Tontine Group what is a commodity market," she said. "In other countries there is no market leader because manufacturers tended to stay in their local areas." As the company is well known, it is referenced in jokes. For example, an Australian legal newsletter said of an alleged swindler who padded his timesheets "that at one stage pillow makers Tontine were said to be interested in sponsoring him." Duvets in Australia are known by the genericized trademark "Doona"; the brand name is owned by the Tontine Group. The brand name was acquired by Tontine in 1991 when Pacific Dunlop took over the Northern
Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union case is still an applicable authority in determining what can and cannot be placed in an enterprise agreement. Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union Electrolux v The Australian Workers' Union was a 2004 decision by the High Court of Australia that held that a bargaining agent fee did not pertain to the relationship between employer and employee and so could not be included in an enterprise bargaining agreement. The case dealt with whether bargaining agent's fees could be in an enterprise bargaining agreement as created by the "Workplace Relations Act (Cth) 1996". Bargaining agent's fees were politically