of the prosecution at all and that apart he had stated so, for the first time only in the Court. In that regard he was confronted with his previous statement - Ext.P22. Besides the same, there is nothing in the opinion of PW- 1, the Doctor who conducted autopsy on the body of Naseem Khan, which would indicate that the head injury was caused on account of the deceased being thrown on the stone boulder. When that be the nature of evidence of PW-17, it can only be held that the finding of the trial Court that the evidence of PW-17 would not fetch any benefit for the accused cannot be sustained. Hence, according to us, the High Court held his evidence unreliable correctly. 28. In the aforesaid circumstances the question is with respect to the reliability on the oral testimonies of PW-5 Page 17 of 21 Criminal Appeal No. 2129 of 2014and PW-9 who are the younger brothers of deceased Naseem Khan. As noticed hereinbefore, their oral testimonies were held as reliable by the trial Court and at