>
>OK, then why is electric fence telling him to make DOUBLEALIGN match
>INTALIGN?  You would think that if this change made sense, we would be
>having some Linux problems, but we don't.

Don't you think it's dangerous to presume that a problem doesn't exist 
just because you've never noticed it?
Umm, -:)


With regards from Maurice.




Sun, 22 Mar 1998 10:45:32 +0100
"Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>
Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)
> 
> >
> >OK, then why is electric fence telling him to make DOUBLEALIGN match
> >INTALIGN?  You would think that if this change made sense, we would be
> >having some Linux problems, but we don't.
> 
> Don't you think it's dangerous to presume that a problem doesn't exist 
> just because you've never noticed it?
> Umm, -:)

Yes.  I am not staying it doesn't exist, but that we need to research it
further before applying a change that will affect so much code.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Sun, 22 Mar 1998 15:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)