It is further contended that the respondents have the right of renewal as they have not violated any of the terms & conditions of the lease. 1317.3 It is submitted that no material had been placed on record by State to support the finding of the Tahsildar that the building was in a dilapidated condition or it was not habitable and one sided report of Tahsildar could not be relied upon. 17.4 It is urged that the resumption of possession can only be taken under due process of law i.e. by way of filing a civil suit in a court of competent jurisdiction as per Clause 20 of the Bihar and Orissa Estates Manual 1919. The action of the appellant in adopting extra judicial methods to unilaterally resume possession is clearly mala fide, illegal and contrary to the law. 17.5 It is submitted that, even assuming that the land was required for any public purpose as indicated in the resumption order, no such material was brought on record to show that there was any specific purpose for which the land