======================
 All 76 tests passed.
======================

vlad: uname -a
SunOS vlad 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)

CFLAGS=-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa
CXXFLAGS=-O6 -felide-constructors -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa

configure --prefix=/opt/pgsql \
               --with-tcl \
               --with-includes=/opt/sfw/include \
               --with-libraries=/opt/sfw/lib \
               --with-tclconfig=/opt/sfw/lib \
               --with-CC=gcc \
               --with-CXX=gcc

This was cvs checjout this am (3/27/2001)

Thanks.

--
Brian Millett
Enterprise Consulting Group   "Shifts in paradigms
(314) 205-9030               often cause nose bleeds."
bpm@ec-group.com                           Greg Glenn




Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:34:13 -0600
Brian P Millett <bpm@ec-group.com>
SPARC Solaris 8 OK
> Erm, I've just tested 7.1RC1 on Solaris 8 x86 and SPARC. Solaris x86
> works without any problems and passes the regression test (apart from
> a few very small roundoff errors in the geometry tests).

OK, I've got Solaris/x86 checked off. Thanks!

> ... However, on
> Solaris SPARC tests randomly fail (like someone else reported too). I've
> tried running configure without any options and the options given above,
> but the results were the same. I'm using gcc 2.95.3. I'll see if I can
> give the cvs version and gcc 2.95.2 a try tomorrow. Same goes for
> Solaris 7 SPARC and maybe Solaris 2.6 SPARC.

Random failures on Solaris seem to *always* be linked to Unix socket
resource limits, per the ongoing discussion.

                        - Thomas

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:54:51 +0000
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:34:13AM -0600, Brian P Millett allegedly wrote:
> ======================
>  All 76 tests passed.
> ======================
> 
> vlad: uname -a
> SunOS vlad 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> 
> Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs
> gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> 
> CFLAGS=-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa
> CXXFLAGS=-O6 -felide-constructors -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa
> 
> configure --prefix=/opt/pgsql \
>                --with-tcl \
>                --with-includes=/opt/sfw/include \
>                --with-libraries=/opt/sfw/lib \
>                --with-tclconfig=/opt/sfw/lib \
>                --with-CC=gcc \
>                --with-CXX=gcc
> 
> This was cvs checjout this am (3/27/2001)
> 
> Thanks.

Erm, I've just tested 7.1RC1 on Solaris 8 x86 and SPARC. Solaris x86
works without any problems and passes the regression test (apart from
a few very small roundoff errors in the geometry tests). However, on
Solaris SPARC tests randomly fail (like someone else reported too). I've
tried running configure without any options and the options given above,
but the results were the same. I'm using gcc 2.95.3. I'll see if I can
give the cvs version and gcc 2.95.2 a try tomorrow. Same goes for
Solaris 7 SPARC and maybe Solaris 2.6 SPARC.

Cheers,

Mathijs
-- 
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
                                                    Erik Naggum

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 02:36:00 +0200
Mathijs Brands <mathijs@ilse.nl>
Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK)