question of law in favour of plaintiff/respondent by assigning the following reasons: a. There was no material before the Collector to arrive at a conclusion that Clause 9 of the lease deed had been violated. b. The defendant did not bring any material on record before the Trial Court to show that the determination of lease made 8by Collector was in accordance with Clause 15 of the lease deed. c. The renewal application could not have been rejected otherwise without recording a finding that the lessee had not duly observed and performed all the conditions of the lease. d. The State had not brought on record any material to show that there was any specific public purpose for which the land was required as provided under Rule 28 of the Bihar and Orissa Government Estate Manual, 1919 for returning the land. e. Unilateral resumption cannot be sustained when the lessor has not approached the common law forum for determination of the lease. 14. Assailing the aforesaid judgement and decree,