holding that the death of Naseem Khan is culpable homicide amounting to murder. 26. Now, the surviving question is only whether the prosecution had succeeded in establishing conclusively beyond any reasonable doubt that the culprits for the murder of Naseem Khan, are the respondents herein as held by the trial Court or whether they are entitled to the benefit of doubt and consequential acquittal as held by the High Court. In the decision in Anil Phukan v. State of Assam9, this Court held that conviction could be based on testimony of a single witness provided his testimony is found reliable and inspires confidence. In 9 (1993) 3 SCC 282 Page 15 of 21 Criminal Appeal No. 2129 of 2014the decision in Chandu Bhai Shana Bhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat10, this Court held that when the ocular evidence in a murder case is unreliable benefit of doubt to be given to all accused. 27. We have already held, for the reasons given earlier, that the High Court had rightly held the oral testimony of