campus area would not per se mean that the capacity has been enhanced or augmented. What is required to be seen is that whether the requisite facilities for each individual prisoner are adequate in terms of sleeping area, mobility within the prison, kitchen/food, health facilities, other matters etc. 41. Thus, States/UTs, in their proposed affidavits, should address all issues holistically, including inmate-capacity enhancement/augmentation. Other logistics such as creation of posts of wardens/cooks/doctors/various jail staff etc. should also be factored in. 42. Before concluding, we may reiterate that prisoners are covered under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In Sunil Batra (II) v Delhi Administration6, this Court had pointedly answered that prisoners are persons who are entitled to Fundamental Rights even while in custody. Rama Murthy v State of Karnataka7, was a case where 5 We take it that the reference is to the Uttar Pradesh Jail Manual, 2022. 6 (1980) 3 SCC 488 7