I sent this to general:
> I have written an aggregate function which returns a "varlena" type whose
> length is proportional to the number of rows passed to the function.
> 
> My question is what is the consensus on the best way to handle the case 
> where the input to the aggregate causes the length of the variable to 
> exceed the 8k limit?  Abort the query?  Generate an error message, and
> discard subsequent data?  Silently discard data?  Something else?

Apparently, not only is there no consensus, but nobody seems to have any
opinions either.  So, I would like to solicit opinions.

What is the proper thing for aggregate functions and operators to do when 
they discover they need more than 8k for a variable length data type?

	-Michael Robinson


Mon, 22 Jun 1998 14:59:53 +0800 (GMT)
Michael Robinson <robinson@public.bta.net.cn>
Gracefully handling variable-length data types at the 8k limit?