
> > At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
> 

Yes, this is now an imho very much improved way to go :-)

I would probably have used the "parameter style" extension to create function,
but that is imho not an important issue.

Thanks especially for the "standard C function" handler.

Andreas

Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:51:08 +0100
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue 
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> 
> > > At 17:16 19/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> 
> > http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr/README
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is now an imho very much improved way to go :-)
> 
> I would probably have used the "parameter style" extension to create function,
> but that is imho not an important issue.
> 
> Thanks especially for the "standard C function" handler.

The other nice thing about this is that we can make make the new style
standard at some point, so the macros are not even required.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:15:55 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: AW: Final proposal for resolving C-vs-newC issue