The term "homosexual transsexual" has attracted controversy. It has been criticized from a lexical standpoint by Benjamin, Bruce Bagemihl, and John Bancroft as being confusing (though supported "conceptually" by the former two), as well as insensitive to the gender identities of those whom it is intended to describe. The alternatives "androphilic" and "gynephilic" have been proposed by Milton Diamond as descriptors for sexual orientation that do not make assumptions about the sex or gender identity of the person being described. Terms such as "androphilia" and "gynephilia" are sometimes used instead of, or concurrently with, "homosexual", "heterosexual", or "non-homosexual" in current research, such as research which has used the Modified Androphilia Scale to assess the attraction to men of a given trans woman. S. J. Wahng contended in 2004 that the term "homosexual transsexual" is "archaic". Though the term "transsexuality" was removed as a mental disorder from the DSM-IV and was replaced with gender identity disorder as a diagnostic label, attraction to males, females, both, or neither was specified in the DSM IV-TR.