

> > I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea 
> > or someone else gets in first.
> 
> That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources.
> winsup/cygwin/localtime.cc claims that it is in the public 
> domain... needs a closer look that I've given it, but might be a 
> good starting point.

For the heck of it, I went and wedged this file into the source base, and
got this:

=======================
 3 of 94 tests failed.
=======================

The 7 tests which failed due to timestamp now pass, leaving the three
failures listed in the original post. I don't know about you, but I'm sure
set on option (c) now :-)

Cheers,
Claudio

--- 
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:19:12 +1100
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status