in according with law. 5. Para No.5 is wrong and denied. 6. Para No.6 is wrong and denied. 7. Para No.7 is wrong and denied. 8. Para No.8 is wrong and denied. 9. Para No.9 is wrong and denied. It is, therefore, prayed that the objection petition may kindly be dismissed with costs.” 6. The Civil Judge, Junior Division, found the objections raised fully maintainable. A perusal of the said judgment and order reveals the following reasons for such a conclusion- (i) The objector (appellant herein) is a co-sharer in the property, having one-fourth share thereof. The decree holder does not have a better title than the objector; 8-SLP(C) 9202-9204 OF 2016(ii) It was held that if the decree holder is entitled to get his share, the objector shares such entitlement. The decree only qua the shares of the decree holder is non-executable without determination of shares of the other parties and as such, modification of the decree is required. (iii) On the aspect of maintainability it was observed