
Have managed to delete char2,4,8 and 16.  The char16 was tricky
since it was still one of the builtins.  Removed fine everywhere
but the bootstrap code.  Had to leave a dummy entry in the Procid
array so all of the types after char16 would be indexed correctly.
Could remove this dummy by moving types 21-30 down one, but that
would entail renumbering the catalog.  With that in mind, I can
live with a filler entry in an array.  Heaven knows there are bigger
and badder hacks elsewhere in the code dying to be discovered. :)

Three points now...regression tests, docs and interfaces.

1. Regression tests make very extensive use of char16.  Seems to
me that these should be changed to a name.  Same for tutorial and
any other example references in the code.  Seem ok?

2. I'll take my best shot at the docs.

3. Also take a look/see at the interfaces that reference the char16.
Perhaps would be better for me to contact the maintainers of those
interfaces as they would know what to do better than I.

Once I do one and two, I'll submit the patch.

darrenk

Fri, 20 Mar 1998 19:45:46 -0500
darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)
char types gone.
> Have managed to delete char2,4,8 and 16.
> Three points now...regression tests, docs and interfaces.
> 
> 1. Regression tests make very extensive use of char16.  Seems to
> me that these should be changed to a name.  Same for tutorial and
> any other example references in the code.  Seem ok?

Any reason not to use "text" for these cases? Or even varchar()? "name"
is probably really only an internal Postgres type. We should have a
regression test for it if we don't already. Let me know if you want me
to help...

> 2. I'll take my best shot at the docs.

Where? The man pages or the sgml sources? I'm shooting for getting the
sgml sources right, and obsoleting the man page _sources_, regenerating
them from the sgml instead.

                       - Tom

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 15:57:48 +0000
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Re-applied this patch, now that 6.3.* is closed.

> 
> 
> Have managed to delete char2,4,8 and 16.  The char16 was tricky
> since it was still one of the builtins.  Removed fine everywhere
> but the bootstrap code.  Had to leave a dummy entry in the Procid
> array so all of the types after char16 would be indexed correctly.
> Could remove this dummy by moving types 21-30 down one, but that
> would entail renumbering the catalog.  With that in mind, I can
> live with a filler entry in an array.  Heaven knows there are bigger
> and badder hacks elsewhere in the code dying to be discovered. :)
> 
> Three points now...regression tests, docs and interfaces.
> 
> 1. Regression tests make very extensive use of char16.  Seems to
> me that these should be changed to a name.  Same for tutorial and
> any other example references in the code.  Seem ok?
> 
> 2. I'll take my best shot at the docs.
> 
> 3. Also take a look/see at the interfaces that reference the char16.
> Perhaps would be better for me to contact the maintainers of those
> interfaces as they would know what to do better than I.
> 
> Once I do one and two, I'll submit the patch.
> 
> darrenk
> 
> 


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Sun, 26 Apr 1998 00:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.