I have committed fixes for all the so-far-reported regression test
discrepancies, with the exception that some of the 'geometry' expected
files look to be out of date and I have no proposed updates.  Would
those folks who reported problems check again, using either a fresh CVS
update or a snapshot dated later than this message?

I also hacked libpq++'s Makefile.in so that it picks up CXXFLAGS
from the template file or configure calculations, rather than
automatically absorbing all of CFLAGS into CXXFLAGS.  This should
make things better on platforms where the C++ compiler doesn't like
the same switch set as the C compiler.  However, we might now need
to take steps to add stuff back into CXXFLAGS on some platforms.
Please check this if you've had trouble building libpq++ in the past.

			regards, tom lane

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:01:02 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Regress test updates: status report
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I have committed fixes for all the so-far-reported regression test
> discrepancies, with the exception that some of the 'geometry' expected
> files look to be out of date and I have no proposed updates.  Would
> those folks who reported problems check again, using either a fresh CVS
> update or a snapshot dated later than this message?

Built CURRENT (as of 9:00AM EST).  No failures on regression at all.
RedHat 6.1 (linux 2.2.12, glibc 2.1.2), Intel Pentium III/600.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:30:44 -0500
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Re: Regress test updates: status report