as having been7 acquired by their father Ghafoor. They, however, admitted half share claim of Zahoor Ahmed in respect of Khata No. 99 while denying the claim to the remaining extent of half. Plot No. 115 of Khata No. 100 was wholly claimed by the respondents denying the claim of Zahoor to the extent of half share in the said land. 11.4. Consolidation Officer upon consideration of the pleadings of the parties in dispute had framed the following issues: (i) Whether respondents were entitled to 11/12 share of Khata No. 98? (ii) Whether Zahoor Ahmed was entitled to half share of Khata No. 98? (iii) What was the share of the parties in respect of Khata No. 98? (iv) Whether Zahoor Ahmed was co-tenant of Khata No. 99 as claimed? (v) Whether the respondents were recorded as the sole owner of the land covered by Khata No. 99? (vi) Whether Sami Ullah and Badlu i.e. the respondents were entitled to 11/12 share in respect of plot Nos. 31, 94, 95, 96, 97 and 99 etc. as claimed? (vii) Whether plot