interference. CONSIDERATION OF SUBMISSIONS 7. We may note here that the impugned judgments in all connected appeals are based on the impugned judgment in Civil Appeal no. 4702 of 2023. In this case, we are dealing with concurrent findings arrived at by the Arbitral Tribunal, the learned Single Judge in a petition under Section 34 of the Civil Appeal no.4702 of 2023 etc. Page 6 of 15Arbitration Act, and the Division Bench in appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act. In this case, we are concerned with the construction of the terms of a contract between the parties. In the case of Parsa Kente Collieries Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.3, in paragraphs 9.1 and 9.2, this Court held thus: “9.1. In Associate Builders [Associate Builders v. DDA, (2015) 3 SCC 49 : (2015) 2 SCC (Civ) 204], this Court had an occasion to consider in detail the jurisdiction of the Court to interfere with the award passed by the Arbitrator in exercise of powers under Section 34 of the