""If Doe is prosecuted under the "Capitol steps" statute and defends on constitutional grounds, which of the following best describes the proper burden of proof?
The state would have to prove that it had a compelling need for this statute and that there were no less restrictive means by which it could satisfy that need
Doe would have to prove that the state did not have a rational basis for enacting this statute.
Doe would have to prove that the state did not have a compelling need for this statute or that it had less restrictive means by which it could satisfy that need.
The state would have to prove that it had a rational basis for enacting this statute.