gave increased attention to the examination of quarto editions of Shakespearean plays published before the First Folio (1623). "Pericles" was among the most notorious "bad quartos." In the second half of the twentieth century, critics began to warm to the play. After John Arthos' 1953 article ""Pericles, Prince of Tyre": A Study in the Dramatic Use of Romantic Narrative," scholars began to find merits and interesting facets within the play's dramaturgy, narrative and use of the marvelous. And, while the play's textual critics have sharply disagreed about editorial methodology in the last half-century, almost all of them, beginning with F. D. Hoeniger with his 1963 "Arden 2" edition, have been enthusiastic about "Pericles" (Other, more recent, critics have been Stephen Orgel ("Pelican Shakespeare"), Suzanne Gossett ("Arden 3"), Roger Warren ("Reconstructed Oxford"), and Doreen DelVecchio and Antony Hammond ("Cambridge")).