The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.

			regards, tom lane

Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:25:39 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
OK, what's this LDREL all about?
> The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.

Fixed.  CVS update.
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:34:58 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?
On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:

> The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.

ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vï¿½g 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



Sat, 11 Dec 1999 03:01:43 +0100 (CET)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:
> 
> > The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> > maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> > Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> > which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> > But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.
> 
> ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
> LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

We have an LDFLAGS, but this for using ld to generate SUBSYS.o.  Not to
be used in normal ld linking use.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 10 Dec 1999 21:44:52 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?