To construct the ergative case pronouns, the ergative postposition ne" is suffixed to the nominative case forms rather than the oblique case forms for the personal pronouns, while the "demonstrative", "relative", and "interrogative" pronouns have unique ergative oblique case forms to which ne gets suffixed. So, rather than *"mujh-ne" and *"tujh-ne", it's ma͠i-ne and tū-ne, and for the non-personal pronouns (e.g., for demonstrative plural) it's inhõ-ne and "unhõ-ne." The "1P" plural and the "2P" familiar pronouns also have an emphatic ergative case form which respectively are hamī̃ne and tumhī̃ne which are derived using the exclusive emphatic particle hī as ham + hī + ne and "tum + hī + ne." For the rest of the personal pronouns, the inclusive emphatic particle hī must come after the pronoun in ergative case and never between the pronoun and the postposition ne. So, rather than *"ma͠i-hī-ne", it's periphrastically constructed as "ma͠ine hī." As for the non-personal pronouns, both ways of constructing the emphatic forms are gramamtically valid. So, for e.g. the demonstrative proximal singular emphatic pronoun isīne and isne hī are synonymous. The emphatic forms for the relative pronouns are constructed periphrastically as well, but they instead use the inclusive emphatic particle "bhī"'." So, the emphatic form of the relative singular ergative pronoun jisne is jisne bhī meaning "whoever" and not *jis-bhī-ne, which not a valid construction.