Is there ever a need to have more than one conversion for a given
combination of encodings?  And if I have more than one combination
registered, which one is used by the implicit server/client conversion?

Also, if my server encoding is A and my client encoding is B, and I do

SELECT convert('some string' using a_to_c); -- not B

or even

SELECT convert('some string' using e_to_f);

this would surely lead to bogus results?  What's the use of all this?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


Sat, 21 Sep 2002 01:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Conversion Questions
> Is there ever a need to have more than one conversion for a given
> combination of encodings?

Sure. For example, several Unicode and SJIS mappings exist depending
on vendors or standards. M$ has its own, Apple has another one...
If a user want to employ Apple's map, he could define his own implicit
conversion.

> And if I have more than one combination
> registered, which one is used by the implicit server/client conversion?

That depends on current name space. You could find such an example in
the conversion regression test. Note that you cannot define more than
one implicit conversion for a schema/server encoding/client encoding
combination.

> Also, if my server encoding is A and my client encoding is B, and I do
> 
> SELECT convert('some string' using a_to_c); -- not B
> 
> or even
> 
> SELECT convert('some string' using e_to_f);
> 
> this would surely lead to bogus results?

Yes. Choosing right conversion is callers responsibilty.

> What's the use of all this?

One example. A user wants to apply lower() to Unicode database.

select convert(lower(convert('X' using utf_8_to_iso_8859_1)) using iso_8859_1_to_utf_8);
--
Tatsuo Ishii

Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:39:58 +0900 (JST)
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: Conversion Questions