at Ludhiana. Further more since 1989, the objector is the owner in possession of the property in question and this fact is in the knowledge of the decree holder and his Legal representatives, but with ulterior motive, neither the decree holder Thakur Singh nor his L/Rs ever informed or brought to the notice of the court that the property described & shown in the site plan, which is part of khasra No.2259 is owned and possessed by the objector and by misguiding the honourable court, got the property into their shares, which was owned and possessed by the objector. iv. That the objector had no knowledge regarding the pendency of the litigation regarding the property in dispute, as he had no occasion to know the same, as the decree holder willfully and with ulterior motive, kept the honourable court in dark regarding the possession and ownership of the objector. Had the decree holder brought the fact regarding ownership and possession of the objector over the property 5-SLP(C) 9202-9204