Single Judge went on to hold that the writ petitioner(respondent herein) was not wrong in saying that he had worked 33 days less than the stipulated contract period of 365 days and thus, he was entitled to payment of pro-rata auction amount for these days. 12. The learned Single Judge was persuaded by the equitable concept that a social welfare state where the Government has to 7play a key role in protecting and promoting the economic interest and social well-being of the citizens, it would not be entitled to or justified in earning undue benefit/profit from the citizens. Observing so, the learned Single Judge took upon himself to quantify the damages suffered by the bidder to be equivalent to net revenue collected by the appellant herein during first 32 days of contract period commencing from 1st April, 2010 after deducting expenses such as salaries and allied expenses and proceeded to direct the appellants to make payment thereof to the respondent herein. 13. The intra court appeal