1 CORRECTED 2024 INSC 773 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8315 – 8316 OF 2014 RENJITH K.G. & OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SHEEBA ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T R.MAHADEVAN, J. Heard Mr. Rajeev Mishra and Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Jayant Muth Raj, learned senior counsel and Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, learned counsel for the Respondent. 2. These Civil Appeals are preferred against the judgment and order dated 11.11.2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam1 in E.F.A Nos.6 and 7 of 1998, whereby, the High Court allowed the said appeals and remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh consideration. 3. Succinctly stated facts are that the appellants are the legal representatives of the original plaintiff / decree holder viz., Padmakshy (deceased), who had filed a suit in O.S.No.38 of 1956 before the Sub Court, Parur, for partition and separate possession of her share in the