on its own is a notice to the purchaser that he is bound by a decree that may be entered in the pending suit. Given that the property was transferred in the name of the objector by his father, Mukand Singh during the pendecy of the suit, he would be bound by the decree. (v) The objector ought to have raised all objections before the Civil Court by filing an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree against his father and predecessor-in-interest, Mukand Singh and not by filing objections to the execution. 8. Aggrieved by allowing the appeal, the High Court was approached under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The appellant’s revision petition was dismissed observing that- (i) The objections raised under Order XXI Rule 58 read with Order XXI Rule 97 read with Section 47 of the C.P.C. have to be rejected at the threshold since the latter deals with all issues relating to the subject of execution and cannot adjudicate on individual rights of the persons who are not