
> > Still, it's an interesting alternative.  Comments anyone?
> 
> SelfExclusiveLock is clear and can't be confused with other 
> lock types.

How about giving it a label ? SelfExclusive would somehow suggest,
that you can have more than one self exclusive lock.
Like:
	lock table atab in self exclusive mode for "vacuum";
	does not conflict with:
	lock table atab in self exclusive mode for "account balancing";

Andreas 

Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:17:10 +0200
Zeugswetter Andreas SB  <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>
AW: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?