Treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism and malignant disease: should vena cava filter placement be routine?
In summary, our experience suggests that 64% of patients with malignant disease and venous thromboembolism are effectively treated with anticoagulation alone; 17% require primary filter placement for standard indications, and an additional 19% require subsequent filter placement because of complications (primarily bleeding) or failure of anticoagulation therapy. Although technical complications of filter placement are low, serious life-threatening or limb-threatening thromboembolic complications developed in 17% of patients. Survival was poor in all patients, regardless of treatment. These data support a conservative approach of routine anticoagulation therapy with selective filter placement.
HR CTV size of 4 × 3 × 3 cm seems to be a threshold volume in this simulation analysis, and IGICBT is a better choice for smaller HR CTV than the threshold volume. On larger HR CTV, ICISBT or ISBT is the better choice.