Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu and others6; and (vii) Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sadhu Ram Singla and others7. 9. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 Bank confirms the fact regarding the settlement entered into between the Bank and the borrowers. 10. Shri Vikramjeet Banerjee, learned ASG, appearing on behalf of the CBI, however, submits that merely because the matter is settled between the Bank and the borrowers, it does not absolve the accused persons of their criminal liability. It is submitted that the learned Chief Justice of the High Court has rightly, upon consideration of the legal position, dismissed the petition under Section 482 of the CrPC. The learned ASG, therefore, prays for 4 (2014) 5 SCC 364 5 (2014) 6 SCC 466 6 (2014) 15 SCC 235 7 (2017) 5 SCC 350 9dismissal of the present appeals. 11. The facts in the present case are not in dispute. It is not disputed that the matter has been compromised between the borrowers and the Bank. It