I'm getting itchy to get to work on 7.3 development, and with so few
bug reports coming in for 7.2, it seems that now is not too soon to
split off the 7.2 maintenance branch in CVS.  Comments?

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:38:25 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?

Definitely agree on the itchiness, especially with the broken planner in
v7.2? :)

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm getting itchy to get to work on 7.3 development, and with so few
> bug reports coming in for 7.2, it seems that now is not too soon to
> split off the 7.2 maintenance branch in CVS.  Comments?
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>


Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:18:08 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
I vote for a fork - 7.2 seems to be very stable (as it should be after a
year!)

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 11:18 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
>
>
>
> Definitely agree on the itchiness, especially with the broken planner in
> v7.2? :)
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I'm getting itchy to get to work on 7.3 development, and with so few
> > bug reports coming in for 7.2, it seems that now is not too soon to
> > split off the 7.2 maintenance branch in CVS.  Comments?
> >
> > 			regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:45:44 +0800
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
Tom Lane writes:

> I'm getting itchy to get to work on 7.3 development, and with so few
> bug reports coming in for 7.2, it seems that now is not too soon to
> split off the 7.2 maintenance branch in CVS.  Comments?

The ecpg thing should probably be fixed first.  Other than that it would
be nice to have a new branch by the weekend.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:51:33 -0500 (EST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ?
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The ecpg thing should probably be fixed first.  Other than that it would
> be nice to have a new branch by the weekend.

I musta missed something.  What ecpg thing?

			regards, tom lane

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:50:05 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 
Tom Lane writes:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > The ecpg thing should probably be fixed first.  Other than that it would
> > be nice to have a new branch by the weekend.
>
> I musta missed something.  What ecpg thing?

The sqlca warning

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I musta missed something.  What ecpg thing?

> The sqlca warning

Um, we can probably manage to double-patch a removal of two lines ;-)

However, since there were no objections, what are you waiting for?
Commit it.

			regards, tom lane

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:39:34 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 

Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a
branch going in this evening?  I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night
based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday?

That way, those anxious to dive into v7.3 have the whole weekend :)



On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> I musta missed something.  What ecpg thing?
>
> > The sqlca warning
>
> Um, we can probably manage to double-patch a removal of two lines ;-)
>
> However, since there were no objections, what are you waiting for?
> Commit it.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>


Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:17:53 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a
> branch going in this evening?  I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night
> based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday?

I don't think it's time for 7.2.1 quite yet; we should probably wait
another week or two to see what comes in.  I just want to branch now...

			regards, tom lane

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:02:27 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a
> > branch going in this evening?  I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night
> > based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday?
>
> I don't think it's time for 7.2.1 quite yet; we should probably wait
> another week or two to see what comes in.  I just want to branch now...

Ahhhh, okay ... I was going by the old 'the way we've always done it'
mentality, sorry :)

But, this sounds cool ... most happy to do that ... I'll do it tonight, if
nobody objects?


Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:34:27 -0400 (AST)
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? 