High Court opined that the appellant had suffered 100% functional disability as against 60% assessed by the Tribunal because even if the disability from persistent 8 (2009) 6 SCC 121, [2009] 5 SCR 1098, 2009 INSC 506 9 MACA No.256 of 2019 by the appellant and MACA No.350 of 2021 by the Insurance Company Page 6 of 14neurocognitive is 60%, such disability entails 100% loss of earning capacity. The High Court modified the Award of the Tribunal and enhanced the amount of compensation from ₹20,60,385/- to ₹30,99,873/-. Head Compensation (in ₹) Loss of future income 25,98,720/- (₹ 1,62,420 x 16 x 100% disability) Medical Expenditure 3,51,153/- Mental agony and suffering 50,000/- Future medical expenses 1,00,000/- Total 30,99,873/- along with interest @ 6% per annum 10 In the present SLP, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that while assessing the compensation, the Tribunal as well as the High Court have failed to appreciate that the income claimed by appellant was ₹22,000/- per