include the prayer to quash the cognizance order. 9. The High Court vide impugned order quashed the order of cognizance and all further proceedings in the case concerned while leaving it open to the original complainant to take recourse to civil remedies. Reasoning of the High Court 10. The High Court reasoned thus: a. There is no allegation of entrustment in the FIR, therefore, offence of criminal breach of trust, punishable under Section 406 IPC6, is not made out. 6 The Indian Penal Code, 1860 Page 4 of 11b. Admittedly, one month rent was paid, therefore, dishonest intention from the very beginning was not there. The application is only for recovery of rent, which can be realised by taking recourse to appropriate civil proceeding. Hence, no offence punishable under Section 420 IPC is made out. 11. Aggrieved by the order of the High Court, original complainant is before us. 12. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the materials on record. Submissions on