discussion, the matter is remanded to the First Appellate Court to take a decision on the objections of the appellant afresh, on merits. It stands clarified that this Court has not expressed any view on the facts of the case. Considering the fact that this matter has been doing the rounds of various Court halls for more than two decades, we request the concerned Court to take all steps necessary for expeditious disposal. After all it was as far back as 1872 that the Privy Council in General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga v. Coomar Ramaput Sing29 lamented that the problems of the litigant in India, begin once he has obtained the decree. In Messer Griesheim GmbH v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt Ltd.30 a hundred and fifty years later this Court observed that ‘there has been no improvement and still the decree holder faces the same problem what was being faced in the past.’ When a litigant approaches the Court, what he is interested in getting is not the imprimatur of the Court on his right over a