the sale fetches a price equal to or higher than the amount mentioned in the sale proclamation and is sufficient to satisfy the decree, no further sale should be held, and the court should stop at that stage.” 25. It is, thus, settled principle of law that court’s power to auction any property or part thereof is not just a discretion but an obligation imposed on the Court and the sale held without31 examining this aspect and not in conformity with this mandatory requirement would be illegal and without jurisdiction. In the case at hand, the Executing Court did not discharge its duty to ascertain whether the sale of a part of the attached property would be sufficient to satisfy the decree. When the valuation of three attached properties is mentioned in the attachment Panchanama, it was the duty of the Court to have satisfied itself on this aspect and having failed to do so the Court has caused great injustice to the judgment debtor by auctioning his entire attached properties causing