upheld the conviction by merely noticing the details of the exhibits, the prosecution witnesses and the defence witnesses in the matter. The petitioners cannot be said to be the persons involved in the cheating. They had not availed any undue benefit. Grant of loans by the banks is a normal practice. Security was furnished when overdraft facility was granted. Immediately when the petitioners were pointed out that the amount is to be returned back, they deposited the entire amount. No case of cheating was made out as Page 4 of 7the bank did not suffer any loss. It was a normal business transaction. In support of the arguments, reliance was placed upon the judgment of this court in A.T. Mydeen and Another vs. Assistant Commissioner, Customs Department3. 8. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, we do not find that any case is made out for grant of leave to appeal. As already noticed above it is a case where bank officers and the private businessmen, two of whom are