from committing waste till the disposal of EA No.1 of 1995; and E.A.No.3 of 1995 for recovery of damages to the tune of Rs.25,000/- from the plaintiff for having committed waste 6 For short, “CPC”4 in the property. All the three applications were jointly heard and were dismissed, by a common order dated 12.08.1997. 7. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order passed in E.A. Nos.1 and 3 of 1995, the said Raghuthaman filed Execution First Appeals viz., EFA Nos.6 of 1998 and 7 of 1998, which came to be dismissed by the High Court, by judgment dated 30.05.2007. Seeking to review the said judgment, the respondents herein, who are the legal representatives of the said Raghuthaman, filed R.P.Nos.1107 and 934 of 2007, which came to be allowed, by order dated 22.03.2010. Pursuant to the same, E.F.A Nos.6 and 7 of 1998 were re-heard and were eventually, allowed by the High Court, by the judgment dated 11.11.2011 which is impugned herein. 8. The first and foremost contention of the learned counsel