a second Admonition order was passed against the appellant dated 18.01.2011. He appealed to respondent No. 2 and even this was rejected on 28.04.2011. The representation to the Chief of Air Staff for reconsideration of order dated 06.01.2011 which was also rejected on the ground of it being repetitive in nature. 6. Being aggrieved, the appellant approached the Armed Forces Tribunal by filing an Original Application. After hearing the appellant and the respondents and having gone through the materials and records before it, the Tribunal set aside the punishment of ‘Admonition’ passed against the appellant vide order dated 18.01.2011. It is important to extract the conclusion of the Tribunal, the relevant part of the order is extracted as follows: “11. Before proceeding further we may recall that the punishment awarded to the petitioner is of 'admonition'. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that on date, the petitioner has retired from service and any further indulgence would