> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
> Sent: 20 May 2002 15:16
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: More schema queries 
> 
> 
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > gcc -g -o postgres.exe -Wl,--base-file,postgres.base postgres.exp 
> > access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o 
> > commands/SUBSYS.o executor /SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o 
> > main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o 
> > postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o 
> storage/ SUBSYS.o 
> > tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o -lcygipc -lcrypt
> > access/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x13):heaptuple.c: undefined reference to 
> > `mcount'
> 
> On Unix it's necessary for the link step to include a -pg 
> switch, just like the compile steps.  This is evidently not 
> happening in the Windows case.
> 
> In the Unix case, $(PROFILE) gets incorporated into 
> $(LDFLAGS) in src/Makefile.global, and then 
> src/backend/Makefile uses $(LDFLAGS) in the backend link rule 
> (line 40 in current source).  I don't see any inclusion of 
> flags at all in the Windows link rule at lines 48, 50. 
> Presumably these ought to at least mention $(PROFILE), and I 
> wonder whether they should not say $(LDFLAGS).
>
> Please check it out and submit a patch...

Attached (& CC'd to -patches). It all built OK with this, so I'll go off
and play with initdb & gprof now.

Regards, Dave.
Mon, 20 May 2002 16:11:36 +0100
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Re: More schema queries 
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> Attached (& CC'd to -patches). It all built OK with this, so I'll go off
> and play with initdb & gprof now.

Makefile patch applied.  We're done with this issue now, right?  Or were
there still loose ends?

			regards, tom lane

Wed, 22 May 2002 17:47:59 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More schema queries 