agree with the High Court that the plea of res judicata advanced by the appellant is unsustainable.” A judgment of far more recent vintage reiterates this position. See Bhagyoday Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Ravindra Balkrishna Patel24. 12.8 In landlord-tenant disputes, writ petitions cannot be entertained when the executing court is seized of applications seeking setting aside of decree of eviction and order of possession. This Court in Hameed Kunju v. Nazim25 held- “26. In any case, in our considered view, the executing court having seized of the applications filed by the respondent, there was no justification on the part of the High Court to have entertained the writ petition and decided them like an original court. All that the High Court, in such circumstances, could do was to request the executing court to dispose of the pending applications (IAs) filed by the respondent on their respective merits leaving the parties to challenge the orders once passed on such applications by filing