

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] 
> Sent: 11 September 2002 22:28
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Oliver Elphick; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
> 
> 
> Why can't we do the remapping in the SQL grammar and remove 
> the remapping in 7.4?
> 

I can see that working for the opaque/language_handler thing, but
would/should it work for tweaking casts that are no longer implicit?

Regards, Dave.

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:33:58 +0100
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Re: 
Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 11 September 2002 22:28
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Oliver Elphick; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
> > 
> > 
> > Why can't we do the remapping in the SQL grammar and remove 
> > the remapping in 7.4?
> > 
> 
> I can see that working for the opaque/language_handler thing, but
> would/should it work for tweaking casts that are no longer implicit?

OK, I am going to add these items to the open items list because I am
having trouble keeping track of all the compatibility changes for
pg_dump.

I have:

	Loading 7.2 pg_dumps 
        	opaque language handler no longer recognized  

What else is there?  

Do cast problems related to pg_dump loading or to working with the data
after the load?  Is it casts in user functions?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: 