2024 INSC 799 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION Review Petition (Civil) No 359 of 2023 in Civil Appeal No 5783 of 2022 Union of India & Anr ...Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Ganpati Dealcom Pvt Ltd ...Respondent(s) O R D E R 1 We have heard Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India, and Mr Ajay Vohra, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2 The review has been sought in these proceedings of the judgment of a three- Judge Bench of this Court in Union of India and Another v Ganpati Dealcom Private Ltd1. The only question which was framed for consideration by this Court was in the following terms: “3. The short legal question which arises for this Court's consideration is whether the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (for short “the 1988 Act”), as amended by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 (for short “the 2016 Act”) has a prospective effect. Although a purely legal