If Crane asserts a claim against Abco based on strict liability in tort, which of the following will be a decisive question in determining whether Crane will prevail?
Can liability be imposed on Abco without showing that its pills were used by Crane's father
Does the res ipsa loquitur doctrine apply?
Can liability be imposed on Abco without proof that Abco knew that the drug had an undesirable side effect?
Is Abco relieved of liability by the FDA approval of the drug?