> At 01:05 AM 7/8/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >> I get the same for indexing TIMESTAMP in version 6.4.2.  Has this been
> >> fixed in 6.5?
> >> 
> >
> >No.  DATETIME works, though.
> 
> 
> Not really, since I need to access it from JDBC and the
> ResultSet.getTimestamp() method doesn't work with DATETIME columns (at
> least under my installation of 6.4.2).
> 
> Thanks, anyway.
> 

Peter, we are getting requests for DATETIME in jdbc.  Can you add it?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [SQL] Index on Type Numeric
> Peter, we are getting requests for DATETIME in jdbc.  Can you add it?

If it matters...

I'm planning on folding datetime into timestamp for the next release
(unless there are objections). Both names will be synonyms, but the
underlying code will be say "timestamp", and will look like the
current "datetime".

                     - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California

Tue, 27 Jul 1999 05:54:13 +0000
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Index on Type Numeric