by the Trial Court was challenged by the appellants before the High Court. Initially, on a wrong premise the High Court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the Trial Court. However, there being error apparent on the record, the Review Application filed by the respondents was allowed and after recalling the earlier order passed in the Revision Petition, the High Court dismissed the same. 5.3 There is no error in the order passed by the High Court. Even if the time granted by the court for deposit of the amount can be extended but there has to be sufficient reason for the same. In the case Page 7 of 17in hand, there is no reason, what to talk about sufficient reason. There was no fault of the Trial Court as the order for deposit was passed on the same line as was prayed for by the appellants. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. 7. The respondents purchased the property in dispute from Jai Singh, Jai Kishan, Randhir and