was deposited by the appellant on 21st July 2019 with the 3rd respondent. The excess amount of Rs.59,64,600/- was sought to be refunded to the borrowers by the 3rd respondent by a cheque along with a letter dated 5th September 2019. It appears that the cheque was returned due to inter se dispute amongst the borrowers. 4. The 1st and 2nd respondents invoked the writ jurisdiction of the High Court of Karnataka for setting aside the auction. By judgment dated 17th March 2022, the learned Single Judge proceeded to set aside the auction sale made in favour of the appellant. The learned Single Judge held that the 4th respondent bank was entitled to the awarded amount along with interest, and the 1st and 2nd respondents are liable to pay the said amount to the bank. The learned Single Judge noted that the amount of Rs.25,61,400/- was deposited by the 1st and Civil Appeal @ SLP(C) No. 5464 of 2023 Page 2 of 82nd respondents within three months of filing the writ petition. The learned Single