Further complications are introduced by the following variant. Suppose that we follow the same process as above, but instead of taking out marble 1 at "t" = 0, one takes out marble 2. And, at "t" = 0.5 one takes out marble 3, at "t" = 0.75 marble 4, etc. Then, one can use the same logic from above to show that while at "t" = 1, marble 1 is still in the jar, no other marbles can be left in the jar. Similarly, one can construct scenarios where in the end, 2 marbles are left, or 17 or, of course, infinitely many. But again this is paradoxical: given that in all these variations the same number of marbles are added or taken out at each step of the way, how can the end result differ?