In "Escobedo v. Illinois" (1964), the Court held that the Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal suspects the right to speak to their counsel during police interrogations. "Escobedo" was limited to criminal suspects who had an attorney at the time of their arrest and requested to speak with that counsel. In the landmark case of "Miranda v. Arizona", Warren wrote the majority opinion, which established a right to counsel for every criminal suspect and required police to give criminal suspects what became known as a "Miranda warning" in which suspects are notified of their right to an attorney and their right to silence. Warren incorporated some suggestions from Brennan, but his holding in "Miranda" was most influenced by his past experiences as a district attorney. Unlike many of the other Warren Court decisions, including "Mapp" and "Gideon", "Miranda" created standards that went far beyond anything that had been established by any of the states. "Miranda" received a strong backlash from law enforcement and political leaders. Conservatives angrily denounced what they called the "handcuffing of the police."