the learned counsel for the appellant the said indisputable facts obtained from the materials on record would reveal that the appellant had not even had opportunity to interact with the deceased much less to harass or to show cruelty to her. The learned counsel would further contend that the said circumstances and the conspicuous absence of specific accusation and lack of any specific evidence against the appellant would reveal that the implication of the appellant in the case is because of the unwholesome attitude over implication, which was deprecated by this Court. Furthermore, it is submitted that the implication of accused Nos.5 and 4, who are respectively another sister-in-law and husband of the deceased and their acquittal would fortify the factum over implication. In short, it is the contention that during the alleged period of torture for dowry of Rs. 5 lakhs, which is the main alleged cruelty, the appellant was not even a relative of the first accused and his family, to fall