Is the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) valid for tailoring information for patients with head and neck cancer?
The SCIP-A has been shown to be a valid discriminative measure and should prove suitable for tailoring treatment information at the level of item, subscale and total scale score. The SCIP-B, while a discriminating measure of total satisfaction, comprises too uniform a set of indicators of patient satisfaction to make it useful for tailoring information at the item level. Overall, the SCIP is valid as a measure of overall satisfaction with information about treatment and as a guide to tailoring such information.
Calcium-channel blockers were an independent risk factor for the presence of an AAA and were associated with an increased arterial aortic wall stiffness. ACE inhibitors were associated with decreased stiffness and greater collagen turnover. No significant effects on the growth rate of small aneurysms were detected.