
Do people interpret this syntax to mean that you can only have an UNDER
clause when using the OF <user-defined type> clause as well?


         <table definition> ::=
              CREATE [ <table scope> ] TABLE <table name>
                <table contents source>
                [ ON COMMIT <table commit action> ROWS ]

         <table contents source> ::=
                <table element list>
              | OF <user-defined type>
                  [ <subtable clause> ]
                  [ <table element list> ]
      <subtable clause> ::=
              UNDER <supertable clause>

Wed, 24 May 2000 20:16:21 +1000
Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
UNDER syntax