whose under construction house was allegedly demolished/damaged by the appellant did not approach the police for lodging a complaint regarding the so called criminal act allegedly committed by the accused on her property. When the site inspection memo was prepared, the Investigating Officer did not find any damage to the boundary wall on Barkat Ali’s plot as had been alleged in the FIR. It was further contended that the impugned FIR and the charge sheet filed as a consequence thereof deserve to be quashed because on a plain reading of the charge sheet, the ingredients of the offences alleged are not made out. 47. Learned counsel urged that the appellant had lodged FIR No. 227 of 2014 against one Satraj Ali who is the panchnama witness of the complainant and that the present FIR is nothing but a counterblast to the FIR registered at the instance of the appellant. 8. Learned counsel further submitted that the incident is alleged to have taken place some time prior to 20th May, 2019