

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev@michvhf.com] 
> Sent: 07 January 2003 22:47
> To: mlw
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Marc G. Fournier
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
> 
> 
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
> 
> > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are 
> complaining about 
> > ads.
> >
> > What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
> 
> FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
> 
> On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less 
> than the normal traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming 
> audio uses up even more than that.

Disk is cheap, it's the bandwidth that costs. A cursory look at the new
portal (which is on a new machine on it's own) is showing about 1Gb
since going live on Saturday/Sunday. Of course, these are not just bits
of webspace, they are BSD boxes to which we have complete access. There
are all sorts of things being run on them - CVS, docbook, distribution
builds, Gborg, PostgreSQL, Majordomo, Horde...

Regards, Dave.

Tue, 7 Jan 2003 23:05:06 -0000
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?