No. 2891 of 2023 Page 3 of 11the charge, the High Court has purported to conduct a mini- trial in this case. She submitted that to prove allegations of conspiracy, it is not necessary that all the co-conspirators must know every detail of the conspiracy, and it is not essential that every accused must participate in the conspiracy from its inception to the last. She submits that even a strong suspicion created by the material forming part of the charge sheet is sufficient for framing the charge. The learned ASG pointed out the material forming part of the charge sheet against the respondent. She submitted that a proposal regarding the EPC facility of Rs.330 crores was added by a witness-V.K. Nagpal, on instruction of accused no.5, though there was no recommendation made by the zonal office to the proposal. She submitted that this was done on 10th August 2010, and on the same day, accused no.5 and 6 prepared a Memorandum to be submitted to the management committee. The said two accused