Bruxism even orthognathic surgery. Some have criticized these occlusal reorganizations as having no evidence base, and irreversibly damaging the dentition on top of the damage already caused by bruxism. There is a wide variation in reported epidemiologic data for bruxism, and this is largely due to differences in the definition, diagnosis and research methodologies of these studies. E.g. several studies use self-reported bruxism as a measure of bruxism, and since many people with bruxism are not aware of their habit, self-reported tooth grinding and clenching habits may be a poor measure of the true prevalence. The ICSD-R states that 85–90% of
Habitual be the introduction, and subsequent loss of habitual "do (be)" in America, which was also the problem with the first expansion of the diffusion hypothesis. Another hypothesis for the origins of habitual "be" in NWBE and afterwards into AAE is the most logical and the strongest of the lot. The decreolization theory for the emergence of habitual "be" in AAE is the most likely and most supported of the theories of its origin. It involves the decreolization process of Caribbean English creole, with the loss of "does (be)", which itself is a decreolization of a previous creole habitual marker and its