prosecutrix and the medical evidence does not support the prosecution case, the conviction could not be sustainable. 5. In the present case, the prosecutrix as well as her mother-Jaya (PW-2) and her aunt-Jamuna (PW-3) have fully 5 (2012) 8 SCC 21 : 2012 INSC 322 6supported the prosecution case. The examination-in-chief of the prosecutrix would reveal that she has stated that when she was returning to her house, the Accused No.1, who is the owner of the company in which she works, came and asked her to come with him for giving details of some official work. Accused No.1 took the victim, where four accused persons were standing and then Accused No.1 asked the prosecutrix to remove her clothes and when she refused, her clothes were removed by the other accused and thereafter they ravished her. The evidence would also show that though she informed that she was at pains, they committed forcible sexual intercourse with her one by one on various occasions. She has stated that, when the