is true that the aforementioned decisions would undoubtedly reveal the position that an FIR is not meant to be a detailed document containing chronicle of all intricate and minute details. 13. Even after, referring to the decisions mentioned above, we think it equally relevant to refer to the decision of this Court in Dharma Rama Bhagare v. State of Maharashtra8. It was held therein thus: - “The first information report, it may be pointed out, is never treated as a substantive piece of evidence. It can only be used for corroborating or contradicting its maker when he appears in court as a witness.” 14. There can be no doubt with respect to the position that the prime object of FIR, from the point of view of the informant is to set the criminal law in motion and from the point of the investigating authorities is to obtain 4 (2003) 6 SCC 175 5 (2011) 4 SCC 324 6 (2014) 2 SCC 1 7 (2021) 1 SCC 1 8 (1973) 1 SCC 537 Page 7 of 21 Criminal Appeal No. 2129 of 2014information about the alleged