The term fundamental justice might have some meaning in Charter case law even outside section 7. In the 2003 Charter case "Doucet-Boudreau", some Supreme Court justices wished to narrow the scope of the remedial section 24 by citing "fundamental justice". In this case, a lower-court judge, after having found the claimants' section 23 rights were violated, used section 24 to demand that the government, while working to repair the infringement of the right, continue to report to him "after" his ruling. Some Supreme Court justices felt this was an unconstitutional breach of fundamental justice because the judicial order was not clear enough to the government. However, these justices formed the minority of the panel, and the earlier decision was upheld.