Topic: Evolution
Quote: Then you freely admit that you lied when you said this, and I quote: People like Arch are setting it as opposed to science and in that position it will be doomed to fail.\nAND\nArch is doing nothing but distorting the very thing he holds so dear, I mean, how is accurately quoting passages from the bible distorting it in any way? You do nothing but post drivel which makes no factual statements at all. And you call that debating?\nSo, we are debating creation, yet you don't consider quoting the bible, the single most important original proponent of the creation account and to you, it doesn't qualify as a source for what is being discussed here? You say this and expect to be taken seriously? \nReally? What book is that, because I have seen no quotes or links to any source of any info at all from you anywhere above on this page. So once again accipiter, what in the world are you referring to? You and the obvious child oughta get along fine since you both offer nothing more substantial than personal attacks which are based on your own warped beliefs and corrupted interpretations of that which you disagree with. \nHere's my original post again, I challenge you to explain how these alleged stone age sheep herders whom you scoff at and mock described contemporary living creatures which paleontologists today identify as dinosaurs, from skeletal remains?
Response: They didn't. Simple as that.\nNow, let's look at the post you keep quoting (although it has already been addressed by others).\nFirst one, Job 40: 15-24, seems to describe a Hippo (possibly an elephant).\nAs to the second one, please show me a fire breathing dinosaur and you'll be in business with your claim that they described dinosaurs. Otherwise, there'll be quite a bit of mocking and scoffing at their claim of fire-breathing creatures.\nAside from the fire breathing thing, it sort of sounds like the Nile Crocodile or something of the sort.
0.166667