affirmed that a Civil Suit10 is pending between the State and the complainant, his wife, and Mahant Pushpraj in which the State has sought a declaration of title and permanent injunction. As per the learned counsel for the State, while deciding the bail application, the High Court ought not to have ventured into the civil dispute inter se between the parties, as the order to deliver the possession of the property to the complainant(who is the defendant in the pending suit for title declaration), is bound to have prejudicial consequences on the civil rights of the parties. 10. Mr. Puneet Jain, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant vehemently and fervently opposed the submissions advanced by the appellant's counsel. He urged that looking at the fact that the appellants had forcibly broken into the premises of the complainant being the registered owner of the property and caused injuries to him and his family members, the High Court was fully justified in imposing