Trying to get my FreeBSD box (lerbsd.lerctr.org, 4.2-BETA) up on 
current sources.  Got this error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/src/backend/parser'
cc -O2 -m486 -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
-Wno-error
-I/usr/local/include -I../../../src/include  -c -o keywords.o
keywords.c
keywords.c:250: `TEMPLATE' undeclared here (not in a function)
keywords.c:250: initializer element is not constant
keywords.c:250: (near initialization for `ScanKeywords[217].value')
gmake[3]: *** [keywords.o] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/src/backend/parser'
gmake[2]: *** [parser-recursive] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/src/backend'
gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/src'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
$

Tom,
   Is the template0/1 stuff all in? 

LER

-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:00:02 -0600
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Commit finished?
Is your copy of gram.y up to date?

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:07:31 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Commit finished? 
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:07]:
> Is your copy of gram.y up to date?
$ find . -name gram.y
./src/backend/parser/gram.y
./src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y
$ more src/backend/parser/gram.y

src/backend/parser/gram.y 0%
%{

/*#define YYDEBUG 1*/
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * gram.y
 *        POSTGRES SQL YACC rules/actions
 *
 * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2000, PostgreSQL, Inc
 * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of
 * California
 *
 *
 * IDENTIFICATION
 *        $Header:
 *        /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y,
v 2.209 2000/11/14 18:37:49 tgl Exp $
 *
 * HISTORY
 *        AUTHOR                        DATE                    MAJOR
 *        EVENT
 *        Andrew Yu                     Sept, 1994
 *        POSTQUEL to SQL
conversion
 *        Andrew Yu                     Oct, 1994               lispy
 *        code conve
rsion
 *
$

> 
> 			regards, tom lane
-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:09:49 -0600
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: Commit finished?
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> * Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:07]:
>> Is your copy of gram.y up to date?

>  *        $Header:
>  *        /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y,
> v 2.209 2000/11/14 18:37:49 tgl Exp $

Hm.  Looks up-to-date to me.  I wonder why the derived header files
didn't get rebuilt?  How did you start the make, anyway?

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:16:05 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Commit finished? 
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:16]:
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> > * Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:07]:
> >> Is your copy of gram.y up to date?
> 
> >  *        $Header:
> >  *        /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y,
> > v 2.209 2000/11/14 18:37:49 tgl Exp $
> 
> Hm.  Looks up-to-date to me.  I wonder why the derived header files
> didn't get rebuilt?  How did you start the make, anyway?
It may be my screw up.  I did a scp from lerami to lerbsd.  I'll 
try reseting the timestamps.  THanks.

LER

> 
> 			regards, tom lane
-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:18:17 -0600
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: Commit finished?
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:16]:
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> > * Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [001114 15:07]:
> >> Is your copy of gram.y up to date?
> 
> >  *        $Header:
> >  *        /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/gram.y,
> > v 2.209 2000/11/14 18:37:49 tgl Exp $
> 
> Hm.  Looks up-to-date to me.  I wonder why the derived header files
> didn't get rebuilt?  How did you start the make, anyway?
Looks, to me, like gmake distclean should remove gram.c and it's
header.  I removed gram.c, and restarted, and it went to completion. 

Larry 
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
-- 
Larry Rosenman                      http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 (voice) Internet: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:24:08 -0600
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: Commit finished?
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> Looks, to me, like gmake distclean should remove gram.c and it's
> header.  I removed gram.c, and restarted, and it went to completion. 

distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
distribution.  Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
name for that, not sure).  Peter, any comment here?

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:14:07 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Re: Commit finished? 
Tom Lane writes:

> distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
> distribution.  Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
> of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
> name for that, not sure).  Peter, any comment here?

Not only that, but we've had it for several months... :-)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


Wed, 15 Nov 2000 18:45:46 +0100 (CET)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Re: Commit finished? 
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> distclean does not remove gram.c because we include gram.c in the
>> distribution.  Perhaps there should be another target that gets rid
>> of *all* the derived files (maintainer-clean might be the GNU-approved
>> name for that, not sure).  Peter, any comment here?

> Not only that, but we've had it for several months... :-)

Ah, my mistake.  I looked in backend/parser/Makefile and didn't see
any rule for maintainer-clean, so assumed it wasn't there yet :-(

			regards, tom lane

Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:57:27 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Re: Commit finished? 