The deficit of Rs 100 was a very small fraction of the total payable amount of Rs 33,682 which was paid very much within the fixed time, and there was no reason, except for the mistake, as to why he would not have paid this Rs 100 also within time. The appellants' application with the challan annexed was allowed by Page 13 of 17court officials without pointing out the mistake. The amount was deposited and even possession of the property was delivered to the appellant. The Senior Subordinate Judge allowed the application made by appellant in exercise of the discretion vested in him apparently on the view that sufficient cause had been out for non-deposit of Rs 100. This order, however, as seen above, was set aside by the High Court in a civil revision under Section 115 CPC. xx xx xx 25. In this view of the matter there seems to be no manner of doubt that the Senior Subordinate Judge had jurisdiction to extend the time under Section 148 CPC on sufficient cause being made out. The first