wife of the accused namely PW-1. 8.3 It is further submitted that the prosecution has been successful in establishing and proving that the deceased went with the appellant at his instance and that the appellant was seen strangulating her neck with rope/string and subsequently fleeing from the spot on being confronted by PW2. All these circumstances will singularly point towards the guilt of the accused and does not give scope for raising any doubt. 8.4 It is further submitted that death of deceased Pramila was homicidal death, which has been established and proved by examining the doctors who conducted the post-mortem. 8.5 It is also submitted that this is a fit case to award death sentence and the case would fall into the “rarest of the rare case”. It is further submitted that the balance of mitigating and aggravating circumstances would not lie in favour of the appellant and he has committed a heinous crime by killing his own daughter who was in advanced pregnancy stage in a