Jurors Cooley, Bess, and Rubin-Jackson wrote in "A Rush to Judgement?" that Barry Scheck was the most persuasive attorney at the trial. However, Vincent Bugliosi, Darnel M. Hunt, Daniel M. Petrocelli, and defense witness Henry Lee all wrote that Scheck made many factually false claims about the physical evidence. Lee wrote in "Blood Evidence: How DNA is Revolutionizing the Way We Solve Crimes" (2003) that both of the defense's forensic DNA experts, Lee and Edward Blake, had rejected Scheck’s argument that the mistakes made during evidence collection rendered the results unreliable and his contamination claim. Hunt wrote in "O. J. Simpson Facts and Fictions: News Rituals in the Construction of Reality" that Scheck "floated ridiculous conspiracy theories to the jury". Jeffrey Toobin wrote in "The Run of His Life: The People v. O.J. Simpson" that "the most remarkable thing was that Scheck actually accomplished this goal...Schecks arguments presupposed a conspiracy so immense within the LAPD that, analyzed objectively, it seemed a practical impossibility but Scheck made his theories real for the jury and for that reason he was primarily responsible for that verdict."