
> For a log file on a busy system, this could improve throughput a lot--batch
> commit.  You end up with fewer than one fsync() per transaction.

This is not the issue, since that is already implemented.
The current bunching method might have room for improvement, but
there are currently fewer fsync's than transactions when appropriate.

Andreas

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 18:14:29 +0100
Zeugswetter Andreas SB  <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC