
> Even more to the point, those typical installations do not want
> exclusive-locked VACUUM.  Haven't you paid any attention to the user
> complaints we've been hearing for the last N years?  People want a
> nonexclusive VACUUM (or no VACUUM at all, but that's not a choice we
can
> offer them now.)  That *is* what the typical dbadmin will want to run,
> and that's why I say it should be the default.

I agree.

Andreas

Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:55:33 +0200
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
AW: Name for new VACUUM 