hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through...
re-attempt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>
Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Sent: January 02, 2003 6:16 PM
> 
> > static void
> > usage(void)
> > {
> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", longOption, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", shortOption, desc)
> > #endif
> > 
> > ... lots of xo() calls ...
> > 
> > #undef xo
> > }
> > 
> > This gives us the convenience of a very short name within the usage()
> > subroutines, while not polluting the namespace for everyplace else in
> > these utilities.
> 
> Revised patch attached as per above.
> 
> -s

Fri, 3 Jan 2003 18:41:33 -0500
"Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III