See attached file. Now accepts "exec sql whenever sqlwarning".

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:04:16 +0100
Michael Meskes <Michael.Meskes@usa.net>
more patches for ecpg

Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
here? :(


On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Michael Meskes wrote:

> See attached file. Now accepts "exec sql whenever sqlwarning".
> 
> Michael
> -- 
> Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
> Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
> Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
> Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!
> 

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:07:39 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker
> Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
> here? :(

Perhaps like me he doesn't subscribe to patches and you don't accept
postings to mailing lists from non-subscribers.  Personally I find
the CVS update summaries informational enough and prefer not to have
to wade through the raw patches.  Is the assumption that those that
submit should also be peer reviewing?

By the way, what ever happened to my primary key patches?  On Bruce's
suggestion I posted them to hackers and I saw them but so far no one
has commented on them or checked them in.

P.S.  If anyone is trying to mail me directly, druid.net is on hold
due to Internic snafu.  It should be fixed soon.  In the meantime
you can reach me at darcy@hub.org.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:06:56 -0500 (EST)
"D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy@druid.net>
Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
> By the way, what ever happened to my primary key patches?  On Bruce's
> suggestion I posted them to hackers and I saw them but so far no one
> has commented on them or checked them in.

I still have them.  They look good.



-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:32:39 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 05:06:56PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
> > here? :(
> 
> Perhaps like me he doesn't subscribe to patches and you don't accept
> postings to mailing lists from non-subscribers.  Personally I find

Correct. In fact I even tried subscribe in the process of changing my
hackers and interfaces account but am still waiting for Marc to approve
this. 

> the CVS update summaries informational enough and prefer not to have
> to wade through the raw patches.  Is the assumption that those that
> submit should also be peer reviewing?

That one is also my problem. As it is now I get way too much email and
cannot cope with lots of patches I will delete anyway.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:39:10 +0100
Michael Meskes <Michael.Meskes@usa.net>
Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 04:07:39PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
> here? :(

Thanks Marc.

As I already said the patches list is a problem for me. The only reason for
this list I see is to get the patches to all people with direct CVS access
so the work does not have to be done by just one person. If this is the real
reason I wonder why we don't set it up this way, i.e. distribution to only
some and the others can send patches but don't get the patches send to them.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net          | Use PostgreSQL!

Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:42:54 +0100
Michael Meskes <Michael.Meskes@usa.net>
Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg