of evidence by the Trial Court. 33. We may usefully refer to the exposition of law in Sanjeev v. State of H.P.12, wherein this Court summarized the position in this regard and observed as follows: “7. It is well settled that: 7.1. While dealing with an appeal against acquittal, the reasons which had weighed with the trial court in acquitting the accused must be dealt with, in case the appellate court is of the view that the acquittal rendered by the trial court deserves to be upturned (see Vijay Mohan 12 (2022) 6 SCC 294 Criminal Appeal No. 1031/2015 and others Page 23 of 26Singh v. State of Karnataka13, Anwar Ali v. State of H.P.14 ) 7.2. With an order of acquittal by the trial court, the normal presumption of innocence in a criminal matter gets reinforced (see Atley v. State of U.P.15 ) 7.3. If two views are possible from the evidence on record, the appellate court must be extremely slow in interfering with the appeal against acquittal (see Sambasivan v. State of Kerala16 )” 34.