paid, municipal taxes were not paid, the structures were in a dilapidated condition and outsiders were in possession of the property which were in blatant violation of the terms of the lease. As such the lease was determined and possession of the lessee was declared as illegal under clause 19 of the Manual of 2019 due to violation of the terms and conditions of the lease and possession of leased land was resumed. 16.9 It is contended that High Court had not considered the notice of the Collector dated 28/08/1975 and the reply thereto furnished by one of the lessees on 06/10/1975. 1216.10 It is contended that no document was tendered before the Trial Court to demonstrate that a receiver had been appointed by the High Court in Suit No.1377/1965 and application had been filed by the receiver for renewal of the lease. On the above grounds, the appellant sought for allowing the appeal. CONTENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS 17. It is contended that the application for renewal of the