
> > > Or the slave could reject the request.
> > 
> > Huh?  The slave has that option??  In what circumstance?
> 
> I thought the slave could reject if someone local already had the row
> locked.

No, not at all. The slave would need to reject phase 1 "commit ready"
for this.

Andreas

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:20:00 +0200
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
Re: 2-phase commit
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> 
> > > > Or the slave could reject the request.
> > > 
> > > Huh?  The slave has that option??  In what circumstance?
> > 
> > I thought the slave could reject if someone local already had the row
> > locked.
> 
> No, not at all. The slave would need to reject phase 1 "commit ready"
> for this.

Oh, yea, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: 2-phase commit