It was noted the wording of section 6(1) was vague, and if given a straightforward reading could be interpreted to provide rights against extradition and not just arbitrary banishment. Indeed, the "Canadian Bill of Rights" (1960) had provided a right against exile and the "Charter" did not use that limited wording. Nevertheless, while extradition would violate section 6(1), it would not violate the primary principles underlying the right. European case law, in particular, was cited to show extradition and exile are different. Past Canadian case law, like "Re Federal Republic of Germany and Rauca" and obiter dicta in "Canada v. Schmidt" (1987) also indicated extradition was a violation, but still a justified limit, on section 6.