Nix v. Hedden status of the cucumber, squash, pea, and bean. "Nix" has been cited in three Supreme Court decisions as a precedent for court interpretation of common meanings, especially dictionary definitions. ("Sonn v. Maggone," ; "Saltonstall v. Wiebusch & Hilger," ; and "Cadwalader v. Zeh," ). Additionally, in "JSG Trading Corp. v. Tray-Wrap, Inc.," 917 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1990), a case unrelated to "Nix" aside from the shared focus on tomatoes, a judge wrote the following paragraph citing the case: In 2005, supporters in the New Jersey legislature cited "Nix" as a basis for a bill designating the tomato as the
Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation (NSW) High Court held in "D'Emden v Pedder" that the salary receipts of federal government employees were not subject to state stamp duty. "Wollaston's case" was cited in argument, as that the applicability of the principle in "McCulloch v Maryland", to the Constitution was negatived by the decision of the Privy Council in "The Bank of Toronto v Lambe". In response Griffith CJ stated "The decision in the case of "The Bank of Toronto v Lambe" merely amounts to this-that under sec. 92 [of the Constitution of Canada] the Provinces have the power of direct taxation". The judgement of the Court,