that the said option of renewal is not unrestricted and can only be exercised by the lessee after having duly observed and performed all the conditions of the lease. From the perusal of the report submitted by the Tahsildar on 30/05/1975 and the letter dated 06/10/1975 by the lessee, it is evident that multiple terms and conditions of the lease have been breached by the lessees. This being the case, the appellant/State had rightly not renewed the lease as per Clause 20 of the Manual, 1919 and Clause 16 of the lease agreement. 23. The reliance placed by the respondents on the judgement of the High Court of Orissa in Shankarlal Verma and Others v Smt. Uma Sahu and 22Others (supra) would not come to their rescue as the terms and conditions of the lease have been squarely breached and not adhered to by the lessees in the present case. As such the lease came to be determined in the present case even though the lease deed does not provide anywhere that upon expiry of the term, the lease