Eskimo bowline structure of the knot was not identified by Clifford Ashley (in 1944). All of the maneuvers to tie this knot are generally in the opposite (or 'anti' direction) relative to the bowline. Dan Lehman regards the general, bowline-like structure as an 'anti-bowline' in the sense of "anti-clockwise": in that with regard to the main nipping loop, the tail on returning from forming the eye is brought through this loop in the opposite direction relative to what is done for a bowline. When this knot is ring-loaded – and the knot effectively becomes an end-to-end knot – it is effectively a
Signature of a knot formula_11. This form takes value in the rational polynomials whose denominators are the Alexander polynomial of the knot, which as a formula_11-module is isomorphic to formula_34. Let formula_35 be any linear function which is invariant under the involution formula_36, then composing it with the sesquilinear duality pairing gives a symmetric bilinear form on formula_37 whose signature is an invariant of the knot. All such signatures are concordance invariants, so all signatures of slice knots are zero. The sesquilinear duality pairing respects the prime-power decomposition of formula_37—i.e.: the prime power decomposition gives an orthogonal decomposition of formula_39. Cherry Kearton has shown