charge sheet filed against the appellant. 10. Per contra, learned counsel representing the State of Chhattisgarh vehemently and fervently opposed the submissions advanced by the appellant’s counsel. He urged that the complainant had no motive to falsely implicate the accused- 5appellant. Investigation was conducted by the Investigating Officer and during the course of the collection of evidence, the statements of complainant-Barkat Ali, Sushma Kashyap and so also her husband-Rajkumar Kashyap were recorded wherein, they fully affirmed the allegations levelled in the FIR. 11. He thus, urged that the appellant herein has failed to make out a case for interference in the impugned order and the charge sheet. 12. No one has appeared to contest the matter on behalf of respondent No. 5 i.e., complainant-Barkat Ali. 13. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced at bar and have gone through the material placed on record. 14. A bare perusal of the impugned FIR would