assuming that the land was required for any public purpose as indicated in the resumption order, no such material was brought on record to show that there was any specific purpose for which the land was required by the Government. Further reliance was placed on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa in the matter of Shankarlal Verma and Others v Smt. Uma Sahu and Others [1992 SCC Online Ori 239] to contend that lease deed could only be determined in the case of requirement of the land for a public purpose or breach of the conditions of the lease. It was further urged that the lease deed cannot be cancelled when the lease deed does not provide that upon expiry of the term, the lease shall stand 14determined and by relying upon the judgment of the First Appellate court, he has sought for upholding of the same 17.6 It is urged that none of the terms of the lease having been violated by the lessee, the lease ought not to have been determined by the State and on the above