sought relaxation in the Clause-8 of the NIT on the ground that the condition of furnishing bank guarantee for the remainder amount was unjust and arbitrary. 6. Having failed to get a favourable response from the Municipal authorities, the respondent filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that Clause-8 of the NIT was arbitrary. The suit was accompanied by an application seeking temporary injunction. The Court of learned District Judge, Reasi vide order dated 29th April, 2010, allowed the application and granted temporary injunction 3directing the appellants herein to issue the order of allotment of contract to the respondent-plaintiff. 7. The defendants i.e. appellants herein challenged the order dated 29th April, 2010 by filing a Civil 1st Miscellaneous Appeal(CIMA) No.312 of 2010 wherein the High Court passed an order dated 7th May, 2010 directing the appellants to issue a work order in favour of the respondent. 8. In view of the order dated 7th May, 2010 passed by the High Court