before the High Court. 6. By the impugned judgement and order, the High Court affirmed the reference made by the Trial Court and confirmed the death penalty and sentences awarded by the Trial Court under Sections 302, 316 and 364 IPC. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned judgement and order passed by the High 4Court in confirming the reference made by the Trial Court, the appellant has preferred the present appeal. SUBMISSIONS 7. Learned Senior Counsel, Dr. Aditya Sondhi appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the case, both the Trial Court and the High Court have erred in convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 316 and 364 IPC. 7.1 It is further submitted that the motive for killing the deceased is not proved. It is submitted that the PW1's statement that appellant was angry with the deceased Pramila as she got married out of caste, is a vague statement and without basis. It is further