
> My inclindation is that tablespaces should be installation-wide, but
> I'm not completely sold on it.  In any case I could see wanting a
> permissions mechanism that would only allow some databases to have
> tables in a particular tablespace.

I fully second that.

> We do need to think more about how traditional Postgres databases
> fit together with SCHEMA.  Maybe we wouldn't even need multiple
> databases per installation if we had SCHEMA done right.

This gives me the goose bumps. A schema is something that is below
the database hierarchy. It is the owner of a table. We lack the ability
to qualify a tablemname with an owner like "owner".tabname .
Can we please agree to that much ?

Andreas 

Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:14:51 +0200
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: Big 7.1 open items 