in the context of the right to vote. He also relied upon another decision in the case of Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community & Another. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.2, wherein this Court held that the role of the constitutional Courts is to interpret the Constitution, considering the changing needs of the society. 8. The learned senior counsel submitted that, independently of the constitutional provisions, Pranav is entitled to be registered as an Indian citizen under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the 1955 Act. He submitted that Pranav is a person of Indian origin as his parents were born within the territory of India after independence. He submitted that a common sense of interpretation would have to be given to the phrase “in such other territory which became part of India after the 1 (2023) 6 SCC 161 2 (2023) 4 SCC 541 Civil Appeal No.5932 of 2023, etc. Page 5 of 2515th day of August 1947,” occurring in Explanation-2 to Section 5 of the 1955 Act. Therefore, it