I have noticed some people are complaining about patches being applied. 
I feel this is very discouraging to the people who submit them.

I apply patches as soon as I seem them, assuming they look OK.  We
always have the ability to back them out later.

What I am seeing is people voting for people to reverse out patches
without giving the patch submitter a chance to address any concerns.  I
think we owe our patch submitters the dignity of having a chance to
respond to criticism of the patches before anyone suggests yanking a
patch.

I have rejected patches in the past, but I usually tell the person what
I don't like about the patch, and encourage them to resubmit the patch
with the suggested changes.  

Sometime, I even apply the patch, but tell the submitter they have to
give me the fixes I requested.  If they don't arrive in a few days, then
I reverse out the patch.  Sometimes it is easier for people to fix what
they have already done than to submit a totally new patch.

Of course, this is all my personal opinion.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Sat, 22 Jan 2000 22:41:15 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Refusing patches