Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
there two of them there now?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> there two of them there now?

There are indeed two - mine and the other one:
  http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtclng/
     Version 1.5.0 released 2004-02-29 (source, manual, and Windows binary
     releases)
  http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtcl/
     Last release was beta 1.4b3 2002-11-15?

If you delete libpgtcl from "core" CVS, you lose the histories. I don't
think you want that. But that doesn't mean you necessarily have to bundle
it with the release anymore, does it? It's up to you core team people what
you want to do about unbundling libpgtcl. I've done my part. But I do have
a suggestion: if you chose to unbundled it and pgtclng becomes the
"official" Tcl interface, someone from the core team needs to be added to
the admin list of the gborg pgtclng project. You know, just in case...

Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>
Re: Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> there two of them there now?

I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:46:38 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
for the second part, yes, there are 2 on gborg: pgtcl
and pgtclng

--- Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't
> it now on gborg?  Are
> > there two of them there now?
> 
> I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no
> one know?
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        | 
> http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
> 359-1001
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts
> Road
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown
> Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose
> an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25���
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Brett Schwarz <brett_schwarz@yahoo.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Brett Schwarz wrote:
> for the second part, yes, there are 2 on gborg: pgtcl
> and pgtclng
> 
My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> > there two of them there now?
> 
> I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?

I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
Never got it? It's in the archive:
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php

> My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.

I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> > > there two of them there now?
> > 
> > I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?
> 
> I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
> Never got it? It's in the archive:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php

Yes, I saw that.  The issue is that the CVS history needs to be moved
over into one of the gborg TCL project histories.

Marc?

> > My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> > libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.
> 
> I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
> pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.

Yea, we need to do that before removing from CVS.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:00:39 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> L J Bayuk wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > 
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> > > > there two of them there now?
> > > 
> > > I am still waiting for an answer on this.  Does no one know?
> > 
> > I replied right away - to you and the lists you posted to.
> > Never got it? It's in the archive:
> >   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-04/msg00020.php
> 
> Yes, I saw that.  The issue is that the CVS history needs to be moved
> over into one of the gborg TCL project histories.
> 
> Marc?
> 
> > > My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
> > > libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.
> > 
> > I believe I have all the fixes, and I know I have none of the histories, in
> > pgtcl-ng. I think both statements are also true about the Gborg pgtcl project.
> 
> Yea, we need to do that before removing from CVS.

OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.

Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
	
	pgtclsh is an example of a tclsh extended with the new Tcl
	commands provided by the libpgtcl library.  By using pgtclsh, one can
	write front-end applications to PostgreSQL in Tcl without having to
	deal with any libpq programming at all.  
	
	The pgtclsh is an enhanced version of tclsh.  Similarly, pgtksh is a
	wish replacement with PostgreSQL bindings.
	
	For details of the libpgtcl interface, please see the Programmer's
	Guide.

Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
7.4 CVS.

Anyone?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:14:07 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> ...
> OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.
> 
> Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
>...
> 
> Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
> 7.4 CVS.
> 
> Anyone?

Already discussed:
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
and
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
L J Bayuk wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > ...
> > OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl.  I just removed the docs for them.
> > 
> > Can someone comment on pgtclsh?  The README says:
> >...
> > 
> > Do we need to move that over to gborg?  If so, you can pull it out of
> > 7.4 CVS.
> > 
> > Anyone?
> 
> Already discussed:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
> and
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

Great.  Thanks you.

I heard it wasn't needed, but couldn't remember if that was current
information or something old.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?