but a counterblast to the FIR registered at the instance of the appellant. 8. Learned counsel further submitted that the incident is alleged to have taken place some time prior to 20th May, 2019 whereas, the FIR had been lodged on 29th June, 2019 and no explanation has been furnished for this gross delay in lodging of the FIR. He also pointed out that the complainant was not even sure of the date on which the offences were allegedly committed and that is why, the date of the incident has been mentioned in the FIR and the charge sheet as some time prior to 20th May, 2019 which clearly indicates that the allegations made by the complainant are totally vague and uncertain and unworthy of credence. 9. Learned counsel thus, implored the Court to accept the appeal and quash the FIR and consequential charge sheet filed against the appellant. 10. Per contra, learned counsel representing the State of Chhattisgarh vehemently and fervently opposed the submissions advanced by the appellant’s