47 of the C.P.C. have to be rejected at the threshold since the latter deals with all issues relating to the subject of execution and cannot adjudicate on individual rights of the persons who are not parties. Order XXI Rule 58 enables third parties to present their claims in relation to the suit. The objector/appellant being the son of the judgment debtor, is not a third party to the suit. (ii) Objection under XXI Rule 97 would have to be discarded by virtue of Order XXI Rule 102 which bars the creation of any obstruction, pendente lite. (iii) If a decision was under Order XXI Rule 58 or 97, an appeal was the only possible remedy, which the objector has utilized. If the 6 (2008) 7 SCC 144 10-SLP(C) 9202-9204 OF 2016objection is under Section 47, only revision is maintainable. The case erroneously made its way to the Court of the Additional District Judge because the Executing Court allowed “a meaningless petition to be entertained which contained a reference to inconsistent