She refrained from going further into the accusations directed against her, or defending her new opinion in light of the Empirical research method, but generally accused those who signed the petition of arguing "unscientifically". She accused them of representing the illusion of successful integration of Muslim migrants, despite the "actual state of affairs". Despite daily events which contradicted this view, the representatives of the academic majority opinion allegedly would rather criticize the bearer of bad news than their own views or their ""ideological concept of multiculturalism"". She intensified her reply, by accusing the ""critics from the well-equipped world of the publicly financed migration research"" of being ""responsible for the failure of the integration policy for 30 years"". The true purpose of their objection is ""anxiety about their research funds"".