As part of yesterday's patch, I fixed a problem with indexing of nulls. 
The old code did:


                    mask = (finalbit << 1) - 1;
                    if ((~n) & mask)
                        slow=1;

when it meant to do:

                    mask = (1 << finalbit) - 1;
                    if ((~n) & mask)
                        slow=1;

This may explain some problems people were reporing.

-- 
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

Thu, 5 Feb 1998 12:24:16 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
index with nulls