Bruce,

If you have the relevant discussions in a neat bundle I'd like
to have a read through them to see what the issues are.

The other curiosity is the creation of an _<typname> type, which
I believe is an array type, at the time of type creation.

I can't remember seeing this in previous versions.

Thanks,
Keith.

> > Needless to say, I can't dump/restore a database with user defined
> > types at all.
> 
> Yes, we have a problem with user-defined types because of the changes I
> made to make the function name unique by adding the pg_proc oid to the
> name.
> 
> I can make the fix, but no one seems to have an opinion on how yet.  I
> can e-mail the pertinent postings if you want to discuss solutions.



Wed, 23 Sep 1998 22:01:30 +0100 (BST)
Keith Parks <emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types?
> Bruce,
> 
> If you have the relevant discussions in a neat bundle I'd like
> to have a read through them to see what the issues are.
> 
> The other curiosity is the creation of an _<typname> type, which
> I believe is an array type, at the time of type creation.
> 
> I can't remember seeing this in previous versions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Keith.

OK, here are the relivant postings.  Please make a suggestion for a fix.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
  830 Blythe Avenue                    |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026      |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 853-3000(h)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |
Wed, 23 Sep 1998 17:18:23 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types?