Beck does concede, however, that the Lushootseed argument "ti ʔux̌ʷ" ('the one who goes', shown in example sentence (1b) above) does represent an example of an unmarked 'verb' used as an argument and that further research may potentially substantiate M. Dale Kinkade's 1983 position that all Salishan content words are essentially 'verbs' (such as "ʔux̌ʷ" 'goes' and "sbiaw" 'is a coyote') and that the use of any content word as an argument involves an underlying relative clause. For example, with the determiner "ti" translated as 'that which', the arguments "ti ʔux̌ʷ" and "ti sbiaw" would be most literally translated as 'that which goes' and 'that which is a coyote' respectively.