Sorry, guys. Here is the ultimate patch which keeps the entire
behavior as it was, apart from forbidding minus-terminated 
operators. Seems that I have to break the habit of doing before
thinking properly :-/  The point is that my second patch breaks
constructs like a & b  or   a ! b. This patch is to be applied 
instead of any of two other today's patches.

-- 
Leon.
Thu, 02 Sep 1999 20:38:20 +0500
Leon <leon@udmnet.ru>
Lexer again.
> Sorry, guys. Here is the ultimate patch which keeps the entire
> behavior as it was, apart from forbidding minus-terminated 
> operators. Seems that I have to break the habit of doing before
> thinking properly :-/  The point is that my second patch breaks
> constructs like a & b  or   a ! b. This patch is to be applied 
> instead of any of two other today's patches.
> 

Applied.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Mon, 27 Sep 1999 17:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, guys. Here is the ultimate patch which keeps the entire
> > behavior as it was, apart from forbidding minus-terminated
> > operators. Seems that I have to break the habit of doing before
> > thinking properly :-/  The point is that my second patch breaks
> > constructs like a & b  or   a ! b. This patch is to be applied
> > instead of any of two other today's patches.
> >
> 
> Applied.

Hey! Later discussion on that matter made us think that minus-terminated
operators have to be preserved, especially considering
that there is already one such operator here: geometric ?-.
I'm terribly sorry, but that patch shouldn't be applied. 

The other patch applied by you which exterminates uminus exclusive
state in parser is considered to be ok.

-- 
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually 
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.


Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:17:14 +0500
Leon <leon@udmnet.ru>
Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again.
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > Sorry, guys. Here is the ultimate patch which keeps the entire
> > > behavior as it was, apart from forbidding minus-terminated
> > > operators. Seems that I have to break the habit of doing before
> > > thinking properly :-/  The point is that my second patch breaks
> > > constructs like a & b  or   a ! b. This patch is to be applied
> > > instead of any of two other today's patches.
> > >
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> Hey! Later discussion on that matter made us think that minus-terminated
> operators have to be preserved, especially considering
> that there is already one such operator here: geometric ?-.
> I'm terribly sorry, but that patch shouldn't be applied. 
> 
> The other patch applied by you which exterminates uminus exclusive
> state in parser is considered to be ok.

Reversed out.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Mon, 27 Sep 1999 23:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Lexer again.