property was delivered to the decree-holder. Relevant paras 20, 21, 25 and 26 are extracted below: “20. In the third category of cases, namely, non- deposit of only a relatively small fraction of the purchase money due to inadvertent mistake whether or not caused by any action of the court, the court has the discretion under Section 148 CPC to extend the time even though the time fixed has already expired provided it is satisfied that the mistake is bona fide and was not indicative of negligence or inaction as was the case in Jogdhayan [(1983) 1 SCC 26 : (1983) 1 SCR 844] . The court will extend the time when it finds that the mistake was the result of, or induced by, an action of the court applying the maxim “actus curiae neminem gravabit” — an act of Page 12 of 17the court shall prejudice no man, as was the case in Jang Singh [AIR 1966 SC 1631 : (1964) 2 SCR 145] . While it would be necessary to consider the facts of the case to determine whether the inadvertent mistake was due to