This means that the choice of complement and in particular the choice of the preposition can also be affected: in English, the "particle" or the "prepositional phrase" (the "satellite") is where the path is expressed, with the use of a dynamic preposition: "(walk) into (the room)", "(fly) to (London)", whereas in French, it is the "verb" that normally expresses the path. A preposition like "à" ("to, at, in") is ambiguous between a static reading ("Je suis à Paris"/"I'm in Paris") and a dynamic reading ("Je vais à Paris"/"I'm going to Paris"). If the verb is dynamic and expresses directed motion (motion with an intrinsic direction), "à" can express movement ("Je vais à Paris"). If not, as is the case for instance with "voler" ("to fly"), which expresses manner of motion but not directed motion, "à" tends to receive a static and not a dynamic, interpretation: "je vole à Paris" would mean something like "I'm flying IN Paris", and not "I'm flying TO Paris". Using the same structure in French as directly translated from English can be doubly misleading, as the verb and the preposition are both unusual; "Je vais à" ("I'm going to") or "Je suis en route" ("I am on my way") "vers"/"pour Paris" ("towards/for Paris") are much clearer in meaning.