In "Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump" (2017), Judge Wynn wrote a concurring opinion contending that President Trump's Travel Ban exceeded the President's authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act because it denied entry to a class of aliens on the basis of individious discrimination. Judge Wynn's opinion was grounded in the interpretive principle that absent a clear statement by Congress, courts should not construe a delegation of congressional power as authorizing the delegates to exercise that power in a manner that curtails or dilutes fundamental rights.