learned senior counsel for the respondent. The submissions made, are recorded briefly as under:- A. Appellant (i) It was submitted that Clause 4 of the Agreement provides that a license was terminable immediately on (a) the termination of the Agreement; (b) breach of any of the terms thereof which are described in Clause 58; 4 (2012) 2 SCC 1 4(ii) The tests conducted by the Agency as also the officials of the appellant(s) found the respondent to be in breach of Clause 58(h), (i), (m); (iii) The appellant(s) found the respondent to have violated in total, five clauses of the Agreement – Clauses 26, 27, 44, 58(i) and (m) and as such the same was terminated; (iv) It was contended that the Agency had the authority to conduct the tests in question as Clause 2.2.2.3 of Marketing Discipline Guidelines5 dated 1st August 2005 issued by the Government of India, provides that apart from oil company officials, mobile labs and ‘agencies authorized by oil companies’ were permitted to draw samples.