on such re-test as well. This is evident from the Analysis Report3. 1 ‘Agreement’ 2 ‘Agency’ 3 At page 164 of the paper book 23.6 The authority of the Agency to conduct such collection of samples was questioned by the respondent at the Regional Office of the appellant(s). However, it is alleged that without considering the same Marker Test was conducted on such samples. 3.7 Being aggrieved by the order of suspension of supply, the writ petition which eventually gave rise to the present proceedings was filed. 4. In allowing the writ petition filed on behalf of the present respondent, the Learned Single Judge observed as under:- “…it appears that there are specific provisions under Clause 7 of the aforesaid order of 2005 wherein the Gazetted Officer of both the Central Government and the State Government and also the police officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or the authorized officer of the Company itself duly authorized, can take sample and get it tested. But