Court with the direction to first decide the application under section 319 CrPC and thereafter proceed with the sessions trial expeditiously. 14. The judgment in the case of Hardeep Singh (supra) does not provide that it is mandatory to decide the application under section 319 CrPC before conducting cross-examination and only on the basis of examination-in-chief. It merely clarifies that even examination-in-chief is part of SLP(Crl.) No.12292 of 2022 Page 9 of 14evidence and record and thus can be relied upon to decide an application under section 319 CrPC. 15. The judgment does not take away the discretion of the Trial Court to wait for the cross- examination to take place before deciding the application under section 319 CrPC. It merely provides that consideration of such an application should not be a mini trial. It is for the Trial Court to decide whether the application should be decided without waiting for the cross- examination to take place or to wait for it. The same would