There is an ongoing debate on terminology regarding female sex tourism. Pruitt and LaFont argue that the term "female sex tourism" is not representative of the relationship that female tourists have with local men. They argue that "female sex tourism" oversimplifies the motives of these women and that "romance tourism" explains the complex nature of what these women are engaging themselves in while involved in romance tours. They also propose that the expression "female sex tourism" "serves to perpetuate gender roles and reinforce power relations of male dominance and female subordination, romance tourism in Jamaica provides an arena for change".