> So, we probably should put new free dirty buffer just before first
> undirty one in LRU.

Ops - new free UNdirty buffer before first DIRTY one in LRU,
sorry -:)

Vadim

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:13:54 -0800
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen
	t policy
Got it.  Corrected TODO.detail.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > So, we probably should put new free dirty buffer just before first
> > undirty one in LRU.
> 
> Ops - new free UNdirty buffer before first DIRTY one in LRU,
> sorry -:)
> 
> Vadim
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:50:02 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t
 policy