See attached regression.diffs.

Chris

parallel group (5 tests):  select_views portals_p2 cluster foreign_key rules
      select_views         ... ok
      portals_p2           ... ok
      rules                ... FAILED
      foreign_key          ... ok
      cluster              ... ok
parallel group (14 tests):  limit truncate prepare sequence copy2 
without_oid po
lymorphism domain rangefuncs stats conversion temp plpgsql alter_table
      limit                ... ok
      plpgsql              ... ok
      copy2                ... ok
      temp                 ... ok
      domain               ... ok
      rangefuncs           ... ok
      prepare              ... ok
      without_oid          ... ok
      conversion           ... ok
      truncate             ... ok
      alter_table          ... ok
      sequence             ... ok
      polymorphism         ... ok
      stats                ... ok
============== shutting down postmaster               ==============

=======================
  1 of 93 tests failed.
=======================
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:30:00 +0800
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Rule regression failure freebsd?
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> See attached regression.diffs.

Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.

			regards, tom lane

Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:55:03 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Rule regression failure freebsd? 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> See attached regression.diffs.
> 
> Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

Not exactly,

I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and 
foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter 
now affects the result of the former.

I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there 
as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will 
back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at 
this stage in the release cycle.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:25:28 -0500
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: Rule regression failure freebsd?
Jan Wieck wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>>> See attached regression.diffs.
>> 
>> Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
>> 
>> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> Not exactly,
> 
> I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and 
> foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter 
> now affects the result of the former.
> 
> I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there 
> as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will 
> back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at 
> this stage in the release cycle.

The test is now in rule.sql.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:29:11 -0500
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Re: Rule regression failure freebsd?