13. From the record, it is revealed that the petitioner was assured in writing on two occasions that the punishment entry will be expunged. Despite that, the respondent chose to proceed afresh. It gives an indication of vindictiveness and perhaps it was instigated by the officer. 14. For reasons mentioned hereinabove, we are of the considered view that the Summary of Evidence and punishment of 'admonition" awarded to the applicant deserve to be set aside. 15. Accordingly, punishment of 'admonition' dated 18.01.2011 awarded to the petitioner is set aside. Impugned order dated 28.04.2011 (Annexure-27 to the petition), and order dated 06.01.2010 (Annexure-25 to the petition) are also set side. Consequences to follow. So far as prayer of the petitioner for directing Sqn Ldr H.V. Pandey, respondent no.7 to pay compensation to the petitioner is concerned, we find that the petitioner has not been able to make out a case, hence rejected. 16. T.A is disposed of accordingly.” 66.1 It is