<s>[INST] Understand how to evaluate $\lim _{x\to 2}\frac{\sqrt{6-x}-2}{\sqrt{3-x}-1}$ We are given this limit to evaluate:
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\frac{\sqrt{6-x}-2}{\sqrt{3-x}-1}$$
In this example, if we try substitution it will lead to an indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$. So, in order to evaluate this limit, we can multiply this expression by the conjugate of the denominator.
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{6-x}-2}{\sqrt{3-x}-1} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{\sqrt{3-x}+1}   \right) = \lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{(\sqrt{6-x}-2)(\sqrt{3-x}+1)}{2-x}\right) $$
But it still gives the indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$ .
But multiplying the expression by the conjugate of the demoninator and numerator we get
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{6-x}-2}{\sqrt{3-x}-1} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{\sqrt{3-x}+1} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{6-x}+2}{\sqrt{6-x}+2}\right) $$
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{6-x-4}{3-x-1} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{1} \cdot \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{6-x}+2}\right)$$
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{6-x-4}{3-x-1} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{\sqrt{6-x}+2}\right)$$
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{2-x}{2-x} \cdot \dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{\sqrt{6-x}+2}\right)$$
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{3-x}+1}{\sqrt{6-x}+2}\right)$$
Now we can evaluate the limit:
$$\lim _{x\to 2}\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{3-2}+1}{\sqrt{6-2}+2}\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}$$

Taking this example, I would like to understand why rationalization was used. What did it change in the expression so the evaluation was possible? Especially, why multiplying by the numerator's and denominator's conjugate?
I am still new to limits and Calculus, so anything concerning concepts I'm missing is appreciated. I still couldn't understand how a limit supposedly tending to $\frac{0}{0}$ went to be $\frac{1}{2}$, I really want to understand it.
Thanks in advance for you answer.

 [/INST] On the 4th row of the second calculation, you arrive at the following expression:
$$
\frac{2-x}{2-x}
$$
This expression is actually $\frac{0}{0}$ (undefined) at $x=2$. Equating it to $1$ - which is what you did is the same as removing the singularity (the point of where the function is not defined) in the expression and that's why you get the  correct  limit. It is correct since we have replaced a function that we could not evaluate at $x=2$ with another function that can be evaluated and have the same limit as the one we could not evaluate.
</s>