the subject suit was pending since 7th November 2019, there was no occasion for the learned trial court to have considered the application filed by a stranger subsequently on 12th 6October 2021. 7. Shri Rohatgi further submitted that, as a matter of fact, the subject suit itself is a frivolous one. The suit land belonged to the predecessors of the appellants and it was acquired by the State and the compensation duly received by the appellants. The proceedings for enhancement are also pending before the High Court. It is submitted that entertaining the application at the instance of a stranger for condonation of delay in filing an application for restoration of a frivolous suit is nothing else but a travesty of justice. It is submitted that, for the same reasons, the judgment of the High Court is also not sustainable. 8. Shri Sundaram, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the contrary, submitted that respondent No.1 has accrued a right in the lis on account