the manner in which this appeal has been filed, but in the ends of justice, proceed to consider it on merits along with the tagged appeal. 6. The complainants are father and son. The son was a minor aged about 6 years when he was diagnosed of congenital disorder in his left eye (also known as ‘PTOSIS’ or ‘drooping eyelid’) for which a minor surgery was performed on 26.06.1996 by Dr. Neeraj Sud at PGI. The complainant alleges that there was no other defect in the 3eyes of the son and both eyes had normal 6/9 equal vision and the physical deformity diagnosed (PTOSIS, drooping eyelid) could have been cured by a minor operation which required lifting of the left eyelid a little to make it of the same size as the right eye but the said surgery was done in a most negligent manner. Instead of any improvement the condition of the eye further deteriorated post-surgery. 7. The complainants, thus through the complaint made to the State Commission claimed compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the