application is untenable. Contrary to this approach of the High Court, the law on impleadment of subsequent transferees, as established by this Court has evolved in a manner that liberally enables subsequent transferees to protect their interests in recognition of the possibility that the transferor pendente lite may not defend the title or may collude with the plaintiff therein (see the decision of this Court in Amit Kumar Shaw v. Farida Khatoon [Amit Kumar Shaw v. Farida Khatoon, (2005) 11 SCC 403] & A. Nawab John v. V.N. Subramaniyam[A. Nawab John v. V.N. Subramaniyam, (2012) 7 SCC 738 : (2012) 4 SCC (Civ) 324] ).” 16. The difference between the rights of a decree holder qua a third party to the suit and the right of a third party after being dispossessed has been laid down by this Court in Sriram Housing Finance & Investment (India) Ltd. v. Omesh Mishra Memorial Charitable Trust, (2022) 15 SCC 176 : 2022 SCC OnLine SC 794, wherein it was held as follows: “24. On conjoint reading