are recorded in the name of the State of Madhya Pradesh and hence, the applicant cannot claim any right thereupon. 16. Mr. K. Parameshwar, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the CEC submitted that in view of the ESZ notification dated 9th August, 2017, permission to raise a new construction on the land in question cannot be granted and whatever permissions are sought for, have to be routed through the CEC. 17. Learned counsel appearing for the Union of India adopted the submissions advanced by the standing counsel for the State and learned Amicus Curiae. 18. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at bar and have gone through the material placed on record. 19. It is not in dispute that the applicant herein was never impleaded in any of the proceedings before the Revenue Courts or the High Court as has been emphatically stated in Para-9 of the 14compliance affidavit dated 12th February, 2024. It is thus, clear that irrespective of the fact that