
> Added to TODO:
> 
> 	o Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered or primary key
> 
> > > And what happens with those tables that do not have any such index?
> > 
> > Nothing, would be my vote.  You'd just re-CLUSTER all tables that have
> > been clustered before, the same way they were last clustered.

I second Tom's opinion. If the table was not clustered before leave it as is.

Thus the TODO should imho (if at all :-) read:
	o Cluster all tables at once that have a pg_index.indisclustered

Andreas

Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:07:01 +0200
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
Re: CLUSTER all tables at once?

Sounds good to me.  TODO updated:

        o Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered set
	 during previous CLUSTER

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> 
> > Added to TODO:
> > 
> > 	o Cluster all tables at once using pg_index.indisclustered or primary key
> > 
> > > > And what happens with those tables that do not have any such index?
> > > 
> > > Nothing, would be my vote.  You'd just re-CLUSTER all tables that have
> > > been clustered before, the same way they were last clustered.
> 
> I second Tom's opinion. If the table was not clustered before leave it as is.
> 
> Thus the TODO should imho (if at all :-) read:
> 	o Cluster all tables at once that have a pg_index.indisclustered
> 
> Andreas
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:40:33 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: CLUSTER all tables at once?