made out. 11. Aggrieved by the order of the High Court, original complainant is before us. 12. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the materials on record. Submissions on behalf of Appellant 13. On behalf of the appellant, it was submitted: a. The FIR did disclose that after making payment of one month rent, no rent was paid despite false assurances. In such circumstances, a case for investigation was made out. b. The High Court did not consider the materials collected during investigation which resulted in filing of charge sheet. As charge sheet was submitted, the High Court ought to have considered the materials collected during Page 5 of 11investigation before concluding whether offence has been committed or not. c. The High Court failed to consider that whereabouts of the Truck was not known. Otherwise also, since the Truck was not returned, it could be taken that it has been misappropriated or disposed of by the accused in violation of the agreement,