At 12:59 PM 5/25/00 +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:

> Wow, that sounds darn slow. Speed of a seq scan on one CPU, 
> one disk should give you more like 19000 rows/s with a small record size.
> Of course you are probably talking about random fetch order here,
> but we need fast seq scans too.

The test was random reads on a 250GB database.  I don't have a
similar characterization for sequential scans off the top of my
head.
					mike


Thu, 25 May 2000 07:41:08 -0700
"Michael A. Olson" <mao@sleepycat.com>
Re: AW: Berkeley DB...