
Just a quick note that we'd like to wrap up a Beta5 during the day
tomorrow, based on all the changes since Beta4 ... is anyone sitting on
any patches that postponing it "just one more day" would help ... ?

Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:13:05 -0300 (ADT)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... 
What about bumping the libpq version?

Chris

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Just a quick note that we'd like to wrap up a Beta5 during the day
> tomorrow, based on all the changes since Beta4 ... is anyone sitting on
> any patches that postponing it "just one more day" would help ... ?
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:38:49 +0800
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> What about bumping the libpq version?

After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
only additions).  That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
was incorrect.  Never mind ...

			regards, tom lane

Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:43:54 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What about bumping the libpq version?
> 
> After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
> major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
> only additions).  That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
> was incorrect.  Never mind ...

Got it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What about bumping the libpq version?
> 
> After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
> major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
> only additions).  That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
> was incorrect.  Never mind ...

Or, should I say, "Glad we are OK with current libpq version numbers".

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:13:47 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...