In the first example, in the South, the part shows that the etymological origin is forgotten, and the word is written as pronounced as "olbareuda", but in the North, the first part is seen to come from "olt'a" and thus the whole word is written "olbarŭda" (pronounced the same as in the South). Conversely, in the second example, the South spelling catches the word as the combination of "beot" and "kkot", but in the North, this is no longer recognised and thus the word is written as pronounced as "pŏtkkot".