Appeal No. 1637 of 2021 Page 17 of 23recorded under Section 161 of CrPC. A suggestion was given in his cross-examination that he did not tell the police that at about 6.30 p.m., appellant no. 2 returned with his father on a motorcycle. Moreover, a suggestion was given that he did not tell the police that he followed them on his bicycle. Another suggestion was given to the witness that he did not tell the police that while coming back from a meeting on a bicycle, he saw in the flash of the headlight of a motorcycle that appellant no. 3 was running away and leaving the place with a weapon. At this stage, it is necessary to look at the cross-examination of PW-11 (Sri Bidyut Bikash Baruah), the Investigating Officer. In the cross-examination, he stated thus: “ PW3 Afazuddin Choudhury has not stated before me that he also went to attend the meeting. This witness has also not stated before me that at about 6:30 p.m. accused Kadir brought his father back from the meeting in a motor cycle and