between the size of the land covered by the sale exemplar and the acquired land. On the other hand, it is incumbent that we take note of the various 27 | Pageadvantageous factors associated with the acquired land at the time of issuance of the Section 4 notification. A balanced approach in adjudicating this particular issue is therefore necessary. Considering these militating aspects, we cannot justify applying deduction at either extreme end of the spectrum. A prudent course of action might be to steer a middle path, aiming for a range approximately between 46% to 50%. 34. Having said that, even if we were to apply the higher end of deductions from this middle course, at 50%, the compensation to be granted to the Appellants would still surpass the amount initially determined by the LAC and would in fact, be closer in range to the rate granted by the Reference Court. 35. Alternatively, and only to bolster our above arrived conclusion, even if the principle of averaging were applied,