the objectivity of the entire process. 42. Despite meticulously analyzing all relevant documents appended with the file, including the cryptic brief notes of the Assistant, we are unable to get any qualitative assistance from the government record. As noted above, there is little discussion about: (i) the effect of release of the Respondents’ land on the remaining acquisition, in light of the challenge pending before the High Court or this Court; (ii) the cascading effect that this compromise would have on the other landowners along with the arguments it would invite on the question of hostility of Article 14, and if so; (iii) the basis of such classification and whether it would be reasonable; (iv) whether the release of the land would affect the contiguity of the land under acquisition and if so, would it impair the planned development of the area under acquisition; and (v) whether the State was competent to release the land in purported exercise of its powers under Section 48 of