text: Richard, according to Marlene, she needs to put in an IT request to change 
  the National Fuel contracts from non-pathed to pathed.  Does this sound 
  correct to you?
  
  Please let me know.
  chris
  ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:28 
  PM ---------------------------
     
  	
  	
  	From:  Beverly Beaty                           05/03/2000 02:14 PM
  	
  
  To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
  cc:  
  Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type
  
  Per our conversation....
  
  Bev
  ---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 02:14 
  PM ---------------------------
     
  	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
  	
  	From:  Donna Greif                           04/21/2000 12:44 PM
  	
  
  To: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
  cc: Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT 
  Subject: Re: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type  
  
  Richard,
  
  I trust you're on top of this.....let me know if you'd like my help!
  
  Thanks!
  
  dg
  
  
  
  
  From: Diane E Niestrath on 04/19/2000 06:23 PM
  To: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
  cc: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT 
  Subject: National Fuel Says They Are Pathed Model Type
  
  DG & RP,
  
  National Fuel says they are 100% using the GISB pathed model type.  Our Unify 
  noms are non-pathed.
  
  1) Can you look at the National Fuel invoice and verify that the accounting 
  area will still work effortlessly if we change Unify to pathed.
  2) If we elect to change Unify's model type to pathed, let's do it just like 
  we did Southern Natural.  And, I would like this done for May 1 noms in 
  production and have the Scheduler (Beverly?) path in this new model type 
  manner.  We are suppose to be getting scheduled quantities in production 
  starting tomorrow, unless ECOM prevents it, so you'll be able to see what the 
  pipe expects in the pathed model type.
  3) If we elect to NOT change Unify's model type to pathed, I guess we can't 
  ever edi this pipe unless I can figure out some clever way to join up the 
  noms.
  
  Beverly, Do you think it would be a problem to start entering the upstream 
  k's and downstream k's when you path in Unify.  The pipe told me this is 
  mandatory data unless the nom is involved in the Appalachian area.  If it is 
  a problem, don't do, I don't want to slow you down since you have to enter 
  the data twice today.  If and when we do edi, we'll need the up/down k's 
  entered at that time.
  
  Thanks, Diane
  x3-9931
  
  ==============================================================================
  =======================
  Email excerpt between Diane (in magenta) and Chris Zachary in IT Dptmt at 
  National Fuel Gas Supply Corp (in blue) ===>
  
  >> 3) Please confirm that your model type is always "P" pathed from noms all 
  the
  >> way down to invoices.
  
      Our model type is always "P" for pathed.