
> Face it, everything has locale support these day.  PostgreSQL is one
of
> the few packages that even has it as an option to turn it off.  Users
of
> binary packages of PostgreSQL are all invariably faced with locale
> features.  So it's not like sudden unasked-for locale support is going
to
> be a major shock.

What makes you so opposed to a GUC for disabling locale support ?

Andreas

Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:58:47 +0200
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
RE: Locale by default?
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD writes:

> What makes you so opposed to a GUC for disabling locale support ?

Nothing.  It may in fact be the best solution.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:14:06 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
RE: Locale by default?
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD writes:
>> What makes you so opposed to a GUC for disabling locale support ?

> Nothing.  It may in fact be the best solution.

As long as locale has to be an initdb-time setting, a GUC var won't
help much.

			regards, tom lane

Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:46:38 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Locale by default? 