Criticism of the Work Capability Assessment oversaw the study" and named the lead experts as a professor of psychiatry, a consultant psychiatrist in learning disability, a professor of rheumatology, and an expert in human resources. The review's conclusion was that "the WCA produced consistent results on the whole, and is an accurate indicator of work capability compared with expert opinion". But the following year the firm that had carried out millions of WCAs on behalf of the DWP since 2008 said it had come to the conclusion that "in its current form, the WCA is not working for claimants, for DWP or for Atos Healthcare". The
Criticism of the Work Capability Assessment that it was "an accurate indicator of work capability compared with expert opinion". Conversely, Kent University academic Ben Geiger has made international comparisons of the test: he found “no transparent evidence that the WCA captures the demands of work in Britain today". In practice, experience has shown that the WCA usually identifies these types of claims correctly: However, the process has largely struggled to categorise claims correctly if they fall between these two extremes, particularly where mental health is concerned. In fiscal terms, the deployment of the WCA was expected to more than halve the sickness benefit bill over the