Salomon's case still represents the orthodox view of separate legal personality under English law, although a number of exceptions have since evolved. In "Williams & Humbert v W & H Trade Marks" AC 368 at 429B Lord Templeman described as "heretical" the suggestion that this principle should be ignored. In "E.B.M. Co Limited v Dominion Bank" [1937 3 All ER 555 at 564 Lord Russell of Killowen stated the principle was one of "supreme importance". In "Adams v Cape Industries plc" Ch 433 Slade LJ said "the court is not free to disregard the principle of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897 AC 22 merely because it considers that justice so requires. Our law, for better or worse, recognises the creation of subsidiary companies, which though in one sense the creatures of their parent companies, will nevertheless under the general law fall to be treated as separate legal entities with all the rights and liabilities which would normally attach to separate legal entities." In at paragraph 66 Lord Neuberger called "Salomon": "a clear and principled decision, which has stood unimpeached for over a century".