are 2 (2021) 10 SCC 690 14disputed questions of facts. There is no admission on the part of the appellants to infer that the amount stands crystallised. Therefore, in the absence of any acceptance of joint survey report by the competent authority, no right would accrue to the writ petitioner only because measurements cannot be undertaken after passage of time. Maybe, the resurvey cannot take place but the measurement books of the work executed from time to time would form a reasonable basis for assessing the amount due and payable to the writ petitioner, but such process could be undertaken only by the agreed forum i.e. arbitration and not by the writ court as it does not have the expertise in respect of measurements or construction of roads.” 24. In wake of discussion made herein above, this Court is of the firm view that the impugned judgments dated 20th February, 2015 and 30th September, 2015 are ex-facie illegal and without jurisdiction. Hence, the same deserve to be and are