It has been assumed that he allowed a single temple for his cult in Britain, following his conquest there. The temple is certain – it was sited at Camulodunum (modern Colchester), the main "colonia" in the province, and was a focus of British wrath during the Boudiccan revolt of 60 AD. But cult to the living Claudius there is very unlikely: he had already refused Alexandrine cult honours as "vulgar" and impious and cult to living emperors was associated with "arae" (altars), not temples. The British worship offered him as a living "divus" is probably no more than a cruel literary judgment on his worth as emperor. Despite his evident respect for Republican norms he was not taken seriously by his own class, and in Seneca's fawning Neronian fiction, the Roman gods cannot take him seriously as a "divus" – the wild British might be more gullible. In reality, they proved resentful enough to rebel, though probably less against the Claudian "divus" than against brutal abuses and the financial burden represented by its temple.