15. Learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that the theory setup by Ram Prakash(PW-1) in his examination-in-chief, that he and Ram Naresh(PW-5) both climbed on to the roof with Sanju(deceased) and saw the gunshots being fired at him is totally falsified and contradicted by Ram Naresh(PW-5) who candidly admitted that he and his brother-in-law Ram Prakash(PW-1), upon hearing the sound of firing, went towards the roof and saw that 9Sanju had been injured by gunshots. This very fact was also mentioned in the FIR(Ex.Ka.2). He also urged that the witness Ram Naresh(PW-5) admitted in his testimony that they saw Sanju stumbling down from the staircase into the courtyard. They were standing in the veranda in front of his house and from there the roof of Omkar’s house is not visible. 16. Learned counsel urged that Ram Prakash(PW-1) being the father of the deceased did not sign any of the documents prepared at the spot. He admitted in his cross examination that during the incident,