Honeycomb honeycomb conjecture, this was given by Jan Brożek and proved much later by Thomas Hales. Thus, a hexagonal structure uses the least material to create a lattice of cells within a given volume. A second reason, given by D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson, is that the shape simply results from the process of individual bees putting cells together: somewhat analogous to the boundary shapes created in a field of soap bubbles. In support of this, he notes that queen cells, which are constructed singly, are irregular and lumpy with no apparent attempt at efficiency. The closed ends of the honeycomb cells are
2 22 honeycomb types of cells: octahedron, 0, and tetrahedron, 0. The 2 honeycomb, is fourth in a dimensional series of uniform polytopes, expressed by Coxeter as k series. The final is a paracompact hyperbolic honeycomb, 3. Each progressive uniform polytope is constructed from the previous as its vertex figure. The 2 honeycomb is third in another dimensional series 2. 2 22 honeycomb In geometry, the 2 honeycomb is a uniform tessellation of the six-dimensional Euclidean space. It can be represented by the Schläfli symbol {3,3,3}. It is constructed from 2 facets and has a 1 vertex figure, with 54 2 polytopes around