since July 2014, 3 CJM Page 2 of 11rent including arrears amounting to Rs.12,49,780 was not paid despite repeated false assurances. 4. On the aforesaid application under Section 156(3) CrPC, the learned CJM vide order dated 12.11.2016 directed the police to institute a case and investigate. 5. During investigation when despite notice under Section 41A CrPC the accused did not appear, the police applied to the CJM for issuance of NBW4 against the accused. The said application was allowed vide order dated 30.06.2017. 6. Aggrieved with the order dated 30.06.2017, the second and third respondents filed application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the aforesaid order as well as proceedings pursuant to the FIR5 registered as Case No.78 of 2016 at P.S. Sakchi. 7. In the application under Section 482 CrPC it was, inter alia, alleged that no agreement was executed; that appellant intended to let out his Truck parked inside Tata Steel Factory, but, despite payment of advance rent of one