Is tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper?
MicroCT was more accurate than both caliper and 18F-FDG-PET for in vivo volumetric measurements of subcutaneous tumors in mice.18F-FDG-PET was considered unsuitable for determination of tumor size. External caliper were inaccurate and encumbered with a significant and size dependent bias. MicroCT was also the most reproducible of the methods.
High E-cadherin concentration in presence of enhanced γ-secretase activity is incontestably a paradoxically result, highlighting that E-cadherin loss is not a pre-requisite for EMT. Additionally, EMT and chemoresistance acquisition in HCT-8 should be considered as distinct processes.