actions, keeping in view the high discipline and dignity of Airforce. However, the manner in which respondent No. 7 conducted himself was not appreciated. While deprecating the conduct of respondent No. 7 the Tribunal also came to the conclusion that the appellant was subjected to harassment and humiliation giving an impression of vindictiveness at the instance of the concerned officers. It is for this reason the Tribunal had no hesitation in setting aside the punishment. The Tribunal set aside the order of Admonition dt. 18.01.2011. It also set aside the order dated 28.04.2011, whereby the appellant’s statutory appeal had been dismissed. Lastly, the Tribunal also set aside the order dated 06.01.2010, wherein the Air Force Commander had rejected the appellant’s representation. Thus, the decision and the findings of the Tribunal have attained finality. 76.2 However, for reason that the Tribunal rejected the prayer for compensation, the present appeal filed by the appellant. We have