In the 1990s, French researchers published on new camarasaurid bones from the same formation. At first, Buffetaut and Martin (1993) suggested that they belonged to "Neosodon praecursor", but Le Loeuff "et al." (1996) later rejected this, as "Neosodon" is based only on several teeth, which did not overlap the new material. The latest review accepted both "Neosodon" and "Iguanodon" "praecursor" as dubious sauropods. However, Royo-Torres "et al." (2006), in their description of "Turiasaurus", noted that this tooth was similar to those of their genus and suggested that it could be a turiasaur.