> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked 
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> 
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...

Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
Hiroshi?
Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.

Vadim
2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:23:57 -0700
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>
RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un
	ique  constraint?


"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:

> > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> >
> > Nope. It has been broken a long time...
>
> Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
> Hiroshi?
> Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
> Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.
>
> Vadim
> 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
>

Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
have already been changed.
I committed the the change to current tree and
asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue



Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:34:43 +0900
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique  
	constraint?