Nix v. Hedden status of the cucumber, squash, pea, and bean. "Nix" has been cited in three Supreme Court decisions as a precedent for court interpretation of common meanings, especially dictionary definitions. ("Sonn v. Maggone," ; "Saltonstall v. Wiebusch & Hilger," ; and "Cadwalader v. Zeh," ). Additionally, in "JSG Trading Corp. v. Tray-Wrap, Inc.," 917 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1990), a case unrelated to "Nix" aside from the shared focus on tomatoes, a judge wrote the following paragraph citing the case: In 2005, supporters in the New Jersey legislature cited "Nix" as a basis for a bill designating the tomato as the
Section 125 of the Constitution Act, 1867 to a taxation of the province's property. In addition, provincial authorities must still pay customs duties, because such charges are not strictly based on the taxation power. As noted in the "Johnnie Walker" case: Because of that, as noted in "Re Exported Natural Gas Tax": Section 125 of the Constitution Act, 1867 Section 125 of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides that: This affects the taxation powers of both levels of government, and has received a broad interpretation in the Canadian courts. Since the 1930 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in "Lawson v. Interior Tree Fruit and Vegetables Committee of Direction",