In "Quirin", Jackson ultimately believed it was a mistake for the Court to review military judgments in times of war and he solidified this position in his dissent in "Korematsu v. United States". In that case, he stated "in the very nature of things military decisions are not susceptible of intelligent judicial appraisal." His dissent in "Korematsu" expresses his belief that bringing those affected by military orders under the protection of the constitution would be a dangerous precedent and that the court should neither execute nor review such orders. He was afraid that the "emergency that justified the classification (in "Korematsu") would eventually be forgotten, leaving the constitutionality of the classification as the lesson of the case." Jackson believed the court would never be able to perform its duty if it joined the executive in making constitutional shortcuts.