Another matter is the transfer of other legal rights normally granted by ownership. In 2011, a US District judge ruled that a woman who had purchased a stolen laptop could sue a device tracking company for invasion of privacy stemming from recording software installed on the laptop to facilitate its recovery after being stolen. This ruling demonstrated that "bona fide" purchasers are entitled to some rights by virtue of possession alone, or that "nemo dat" is superseded by the "bona fide" purchaser's right to privacy.