Topic: Evolution
Quote: That distinction may be irrelevant since they do say that no god that any religious person believes in exists. And that is what I was getting at originaly. Still I think that the idea that the existence of all religious gods can be ultimately refuted based on the logic you bring up is invalid.
Response: Here\xe2\x80\x99s the thing\xe2\x80\xa6 this is my thought process\xe2\x80\xa6 and probably the thought process of a lot of other agnostics and atheists. I\xe2\x80\x99m not expecting this to change the minds of any religious individuals out there (not do I even hope). This is simply what has caused me to adopt the position I hold today. \nI accept that possibly my logic is horribly flawed (but I don\xe2\x80\x99t think it is)\xe2\x80\xa6 but even if it were at the very worst I would just be as religious and dogmatic as religious folks. It\xe2\x80\x99s just that in my mind I prefer to have reasoning and logic behind my beliefs. For me it\xe2\x80\x99s better to have reasons and logic for beliefs. Going through this thought process is better for me because of who I am. Maybe some of my reasoning is flawed\xe2\x80\xa6 but I doubt ALL of it is flawed\xe2\x80\xa6 and as long as it\xe2\x80\x99s not all flawed then I am just that much farther from totally blind faith (which is better for me).
-1.66667