daughter Ms. xxx in a fixed deposit with UCO Bank, Sabhawala Branch by the first respondent- husband which is not disputed by the petitioner, though the said settlement is seriously disputed by the petitioner on the ground that she is not a signatory. Having regard to the fact that petitioner is also gainfully employed in a Government school and earning a reasonable income and keeping in mind the financial capability of the first respondent-husband to take care of the interest of the daughter, we are of the considered view that ends of the justice would meet if the first respondent is directed to pay a permanent 4alimony of Rs.13,00,000/- in addition to the amount of Rs. 7,00,000/- already deposited in a fixed deposit, as it would take care of the financial interest of the minor daughter. Thus, by securing the interest of the minor daughter of the petitioner and first respondent, the petition HMA No.428 of 2023 titled “Sh. Chaman Singh Vs. Smt. Sapna Negi and another” pending before