there is no challenge by the insurance company. 14.3 However, the Tribunal and the High Court both have failed to consider the fact that the appellant is also entitled for enhancement on account of future prospects. Hence, in line with the law laid down in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Page 10 of 14Others10, given the age of appellant was 32 years at the time of accident, he is entitled to 40% future prospects. 15. As far as award of amount on account of medical expenditure is concerned, we do not find any case to be made out for further enhancement, as the amount awarded is in tune with the bills placed by the appellant on record. 16. Coming to the compensation under the head of attendant, Tribunal awarded a meagre sum of ₹10,000/-. While this amount may have been awarded considering the cost of attendant charges incurred during the period of appellant’s treatment, as he remained admitted in hospital for 25 days and had to undergo surgery post initial