Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile
problem is presumably still there:

http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg00003.html

as the referenced source file hasn't been updated.  If I recall
right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 SDK to be installed.

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:32:48 -0500
Nat Howard <nrh@pupworks.com>
Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow
Nat Howard writes:

> Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile
> problem is presumably still there:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg00003.html
>
> as the referenced source file hasn't been updated.  If I recall
> right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 SDK to be installed.

Care to submit a patch?  This seems easy enough to fix for someone with an
appropriate JDK installed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:21:53 +0100 (CET)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow
Peter,

I'll give it a try, and send the stuff to you directly, so you can
say something like "that isn't what I meant!".



>Nat Howard writes:
>
>> Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile
>> problem is presumably still there:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg00003.html
>>
>> as the referenced source file hasn't been updated.  If I recall
>> right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 SDK to be installed.
>
>Care to submit a patch?  This seems easy enough to fix for someone with an
>appropriate JDK installed.
>
>-- 
>Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/
>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 20:13:35 -0500
Nat Howard <nrh@pupworks.com>
Re: Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow 