
I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.

So there is no big difference at all. Is this right?

Regards, Christoph



Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:26:02 +0100
Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
ecpg vs. libpq
On 21 Feb 2003 at 11:26, Christoph Haller wrote:

> 
> I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
> using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
> calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.
> 
> So there is no big difference at all. Is this right?

That is correct but there are some other differences.

1. Obviously ecpg is simpler to use.
2. libpq is almost thread safe. ecpg is not. It is work in progress.
3. ecpg can not be C++ in itself, libpq can be.

Just about it..

Bye
 Shridhar

--
Drew's Law of Highway Biology:	The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands 
directly in front	of your eyes.


Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:04:29 +0530
"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: ecpg vs. libpq
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:26:02AM +0100, Christoph Haller wrote:
> I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
> using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
> calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.

That's correct. There shouldn't be much of a performance penalty.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
ICQ: 179140304
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:19:49 +0100
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: ecpg vs. libpq