I've hacked the spec file from a 7.2.x source RPM to produce a 7.3 source RPM. 
I've also created a set of i686 binary RPMs. These are *not* official PGDG 
RPMs, and I'm not an RPM expert by any means (so use at your own risk!), but 
I've posted them in case anyone is interested. I'll leave them up until Lamar 
gets time to create the "official" set.

http://www.joeconway.com/

Joe


Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:59:58 -0800
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
"unofficial" 7.3 RPMs
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 23:59, Joe Conway wrote:
> I've hacked the spec file from a 7.2.x source RPM to produce a 7.3 source RPM. 
> I've also created a set of i686 binary RPMs. These are *not* official PGDG 
> RPMs, and I'm not an RPM expert by any means (so use at your own risk!), but 
> I've posted them in case anyone is interested. I'll leave them up until Lamar 
> gets time to create the "official" set.
> 
> http://www.joeconway.com/

Thanks, they seem to work fine. 

Except that I had to tweak the startup script - 
as distributed it defines the version to be 7.3b2 and checks database for version 7.2.

It also expects/puts the database in nonstandard place.

But otherways they saved me a lot of trouble ;)

---------------
Hannu


04 Dec 2002 12:37:46 +0000
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Re: "unofficial" 7.3 RPMs
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Except that I had to tweak the startup script - 
> as distributed it defines the version to be 7.3b2 and checks database for version 7.2.
> 
> It also expects/puts the database in nonstandard place.

Oops! That's why it is the unofficial RPM set ;-)

FWIW, I produced a new set that should fix these two issues and those are now 
posted in place of the others.

   http://www.joeconway.com/

Thanks,

Joe


Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:52:00 -0800
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: "unofficial" 7.3 RPMs