Naskh is applied almost exclusively to the Qur'an and the Sunnah. According to Mohammad Hashim Kamali and Hafiz Muhammad Azeem its application to "Ijma`" and "Qiyas" — secondary sources of Sunni Islamic law unlike the Qur'an and the Sunnah not divinely revealed — "has been generally overruled", as abrogation "is not relevant" to "Ijma" (the consensus or agreement of Muslim scholars on a religious issue), and the theory of naskh "has no place" in "Qiyas" (the process of deductive analogy in Islamic scripture in order to apply a known injunction ("nass") to a new circumstance and create a new injunction). Islamic jurists cannot abrogate, it is confined to the lifetime of the Prophet in the Qur'an and Sunnah.