appellant-bank at its aforementioned branch for the offences punishable under Sections 34, 37, 120B, 201, 207, 217, 406, 409, 420 and 462 of the IPC at the Gandhi Maidan Police Station, Patna. 3.12 Aggrieved by the registration of the FIR, the appellant-bank preferred a Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case thereby invoking the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19735 for 5 Hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ 7the quashing of the FIR. The High Court vide the impugned order dismissed the writ petition finding it to be devoid of merit. 3.13 Being aggrieved thereby, the present appeal. 4. We have heard Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Manish Kumar, learned Advocate-on-Record appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. Venkataraman Chandrashekhara Bharathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5. 5. Shri Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Counsel submits that