See the attached file for details
>From pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org  Tue Aug 19 14:39:33 2003
X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC51D1B8DC
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:39:32 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
 by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 13407-06
 for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
 Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:39:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from pns.mm.eutelsat.org (pns.mm.eutelsat.org [194.214.173.227])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE53BD1B89D
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:39:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from nts-03.mm.eutelsat.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pns.mm.eutelsat.org (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id h7JGf5W03175;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:41:05 +0200
Received: from gmendola (gmendola.mm.eutelsat.org [194.214.173.50])
	by nts-03.mm.eutelsat.org (8.11.6/linuxconf) with SMTP id h7JHYGR06565;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:34:16 +0200
Message-ID: <035901c36678$880b81b0$10d4a8c0@mm.eutelsat.org>
From: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1061236607.19705.132.camel@jester> <18816.1061256553@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: Qualified tables in error messages
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:37:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0
 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3, REFERENCES
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200308/915
X-Sequence-Number: 42572

"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> ERROR: table "schema"."foo" does not exist
> 
> which is just plain ugly.

I think that is better for the moment this ugly message
that have lack of information.


Regards
Gaetano Mendola





Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:22:25 --0500
<jason@tishler.net>
Re: Approved