Has anyone made a decision about the SET LOCAL needing to be changed to SET
TRANSATION for SQL compatibiltity?

Chris


Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:18:12 +0800
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
7.3 TODO
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Has anyone made a decision about the SET LOCAL needing to be changed to SET
> TRANSATION for SQL compatibiltity?

I think we had decided not to; IIRC the argument that spelling it
TRANSACTION would be more spec-compatible looked bogus on closer
inspection.

			regards, tom lane

Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:10:57 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3 TODO 