> > I have been studying DeadLockCheck for most of a day now, 
> > and I doubt that this is the only bug lurking in it.
> > I think that we really ought to throw it away and start
> > over, because it doesn't look to me at all like a standard
> > deadlock-detection algorithm.  The standard way of doing
> 
> Go ahead.  Throw away my code.  *sniff*  :-)

And my changes from the days of 6.5 -:)

Vadim

Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:25:49 -0800
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
RE: DeadLockCheck is buggy