not bar the further execution of the decree in pursuance of fresh execution petitions filed in accordance with law — see Lakshmibai Anant Kondkar v. Rayji Bhikaji Kondkar [XXXI, BLR 400] . Even the dismissal for default of objections raised under Section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code does not operate as res judicata when the same objections are raised again in the course of the execution—see Bahir Das Pal v. Girish Chandra Pal [AIR 1923 Cal 287] ; Bhagwati Prasad Sah v. Radha Kishan Sah [AIR 1950 Pat 354] ; Jethmal v. Mst. Sakina [AIR 1961 Raj 59] ; Bisvavannath Kundu v. Smt Subala Dassi [AIR 1962 Cal 272] . We do not think that the decision in Ramnarain v. Basudeo [ILR XXV Pat 595] on which the learned counsel for the appellant placed great deal of reliance is correctly decided. Hence, we agree with the High Court that the plea of res judicata advanced by the appellant is unsustainable.” A judgment of far more recent vintage reiterates this position. See Bhagyoday Coop. Bank Ltd. v.