perhaps even an appellate court, with full- fledged appellate jurisdiction would, in the circumstances of the present case, have felt compelled to abstain from and reluctant to do. Contention (c) would also require to be upheld.” (emphasis in original) 25. In Jagannath v. Arulappa & Anr.8 and H.K.N. Swami v. Irshad Basith (Dead) By Lrs.9, this Court has opined that it would be wholly improper to allow first appeal without adverting to the specific findings of the trial court and that the First Appellate Court is required to address all the issues and determine the appeal upon assignment of cogent reasons. 26. Having considered the evidence on record and the findings of the trial court, the First Appellate Court and the High Court, we are satisfied that the First Appellate Court wrongly set aside the Judgment, decree, and findings of the trial court without meeting the findings of the trial court which could not have 8. (2005) 12 SCC 303 9. (2005) 10 SCC 24321 been done in exercise of