Have "convinceme" pro choice debaters reasoned away their human rights?   stance: pro choice reasoning on "convince me" leaves a basis for human rights in grave doubt:
This is what I have learned from the "convinceme" pro choice debates.
Living cells in a mothers womb, though possessing Human DNA that is distinct from the mothers, is not human life.
The fact that the unborn have a heartbeat AND a distinct DNA inside the womb does not mean it is human life.
The fact that an unborn may have a distinct blood type from the mother, does have a distinct DNA, the DNA is Human and the cells are all replicating and living...Does not equal human life
recognizable human hands, feet, eyes, facial features, reproductive organs and formed human organs in the unborn are not human life.
i wonder...
If none of those things are human life...
What makes anyone reading this human?
(take a pass on sentient being and souls and self awareness and all the other quasi mystic nonesense that science and the law don't concern themselves with)
We have reasoned ourselves away while rationalizing the atrocity known as abortion.