Would it be politically incorrect to combine named templates (including
port makefiles, etc.) into one, since they all do the same thing anyway?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/


Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD templates
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:40:17PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Would it be politically incorrect to combine named templates (including
> port makefiles, etc.) into one, since they all do the same thing anyway?

i'm not sure about openbsd, but freebsd likes to install "packages" into
/usr/local and netbsd likes to install them in /usr/pkg.

the postgresql bundling might be different, but i thought i'd comment.

-- 
[ Jim Mercer                 jim@reptiles.org              +1 416 410-5633 ]
[          Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood          ]
[  Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code.  ]

Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:50:30 -0400
Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>
Re: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD templates
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Would it be politically incorrect to combine named templates (including
> port makefiles, etc.) into one, since they all do the same thing anyway?

Don't forget bsdi.  Lately they've all been referring to the group of
them as bsd.  

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net
 128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
        Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com
       Online Giftshop Superstore    http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================




Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:01:26 -0400 (EDT)
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
Re: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD templates