to seek formal instructions in this regard. Respondents meanwhile filed a formal undertaking stating that they would use the land only for non-profit and charitable purposes. 33. On 13.09.2023, we directed the State Government / Appellant to file an affidavit responding to the following queries: (a) Why the State Government is agreeable to release the land of the Respondents from acquisition? (b) Whether such release of land will affect the acquisition of adjoining lands or not? (c) Whether the subject-land falls within or near the Sukhna Lake catchment area? 22(d) Whether the land in dispute falls in any non-construction zone? (e) If not, what type of construction is permissible in and around the area of subject-land? 34. In response thereto, the State of Haryana filed an affidavit stating, inter alia, as follows: (a) The land can be released because the acquisition proceedings for the same were quashed by the High Court and are under abeyance in view of the status quo order passed