the last about 5 years may cause psychological disturbances. 21. In our view, an exercise for promoting the bond between the minor child and the respondent-father in a graded manner and 18thereafter considering the grant of custody of minor child to the respondent-father taking into consideration the paramount interest of the welfare of the minor child would be required to be done in the present matter. Such an exercise would not be permissible in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 22. We therefore find that the High Court was not justified in entertaining the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The impugned judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana dated 23rd August 2022 in CRWP-1485-2021 (O&M) is quashed and set aside. The writ petition filed by the respondent- father is dismissed. 23. However, we clarify that no observation in the impugned judgment and order and in the present judgment and order would be binding on