In an immediate suit by Finance Company against Sartorial for total breach, which of the following would be useful in Sartorial's defense?
Sartorial ceased in good faith to have any further requirements for elasticized fabric
Stretch's rights under its agreement with Sartorial were personal and therefore nonassignable.
Stretch's "assignment of the contract" to Finance Company to secure a loan would normally be interpreted as a delegation of Stretch's duties under the contract as well as an assignment of its rights; and its duties, owed to Sartorial, were personal and therefore nondelegable. 
The original contract between Sartorial and Stretch was unenforceable by either party for want of a legally sufficient consideration for Stretch's promise to supply Sartorial's requirements of the elasticized fabric.