the sole evidence of the terms between them, the document shall form an integral part of the transaction and the same shall require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act.” (emphasis supplied) 29. We are of the opinion that the Single Judge has appreciated the law correctly as far as the Agreement is concerned to hold it to be a mortgage in view of Section 58(f) of the Act. We have read and re-read the Agreement. We have also minutely considered the exposition of law made in Narvir Singh (supra). We are of the opinion that the Agreement only records what has happened and does not create/extinguish rights/liabilities. It would, therefore, be covered by para 14.3 of Narvir24 Singh (supra), as highlighted hereinbefore. The reasoning of the Division Bench proceeds as under: “10. …The recitals of the document marked as Ex.P1 and duly extracted in the judgment does not contain any, clear admission that a mortgage was created on the property. The document proceeds as if the