ignored by the Civil Court. The jurisdiction of the Civil Court in respect of the rights determined by the Consolida- tion Officer stands impliedly excluded by the very scheme of the Consolidation Act. The appellate courts below completely 13fell in error in holding otherwise discarding the order of the Consolidation Officer which was sacrosanct as to the rights in respect to the suit land. 22. Insofar as, the bar of Civil Court imposed by Section 37 of the Consolidation Act is concerned, a plain reading of the said provision would reveal that the Civil Court is prohib- ited from entertaining any suit to vary or set aside any de- cision or order of the Consolidation Court passed under the Act in respect of the matter for which the proceedings could have or ought to have been taken under the Consolidation Act. 23. In the instant case, the plaintiff-appellant has not instituted any suit either to vary or set aside any decision or order passed by the Consolidation Court under the