In the 1960s, the Warren Court handed down several landmark rulings that significantly transformed criminal procedure, redistricting, and other areas of the law. Many of the Court's decisions incorporated the Bill of Rights, making the protections of the Bill of Rights apply to state and local governments. "Gideon v. Wainwright" (1963) established a criminal defendant's right to an attorney in felony cases, and "Miranda v. Arizona" (1966) required police officers to give what became known as the Miranda warning to suspects taken into police custody that advises them of their constitutional protections. "Reynolds v. Sims" "(1964)" established that all state legislative districts must be of roughly equal population size, while the Court's holding in "Wesberry v. Sanders" (1964) required equal populations for congressional districts, thus achieving "one man, one vote" in the United States. "Schmerber v. California" (1966) established that forced extraction of a blood sample is not compelled testimony, illuminating the limits on the protections of the 4th and 5th amendments and "Warden v. Hayden" (1967) dramatically expanded the rights of police to seize evidence with a search warrant, reversing the 'mere evidence' rule. Furthermore, "Griswold v. Connecticut" (1965) struck down a state law that restricted access to contraceptives and established a constitutional right to privacy, and "Loving v. Virginia" (1967) struck down state anti-miscegenation laws, which had banned or otherwise regulated interracial marriage. Warren announced his retirement in 1968 and was succeeded by Appellate Judge Warren E. Burger (Burger Court) in 1969. The Warren Court's rulings have received criticism, but have received widespread support and acclamation from both liberals and conservatives. As yet, few of the Court's decisions have been overturned.