akin to the levy of additional royalty. The Division Bench relied upon a decision of the same Court in the case of the National Highways Authority of India v. M/s. ITD Cementation India Limited1. The Division Bench in the impugned judgment held that the claim made on account of the increase in royalty, sales tax, forest transit fee, etc., was covered in favour of the respondent by the said decision. As stated earlier, the decision in the case of the National Highways Authority of India v. M/s. ITD Cementation India Limited1 was confirmed by this Court by judgment dated 24th April 20152 with a partial modification. A perusal of the said judgment shows that the issue therein was also regarding a claim based on an upward revision of royalty. Clauses 70 to 70.8 of the agreement quoted in the judgment are identical to those in the agreement subject matter of these appeals. The argument before this Court was also the same that the WPI assessment would include a claim for enhanced royalty.