

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
> Sent: 29 September 2003 15:23
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Dave Page; Alvaro Herrera; Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more i18n/l10n issues 
> 
> 
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Dave Page writes:
> >> I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature 
> or tweak 
> >> for pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth & nail to 
> justify getting 
> >> it committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red 
> >> Hat' are getting switches added to the postmaster without any 
> >> discussion?
> 
> > It was not a nice thing to do.
> 
> Gimme a break, guys.  There *was* discussion, eg here, 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-06/msg01092.php
> and the patch was posted for review, see this thread: 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00420.php

My apologes - I was basing my comments on someone else's assertion that
there was no discussion.

Regards, Dave.

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:47:09 +0100
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Re: more i18n/l10n issues 