
> > Also the result would be, that the first readonly statements are allowed to
> > see schema changes, but selects after the first DML would not :-(
> 
> Does it mean that even read-only statements aren't allowed
> to release locks after other DMLs ?

That is, what Tom is suggesting, but not after first DML but earlier 
after transaction start. I would like to avoid this. I want read only statements 
to release locks upon completion regardless of transaction state 
(except in serializable isolation).

Andreas 

Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:15:52 +0200
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while
	in use