in the case of Manoj Suryavanshi v State of Chhattisgarh9 has held there are bound to be some discrepancies between the narration of different witnesses, when they speak on details, and unless the contradictions are of a material dimension, the same should not be used to jettison the evidence in its entirety. It is further observed that corroboration of evidence with mathematical niceties cannot be expected in criminal cases. Minor embellishment, there may be, but variations by reason therefore should not render the evidence unbelievable. Trivial discrepancies ought not 8 (2013) 14 SCC 434 9 (2020) 4 SCC 451 16to obliterate an otherwise acceptable evidence. As such the contention of the appellant raised in this regard is liable to be rejected and accordingly it is rejected. 22. For the reasons aforestated, we are of the opinion that High Court has not committed any error in upholding the conviction of the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 316 and 364 IPC and we