which became final and conclusive. The State of Bi- har never challenged the said order. It is not its case that the aforesaid order has been obtained by concealment of facts or by playing fraud upon the consolidation authorities. The State of Bihar at no point of time came forward to claim the right, title or interest of disputed land before any forum either the consolidation authorities or the Civil Court, rather forced the plaintiff-appellant to institute the civil suit despite recognition of his rights by the consolidation au- thorities. 21. In view of the above, when the rights of the plaintiff-appel- lant have been determined and recognised by the consolida- tion authorities, the order of the Consolidation Officer to that effect in favour of the plaintiff-appellant could not have been ignored by the Civil Court. The jurisdiction of the Civil Court in respect of the rights determined by the Consolida- tion Officer stands impliedly excluded by the very scheme of the Consolidation