I have a question about the make_ctags script in the src/tools
directory. What are the -d  and -t flags to ctags supposed to do?
My version of ctags:

wallace$ ctags --version
Exuberant Ctags 3.2.4, by Darren Hiebert <darren@hiebert.com>

Doesn't recognize them.

Oh, and one little fix: The sym-link generator puts 'tags' symlinks
in the CVS directories. Patch attached.

Ross

-- 
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 12:21:48 -0600
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>
make_ctags script
> I have a question about the make_ctags script in the src/tools
> directory. What are the -d  and -t flags to ctags supposed to do?
> My version of ctags:
> 
> wallace$ ctags --version
> Exuberant Ctags 3.2.4, by Darren Hiebert <darren@hiebert.com>

BSD ctags has:

     -d      create tags for #defines that don't take arguments; #defines that
             take arguments are tagged automatically.

     -t      create tags for typedefs, structs, unions, and enums.

> 
> Doesn't recognize them.
> 
> Oh, and one little fix: The sym-link generator puts 'tags' symlinks
> in the CVS directories. Patch attached.

Applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:34:48 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] make_ctags script
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:34:48PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have a question about the make_ctags script in the src/tools
> > directory. What are the -d  and -t flags to ctags supposed to do?
> > My version of ctags:
> > 
> > wallace$ ctags --version
> > Exuberant Ctags 3.2.4, by Darren Hiebert <darren@hiebert.com>
> 
> BSD ctags has:
> 
>      -d      create tags for #defines that don't take arguments; #defines that
>              take arguments are tagged automatically.
> 
>      -t      create tags for typedefs, structs, unions, and enums.


Ah, O.K. then: Exuberant Ctags does all these by default. Just wanted
to make sure I wan't missing anything.

Slightly off topic: While going through the current source, comparing
to Mariposa, I've seen little traces of old code: some ideas seem to
have been reinvented and reimplemented a number of times. Going back
and digging into Postgres95, and the last postquel based release,
postgres-v4r2, to see how they were implemented, it's been fun seeing
"debate/design by comment block" from some of the original university
developers. In particular, one block with a 12 line NOOOOOO! in
backend/commands/version.c had me rolling on the floor. Ah, I see it lives
on in _deadcode. In general, the functional comments in the current code
are more informative, but not as much fun ;-)

Ross
-- 
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 15:03:35 -0600
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] make_ctags script
> Slightly off topic: While going through the current source, comparing
> to Mariposa, I've seen little traces of old code: some ideas seem to
> have been reinvented and reimplemented a number of times. Going back
> and digging into Postgres95, and the last postquel based release,
> postgres-v4r2, to see how they were implemented, it's been fun seeing
> "debate/design by comment block" from some of the original university
> developers. In particular, one block with a 12 line NOOOOOO! in
> backend/commands/version.c had me rolling on the floor. Ah, I see it lives
> on in _deadcode. In general, the functional comments in the current code
> are more informative, but not as much fun ;-)

What I have realized is how superior some of our code is to the old
stuff.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Fri, 9 Jun 2000 08:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: make_ctags script