Which of the following accurately states the legal effect of the covenant not to assign the contract?
Stretch's assignment was a breach of its contract with Sartorial but was 38 nevertheless effective to transfer to Finance Company Stretch's rights against Sartorial.
By normal interpretation, a covenant against assignment in a sale-of-goods agreement applies to only the buyer, not the seller
The covenant made the assignment to Finance Company ineffective.
The covenant had no legal effect.