is contrary to the Code. They are of opinion that in the present case the compromises can and should be enforced in these execution proceedings.” 14. In a case where parties compromise after the decree in a case has been passed, the effect of the compromise on the executability of the 26 (2000) 7 SCC 240 20-SLP(C) 9202-9204 OF 2016decree depends upon the intention of the parties, which is a mixed question of law and fact and has to be determined by the executing court on an application under Section 47 CPC on interpretation of the decree and the compromise in the light of the facts and circumstances of each case. If on such determination it is gathered that the intention of the parties is to extinguish the decree and either the decree-holder or the judgment-debtor got the compromise recorded under Rule 2 of Order 21 CPC by the court whose duty it is to execute the decree, the execution of the decree cannot be proceeded with by the executing court. But if the intention of the parties