Beyond the master-servant context, however, courts have extended liability to those who profit from infringing activity when an enterprise has the right and ability to prevent the infringement. Under "Dreamland Ball Room v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co.", “owner of a dance hall at whose place copyrighted musical compositions are played in violation of the rights of the copyright holder is liable, if the playing be for the profit of the proprietor of the dance hall. And this is so even though the orchestra be employed under a contract that would ordinarily make it an independent contractor.” By contrast, courts did not extend liability to landlords who leased premises to a direct infringer for a fixed rental and did not participate directly in organizing or soliciting the infringing activity. For example, "Deutsch v. Arnold", "Fonovisa v. Cherry Auction" (extending liability to the operator of a swap meet who repeatedly leased booth space to concessionaires selling infringing tapes).