the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Venkataraman Chandrashekhara Bharathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5. 5. Shri Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Counsel submits that taking the FIR at its face value, it does not disclose any mens rea of the officials of the appellant-bank and it also fails to disclose the commission of any offence. He further submits that the complaint also does not disclose any specific allegation with regard to collusion between the unnamed staff of the appellant- bank with Ms. Sunita Khemka. The only allegation against the unnamed staff members of the appellant-bank is that while the Prohibitory Order dated 5th October 2021 was in force in relation to the bank locker No.462, Ms. Sunita Khema, customer of the 8appellant-bank, was permitted to operate the said bank locker. 6. The learned Senior Counsel submits that taking the allegations at their face value, they do not disclose commission of the alleged offences of Sections 420, 409,