to be prejudiced by the contempt proceedings as they are acting under the pressure thereof and thus, the appellants will not get a fair chance to contest the notice. 6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 vehemently opposed the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the 3appellants. He urged that the learned Single Judge, after extensive consideration of the material available on record has found that the sanctioned building plan was violated by the appellants while raising construction of their residential premises and as such, the direction to conduct an enquiry into the matter was justified. 7. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at bar and have gone through the materials placed on record. 8. We express our reservations on the exercise of writ jurisdiction by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Calcutta in a controversy, which appears to be a purely private dispute between the appellants herein and the private