
ftp.postgresql.org/pub/patches/.test/v6.3p1beta3.gz

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Fri, 20 Mar 1998 19:57:34 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Newest Patch...try this one...
At 7:57 PM 98.3.20 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>ftp.postgresql.org/pub/patches/.test/v6.3p1beta3.gz

I have tested the patch on my FreeBSD 2.2.5 box. 
Here are quick reports.

o the patch command needs -p1 and -l option. It would be nice
  if this is mentioned in README or whatever. 
o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
  backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
  compile errors.
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp


Sat, 21 Mar 1998 23:10:20 +0900
t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
>   backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
>   compile errors.

	This patch represents what has changed between the tar file that
is v6.3 and the source tree that is current...if there is an unnecessary
patch, then it should most likely be removed from current tree altogether,
no?

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Sat, 21 Mar 1998 14:42:02 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
At 2:42 PM 98.3.21 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
>> o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
>>   backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
>>   compile errors.
>
>        This patch represents what has changed between the tar file that
>is v6.3 and the source tree that is current...if there is an unnecessary
>patch, then it should most likely be removed from current tree altogether,
>no?

I don't know why this happens, but...

It seems that the patch is trying to create a new file of geqo_path.c
which is identical to existing geqo_path.c in the 6.3 tar file.
As a result, dupliation of it is performed by the patch.
To confirm above, take a look at the RCS id of geqo_path.c
in the tar file and the patch.
You will find they are same (1.8 created on 1998/2/26).
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp


Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:39:36 +0900
t-ishii@sra.co.jp (Tatsuo Ishii)
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
> 
> At 7:57 PM 98.3.20 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >ftp.postgresql.org/pub/patches/.test/v6.3p1beta3.gz
> 
> I have tested the patch on my FreeBSD 2.2.5 box. 
> Here are quick reports.
> 
> o the patch command needs -p1 and -l option. It would be nice
>   if this is mentioned in README or whatever. 
> o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
>   backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
>   compile errors.
> Tatsuo Ishii
> t-ishii@sra.co.jp
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Sat, 21 Mar 1998 22:32:13 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
> o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
>   backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
>   compile errors.
> Tatsuo Ishii
> t-ishii@sra.co.jp

I am confused about this item.  cvs shows no changes in this file since
the 6.3 release.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c,v
Working file: geqo_paths.c
head: 1.8
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
        release-6-3: 1.8
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 8;     selected revisions: 8
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.8
date: 1998/02/26 04:32:23;  author: momjian;  state: Exp;  lines: +2 -2
pgindent run before 6.3 release, with Thomas' requested changes.
----------------------------
revision 1.7
date: 1997/09/08 21:44:32;  author: momjian;  state: Exp;  lines: +7 -7
Used modified version of indent that understands over 100 typedefs.


-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

Sat, 21 Mar 1998 22:32:49 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
>I just put the final patch in place (unannounced) for anyone to try out...
>
>ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz
>
>Unless there are any outstandign problems with either that patch or the
>full distribution, I will put out an announcement of those two Monday
>morning...

It seems still the problem below exists in postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz.
(I haven't checked postgresql-6.3.1.tar.gz yet)

>>> o an unnecceary patch (I guess) for 
>>>   backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_paths.c included. This cause some
>>>   compile errors.
>>
>>        This patch represents what has changed between the tar file that
>>is v6.3 and the source tree that is current...if there is an unnecessary
>>patch, then it should most likely be removed from current tree altogether,
>>no?
>
>I don't know why this happens, but...
>
>It seems that the patch is trying to create a new file of geqo_path.c
>which is identical to existing geqo_path.c in the 6.3 tar file.
>As a result, dupliation of it is performed by the patch.
>To confirm above, take a look at the RCS id of geqo_path.c
>in the tar file and the patch.
>You will find they are same (1.8 created on 1998/2/26).

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 10:01:37 +0900
t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one... 
>>I just put the final patch in place (unannounced) for anyone to try out...
>>
>>ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz
>>
>>Unless there are any outstandign problems with either that patch or the
>>full distribution, I will put out an announcement of those two Monday
>>morning...
>
>It seems still the problem below exists in postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz.
>(I haven't checked postgresql-6.3.1.tar.gz yet)

postgresql-6.3.1.tar.gz has passed the regression test on following
platforms:

Sparc/Solaris2.6
FreeBSD 2.2.1R
PPC/MkLinux
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp

Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:01:25 +0900
t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Re: Final Patch?
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 t-ishii@sra.co.jp wrote:

> >I just put the final patch in place (unannounced) for anyone to try out...
> >
> >ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz
> >
> >Unless there are any outstandign problems with either that patch or the
> >full distribution, I will put out an announcement of those two Monday
> >morning...
> 
> It seems still the problem below exists in postgresql-6.3-6.3.1.gz.
> (I haven't checked postgresql-6.3.1.tar.gz yet)

	I don't know how, but for some reason, the geqo_paths.c that was
untar'd from the 6.3 tar file came out zero length...rebuilding the patch
now...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:59:55 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one... 


> It seems that the patch is trying to create a new file of geqo_path.c
> which is identical to existing geqo_path.c in the 6.3 tar file.
> As a result, dupliation of it is performed by the patch.
> To confirm above, take a look at the RCS id of geqo_path.c
> in the tar file and the patch.
> You will find they are same (1.8 created on 1998/2/26).

	Fixed...I will be regenerating the patch as well as the tar file
tomorrow morning, prior to announcing...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Mon, 23 Mar 1998 01:13:02 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Newest Patch...try this one...
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 t-ishii@sra.co.jp wrote:

> Sparc/Solaris2.6
> FreeBSD 2.2.1R
> PPC/MkLinux

add RH/Linux 5.0 Intel

Cristian
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cristian Gafton   --   gafton@redhat.com   --   Red Hat Software, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.


Wed, 1 Apr 1998 21:11:20 -0500 (EST)
Cristian Gafton <gafton@redhat.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Final Patch?