Just going through the TODO list, at the risk of starting another
heart-breaking discussion, did we not agree to _not_ do this:

* rename 'createuser' to 'pg_createuser', and add 'pg_' to other commands

All the commands that need it (version, dump, id) already have this
prefix, all the other ones have no provable name conflicts, so leave as
is?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vï¿½g 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:28:07 +0100 (CET)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
pg_createuser
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Just going through the TODO list, at the risk of starting another
> heart-breaking discussion, did we not agree to _not_ do this:
> 
> * rename 'createuser' to 'pg_createuser', and add 'pg_' to other commands
> 
> All the commands that need it (version, dump, id) already have this
> prefix, all the other ones have no provable name conflicts, so leave as
> is?

Removed from TODO list.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:12:08 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_createuser