'I was one of about a dozen (senators) who voted against the Bridge to Nowhere.
Republican Senate candidate George Allen says he gave a thumbs down to a project that became a symbol of federal waste. 'I was one of about a dozen (senators) who voted against the Bridge to Nowhere,' Allen said in a Dec. 7 debate with Tim Kaine, his expected Democratic rival for the senate seat. Allen, who served in the senate from 2001-2007, was referring to a federal plan to build a $225 million bridge connecting the city of Ketchikan, Alaska, with the Island of Gravina, which has 50 residents. The plan became a lightning rod for critics who said congressional earmarking -- the set aside of federal money for pet projects -- had run amok. Funding for the bridge was included in a $286.5 billion highway and transportation bill in 2005. The Senate passed the legislation on July 29, 2005, by a vote of 91-4. Jamie Radtke, who is challenging Allen for the GOP nomination for the Senate seat, has charged that Allen supported the bridge because he voted for the omnibus highway bill. We're dismissive of the charge, because funding for the Alaska bridge came to less than one-tenth of one percent of the expenses in the bill. PolitiFact examined a similar charge that President Barack Obama supported the Bridge to Nowhere because, like Allen, he voted in favor of the overall highway bill that contained the bridge funding. The claim -- made by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, was rated Mostly False. But how does Allen justify his assertion that he actually voted against the bridge? Dan Allen, a senior advisor to the Allen campaign, cited the former senator's vote on an amendment in a later transportation appropriations bill that called for stripping federal funding from the Bridge to Nowhere project. That amendment, sponsored by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, sought to redirect part of the funding for the Ketchikan-Gravina Island bridge funding to a project to rebuild the Twin Spans Bridge between New Orleans and Slidell, La., which had been damaged during Hurricane Katrina. That amendment failed by a vote of 82-15. Allen was indeed one of the 15 senators who voted in favor of killing the funding for the Bridge to Nowhere. Steve Ellis, the vice president of the Taxpayers for Common Sense, said considering Allen's vote on the amendment, Allen's statement is accurate. 'It rings pretty true,' Ellis said. After the amendment's defeat, lawmakers hashing out differences between the House and Senate measure of the appropriations bill removed the earmark for the Bridge project and instead provided the money directly to the Alaska Department of Transportation to spend on whatever projects it saw fit. That funding still could have gone to Ketchikan-Gravina Island span, but ultimately the bridge was never built. Our Ruling Allen said he was one of a dozen senators who voted against the Bridge to Nowhere. When faced with a specific amendment to defund the bridge, Allen was one of a minority of senators who opted to kill the project. We rate his claim True.
Republican Senate candidate George Allen says he gave a thumbs down to a project that became a symbol of federal waste. 'I was one of about a dozen (senators) who voted against the Bridge to Nowhere,' Allen said in a Dec. 7 debate with Tim Kaine, his expected Democratic rival for the senate seat. Allen, who served in the senate from 2001-2007, was referring to a federal plan to build a $225 million bridge connecting the city of Ketchikan, Alaska, with the Island of Gravina, which has 50 residents. The plan became a lightning rod for critics who said congressional earmarking -- the set aside of federal money for pet projects -- had run amok. Funding for the bridge was included in a $286.5 billion highway and transportation bill in 2005. The Senate passed the legislation on July 29, 2005, by a vote of 91-4. Jamie Radtke, who is challenging Allen for the GOP nomination for the Senate seat, has charged that Allen supported the bridge because he voted for the omnibus highway bill. We're dismissive of the charge, because funding for the Alaska bridge came to less than one-tenth of one percent of the expenses in the bill. PolitiFact examined a similar charge that President Barack Obama supported the Bridge to Nowhere because, like Allen, he voted in favor of the overall highway bill that contained the bridge funding. The claim -- made by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, was rated Mostly False. But how does Allen justify his assertion that he actually voted against the bridge? Dan Allen, a senior advisor to the Allen campaign, cited the former senator's vote on an amendment in a later transportation appropriations bill that called for stripping federal funding from the Bridge to Nowhere project. That amendment, sponsored by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, sought to redirect part of the funding for the Ketchikan-Gravina Island bridge funding to a project to rebuild the Twin Spans Bridge between New Orleans and Slidell, La., which had been damaged during Hurricane Katrina. That amendment failed by a vote of 82-15. Allen was indeed one of the 15 senators who voted in favor of killing the funding for the Bridge to Nowhere. Steve Ellis, the vice president of the Taxpayers for Common Sense, said considering Allen's vote on the amendment, Allen's statement is accurate. 'It rings pretty true,' Ellis said. After the amendment's defeat, lawmakers hashing out differences between the House and Senate measure of the appropriations bill removed the earmark for the Bridge project and instead provided the money directly to the Alaska Department of Transportation to spend on whatever projects it saw fit. That funding still could have gone to Ketchikan-Gravina Island span, but ultimately the bridge was never built. Our Ruling Allen said he was one of a dozen senators who voted against the Bridge to Nowhere. When faced with a specific amendment to defund the bridge, Allen was one of a minority of senators who opted to kill the project. We rate his claim True. Featured Fact-check Jen Psaki stated on November 15, 2021 in a White House press briefing 'No economist out there is projecting that (the Build Back Better bill) will have a negative impact on inflation.' By Louis Jacobson • November 18, 2021