Dr Paul Monk, an Australian former senior intelligence analyst and author of the argument maps used in the Institute of World Politics panel, provides a counterpoint to the Authorized History. He believes Andrew dismisses Wright's claims almost "ad hominem" but fails to address the specific points made by Pincher in his final (2009) book on the subject. He describes Andrew's description of Hollis's background as - in light of the allegations made against him - insouciant. Monk feels that as he is arguing that Hollis is innocent, Andrew should have given Hollis the vetting he did not receive when he entered MI5 (Particularly in light of Hollis's relationships with "confirmed" Soviet assets, regardless of whether he was one of them). Monk discusses at length the flaws of the book, for example, the notion that Leo Long was definitely "ELLI" (this is supposedly disproved by KGB archives - Long is thought to be "RALPH", rather - and solely supported by the later questioned testimony of Gordievsky). He surmises with the following"Christopher Andrew treads a well-worn path in failing utterly to address that case, much less refute it once and for all."In the 2009 ITV programme, "Inside MI5: The Real Spooks", Oleg Gordievsky recounted how he saw the head of the British section of the KGB, expressing surprise at the allegations that he read in a British newspaper about Hollis being a KGB agent, saying "Why is it they are speaking about Roger Hollis, such nonsense, can't understand it, it must be some special English trick directed against us."