of pension is worked out in terms of sub-rules (1) and (2) above shall further be reduced pro-rata in all cases, where the pensioner had less than the minimum service required for full pension as per rules as applicable on 1st January, 2006 and in no case, it will be less than Rs.3500/- per month.” Pursuant to the aforesaid Rules, pay scale was revised and the teachers working in the Government Colleges were receiving the revised pension. While so, the Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, sent a communication dated 07.09.2010 to the banks, stating that the revised pension will be payable only to those, who were in service as on 01.01.2006 and not to those who had retired7 prior to 01.01.2006 and accordingly, ordered to reduce the pension and recover the excess payment made. The said order was challenged in CWP No.19266 of 2010 and connected cases, titled as Satyapal Yadav v. State of Haryana and others. By order dated 25.07.2012, the said civil writ petitions came to be allowed, by