appellant fired at Sanju while standing beside 10accused Omkar is nothing but a piece of fabrication made owing to prior enmity. 18. It was further submitted that as per Ram Prakash(PW-1) and Ram Naresh(PW-5), the incident took place in two parts. In the first part, there was an exchange of hot words(arguments) between the four accused and Sanju(deceased). Even at that point of time, all the four accused were carrying weapon in their hands whereas, Sanju(deceased) was alone and unarmed. Thus, if at all, the accused were intending to kill Sanju, then there was no reason for them to have gone away from the house of Ram Naresh(PW-1) where this heated exchange took place. Rather, they could have easily shot and killed Sanju then and there. 19. It was further submitted that the very sequence of events regarding the second part of the incident wherein, the witnesses claimed that the two accused persons Sobran and Durvin were asked to surround Sanju; the accused Omkar and Jagvir