Is it feasible and/or advantageous to move all the system tables to a
system schema (to "system" or "pg_system")?  This seems a much more
natural place for this type of information.  This would remove the
artificial 'pg_' restriction on class names and simplify the overall
system a little bit.  Just a thought.
 
Regards,
Merlin














Is it feasible and/or advantageous to move all the system
tables to a system schema (to “system” or “pg_system”)? 
This seems a much more natural place for this type of information.  This would remove the artificial ‘pg_’
restriction on class names and simplify the overall system a little bit.  Just a thought.
 
Regards,
Merlin
Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:25:50 -0400
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>
schemas and system tables 
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> Is it feasible and/or advantageous to move all the system tables to a
> system schema (to "system" or "pg_system")?  This seems a much more
> natural place for this type of information.  This would remove the
> artificial 'pg_' restriction on class names and simplify the overall
> system a little bit.  Just a thought.

I believe 7.3 already did this with pg_catalog.



Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: schemas and system tables 