Order-6 hexagonal tiling honeycomb . The "cantellated order-6 hexagonal tiling honeycomb", t{6,3,6}, has trihexagonal tiling and rhombitrihexagonal tiling cells, with a triangular prism vertex figure. The "cantitruncated order-6 hexagonal tiling honeycomb", t{6,3,6}, has hexagonal tiling and truncated trihexagonal tiling cells, with a triangular prism vertex figure. The runcinated order-6 hexagonal tiling honeycomb, t{6,3,6}, has hexagonal tiling and hexagonal prism cells, with a triangular antiprism vertex figure. It is analogous to the 2D hyperbolic rhombihexahexagonal tiling, rr{6,6}, with square and hexagonal faces: The runcitruncated order-6 hexagonal tiling honeycomb, t{6,3,6}, has Truncated hexagonal tiling, rhombitrihexagonal tiling, hexagonal prism, and dodecagonal prism cells. The omnitruncated order-6 hexagonal
Wax argument Wax argument The wax argument or the ball of wax example is a thought experiment that René Descartes created within his "Meditations on First Philosophy". He devised it to analyze what properties are essential for bodies, show how uncertain our knowledge of the world is compared to our knowledge of our minds, and argue for rationalism. Descartes first considers all the sensible properties of a ball of wax such as its shape, texture, size, color, and smell. He then points out that all these properties change as the wax is moved closer to a fire. The only properties that necessarily