respondents No. 2 and 3 alongwith an irrevocable Power of Attorney dated 8th December 2009, thereby appointing respondent No. 1 as their constituted Attorney for doing all such acts, deeds and things to implement the Agreement for Sale. 4.9 Vide order dated 4th May 2022, the trial court allowed the restoration application being MCA No. 1473 of 2021 filed by respondent No.1, subject to the payment of costs of Rs. 15,000/-, thereby condoning the delay of 9 years and 11 months. 4.10 Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the trial court dated 4th May 2022, the appellants filed Civil Revision Application 5No. 269 of 2022 before the High Court. 4.11 The High Court, vide impugned judgment, dismissed the civil revision application filed by the appellants, upheld the order of the trial court and only enhanced the costs awarded from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/-. 4.12 Being aggrieved thereby, the present appeal. 5. We have heard Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of