 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net] 
> Sent: 05 November 2003 12:48
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Sourcing pgManage
> 
> 
> 
> "especially" != "only"
> 

Very true :-)


> BTW, pgadmin could improve its Linux coverage somewhat by a) 
> providing 
> RPMs for versions of RedHat before 9, 

Unfortunately we are somewhat limited to the boxes that our developers
have available, however if anyone can help out  with additional
ports/distributions we would welcome them and help out in any way we
can.

> or at least providing 
> SRPMs that 
> can be built on such platforms, 

I believe they should do know - Jean-Michel, were you looking at this?

> and b) getting pgadmin 
> included in the 
> fedora package set.

I only heard about Fedora about 20 minutes ago! Jean-Michel, do you have
any contacts that might be able to help with this?

> Anyway, CommandPrompt have apparently done something cool and 
> they are 
> donating it and we should all be happy, no? :-)

With my PostgreSQL hat on, yes, it's a good thing. With my pgAdmin hat,
no, it's a bad thing!

Regards, Dave.

Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:58:00 -0000
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Re: Open Sourcing pgManage
Dave Page wrote:

>>Anyway, CommandPrompt have apparently done something cool and 
>>they are 
>>donating it and we should all be happy, no? :-)
>>    
>>
>
>With my PostgreSQL hat on, yes, it's a good thing. With my pgAdmin hat,
>no, it's a bad thing!
>  
>

I'm feeling quite relaxed about that. Competition stimulates advances, 
and we're better anyway :-)

Regards,
Andreas



Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:35:21 +0100
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
Re: Open Sourcing pgManage