paragraph 4 of the impugned judgment in the appeal. 11. In the contextual situation, it is only appropriate to keep reminded of the observations of this Court in the decision in Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand1. This Court observed that it is a matter of common knowledge that exaggerated versions of the incident are reflected in a large number of complaints and the tendency of over implication is also reflected in a large number of cases. 12. We are of the view that in view of such circumstances, the courts have to be careful to identify instances of over implication and to avert the suffering of ignominy and inexpiable consequences, by such persons. 13. The upshot of the discussion is that the finding of guilt against the appellant by the courts below for the offence under Section 498-A, IPC, with the aid of Section 1 (2010) 7 SCC 667 Page 10 of 11 SLP (Crl.) No. 8245 of 202334, IPC, is absolutely perverse in view of the absolute absence of any evidence against him to connect him