title or interest in the property allotted to D.H. out of Khasra No.2259. (iv) Sub Para (iv) is wrong and denied. Detailed reply has been given above. (v) Sub Para (v) is wrong and denied. Detailed reply has been given above. (vi) This sub para is wrong & denied as alleged. Pendency of injunction suit is admitted. The very objector is a party to the said suit. It is wrong & denied the objector learnt about the suit on 22-1- 2002 as alleged. Nothing has been concealed by D.H. (vii) This sub para is wrong & denied. In Sub para (iii) above 1965 is the alleged year & this sub para 1979 is the alleged year of departure from Moga and whereas the alleged Civil Court Decree is dated 27-04-89. The fact is that neither the objector nor his father ever left Moga & reside at Moga. Service was effect in according with law. 5. Para No.5 is wrong and denied. 6. Para No.6 is wrong and denied. 7. Para No.7 is wrong and denied. 8. Para No.8 is wrong and denied. 9. Para No.9 is wrong and denied. It is,