12. Firstly, coming to the petitions filed by the contesting doctors. A perusal of the paper book and various orders passed by this Court shows that notice has not been issued in the same. 13. As far as petitions filed by the LRs of the deceased complainant are concerned, it is an admitted position that the Endoscopic Polypectomy procedure performed on the deceased patient was successful. It was after the procedure that the patient suffered cardiac arrest, which led her shifting to opposite party No.5, Dr. Rajendra Banthia’s nursing home, and subsequently to opposite party No.6, Dr. Gautam Darda’s hospital, where she eventually died. It Page 6 of 9was submitted on behalf of the LRs of the deceased patient that the opposite parties No. 1 to 4 were negligent in not conducting proper pre-anesthetic checkup before performing the procedure. Furthermore, it was submitted that the opposite party No. 5, Dr. Rajendra Banthia, who is a general physician, treated the patient without referring