that way. at least it tries not to. thus is often loses in these reasoning sessions.
i would argue that the idea of reasoning used in this report is a very different one than a scientist would use when saying reasoning. not that i disagree with its point and the idea that these sorts of reasoning arguments in a social setting could be very important for human survival.
but science – our tool for understanding the world around us – has spent the last 400 years moving away from these sorts of arguments and approach to reasoning. science is not decided by who has the best argumentative personality or knows the best 