A review of the painting in the "Deseret News" shortly after it was revealed to the public describes its tonality as being darker, and describes the coloring as being in "accordance with almost all the works attributed to Leonardo–that of a golden glow–while the finish is of a most minute character". Italian curator Lorenzo Cecconi, who also examined the painting in the 1920s, said that "the fusion of the tints of the flesh, especially in the eyes; the line which designs the nose, the mouth, and the oval of the face" were remarkable, and indicated that "this may be a second work of the Great Leonardo". In the same period, Renaissance scholar Arduino Colasanti thought "the upper part with the eyes and nose of the face" were definitely by Leonardo, and noted collector Ludovico Spiridon stated that "the face has been painted by Leonardo; no doubt of this at all". In the 1960s, Pulitzer claimed that "densitometric tests on the planes of face and hands show a gradual change of tone values from dark to light which only da Vinci, with his amazing eyesight, was capable of". Asmus similarly found in the 1980s that amplitude histograms sorting the number of pixels of each brightness level in these features "reveal a remarkable similarity even though the images are noticeably different". Other differences have been noted with respect to aspects of the face: