Kant's arguments for this conclusion are widely debated among Kant scholars. Some see the argument as based on Kant's conclusions that our representation ("Vorstellung") of space and time is an "a priori" intuition. From here Kant is thought to argue that our representation of space and time as "a priori" intuitions entails that space and time are transcendentally ideal. It is undeniable from Kant's point of view that in Transcendental Philosophy, the difference of things as they appear and things as they are is a major philosophical discovery. Others see the argument as based upon the question of whether synthetic "a priori" judgments are possible. Kant is taken to argue that the only way synthetic "a priori" judgments, such as those made in geometry, are possible is if space is transcendentally ideal.