
> Also, the grammar clause "LANGUAGE C" is actually part of the standard, so
> naming it "LANGUAGE stdC" will make it *less* standard.  (Not that I buy
> Informix as being a "standard".)

I only quoted Informix, because it is the only one where I know how it works.
It might even be, that the Oracle and DB/2 interface is also similar to our "oldC",
I simply don't know.

The fact, that part of this is already in the standard (like "language c") makes me 
even more firm in my opinion, that more research is needed before advertising "newC".

Andreas

Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:29:37 +0100
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: AW: AW: AW: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function lang uage nam esh