19738 by imposing onerous conditions that goes beyond ensuring the presence of the accused during investigation and trial. 8. It was further submitted that the High Court's order to hand over the keys of the disputed property to the complainant has prejudiced the ongoing Civil Suit9 between the State of Madhya Pradesh and the complainant, his wife, and Mahant Pushpraj 8 Hereinafter being referred to as the ‘CrPC’ 9 RCSA No. 2019 of 2024, for declaration and permanent injunction against the complainant [Ghanshyam Lashkari], his wife [Durga Lashkari] and Mahant Pushparaj seeking cancellation of a deed dated 21.07.2011.titled “Government of Madhya Pradesh through Collector, Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh v. Mrs. Durga Lashkari and Ors.”. 9. Learned standing counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh affirmed that a Civil Suit10 is pending between the State and the complainant, his wife, and Mahant Pushpraj in which the State has sought a declaration of title and permanent injunction. As per the