however, so you will 
> probably still need to parse dump statements from old dump files. Unless 
> we can back-patch...
> 
> So, rather than carry the hack forward, doing it right for future 
> versions would be my vote.

I guess there's no reason not to.  I'll see if I can come up with something.

Chris

Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:39:52 +0800
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: [PATCHES] Fixes for pg_dump and ownership/acl problems