must be remedied.” 17. It is well to remember that the Code of Civil Procedure is a body of procedural law designed to facilitate justice and it should not be treated as an enactment providing for punishments and penalties. The laws of procedure should be so construed as to render justice wherever reasonably possible. It is in our opinion, not unreasonable to demand restitution from a person who has purchased the property in court auction being aware of the pending appeal against the decree.” 17. In the matter of Padanathil Ruqmini Amma (supra), this Court while dealing with somewhat similar fact situation (as21 in the case in hand) wherein a decree holder himself became the auction purchaser and later on leased out the property to a third party who in turn sold to another one and then this man again sold out to a fourth person, held thus in paras 10, 11, 14, 15,16 and 17: “10. It is, however, contended by the respondent that he is a lessee from the decree-holder auction-purchaser.