of the decree holder is non-executable without determination of shares of the other parties and as such, modification of the decree is required. (iii) On the aspect of maintainability it was observed that since the objector is a co-sharer, he possesses the requisite locus standi to file objections. (iv) The submission of the decree holder in regard to the maintainability of the objections was dismissed by the learned Judge having observed that the principle of res judicata does not apply to execution proceedings. 7. An appeal against such a finding was filed before the Additional District Judge, Moga, as Civil Misc. Appeal RT No.105/27.05.2011, which was allowed vide Order dated 17th January 2012. The reasoning therefor may be summarized as under:- (i) No fault can be found with the preliminary decree on the ground that the learned Civil Court did not decide the shares of the remaining parties at the time of passing of the decree. (ii) Reliance was placed on the well-recognized