> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200
> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> 
> Why is the encoding WIN 1250 only for the client side?  It seems that 
> with the new Windows port, folks will be interested in using it on the 
> server side.

Then what about WIN1251 (Cyrillic)? :) And all the others for that matter?

-s

Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:04:45 -0400
"Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>
Re: Why is WIN 1250 client only?
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 07:04 schrieb Serguei Mokhov:
> > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200
> > From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> >
> > Why is the encoding WIN 1250 only for the client side?  It seems that
> > with the new Windows port, folks will be interested in using it on the
> > server side.
>
> Then what about WIN1251 (Cyrillic)? :) And all the others for that matter?

WIN 1251 is already allowed as server-side encoding, which indicates to me 
that this distinction is potentially ill-conceived.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:32:42 +0200
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Why is WIN 1250 client only?