Hackers,

I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction
abort.  Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however
it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were
Lists.  Is it OK if I change them to be so?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Uno combate cuando es necesario... ï¿½no cuando estï¿½ de humor!
El humor es para el ganado, o para hacer el amor, o para tocar el
baliset.  No para combatir."  (Gurney Halleck)


Fri, 28 May 2004 00:05:41 -0400
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
hash, rtree and gist ScanLists
> I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction
> abort.  Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however
> it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were
> Lists.  Is it OK if I change them to be so?

Alvaro,

Have I mentioned that you're a total legend recently!?!  Many thanks for 
working on all this stuff - I'm sure the other hackers would agree!

Chris


Fri, 28 May 2004 13:00:46 +0800
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: hash, rtree and gist ScanLists