On the road to sanitary lex files I finally found a simple answer for the
non-portable <<EOF>>. Patch attached. Any objections/concerns/comments?


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders v�g 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden
Sun, 21 May 2000 18:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
No more <<EOF>>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On the road to sanitary lex files I finally found a simple answer for the
> non-portable <<EOF>>. Patch attached. Any objections/concerns/comments?

Seems reasonable --- but is it worth worrying about?  I had pretty
much concluded that we have no hope of working with non-flex lexers
anyway...

			regards, tom lane

Sun, 21 May 2000 13:41:28 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: No more <<EOF>> 