placed the custody of the minor child with the appellant-grandmother and as such, the custody of the minor child could not have been considered as an illegal custody. He further submits that in such circumstances, the 8learned Single Judge ought not to have entertained the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and relegated the respondent-father to the remedy available to him in law under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. 6. Shri Hooda further submits that the minor child is living with his grandparents from the day when the mother of the minor child i.e., the wife of the respondent-father had died. It is submitted that uprooting the minor child from the company of his grandparents at this tender age would cause a psychological trauma to the minor child. He submits that taking into consideration the best interest of the minor child, the leaned Single Judge of the High Court ought not to have passed the impugned order. He relies on the judgment of this Court in the