Learned counsel urged that Ram Prakash(PW-1) being the father of the deceased did not sign any of the documents prepared at the spot. He admitted in his cross examination that during the incident, he used to stay in Firozabad in a rented accommodation which was about 56-57 kms away from his village Gokulpur where the alleged incident took place. The witness also admitted that the people who registered the report informed him that his name was also mentioned as a witness. Learned counsel submitted that the conjoint reading of these admissions as appearing in the evidence of Ram Prakash(PW-1) would make it clear that he was not present at the spot and was created to be an eye witness at a subsequent point of time. 17. It was contended that the allegation made by the witnesses that the accused appellant fired at Sanju while standing beside 10accused Omkar is nothing but a piece of fabrication made owing to prior enmity. 18. It was further submitted that as per Ram Prakash(PW-1) and Ram