Some of Guattari's diary entries, correspondence with Deleuze, and notes on the development of the book were published posthumously as "The Anti-Oedipus Papers" (2004). The philosopher Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen and the psychologist Sonu Shamdasani wrote that rather than having their confidence shaken by the "provocations and magnificent rhetorical violence" of "Anti-Oedipus", the psychoanalytic profession felt that the debates raised by the book legitimated their discipline. Joshua Ramey wrote that while the passage into Deleuze and Guattari's "body without organs" is "fraught with danger and even pain ... the point of "Anti-Oedipus" is not to make glamorous that violence or that suffering. Rather, the point is to show that there is a viable level of Dinoysian experience." The philosopher Alan D. Schrift wrote in "The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy" (2015) that "Anti-Oedipus" was "read as a major articulation of the philosophy of desire and a profound critique of psychoanalysis."