also entails in termination of service, it is nothing but a species of removal, which is permissible under the CRPF Rules. Therefore, once an enquiry is held, charge of gross indiscipline is found proved, bearing in mind that the original petitioner was a member of a disciplined force, the punishment awarded, being one of the punishments imposable, was not liable to be interfered with by the High Court. Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.4106/2021 Page 11 of 3810. In support of her submissions, Ms. Bhati relied on two decisions of this Court, namely, (a) Union of India & Ors. v. Ghulam Mohd. Bhat9; and (b) Union of India & Ors. v. Diler Singh10. Submissions on behalf of the respondent 11. Mr. Anand Shankar, learned counsel for the respondent, defending the impugned order submitted: (i) Punishment of compulsory retirement as specified in Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules is ultra vires the provisions of Section 11 of the CRPF Act, which is exhaustive, and no punishment beyond what is specified therein