Has the problem resulting from length(pg_proc.prosrc) > 2700" been fixed?

Regards,
Ed Loehr

Thu, 01 Jun 2000 11:54:28 -0500
Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>
2700-byte prosrc limit fixed?
Yes.  Of course the BLCKSZ limit is still there :-(

			regards, tom lane

Thu, 01 Jun 2000 13:18:29 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 2700-byte prosrc limit fixed? 
Ed Loehr wrote:
> Has the problem resulting from length(pg_proc.prosrc) > 2700" been fixed?

    Yes. There was an obsolete index on that column that has been
    removed in 7.0.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:15:09 +0200 (MEST)
JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Re: 2700-byte prosrc limit fixed?