Thumbs up on the math changes; my Linux box behaves better than it used
to (so our "reference machine" will match the expected results).

So, should we look at catching integer overflows while we are at it?
Right now those overflow silently...

                         - Tom

Fri, 04 Dec 1998 16:40:33 +0000
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
exp() changes
> Thumbs up on the math changes; my Linux box behaves better than it used
> to (so our "reference machine" will match the expected results).
> 
> So, should we look at catching integer overflows while we are at it?
> Right now those overflow silently...

I would be surprised if you can catch them.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 4 Dec 1998 12:17:11 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] exp() changes