in the charge sheet as it is, complicity of the respondent is not made out. 16. Therefore, we see no scope to interfere with the impugned order. While we say so, we must observe here that we have examined only the role ascribed to the respondent in the process of sanctioning the facilities to the Company. We have examined the charge sheet only for that limited purpose. Therefore, any observation made in the judgment will not affect the trial against the other accused persons as we have not recorded any findings about the material against them. 17. Subject to what is stated above, the appeal is dismissed. ...…………………………….J. (Abhay S Oka) ..…………………………….J. (Ujjal Bhuyan) New Delhi; October 16, 2024. Criminal Appeal No. 2891 of 2023 Page 11 of 11