appellant in the matter of South Eastern Coal Field (supra) has no application in the facts of the present case. It is further put forth that difference in the value of the property in the year 1985 and 2009 also cannot be allowed to be raised, as it is alien to jurisprudence under Section 144 CPC. According to the learned counsel, the provisions contained in Section 144 CPC need to be read in correct perspective and restitution can be ordered in appropriate case, when decree is set aside, but restitution is not the only way of compensating the party under Section 144 CPC. Laying emphasis on the words “restitution or otherwise” in Section 144 CPC, it is10 vehemently argued that the wordings clearly show such legislative intention that restitution is not the only way of compensating the party and the judgment debtor can be granted relief by way of compensation or interest, in appropriate case. 8. Mr. K. Parameshwar learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 would submit that the