> > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan.
> >
> >> DEBUG:  redo done at (1, 3923880100)
> >> FATAL 2:  XLogFlush: request is not satisfied
> >> postmaster: Startup proc 4228 exited with status 512 - abort
> 
> Is this person using 7.1 release, or a beta/RC version?  That looks
> just like the last WAL bug Vadim fixed before final ...

No, it doesn't. That bug was related to cases when there is no room
on last log page for startup checkpoint. ~5k is free in this case.

Vadim

Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:00:30 -0700
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
RE: 7.1 startup recovery failure 
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:
> 
> > > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan.
> > >
> > >> DEBUG:  redo done at (1, 3923880100)
> > >> FATAL 2:  XLogFlush: request is not satisfied
> > >> postmaster: Startup proc 4228 exited with status 512 - abort
> >
> > Is this person using 7.1 release, or a beta/RC version?  That looks
> > just like the last WAL bug Vadim fixed before final ...
> 
> No, it doesn't. That bug was related to cases when there is no room
> on last log page for startup checkpoint. ~5k is free in this case.
> 

I haven't gotten any reply from him yet.
Many people are on vacation now in Japan.
Probably we couldn't expect too much of him.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:32:21 +0900
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: 7.1 startup recovery failure