proof in view of Section 94 of the JJ Act. Similar observations have been made in Shahrukh Khan v. State of M.P.6 holding that if the genuineness of the School Leaving Certificate is not under challenge, the said document has to be given due primacy. The Punjab & Haryana High Court in the context of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, in Navdeep Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.7 held that Aadhar Cards were not “firm proof 5 2023 SCC OnLine MP 1919 6 2023 SCC OnLine MP 2740 7 2021 SCC OnLine P&H 4553 7| SLP(C) Nos.23939-40 of 2023of age”. Observations similar in nature were also made in Noor Nadia & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.8, Muskan v. State of Punjab9 as well as several other orders/judgments, in various contexts. Views aligning with the one referred to above have been taken by the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad in Parvati Kumari v. State of U.P.10; the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Kumit Kumar v. State of H.P.11 and the High Court of Kerala in Sofikul