of 2023 Page 3 of 8passed by this Court records that the appellant was claiming interest from the 3rd and 4th respondents. SUBMISSIONS 8. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent. Notice has been duly served to the 3rd respondent. 9. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is that solatium at 5 per cent of the amount deposited by the appellant granted to the appellant is inadequate. He submitted that the appellant was deprived of the use of the sum of Rs.81,20,000/- from 21st July 2019. Therefore, the appellant was deprived of interest on the said amount. He would, thus, submit that the appellant is entitled to receive interest on the said amount from the date of its deposit till the date of refund. 10. The learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submitted that as per the said Rules, while setting aside the auction, 5 per cent of the amount deposited by the appellant has been ordered