v) Learned counsel, Shri Jain further contended that reliance placed by the learned Single Judge on the decision of Vasant and Anr. v. Dattu & Ors.2, is ex-facie erroneous as the said 1 (2004) 9 SCC 302 2 (1987) 1 SCC 160 9judgment deals with issues related to properties held by the joint Hindu family having several surviving coparceners and not that of a sole surviving coparcener. He thus, implored the Court to accept the appeal and set aside the impugned judgments. 14. E-converso, Shri Bishwajit Bhattacharya, learned senior advocate representing the respondents, vehemently and fervently opposed the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the appellant and contended that the issue in the present case regarding the ambit of the rights of a female Hindu on the undivided joint Hindu family estate under Section 14(1) of the Succession Act has been settled by this Court in the case of Munni Devi alias Nathi Devi(Dead) Thr LRs & Ors. v. Rajendra alias Lallu Lal(Dead) Thr LRs & Ors.3 He