Hulme continues to break Gurr's interpretation by suggesting that "there is, I think, at present no clear linguistic evidence in support" and that her research in Stratford shows no signs of "evidence at all to confirm [Gurr's suggestion that 'in Stratford in 1582 Hathaway and hate-away would have been a very tolerable pun'" (427). Hulme explains this by describing how her research findings showed no relation or "tolerable pun" between the end-part of the verb of 'hate' (having a specific t sound) and Hathaway (ending in th).