
I packaged up an RC2 over the weekend, and pretty much as soon as I had it
packaged and in place, before I could announce it, there were several
patches thrown in ... so, I left it there, let anyone who happened to see
it pick it up, but didn't announce it ...

Everything has been quiet, as far as patches are concerned, for the past
24+hrs ... I'd like to roll (and actually announce) an solid RC3 tonight,
with announce first thing tomorrow morning, unless anyone has anythign
they aer sitting on?


Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org


Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:53:19 -0300 (ADT)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ...
I just have to setup a trong logging of users postgres activity using php
script.

It's work well and my disk is going full quickly.
i have a file like this

{ TARGETENTRY
         :resdom
            { RESDOM
            :resno 2
            :restype 1043
            :restypmod 24
            :resname "abrev_formation"
            :reskey 0
            :reskeyop 0
            :resgroupref 0
            :resjunk false
            }

it's to hard to exploit this file to extract a user and machine from where
they work.

Some help for managing logging


Fouad  Fezzi


Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:46:06 +0200
"Fouad Fezzi" <fezzi@iup.univ-avignon.fr>
logging is funny...
There is an ELOG_TIMESTAMPS options and some others in include/config.h or
include/config.h.in.  I think that is where you get the pid of the
backend and stuff.  I agree it needs more detail, at least the process
id.


[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> I just have to setup a trong logging of users postgres activity using php
> script.
> 
> It's work well and my disk is going full quickly.
> i have a file like this
> 
> { TARGETENTRY
>          :resdom
>             { RESDOM
>             :resno 2
>             :restype 1043
>             :restypmod 24
>             :resname "abrev_formation"
>             :reskey 0
>             :reskeyop 0
>             :resgroupref 0
>             :resjunk false
>             }
> 
> it's to hard to exploit this file to extract a user and machine from where
> they work.
> 
> Some help for managing logging
> 
> 
> Fouad  Fezzi
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:58:19 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: logging is funny...
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Everything has been quiet, as far as patches are concerned, for the past
> 24+hrs ... I'd like to roll (and actually announce) an solid RC3 tonight,
> with announce first thing tomorrow morning, unless anyone has anythign
> they aer sitting on?

I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.

			regards, tom lane

Wed, 04 Apr 2001 09:59:37 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... 
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Everything has been quiet, as far as patches are concerned, for the past
> > 24+hrs ... I'd like to roll (and actually announce) an solid RC3 tonight,
> > with announce first thing tomorrow morning, unless anyone has anythign
> > they aer sitting on?
>
> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.

can we comment out the test for now, so that its still in there, but not
tested?  or is there absolutely non way that we can fix that in the long
term?



Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:53:22 -0300 (ADT)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... 
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.

> can we comment out the test for now, so that its still in there, but not
> tested?  or is there absolutely non way that we can fix that in the long
> term?

Commenting it out was the only idea that I had.  Maybe Thomas has a
better idea, though.

			regards, tom lane

Wed, 04 Apr 2001 10:56:27 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... 
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:56:27AM -0400, Tom Lane allegedly wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3.
> 
> > can we comment out the test for now, so that its still in there, but not
> > tested?  or is there absolutely non way that we can fix that in the long
> > term?
> 
> Commenting it out was the only idea that I had.  Maybe Thomas has a
> better idea, though.

Why not work with a maximum error in the regression tests? For instance,
allow a small difference after the 8th digit? That would pick out the
real bugs and let the round-off errors pass, right?

Mathijs
-- 
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
                                                    Erik Naggum

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 01:20:35 +0200
Mathijs Brands <mathijs@ilse.nl>
Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ...