in which the prosecutrix was taken initially near the Nullah and after that to another place establishes the case of the prosecutrix of forcible sexual intercourse. Few insignificant contradictions have been brought on record in the cross-examination of the prosecutrix. However, the version of the prosecutrix about the acts of forcible sexual intercourse by the accused has been hardly tested in the cross- examination. 12. In this view of the matter, the High Court's conclusion was the only possible conclusion based on the evidence on record. Therefore, we find no merit in the appeal preferred by the accused Vijay. 13. Now, we come to the sentencing part. For the offence punishable under sub-section (2) of Section 376 of the IPC, the minimum punishment of rigorous imprisonment for ten years was prescribed. However, at the relevant time, the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 376 of the IPC read thus: Criminal Appeal no.2567 of 2024 etc. Page 13 of 15“376.………………………………………………………