28 has no application to the present case on hand. 26. In view of the above findings, the impugned judgement of the High Court cannot be sustained and it is liable to be set aside. 27. During the course of the arguments, the counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the renewal application registered as Lease Renewal Case No.11/1992 would be considered in accordance with law. Said submission is placed on record. 28. In light of the above discussion, the impugned judgement of the High Court dated 13/11/2009 and the First Appellate Court dated 23/12/1992 is set aside and consequently the order of the Trial Court dated 30/09/1991 is confirmed. The pending renewal application in Lease Renewal Case No.11/1992 is directed to be considered by the appellant within 6 months from the date of this order and it would be needless to state that respondents would be at liberty to challenge the order passed in Lease Renewal Case No.11/1992 24before appropriate forum in the event of any adverse