> We do insist on gmake.  Can't compile without it.

Then can we use the gmake 'include' instead of the configure *.in files?

> Like the term "sed monsters"?

Yes :)

Taral

Tue, 27 Oct 1998 17:29:27 -0600
"Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>
RE: [HACKERS] Configure problem,
	redux (was Re: TCL installation troubles)
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Taral wrote:

> > We do insist on gmake.  Can't compile without it.
> 
> Then can we use the gmake 'include' instead of the configure *.in files?

	Ummm...we do:

> grep include */Makefile
backend/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
bin/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
interfaces/Makefile:include $(SRCDIR)/Makefile.global
lextest/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
man/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
pl/Makefile:include $(SRCDIR)/Makefile.global
tutorial/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
utils/Makefile:include ../Makefile.global
utils/Makefile:include depend

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Tue, 27 Oct 1998 22:01:59 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
RE: [HACKERS] Configure problem, redux (was Re: TCL installation
	troubles)