In these circumstances, the appellants are before this Court questioning the impugned judgment and order of the High Court. 8. We have heard Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.4106/2021 Page 6 of 38appellants, and Mr. Anand Shankar, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent. Submissions on behalf of the appellants 9. Ms. Bhati, learned counsel for the appellants, inter alia, submitted: (i) The only ground pressed by the original petitioner was that the punishment of compulsory retirement is not imposable as it is not provided for in Section 11 of the CRPF Act, which is nothing but misconceived; (ii) The High Court while accepting the above ground failed to consider: (a) Section 116 of the CRPF Act is expressly made subject to any rules made under the 6 11. Minor punishments— (1) The Commandant or any other authority or officer as may be prescribed, may, subject to any rules made under this Act, award in lieu of,