could not be applied together given that the method of assailing the orders passed therein are different and cannot co-exist. Whilst looking at it purely from a procedural point of view, this may have some merit; however, as has been long established, procedural irregularity cannot defeat substantive rights or cannot subvert substantive justice. Since the objector or his father already had a decree in their favour, fruits thereof cannot be denied to them by virtue of the fact that while attempting to protect their rights in a subsequent suit which would have affected their enjoyment of such property, the Sections or Orders under which they sought such protection, were incorrect. 25-SLP(C) 9202-9204 OF 201619. This Court cannot help but be reminded of the famous saying that procedure is the handmaiden of justice. This Court in Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal v. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon27 : “5. …. Rules of procedure are intended to be a handmaid to the administration of