According to Harvard University's Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Noah Feldman, "a decision can be wrong at the very moment it was decided—and therefore should not be followed subsequently." Justice Anthony Kennedy applied this approach in "Lawrence v. Texas" to overturn "Bowers v. Hardwick" and thereby strike down anti-sodomy laws in 14 states. The implication is that decisions which are wrong when decided should not be followed even before the Court reverses itself, and "Korematsu" has probably the greatest claim to being wrong when decided of any case which still stood. Legal scholar Richard Primus applied the term "Anti-Canon" to cases which are "universally assailed as wrong, immoral, and unconstitutional" and have become exemplars of faulty legal reasoning. "Plessy v. Ferguson" is one such example, and "Korematsu" has joined this group—as Feldman then put it, ""Korematsu"'s uniquely bad legal status means it's not precedent even though it hasn't been overturned."