> PM: I'm actually sneeking one day time here (shouldn't but will) so
> things should be better by the end of today. I'm about to get a JDK
> installed under NT, just to give an extra platform to test under.

I talked to the Kaffe folks and compiling mutually dependent java files
must be done by compiling them all at the same time:

	java a.java b.java

Seems it is a kaffe limitation/bug.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:12:53 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
> PM: I'm actually sneeking one day time here (shouldn't but will) so
> things should be better by the end of today. I'm about to get a JDK
> installed under NT, just to give an extra platform to test under.

Sorry, I should have said:

	javac a.java b.java

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:13:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status