Tontine Group what is a commodity market," she said. "In other countries there is no market leader because manufacturers tended to stay in their local areas." As the company is well known, it is referenced in jokes. For example, an Australian legal newsletter said of an alleged swindler who padded his timesheets "that at one stage pillow makers Tontine were said to be interested in sponsoring him." Duvets in Australia are known by the genericized trademark "Doona"; the brand name is owned by the Tontine Group. The brand name was acquired by Tontine in 1991 when Pacific Dunlop took over the Northern
Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania Dickenson's Arcade Pty Ltd v Tasmania, also known as the "Tobacco Tax case" is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with section 90 of the Australian Constitution. In this case, the Act in question imposed licences for the sale of tobacco, and the fee was calculated as being 4.5 percent of the retail value of tobacco sold in the 12-month period ending 6 months prior to the licence period. Three judges, namely Gibbs, Menzies and Stephen JJ, applied the criterion of liability approach from "Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria" and held