for dismissal of the suit on account of the non- deposit of the amount as per the decree within the time granted by the court. 4.2 The Trial Court, without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case wrongly rejected the application moved by the appellant-plaintiff seeking permission of the Court to deposit the deficit amount of ₹ 14/-. The aforesaid order was challenged before the High Court. Initially, the Revision Petition was allowed vide order dated 04.12.2008. However, in the Review Application filed by the respondent, the order passed in the Revision Petition was recalled and the same was dismissed vide order dated 26.10.2009. 4.3 The Trial Court as well as the High Court have failed to appreciate the issue that the court is empowered to extend the time for deposit of the amount in case there was any error. In the case in hand there was a bona fide error. The parties should not be made to suffer on account of any error in the judicial proceedings. The amount was too