International Nuclear Event Scale INES rating. Further, the actual accident damage values do not reflect the INES scores. A quantifiable, continuous scale might be preferable to the INES, in the same way that the antiquated Mercalli scale for earthquake magnitudes was superseded by the continuous physically-based Richter scale. The following arguments have been proposed: firstly, the scale is essentially a discrete qualitative ranking, not defined beyond event level 7. Secondly, it was designed as a public relations tool, not an objective scientific scale. Thirdly, its most serious shortcoming is that it conflates magnitude and intensity. An alternative nuclear accident magnitude scale (NAMS) was proposed
Richter magnitude scale isolated area. Several scales have historically been described as the "Richter scale", especially the "local magnitude" formula_2 and the surface wave formula_3 scale. In addition, the "body wave magnitude", formula_4, and the "moment magnitude", formula_5, abbreviated MMS, have been widely used for decades. A couple of new techniques to measure magnitude are in the development stage by seismologists. All magnitude scales have been designed to give numerically similar results. This goal has been achieved well for formula_2, formula_3, and formula_5. The formula_4 scale gives somewhat different values than the other scales. The reason for so many different ways to measure