but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:)
I think we should apply patches and hard test
recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop
with dozens update transactions).

Vadim

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:57:55 -0800
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
xlog patches reviewed
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:)
> I think we should apply patches and hard test
> recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop
> with dozens update transactions).

OK.  I haven't finished putting together an xlog-reset utility quite
yet, but I will go ahead and apply what I have.

CAUTION TO ONLOOKERS: if you update from CVS after I make this patch,
you will need to initdb!!  Wait around for the log-reset utility if you
are running a database you don't want to initdb.  I should have that in
another day or so.

			regards, tom lane

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:20:41 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: xlog patches reviewed 
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mikheev, Vadim wrote:

> but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:)
> I think we should apply patches and hard test
> recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop
> with dozens update transactions).

if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch tonight, give ppl
till Friday to test and put out a RC1 depending on the results?



Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:24:37 -0400 (AST)
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: xlog patches reviewed
The Hermit Hacker writes:

> if this is the case, can we look at applying that patch tonight, give ppl
> till Friday to test and put out a RC1 depending on the results?

This should probably be called beta6, given that there is a lot of new
code in it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:31:54 +0100 (CET)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: xlog patches reviewed