appeal by special leave. Submissions on behalf of the appellant: 10. Shri Kaushal Yadav, learned counsel for the accused appellant vehemently urged that the testimony of so called eye 5witnesses, Ram Prakash(PW-1), Sultan Singh(PW-2) and Ram Naresh(PW-5) is totally unreliable and they are concocted witnesses as they were not present at the crime scene. 11. It was submitted that the manner and location at which Sanju(deceased) received the injuries would make it clear that none of these so called eye witnesses were in a position to see the incident. 12. He urged that as per the admitted case of prosecution, gunshots were fired by the accused persons while standing on the roof of the house of accused Omkar and that time Sanju received the gunshot injury while standing on the roof of the house of his maternal uncle Ram Naresh(PW-5). Drawing the Court’s attention to the Site Inspection Plan(Ex.Ka.12) prepared by Ganga Prasad Gautam, Investigating Officer(PW-6), learned counsel urged that