PW1 specifically stated that he had seen the appellant, while firing bullet shot on his8 father; and after causing bullet shot, all the accused persons ran away. P.W.2 - Gufran Ali also clearly stated that it was only the appellant who shot the deceased and not the other co-accused. Adding further, the learned counsel submitted that P.W.2 deposed that the accused Veer Singh having a spear, appellant having a country-made pistol and Dharamveer and Mintu having lathis, came to the house of the deceased and on exhortation given by the co-accused, the appellant fired bullet shot by country-made pistol on the deceased which hit on his right chest and arm. PW4 Akbar stated in his evidence that the country-made pistol was recovered by the police on pointing out by the appellant. It is also proved from the evidence of P.W.2 that at the time of occurrence, there was sufficient source of light for identification of the accused. Hence, the charge framed against the appellant was duly proved by