
'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
great ...


Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:21:50 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Last beta ... we hope?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> great ...

So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

- -- 
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
OfficeNet AS

- - Writing software is more fun than working.

gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lqWFUopImDh2gfQRArKoAJwPMmF1fE2NiTQX4yKNQuCH+5NokACggzOO
V8w4FFh0Tbvqcce3mLUDZx4=
=B+bj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:43:01 +0200
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Re: Last beta ... we hope?
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 11:43, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

Yes, it is. This should probably be mentioned in the announcement when
it is sent out.

-Neil



Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:08:14 -0400
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Last beta ... we hope?


On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> > date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> > on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> > the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> > great ...
>
> So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

Yes


Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:10:21 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Hi,

7.4beta4 is still mentioned in INSTALL.

Tommi


Am Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2003 16:21 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> great ...
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

-- 
Dr. Eckhardt + Partner GmbH
http://www.epgmbh.de

Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:08:53 +0200
Tommi Maekitalo <t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de>
Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Tommi Maekitalo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 7.4beta4 is still mentioned in INSTALL.

Oh, I didn't realize the beta number was in the install.  I just updated
it, and we will have the right numbers in the for final.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Last beta ... we hope?