text:                    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
  
                                         Docket No. 42894
  
  STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 653
                                                  )
         Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: October 6, 2015
                                                  )
  v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
                                                  )
  JESSEY JOY GILPIN, JR.,                         )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
                                                  )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
         Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
                                                  )
  
         Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
         County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell, District Judge.
  
         Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of life, with twenty years
         determinate, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, affirmed.
  
         Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy
         Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
  
         Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
         General, Boise, for respondent.
                   ________________________________________________
  
                        Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
                                   and HUSKEY, Judge
                    ________________________________________________
  
  PER CURIAM
         Jessey Joy Gilpin, Jr., pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. Idaho
  Code § 18-1508. The district court sentenced Gilpin to a unified term of life with twenty years
  determinate. Gilpin appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an
  excessive sentence.
         Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
  factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
  need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
  15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
  
                                                  1
  1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
  the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
  722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
  in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
         Therefore, Gilpin’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
  
  
  
  
                                                     2
  