




I would be FOR it if the README states the dangers



Bob Henkel          651-738-5085
Mutual Funds I/T Woodbury
Hartford Life
500 Bielenberg Drive
Woodbury, MN 55125


|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           Hans-Jürgen      |
|         |           Schönig          |
|         |           <postgres@cyberte|
|         |           c.at>            |
|         |                            |
|         |           04/05/2004 10:59 |
|         |           AM               |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                              |
  |       To:       Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>                                                                                 |
  |       cc:       pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bob.Henkel@hartfordlife.com                                                    |
  |       Subject:  Re: [HACKERS] Socket communication for contrib                                                               |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Tom Lane wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres@cybertec.at> writes:
>
>>Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help
>>to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most
>>likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>>As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
>>If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it
>>into contrib I can live with that.
>
>
> I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
> but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
> point out the transactional risks.

this should not be a problem.
I can intregrate all necessary information there.

folks, let's do a poll ...
who is for it - who is against it ...

             regards,

                         Hans


--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at








*************************************************************************
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
*************************************************************************


Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:00:56 -0500
Bob.Henkel@hartfordlife.com
Re: Socket communication for contrib