



Bruce,

I will try and start taking a look at the libpq++ over the weekend to
familarize myself with
the way that it is structured. Then, if someone will promise to help guide
me through the
changes required, I will see if I can work on them.

Thanks,

Matt




maillist@candle.pha.pa.us on 03/23/98 01:39:55 PM

To:   todd@nm.net
cc:   pgsql-questions@postgreSQL.org (bcc: Matt Aycock/IntelliQuest)
Subject:  Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface




>
> howdy,
>
> we're using the libpq++ c++ interface for a medium-sized network,
> multi-user scheduling application that uses a java front end, a c++
> middleware server and the postgres backend.  the c++ interface (a matter
> of preference, obvious) is much cleaner than the c interface (especially
> for True Believers in OO), but it does seem to be suffering from lack of
> update.  it works fine for basic stuff with 6.3, though.

I agree it needs updating, but I didn't have the time to do it.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)
--
Official WWW Site: http://www.postgresql.org
Online Docs & FAQ: http://www.postgresql.org/docs
Searchable Lists: http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc






Mon, 23 Mar 1998 17:00:03 -0400
maycock@intelliquest.com
Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] C++ interface