Tribunal and the High Court to award more than what is claimed, provided it is found to be just and reasonable. It is the duty of the Court to assess fair compensation. Rough calculation made by the claimant is not a bar or the upper limit. Reference in this regard can be made to the judgment of this Court in the case of Meena Devi vs. Nunu Chand Mahto11. 21. For the reasons mentioned above, this appeal is allowed and the compensation awarded to the appellant is assessed in the following terms: Head Compensation (in ₹) Annual Income 2,00,000 Annual Income after Future 2,80,000 Prospects @ 40% Loss of future income (₹2,80,000 x 44,80,000 16 x 100% disability) Medical Expenditure 3,51,153 Future Attendant Cost 1,00,000 11 (2023) 1 SCC 204, [2022] 18 SCR 449, 2022 INSC 1080 Page 13 of 14Loss of marriage prospects 1,00,000 Pain and suffering 1,00,000 Future medical expenses 1,00,000 Total 52,31,153 22. The total amount of compensation is rounded off to ₹52,31,000/-. The appellant will be