Attached is a tarball that contains:

pl-perl.sgml - A start at documentation.
	Thomas, I didn't know where this belongs. Does
	it need to be integrated into the user manual
	or should it stand on its own. If it needs
	to stand alone, then all the docbook declarations
	need to be added at the front.

createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
	to the repertoire of createlang.sh
-- 
Mark Hollomon
mhh@mindspring.com
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:51:12 -0500
Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>
docs and createlang patch for plperl
> pl-perl.sgml - A start at documentation.
>         Thomas, I didn't know where this belongs. Does
>         it need to be integrated into the user manual
>         or should it stand on its own. If it needs
>         to stand alone, then all the docbook declarations
>         need to be added at the front.

Great. I haven't had a chance to look, but I would assume that it
should be in the User's Guide or more likely in the Programmer's
Guide.

Thanks for the docs!! I'll add them in this weekend, if not before.

                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California

Fri, 04 Feb 2000 07:47:27 +0000
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl
Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
> createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
> 	to the repertoire of createlang.sh

Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?

I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 08 Feb 2000 11:00:34 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl 
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
> > createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
> >       to the repertoire of createlang.sh
> 
> Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?
> 
> I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
> plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.

Doooh! of course. I'll post a patch tonight.

I guess the docs for droplang and createlang need updating as well.
Unless Thomas has beat me to it.

-- 

Mark Hollomon
mhh@nortelnetworks.com

Tue, 08 Feb 2000 13:59:35 -0500
"Mark Hollomon" <mhh@nortelnetworks.com>
Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes:
> > > createlang.sh.diff - a patch to add plperl
> > >       to the repertoire of createlang.sh
> > 
> > Good, but dare I mention that droplang needs to know about it too?
> > 
> > I'm sure you see no possible reason for someone to want to drop
> > plperl ;-) ... but it should be there.
> 
> Doooh! of course. I'll post a patch tonight.

.PS
Yes, make it a NOOP. We spent so much time building these
languages, that noone should ever have the right to drop 'em again.
.PE


Jan

-- 

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #


Tue, 8 Feb 2000 20:35:30 +0100 (CET)
wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl