or to shield Sanju. 30. Furthermore, both the witnesses claimed that they saw accused Omkar and accused appellant Jagvir Singh rushing towards the house of Omkar and climbing the roof thereof. Hence, there was no rhyme or reason as to why, Sanju would also climb up the roof of Ram Naresh’s house and take the risk of exposing himself to the offensive intents of the accused persons. 31. The participation of accused Durvin and Sobran in the incident has not been accepted by the trial Court and on that basis, these two accused persons were acquitted. Clearly, thus, the story put forth by the witnesses that accused Durvin and Sobran were also amongst the four offenders who were making an attempt 15to eliminate Sanju is unacceptable and unbelievable. Thus, the quarrel, if any, unquestionably took place between accused Omkar and accused appellant Jagvir Singh on the one side and Sanju on the other. Once accused Omkar and accused appellant Jagvir Singh had moved on from the place where the