for the Respondent, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari would support the case of the prosecution and contend that both the courts on proper evaluation of evidence have rightly arrived at a conclusion that appellant had committed the offences alleged and both the courts have rightly awarded the death sentence. 8.1 It is submitted that impugned judgement and order of the High Court is well reasoned and has been passed after considering the entire facts and 8circumstances and same is not to be interfered with by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction vested under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. 8.2 It is submitted that the prosecution has been successful in proving the motive of the accused to take revenge and kill his daughter for having married outside the caste as clearly spoken to by the wife of the accused namely PW-1. 8.3 It is further submitted that the prosecution has been successful in establishing and proving that the deceased went with the appellant at his instance and that