to revoke the gift deed. There is no stipulation in the gift deed that if the suit property is not so utilised, the gift would stand revoked or would be revoked at the discretion of the donor. 17. In the end, we come to another limb of the argument that the suit as filed by the plaintiff-respondent is hit by limitation and as such the first appellate court and the High Court manifestly erred in decreeing the same. 18. In context with the point of limitation, the court of first instance has formulated issue no. 4 which reads as under: “Whether the suit is barred by limitation?” 19. Admittedly, the present suit for declaration and recovery of possession of the suit property was filed by the plaintiff- respondent on 25.09.1991. The court of first instance held that as the same was not filed within three years from the 9date of revocation of the gift deed, i.e., 17.08.1987 (Exhibit B-2), the suit is barred by limitation. 20. Once it is held that the gift deed was validly executed