record. 26. Another material fact emerging from examination-in-chief of Ram Prakash(PW-1) is that he did not allege that accused appellant Jagvir Singh also fired at Sanju. He also admitted in his cross-examination that the house of accused Omkar will not be visible from the courtyard of Ram Naresh. 27. Both, Ram Prakash(PW-1) and Ram Naresh(PW-5) stated in their testimony that they got alarmed on hearing the sound of gunfire. If at all the shot had been fired from the house of Omkar, there is no reason as to why the witnesses would go to the courtyard of the house of Ram Naresh(PW-5) rather than rushing towards the direction from where the sound of the gunshot had been heard. Manifestly, their attention would be drawn towards the sound of the gunshots being fired and in natural course, they would look towards that direction and not anywhere else. 28. Ram Prakash(PW-1) and Ram Naresh(PW-5) deposed in their testimony that during the second part of the incident; accused Omkar asked the