Doing a Google search for SQL standards, I found a 
wonderful page of links to SQL info, including the BNF 
specs for SQL92 and SQL3. Not exactly gram.y but hopefully 
close. 

Could be helpful in deciphering what the standards say.

See: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql.html

---------
Hannu

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:12:42 +0200
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3
> Doing a Google search for SQL standards, I found a 
> wonderful page of links to SQL info, including the BNF 
> specs for SQL92 and SQL3. Not exactly gram.y but hopefully 
> close. 
> 
> Could be helpful in deciphering what the standards say.
> 
> See: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql.html

This is terrific.  We need this on our web page.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:29:33 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> 
> Doing a Google search for SQL standards, I found a
> wonderful page of links to SQL info, including the BNF
> specs for SQL92 and SQL3. Not exactly gram.y but hopefully
> close.

How official is this? I get the feeling this might
be one guy's interpretation because it seems like
it is missing stuff.

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:34:48 +1100
Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3
Chris Bitmead wrote:
> 
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > Doing a Google search for SQL standards, I found a
> > wonderful page of links to SQL info, including the BNF
> > specs for SQL92 and SQL3. Not exactly gram.y but hopefully
> > close.
> 
> How official is this? I get the feeling this might
> be one guy's interpretation because it seems like
> it is missing stuff.
>

I guess it is lifted from the standard as it was in september 1993.

OTOH, the SQL3 standard is still not final.

-----------
Hannu

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 11:30:20 +0200
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3

> I guess it is lifted from the standard as it was in september 1993.
> 
> OTOH, the SQL3 standard is still not final.

Is it progressing, or is it in disrepair?

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:38:42 +1100
Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3