Labour Court, Bhubaneswar3 in I.D. Case No.27 of 2007. By the impugned order, the High Court set aside the award of the Labour Court to the extent that the employee is to be reinstated and to be paid compensation of Rs.75,000/- in lieu of back wages, while upholding the finding of the 1 Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court” 2 For short, “the management” 3 Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the Labour Court”2 Labour Court that the employee falls under the definition of “workman” as given in section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19474. 3. Feeling aggrieved and being dissatisfied with the respective portion of the impugned order of the High Court, both the parties have preferred the instant appeals. 4. A few facts which are necessary for disposal of both the appeals, are as follows: The management is a newspaper establishment publishing a daily newspaper in English viz., New Indian Express having its publication unit at Bhubaneswar. The employee was initially