in proper perspective, the Sessions Court erroneously convicted the appellant alone and sentenced him for the offence under section 302 r/w 34 IPC, and the same was also affirmed by the High Court. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed that the judgments of conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant should be set aside. 10.3. In the alternative, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has already suffered incarceration for more than 14 years and therefore, a lenient view may be taken, qua sentence awarded by the Courts below. 11. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent – State contended that it is proved from the evidence of P.W.l and P.W.2 that the appellant shot the deceased and escaped from the scene of occurrence. PW1 specifically stated that he had seen the appellant, while firing bullet shot on his8 father; and after causing bullet shot, all the accused persons ran away. P.W.2 - Gufran Ali also clearly