Authority, while reconsidering the matter will also consider other grounds raised herein. For the setting aside of the order vide Annexure 5 and as the matter is relegated back to the authority, the position of the petitioner before passing of the final order shall be restored and for interference of this court with the order vide Annexures 5 and 7 release of the arrears, if any, involving the petitioner shall be dependent on the ultimate outcome involving fresh disposal of the proceeding by the Disciplinary Authority in terms of the directions of the apex court in paragraph 24 of the judgement in the case of Ranjit Singh versus Union of India as reported in (2006) 4 SCC 153.” 5. Aggrieved with the order of the learned Single Judge, the appellants preferred writ appeal (supra) 4 CRPF Act Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No.4106/2021 Page 3 of 38before the Division Bench of the High Court, inter alia, on the following grounds: (i) The charges against the respondent were found proved in the