to the proposal. She submitted that this was done on 10th August 2010, and on the same day, accused no.5 and 6 prepared a Memorandum to be submitted to the management committee. The said two accused and respondent signed the Memorandum on the same date. She submitted that undue hurry was shown for sanctioning an EPC facility of Rs.330 crores to the Company. She submitted that for the sake of alleged efficiency, the due process required to be followed for sanctioning credit facilities could not have been sacrificed. She submitted that no application was made by the Company for a grant of EPC facility. It is submitted that though there may not be any allegation of receipt of pecuniary benefits against the respondent, he abused his official position as a public servant and indulged himself in mischief or criminal misconduct, as provided in Section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act. She submitted that Criminal Appeal No. 2891 of 2023 Page 4 of 11at the stage of framing of the charge, the High Court