inter alia, as follows: (a) The land can be released because the acquisition proceedings for the same were quashed by the High Court and are under abeyance in view of the status quo order passed by this Court and because the Respondents undertake to utilize the land for charitable purposes; (b) The present case has unique circumstances; (c) The site does not fall within the Sukhna Catchment Area, however, the exact area that falls under Eco Sensitive Zone would be known once the notification for such zone is finalized; and (d) Construction is permissible in the land. 35. The Respondents also, without any delay, filed their affidavits in consonance and agreement with the State Government’s 23affidavit. Since the parties have reached a ‘settlement’ during the pendency of these appeals, we are introspecting as to whether or not to allow the Government to make such exemption for the Respondents’ land. 36. We are not oblivious to ground realities. This Court is aware that the subject land